Skip to main content
Politics

Former Politico writers accuse outlet of suppressing negative Biden stories

Listen
Share

Two former Politico reporters have taken to a podcast to voice their frustrations with their former employer’s editorial decisions, particularly regarding coverage of now-former President Joe Biden and his family. Marc Caputo and Tara Palmeri, both former Politico writers, claim the news outlet suppressed or outright killed stories that could paint the Bidens negatively.

Media Landscape

MediaMiss™This story is a Media Miss by the left as only 8% of the coverage is from left leaning media. Learn more about this data
Left 8% Center 0% Right 92%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

Claims of censorship: Biden family coverage suppressed

Caputo and Palmeri described Politico as resisting stories that would have been harmful to the Biden family, often under the guise of avoiding “bad press.” One of the most notable examples they shared was the Hunter Biden laptop saga.

Caputo recounted editors telling him not to pursue the story despite his belief that it was worth covering. He noted a particular headline from Politico dismissing the laptop as “Russian disinformation,” a claim Caputo referred to as “misinformation.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“I was covering Biden at the time, and I remember coming to my editor and saying, ‘Hey, we need to write about the Hunter Biden laptop,’” Caputo recalled. “And I was told this came from on high at Politico: Don’t write about the laptop, don’t talk about the laptop, don’t tweet about the laptop.”

Palmeri’s struggles with delayed reporting on Hunter Biden

Palmeri also spoke about her own difficulties in reporting on the Hunter Biden saga. She spent months investigating a gun-related incident involving the president’s son, which ultimately contributed to his conviction. Palmeri questioned whether Politico delayed the story due to its timing during President Biden’s early days in office.

“I spent three months on it. I went to the laptop shop, and I did all of the reporting in Delaware, and I did all of that. But yeah, it had to be 100% nailed down,” Palmeri explained. “But I do wonder if it could have been published a little quicker if it was a different type of story.”

Story on Hunter Biden’s tax issues also allegedly suppressed

Caputo further recounted how Politico editors killed another critical story he wrote about Hunter Biden’s tax issues without explanation. The story related to Hunter Biden’s work with the Ukrainian company Burisma. Caputo believes the decision was an attempt to shield Joe Biden’s presidential campaign from unfavorable publicity.

“I wrote what would’ve been a classic story — vice president’s son slapped with tax lien for the period of time that he worked for this controversial Ukrainian company, which was haunting his father on the campaign trail,” Caputo said. “That story was killed by the editors, and they gave no explanation for that either.”

Politico responds, denies suppression claims

In response to Caputo and Palmeri’s claims, a Politico spokesperson pushed back, suggesting their former reporters had false memories. The spokesperson also highlighted that, over the years, Politico had led the way in reporting on the business dealings of Joe Biden’s family members, including Hunter and James Biden.

“Seems like a case of false memory, given that across the years they referenced, POLITICO journalists lead the way on wide-ranging reporting on the business dealings of Joe Biden’s closest relatives,” the statement read. “Notably, POLITICO was the first to confirm that Hunter Biden’s laptop contained genuine material and to report on the gun incident that led to his conviction.”

The spokesperson also emphasized Politico’s editorial standards, claiming the outlet upholds rigorous reporting processes to vet every story thoroughly.

Conclusion: A tense standoff over editorial decisions

The public dispute between former Politico reporters and the outlet’s editorial leadership highlights a growing tension over the coverage of political figures, particularly within the context of sensitive topics involving the Biden family. While Caputo and Palmeri maintain that Politico suppressed their stories, Politico remains firm in its defense, pointing to its overall record on investigative reporting.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

[Karah Rucker]

“Well since we’re spilling tea about our former employer”

TWO FORMER POLITICO REPORTERS TOOK TO A PODCAST TO AIR THEIR FRUSTRATIONS WITH THEIR FORMER EMPLOYER’S EDITORIAL DECISIONS –

PARTICULARLY HOW IT HANDLED STORIES ABOUT NOW-FORMER PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN AND THE BIDEN FAMILY.

THE TWO FORMER POLITICO WRITERS SAY THE LEFT-LEANING NEWS OUTLET WOULD “KILL” STORIES THAT PORTRAYED HIM IN A NEGATIVE LIGHT.

MARC CAPUTO AND TARA PALMERI SAY POLITICO RESISTED OR KILLED STORIES REGARDING THE BIDEN FAMILY IF IT COULD BE SEEN AS “BAD PRESS.”

ONE OF THEIR EXAMPLES – WAS THE HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP SAGA.

CAPUTO SAYS WHILE HE WAS WORKING AT POLITICO – HE WAS TOLD NOT TO COVER THE LAPTOP STORY – DESPITE HIS BELIEF THAT IT WAS IMPORTANT.

HE POINTED TO A POLITICO HEADLINE – THAT DISMISSED THE LAPTOP AS “RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION” – A REPORT CAPUTO CALLED “MISINFORMATION”.

“I was covering Biden at the time, and I remember coming to my editor and saying, ‘Hey, we need to write about the Hunter Biden laptop.’ And I was told this came from on high at Politico: Don’t write about the laptop, don’t talk about the laptop, don’t tweet about the laptop. 

Palmeri, who also reported on Hunter Biden, shared her own struggles to publish WHAT SHE THOUGHT TO BE WERE critical stories. She spent months investigating a gun-related incident involving Hunter, which later contributed to his conviction ACCORDING TO POLITICO. Palmeri suggested that the story may have been delayed due to the timing of President Biden’s early days in office. 

“ I spent three months on it, I went to the laptop shop, and I did all of the reporting in Delaware, and I did all of that. But yeah  it had, it had to be like much, it had to be 100% nailed down. I had everything, you know, the police reports, every, like, you know, I’m a solid reporter. But I do wonder if it could have, if it would have been published a little quicker if it was a different type of story.”

Caputo also recalled how another story about Hunter Biden’s tax issues, related to his work with Burisma, was killed by Politico editors without explanation. He believes this was an attempt to shield Joe Biden’s presidential campaign from negative publicity.

“I wrote what wouldve been a classic story of vice president’s son slapped with tax lien for the pried of time that he worked for this controversial ukrainian company which is haunting his father on the campaign trial.

That story was killed by the editors and they gave no explanation for that either.”   

A POLITICO SPOKESPERSON HAS RESPONDED TO WHAT THEIR FORMER REPORTERS HAD TO SAY IN THIS TELL-ALL PODCAST –

SAYING “Seems like a case of false memory, given that across the years they referenced, POLITICO journalists lead the way on wide-ranging reporting on the business dealings of Joe Biden’s closest relatives. 

Through deeply reported coverage—both pre- and post-election—POLITICO provided readers with a nuanced understanding of the dealings of James Biden, Hunter Biden, and other relatives of the president, along with the ethical questions they raised. Notably, POLITICO was the first to confirm that Hunter Biden’s laptop contained genuine material and to report on the gun incident that led to his conviction.

our editors uphold rigorous standards, ensuring every story is thoroughly vetted and ‘buttoned up’ before publishing. This approach reflects our unwavering commitment to accuracy and accountability—principles that have guided us and will continue to do so.

Thanks for watching our news update.

For more stories that matter to you–

Download the san mobile app today.