Skip to main content
Ray Bogan Political Correspondent
Share
Politics

House passes bill that bans trans athletes from playing in women sports

Listen
Share
Ray Bogan Political Correspondent
Share

The House passed a bill barring schools that receive federal funds from allowing transgender athletes to participate in women’s sports on Tuesday, Jan. 14. The final vote fell largely along party lines, Republicans voted for it unanimously, all but three Democrats voted against it.

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 34% Center 23% Right 43%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

“As a father of two daughters, I can tell you very clearly that there is no scenario or situation where I would want to see my daughters competing against biological males,” Rep. Riley Moore, R-W.V., said.

“This bill is sloppy, vague and prejudiced,” Rep. Sara Jacobs, D-Calif., said. 

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The legislation is officially called the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act. The bill makes it a violation of Title IX for sports programs to permit a male to participate in an athletic activity that is designated for females. It states sex is recognized solely on the person’s reproductive biology at birth.

“What should be an opportunity for young women to thrive and compete has been clouded by an agenda that prioritized so-called inclusion over fairness,” Rep. Tom Emmer, R-Minn., said.

Democrats oppose the bill for many reasons. One of their biggest concerns is that it does not distinguish programs based on age or competition level.

”They contend it could apply to young girls playing in grade-school leagues the same as it does to NCAA athletes, so long as the program receives federal funding. The bill’s exact language is, “participation with any athletic team.”

“This is interrogation of young girls about their bodies, this is asking people to show them what is underneath their underwear,” Rep. Becca Balint, D-Vt., said. “It’s vile, it’s twisted, they don’t want to talk about the details. It’s an absolute invasion of children’s privacy.” 

The House approved the bill last year but it was never considered in the Senate. It’s unclear if it could get 60 votes in that chamber, even with the new Republican majority.

Tags: , , , , ,

 

The House passed a bill barring schools that receive federal funds from allowing transgender athletes to participate in women’s sports. The final vote fell largely along party lines, Republicans voted for it unanimously, all but three Democrats voted against it. 

 

Rep. Riley Moore, R-WV: “As a father of two daughters, I can tell you very clearly that there is no scenario or situation where I would want to see my daughters competing against biological males.”

 

Rep. Sara Jacobs, D-Calif.,  “This bill is sloppy, vague and prejudiced,” 

 

The legislation is officially called the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act. It would make it a violation of Title IX for sports programs to permit a male to participate in an athletic activity that is designated for females. It states sex is recognized solely on the person’s reproductive biology at birth. 

 

Rep. Tom Emmer, R-MN: “What should be an opportunity for young women to thrive and compete has been clouded by an agenda that prioritized so-called inclusion over fairness.” 

 

Democrats oppose the bill for many reasons, but one of their biggest concerns is that it does not distinguish programs based on age or competition level. They contend it could apply to young girls playing in kids leagues the same as it does to NCAA athletes, so long as the program receives federal funding. The bill’s exact language is, “participation with any athletic team”.  

 

Rep. Becca Balint, D-Vt.: “This is interrogation of young girls about their bodies, this is asking people to show them what is underneath their underwear. It’s vile, it’s twisted, they don’t want to talk about the details. It’s an absolute invasion of children’s privacy.” 

 

The House approved the bill last year but it was never considered in the Senate. It’s unclear if it could get 60 votes in that chamber, even with the new Republican majority.