
Judge orders Trump administration to pay USAID debts by Monday
By Karah Rucker (Anchor), Shea Taylor (Producer), Jake Larsen (Video Editor)
- A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to release a portion of nearly $2 billion in frozen foreign aid by Monday, ruling in favor of nonprofit organizations and aid groups. The judge questioned the administration’s authority to withhold funds approved by Congress.
- The aid freeze, implemented by President Donald Trump’s executive order, halted funding for humanitarian programs worldwide. It affected USAID contracts and forced organizations to pause operations.
- The court ordered the administration to determine an initial payment by Friday and sought additional information from plaintiffs.
Full Story
A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to release a portion of nearly $2 billion in frozen foreign aid by Monday, March 10. It represented a significant legal challenge to the administration’s decision to suspend funding for international assistance programs.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to pay nearly $2 billion owed to partners of the U.S. Agency for International Development and the State Department by Monday, ending a funding freeze on foreign assistance.
- U.S. District Judge Amir Ali ruled in favor of nonprofit groups and businesses that expressed difficulties due to the six-week funding freeze, which caused service cuts and layoffs worldwide.
- The ruling followed a request by the Trump administration to freeze USAID funding, which the Supreme Court rejected a day prior, emphasizing the need for compliance with earlier orders.
- Ali raised concerns about the administration's claim that presidents can override congressional spending decisions, questioning the constitutional basis for such authority.
- U.S. District Judge Amir Ali ruled that the Trump administration must pay nearly $2 billion in debts to nonprofit groups and businesses related to funding freezes at USAID and the State Department.
- Ali stated that appropriations are not optional, rejecting the administration's argument that it could unilaterally freeze congressionally approved funding.
- The ruling comes after the Supreme Court rejected the administration's bid to freeze funding and instructed Ali to clarify what the government must do to comply with his earlier order to release funds.
- A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to pay nearly $2 billion in debts to partners of the U.S. Agency for International Development and the State Department by Monday.
- Judge Amir Ali described the payment as a concrete first step amid ongoing lawsuits over cuts to USAID funding and contracts.
- The Trump administration faced multiple lawsuits for terminating over 90% of USAID contracts, impacting international aid efforts.
- Plaintiffs argue that Trump's executive order freezing foreign aid must be reversed, as it has severely affected millions worldwide.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
U.S. District Judge Amir Ali ruled that several nonprofit organizations and aid groups, including the Global Health Council, Chemonics International and the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, must receive payments for work previously approved by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Why did the Trump administration freeze aid funds?
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Jan. 20 freezing foreign assistance, halting billions in funding for humanitarian programs worldwide.
The freeze affected USAID and State Department contracts, forcing organizations to pause operations and lay off workers. Secretary of State Marco Rubio later confirmed the administration’s plan to cut more than 90% of USAID contracts, amounting to nearly $60 billion in foreign assistance.
How much aid must the administration release?
Ali’s ruling did not require the administration to release the entire $2 billion immediately, but it ordered an initial payment to be established by Friday, March 7.
He also requested further details from the plaintiffs to clarify which organizations should receive funds first.
The judge expressed skepticism about the administration’s authority to override congressional appropriations, stating that the president cannot unilaterally decide which funds to withhold.
How has the Trump administration responded?
The Justice Department argued that logistical challenges could delay payments beyond Monday’s deadline, citing the weekend as an obstacle.
Government attorneys stated that processing the payments could take up to ten business days.
The administration also claimed it had begun reviewing USAID contracts individually, replacing the blanket freeze with case-by-case determinations.
What impact does this have on foreign aid programs?
USAID funding supports humanitarian projects in over 130 countries, with key recipients including Ukraine, Ethiopia, Jordan and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
The aid freeze left many programs in limbo, affecting critical services such as food assistance, medical aid and infrastructure development.
USAID, which received more than $40 billion in funding in 2023, now faces widespread program cancellations unless the court orders further intervention.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
What’s next in the legal battle?
The Supreme Court recently upheld Ali’s previous ruling but directed him to clarify the government’s responsibilities in adhering to the order.
The administration continued to defend its authority to reallocate foreign aid, arguing that contract cancellations were necessary to align spending with its policy priorities.
However, advocacy groups and aid organizations continued challenging the cuts in court, seeking full restoration of funding.
[karah rucker]
A FEDERAL JUDGE SAYS THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HAS UNTIL MONDAY TO PAY SEVERAL NONPROFIT GROUPS AND AID ORGANIZATIONS THAT WERE AFFECTED BY THE EXECUTIVE ORDER TO FREEZE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE AND SHUT DOWN THE U-S AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT.
a U-S DISTRICT JUDGE RULED thursday THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT **MUST** RELEASE FUNDS TO AT LEAST NINE GROUPS — INCLUDING THE GLOBAL HEALTH COUNCIL, CHEMONICS INTERNATIONAL AND THE AIDS VACCINE ADVOCACY COALITION.
the judge DID NOT ORDER THE ADMINISTRATION TO PAY THE FULL 2 BILLION BY MONDAY’S DEADLINE — BUT IT WILL HAVE TO PAY A SMALLER AMOUNT, WHICH IS SET TO BE DETERMINED some time FRIDAY.
THAT SAME JUDGE PREVIOUSLY ORDERED THE ADMINISTRATION TO TEMPORARILY CONTINUE GIVING OUT UP TO TWO BILLION DOLLARS IN FOREIGN AID THAT WAS ALREADY IN PLACE BEFORE TRUMP TOOK OFFICE IN JANUARY.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to pay nearly $2 billion owed to partners of the U.S. Agency for International Development and the State Department by Monday, ending a funding freeze on foreign assistance.
- U.S. District Judge Amir Ali ruled in favor of nonprofit groups and businesses that expressed difficulties due to the six-week funding freeze, which caused service cuts and layoffs worldwide.
- The ruling followed a request by the Trump administration to freeze USAID funding, which the Supreme Court rejected a day prior, emphasizing the need for compliance with earlier orders.
- Ali raised concerns about the administration's claim that presidents can override congressional spending decisions, questioning the constitutional basis for such authority.
- U.S. District Judge Amir Ali ruled that the Trump administration must pay nearly $2 billion in debts to nonprofit groups and businesses related to funding freezes at USAID and the State Department.
- Ali stated that appropriations are not optional, rejecting the administration's argument that it could unilaterally freeze congressionally approved funding.
- The ruling comes after the Supreme Court rejected the administration's bid to freeze funding and instructed Ali to clarify what the government must do to comply with his earlier order to release funds.
- A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to pay nearly $2 billion in debts to partners of the U.S. Agency for International Development and the State Department by Monday.
- Judge Amir Ali described the payment as a concrete first step amid ongoing lawsuits over cuts to USAID funding and contracts.
- The Trump administration faced multiple lawsuits for terminating over 90% of USAID contracts, impacting international aid efforts.
- Plaintiffs argue that Trump's executive order freezing foreign aid must be reversed, as it has severely affected millions worldwide.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
AP Images
House to vote on GOP spending bill, aims to prevent government shutdown
Watch 11:497 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Infowars says reporter killed in Austin, Alex Jones blames district attorney
Read13 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Michelle Obama launches new podcast with brother amid divorce rumors
Watch 2:2514 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Trump-sanctioned ICC prosecutor pressed assault victim to recant: Report
Read16 hrs ago