Skip to main content
U.S.

Delta CEO Ed Bastian calls Trump’s regulatory approach ‘breath of fresh air’

Listen
Share

Delta CEO Ed Bastian said Wednesday, Nov. 20, he’s looking forward to President-elect Donald Trump returning to the White House because his approach to regulation could be “a breath of fresh air.” Bastian spoke with reporters before Delta’s “Investor Day” in Atlanta, saying that under the Biden administration, the airline industry has seen governmental “overreach.”

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 19% Center 62% Right 19%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

He credited Trump’s plan “to take a fresh look at the regulatory environment, the bureaucracy that exists in government, the level of overreach that we have seen over the last four years within our industry.”

Over the past four years, the U.S. Department of Transportation has issued a number of rules for the airline industry — aimed at protecting airline passengers — including automatic cash refunds for canceled flights and eliminating surprise junk fees when purchasing a ticket to fly.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

It’s unclear which policy or policies Bastian considers “overreach.”

In May of this year, several major U.S. airlines — including Delta — filed suit against the U.S. Department of Transportation over the junk fees rule.

The Transportation Department said consumers are paying more than $543 million in fees every year, and that airlines are receiving additional revenue from those hidden fees.

The Department of Transportation is also investigating Delta’s response to a global technology outage it experienced in July, when thousands of flights were canceled.

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said at the time the probe was “to ensure the airline is following the law and taking care of its passengers during continued widespread disruptions.”

Consumer advocates worry that the incoming Trump administration will roll back consumer protections put in place by the Biden administration.

Tags: , , , , ,

[Lauren Taylor]

DELTA’S CEO ED BASTIAN SAID WEDNESDAY HE’S LOOKING FORWARD TO PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP GETTING BACK IN THE WHITE HOUSE BECAUSE HIS APPROACH TO REGULATION COULD BE “A BREATH OF FRESH AIR.”

BASTIAN SPOKE WITH REPORTERS BEFORE DELTA’S INVESTOR DAY IN ATLANTA,SAYING UNDER THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY HAS SEEN A LEVEL OF GOVERNMENTAL “OVERREACH.”

HE CREDITED TRUMP’S PLAN “TO TAKE A FRESH LOOK AT THE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT, THE BUREAUCRACY THAT EXISTS IN GOVERNMENT, THE LEVEL OF OVERREACH THAT WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS WITHIN OUR INDUSTRY.”

OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS, THE US TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT HAS ISSUED A NUMBER OF RULES FOR THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY – AIMED AT PROTECTING AIRLINE PASSENGERS – INCLUDING AUTOMATIC CASH REFUNDS FOR CANCELED FLIGHTS AND GETTING RID OF SURPRISE JUNK FEES WHEN PURCHASING A TICKET TO FLY.

IT’S UNCLEAR WHICH POLICY OR POLICIES BASTIAN CONSIDERS “OVERREACH”.

IN MAY OF THIS YEAR, SEVERAL MAJOR US AIRLINES –INCLUDING DELTA– FILED SUIT AGAINST THE US TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT OVER THE JUNK FEES RULE.

THE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT SAID CONSUMERS ARE PAYING MORE THAN $543 MILLION IN FEES EVERY YEAR – AND THAT AIRLINES ARE RECEIVING ADDITIONAL REVENUE FROM THOOSE HIDDEN FEES.

THE USDOT IS ALSO INVESTIGATING DELTA’S RESPONSE TO A GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OUTAGE IT EXPERIENCED IN JULY WHEN THOUSANDS OF FLIGHTS WERE CANCELED.

TRANSPORTATION SECRETARY PETE BUTTIGIEG SAID AT THE TIME THE PROBE WAS “TO ENSURE THE AIRLINE IS FOLLOWING THE LAW AND TAKING CARE OF ITS PASSENGERS DURING CONTINUED WIDESPREAD DISRUPTIONS.”

CONSUMER ADVOCATES WORRY THAT THE INCOMING TRUMP ADMINISTRATION WILL ROLL BACK CONSUMER PROTECTIONS PUT IN PLACE BY THE BIDEN-ADMINSITRATION.

International

US requests Venezuela respect will of people, says Gonzalez is president-elect

Listen
Share

The United States officially recognized Venezuelan opposition leader Edmundo Gonzalez as president-elect of the country on Tuesday, Nov. 19, months after President Nicolas Maduro controversially declared victory in the July 2024 presidential election. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken recognized Gonzalez as the Venezuelan president in a post on X and demanded that the country “respect the will of the voters.”

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 47% Center 29% Right 24%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

The Biden administration previously acknowledged Gonzalez won the most votes in the presidential election but failed to declare him president-elect until the week of Nov. 18.

Gonzalez responded on X.

“We deeply appreciate the recognition of the sovereign will of all Venezuelans,” Gonzalez wrote. “This gesture honors the desire for change of our people and the civic feat that we carried out together on July 28.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

As Straight Arrow News previously reported, Gonzalez has been exiled to Spain after a warrant for his arrest was issued by the Maduro regime.

Venezuela’s Foreign Minister Yvan Gil responded to Blinken’s acknowledgement by launching a personal attack against Maduro.

“In the last days of his government, he should dedicate himself to reflecting on his failures, getting rid of imperial and colonial complexes and going to write the memoirs of how the Bolivarian Revolution made him bite the dust of defeat, just like his predecessors,” Gil said in a statement.

Gil made no mention of the disputed election results.

Maduro has denied requests from the United States and other nations to show voting records backing up his claims of victory. Meanwhile, Maduro has led a reportedly “brutal crackdown” on his political opponents as he maintains power in the country.

Tags: , , , , ,

THE U-S OFFICIALLY RECOGNIZED VENEZUELAN OPPOSITION LEADER EDMUNDO GONZALEZ AS “PRESIDENT-ELECT” OF THE COUNTRY TUESDAY…  MONTHS AFTER PRESIDENT NICOLAS MADURO CONTROVERSIALLY DECLARED VICTORY IN THE JULY ELECTION.

U-S SECRETARY OF STATE ANTONY BLINKEN RECOGNIZED GONZALEZ AS THE VENEZUELAN PRESIDENT IN A POST ON X AND DEMANDED THE COUNTRY “RESPECT THE WILL OF THE VOTERS.”

THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION PREVIOUSLY ACKNOWLEDGED GONZALEZ WON THE MOST VOTES BUT FAILED TO DECLARE HIM PRESIDENT-ELECT UNTIL THIS WEEK.

GONZALEZ RESPONDED ON X, WRITING, “WE DEEPLY APPRECIATE THE RECOGNITION OF THE SOVEREIGN WILL OF ALL VENEZUELANS. THIS GESTURE HONORS THE DESIRE FOR CHANGE OF OUR PEOPLE AND THE CIVIC FEAT THAT WE CARRIED OUT TOGETHER ON JULY 28TH.”

AS STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS PREVIOUSLY REPORTED, GONZALEZ HAS BEEN EXILED TO SPAIN AFTER A WARRANT FOR HIS ARREST WAS ISSUED BY THE MADURO REGIME.

THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION PREVIOUSLY ACKNOWLEDGED GONZALEZ WON THE MOST VOTES BUT FAILED TO DECLARE HIM PRESIDENT-ELECT UNTIL THIS WEEK.

VENEZUELA’S FOREIGN MINISTER RESPONDED TO BLINKEN’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BY LAUNCHING A PERSONAL ATTACK.

SAYING IN A STATEMENT IN PART:

“IN THE LAST DAYS OF HIS GOVERNMENT, HE SHOULD DEDICATE HIMSELF TO REFLECTING ON HIS FAILURES… “

THE MINISTER MADE NO MENTION OF THE ELECTION RESULTS.

AFTER LEADING A BRUTAL CRACKDOWN OF HIS POLITICAL OPPONENTS IN VENEZUELA… MADURO HAS DENIED REQUESTS FROM THE U-S AND OTHER NATIONS TO SHOW VOTING RECORDS BACKING UP HIS CLAIMS TO VICTORY.

FOR MORE ON THIS STORY– DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP OR VISIT SAN DOT COM.

FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS– I’M LAUREN TAYLOR.

Kennedy Felton Lifestyle Correspondent/Producer
Share
Tech

Church in Switzerland uses AI-powered Jesus to offer advice

Kennedy Felton Lifestyle Correspondent/Producer
Share

St. Peter’s Chapel in Lucerne, Switzerland, is incorporating artificial intelligence into religious settings. Visitors can now interact with a digital avatar of Jesus through an innovative installation by Lucerne University’s scientists and theologians.

Media Landscape

MediaMiss™This story is a Media Miss by the left as only 0% of the coverage is from left leaning media. Learn more about this data
Left 0% Center 17% Right 83%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

Launched in August, the installation features a high-tech confessional booth. Visitors ask questions about faith and the AI responds based on training from the New Testament and other religious texts.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Marco Schmid, a theologian at St. Peter’s Chapel, explained the project is an “experiment.” Its aim is to spark discussions on artificial intelligence’s role in modern faith practices. Schmid hopes it will provide a “concrete experience” to explore AI’s ethical and spiritual implications.

The installation uses a user-friendly interface, making it easy for visitors to engage with the AI Jesus. According to a press release, the installation offers spiritual support anytime.

Unlike human pastors, the AI isn’t bound by traditional schedules, making it available at all hours. The chapel sees it as a tool for individuals to explore faith on their own terms.

Some visitors find the experience moving. Worshippers told DW News they were surprised by how easy the process was and left feeling inspired.

However, others criticized the installation. Some said the AI’s advice seemed “generic.” Additionally, some raised concerns about using AI for spiritual guidance. A professor from Lucerne University warned people to be cautious when relying on AI to seek meaning in religion.

Despite mixed reactions, St. Peter’s Chapel supports the project. The chapel sees it as a way to spark important conversations on how faith can adapt to the digital age. The press release noted the project aims to “start meaningful conversations about faith in a digital world.”

The chapel points out several benefits of the installation. It offers different perspectives, independence from prejudice and personalized answers. The AI speaks in 100 languages, making it accessible to visitors worldwide.

In the end, the AI Jesus installation is about starting a dialogue. The chapel’s goal is clear: provoke thought, encourage conversations and explore how religion can evolve in a digital world.

Tags: , , , , , ,

[KENNEDY FELTON]

IN THE HEART OF LUCERNE, SWITZERLAND… TECHNOLOGY AND FAITH ARE INTERSECTING IN A NEW WAY. 

VISITORS TO SAINT PETER’S CHAPEL CAN NOW INTERACT WITH AN A-I JESUS… THANKS TO AN INNOVATIVE ART INSTALLATION CREATED AT A LOCAL UNIVERSITY.

THE PROJECT HAS CAPTURED GLOBAL ATTENTION, SPARKING BOTH INTRIGUE AND CRITIQUE. 

BUT WHAT EXACTLY IS THIS INSTALLATION… AND WHY DID THE CHURCH DECIDE TO BRING A VIRTUAL JESUS TO LIFE?

[MARCO SCHMID, THEOLOGIAN, ST. PETER’S CHAPEL, LUCERNE]

“WHAT WE’RE DOING HERE IS AN EXPERIMENT. WE WANTED TO LAUNCH THE DISCUSSION BY LETTING PEOPLE HAVE A VERY CONCRETE EXPERIENCE WITH AI. THAT WAY WE HAVE A FOUNDATION FOR TALKING ABOUT IT AND DISCUSSING IT WITH ONE ANOTHER.”

MARCO SCHMID, A THEOLOGIAN AT SAINT PETER’S CHAPEL, GAVE HIS BLESSING FOR THE PROJECT.

THE INSTALLATION, WHICH COST SEVERAL THOUSAND EUROS, LAUNCHED IN AUGUST OF 2024, AIMING TO OFFER SPIRITUAL SUPPORT AT ANY TIME OF DAY –  UNLIKE HUMAN PASTORS, ACCORDING TO THE CHAPEL.

THE CENTERPIECE OF THE PROJECT IS A HIGH-TECH CONFESSIONAL BOOTH, WHERE VISITORS ARE GREETED BY A DIGITAL AVATAR OF JESUS. 

A USER-FRIENDLY INTERFACE ALLOWS PENITENTS TO ASK QUESTIONS ABOUT FAITH, AND THE A-I RESPONDS WITH ANSWERS BASED ON ITS TRAINING FROM THE NEW TESTAMENT AND OTHER RELIGIOUS INFORMATION.

FOR SOME VISITORS, THE EXPERIENCE IS MOVING. 

WORSHIPPERS TOLD D-W NEWS THEY WERE SURPRISED AT HOW EASY THE PROCESS WAS AND LEFT FEELING INSPIRED.

BUT THE INSTALLATION HASN’T BEEN WITHOUT CONTROVERSY. 

OTHER WORSHIPPERS WERE NOT AS IMPRESSED, CALLING THE AVATAR’S ADVICE GENERIC. 

CRITICS ARGUE IT MAY RAISE ETHICAL CONCERNS.

A PROFESSOR AND ETHICIST FROM LUCERNE UNIVERSITY TELLS D-W NEWS THAT PEOPLE SHOULD BE CAREFUL WHEN IT COMES TO FINDING MEANING IN RELIGION THROUGH A-I.

DESPITE MIXED REVIEWS OF A-I JESUS, SAINT PETER’S CHAPEL DEFENDS ITS INSTALLATION. ACCORDING TO A PRESS RELEASE, IT WAS DESIGNED TO SPARK MEANINGFUL CONVERSATIONS ABOUT WHAT FAITH CAN LOOK LIKE IN A MODERN, DIGITAL WORLD.

THESE ARE SOME OF THE BENEFITS CITED BY THE CHURCH, INCLUDING THE ABILITY TO ACCESS A VARIETY OF VIEWPOINTS, PERSONALIZED RESPONSES, AND FASTER INTERACTIONS. 

AND THEIR FIFTH POINT IS BACKED BY ONE OF THE INSTALLATION’S FEATURES.

A-I JESUS SPEAKS 100 DIFFERENT LANGUAGES, MAKING IT ACCESSIBLE TO VISITORS AROUND THE GLOBE.

AT ITS CORE, THE A-I JESUS AT SAINT PETER’S CHAPEL IS ABOUT SPARKING CONVERSATION. 

THE CHURCH’S AIM IS CLEAR – TO PROVOKE THOUGHT, ENCOURAGE DIALOGUE, AND EXPLORE WHAT FAITH IN THE DIGITAL AGE CAN LOOK LIKE.

WITH SAN, I’M KENNEDY FELTON. STAY INFORMED WITH REAL-TIME UPDATES ON THIS STORY AND MORE BY DOWNLOADING OUR APP.

Military

This is why it would be ‘ludicrous’ for Russia to use nuclear weapons

Listen
Share

Stop me if you’ve heard this before. The President of Russia, Vladimir Putin, is threatening to use nuclear weapons if Ukraine gets or uses certain other weapons in certain ways.

In the latest example of nuclear saber-rattling, Moscow changed its protocols for using nuclear weapons. If a non-nuclear country like Ukraine, is allied with a nuclear-armed country like the United States, and puts Russian sovereignty at risk, the Kremlin said it will use nukes.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Over the course of the war in Ukraine, Russia has issued dozens of threats concerning the use of its nuclear weapons, and each time the threat rang hollow. Straight Arrow News Reporter Ryan Robertson spoke with Matt Shoemaker, a former U.S. intelligence officer who spent time on the Russia desk, about whether to take Russia’s threats seriously.

The following conversation has been edited for length and clarity. You can watch the full interview in the video above.

Ryan Robertson: The last couple of days, the announcement came out that Russia was amending its protocols for nuclear responses to say that if Ukraine, or a nation, attacks Russia with long-range weapons that puts Russian sovereignty at risk, and that nation is being backed by a nuclear power, then Russia can use nuclear weapons.

The announcement was made in September, and went live at the same time Ukraine was using long-range ATACMS outside of Kursk. Is this all just more bluster from Putin?

Matthew Shoemaker: Short answer, yes. There’s been a lot of sensationalism, especially here in the United States, with regards to this usage of ATACMS. If you go on the Drudge Report, for example, the past three days, their main headlines have been essentially, “Nuclear war is about to start. All of these countries are updating their nuclear weapons programs and their nuclear responses.”

This was foreseen, Russia, let’s put it that way, had a good idea that this was going to happen, which is why they announced it back in September. They waited [to implement it] until President Biden announced [his plans]. And let’s be honest, President Putin knows President Biden. They’ve met multiple times. Biden’s got two months left on the clock. Putin knows that. Putin knows that, you know, Trump’s about to come in. Putin is going to have a much better time, from his perspective, negotiating with Trump.

You know, this is all just bluster at this point. No one anticipates, no one expects that President Putin is going to start nuclear war over this with President Biden and two months left. There’s nothing whatsoever in it for President Putin to do this. So this is all just bluster, unfortunately. And, you know, people with their own political axes to grind are using it for their advantage, whether it be bludgeoning the other side over the head with their political comments or just to try and stir up support for themselves. So, you know, there’s a lot of sensationalism going on.

Ryan Robertson: Sure, sure. I mean, it’s 2024, right? You can’t get by without some sensationalism, right? You mentioned something about the ATACMS. You know, President Biden has approved ATACMS. Ukraine probably doesn’t have that many long-range ATACMS at this point, but President Biden has a few billion dollars left of congressionally approved money to spend. If Ukraine suddenly got an influx of ATACMS, you know, long-range missiles, would that be enough to change the course of the war over the next couple of months before President Trump takes office?

Matthew Shoemaker: A short answer, in my professional assessment as a former intelligence officer, is no. None of that is in President Biden’s wheelhouse. Over the past three years of this conflict, effectively, he has slow-walked, at every single opportunity, any chance that the Ukrainians had to get an upper hand with regards to the Russians. President Biden has denied them that. The only thing President Biden has actually done is given the Ukrainians enough to stay in the fight.

And that’s essentially what this is more than anything, because—and not to get too far into the weeds and become too much of a tactician with regards to this—as you mentioned, the Ukrainians don’t have enough of these ATACMS. The ATACMS themselves come in multiple variants. No one really knows which variants the Ukrainians have or how many of those variants they have. The two main variants are–one is a main large warhead itself. And that’s used against, usually, clusters of personnel, for example. That tends to have a shorter range because it’s heavier. You need a bigger warhead for it.

The other variant has a lot of smaller munitions in it and kind of just sprays them out over a wide area. That one, from my understanding, has a little bit of a longer range. We don’t know how many the Ukrainians have. We don’t know how many of the variants they have either. That sort of thing.

On top of it, the Americans have been helping the Ukrainians pay for the development of a Ukrainian-made, essentially ATACMS-style weapon that the Ukrainians have been fielding, and they can produce those themselves. So, you know, the Ukrainians have been lobbing these into Russia, and this doesn’t really change any of the tactics on the field. It is all just bluster. It creates a headline. Because in reality, yes, for the Americans to say you can use these weapons against Russian soil is a new development, if you will.

I would say that, unlike most of the reporting, from my understanding, there actually are quite a lot of restrictions still on the use of ATACMS.

Ryan Robertson: Right. The Ukrainians can only use them around Kursk.

Matthew Shoemaker: Exactly. It’s meant to give the Ukrainians some bargaining chip when Trump does come into office, that the Ukrainians own, essentially, Russian territory that they can negotiate to give back to the Russians under a Trump administration. There’s a lot of gamesmanship, a lot of different tactics going on, a lot of chess being played. But for people to just fly off the handle and assume that nuclear war is coming is irresponsible at best and just ludicrous at worst.

Ryan Robertson: Matt Shoemaker, always a pleasure talking to you.

Matthew Shoemaker: Pleasure to be here.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

[Ryan Robertson]

STOP ME IF YOU’VE HEARD THIS BEFORE.  RUSSIAN PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN IS THREATENING TO USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS IF UKRAINE GETS OR USES CERTAIN OTHER WEAPONS CERTAIN WAYS. 

IN THE LATEST EXAMPLE OF NUCLEAR SABER RATTLING, MOSCOW CHANGED ITS PROTOCOLS FOR USING NUCLEAR WEAPONS. NOW, IF A NON-NUCLEAR COUNTRY–LIKE UKRAINE–IS ALLIES WITH A NUCLEAR-ARMED COUNTRY–LIKE THE UNITED STATES- AND PUTS RUSSIAN SOVEREIGNTY AT RISK THE KREMLIN SAYS IT WILL USE NUKES. 

OVER THE COURSE OF THE WAR IN UKRAINE, RUSSIA ISSUED DOZENS OF THREATS CONCERNING THE USE OF ITS NUCLEAR WEAPONS, AND EACH TIME THE THREAT RANG HOLLOW. 

BEFORE I WROTE IT OFF AS JUST MORE BLUSTER, THOUGH, I WANTED TO TALK WITH MATT SHOEMAKER, A FORMER U.S. INTELLIGENCE OFFICER WHO SPENT TIME ON THE RUSSIA DESK. 

All right, Matt, thanks again for joining us. So, you know, the last couple of days, the announcement had come out that Russia was amending the protocols for nuclear responses to say that if Ukraine, or a nation, attacks Russia with long range weapons that puts Russian safety at risk, and that nation is being backed by nuclear power, then Russia can use nuclear weapons.

The announcement was made in September. Went live at the same time that Ukraine was using long range ATACMS outside of Kursk. Is this all just more bluster from Putin?

[Matthew Shoemaker]

Short answer, yes. There’s been a lot of sensationalism, especially here in the United States with regards to this usage of ATACMS. If you go on the Drudge Report, for example, the past three days, their main headlines have been essentially ‘Nuclear war is about to start. All of these countries are updating their nuclear weapons programs and their nuclear responses.’

This was foreseen–Russia, let’s put it that way, had a good idea that this was going to happen. Which is why they announced it back in September. They waited until President Biden announced it. And let’s be honest, President Putin knows President Biden. They’ve met multiple times. Biden’s got two months left on the clock. Putin knows that. Putin knows that, you know, Trump’s about to come in. Putin is going to have a much better time, from his perspective, negotiating with Trump. You know, this is all just bluster at this point. No one anticipates, no one expects that, you know, President Putin is going to start nuclear war over this with President Biden and two months left. Like, there’s nothing whatsoever in it for President Putin to do this. So this is all just bluster, unfortunately. And, you know, people with their own political axes to grind are using it for their advantage, whether it be bludgeoning the other side over the head with, you know, their political comments or, you know, just to try and stir up support for themselves. So, you know, there’s a lot of sensationalism going on.

[Ryan Robertson]

Sure, sure. I mean, it’s 2024, right? You can’t, can’t get by without some sensationalism, right? You mentioned something about the, about the ATACMS. You know, President Biden had approved ATACMS. Ukraine probably doesn’t have that many long-range ATACMS at this point, but President Biden has a few billion dollars left of Congressionally approved money to spend. If Ukraine suddenly got an influx of ATACMS, you know, long-range missiles–would that be enough to change the course of the war over the next couple of months before President Trump takes office?

[Matthew Shoemaker]

A short answer, in my professional assessment as a former intelligence officer, is no. None of that is in President Biden’s wheelhouse. Over the past three years of this conflict, effectively, he has slow-walked, at every single opportunity, any chance that the Ukrainians had to get an upper hand with regards to the Russians. President Biden has denied them that. The only thing President Biden has actually done is given the Ukrainians enough to stay in the fight.

And that’s essentially what this is more than anything, because–and not to get too far into the weeds and become too much of a tactician with regards to this, as you mentioned, you know, the Ukrainians don’t have enough of these ATACMS. The ATACMS themselves come in multiple variants. No one really knows which variants that the Ukrainians have, how many of those variants they have. And the two main variants are: one is a main large warhead itself. And that’s used against, usually like clusters of personnel, for example. And that tends to have a shorter range to it because it tends to be heavier. You need a bigger warhead for it. 

The other variant is, it has a lot of smaller munitions in it and it kind of just like sprays it out over a wide area. That one, from my understanding, has a little bit of a longer range. We don’t know how many the Ukrainians have. We don’t know how many the Ukrainians have of which variant either. That sort of thing. And on top of it, you know, the Ukrainian–or the Americans for that matter–have been helping the Ukrainians pay for the development of a Ukrainian-made, essentially an ATACMS style weapon that the Ukrainians have been fielding, and they can produce those themselves. So, you know, the Ukrainians have been lobbing these into Russia and this doesn’t really change any of the tactics on the field. It is all just bluster. It creates a headline. Because in reality, yes, you know, for the Americans to say you can use these weapons against Russian soil, it is a new development, if you will. 

I would say that, unlike what most of the reporting is saying,  is that from my understanding, there actually are quite a lot of restrictions still on the use of ATACMS. From my understanding, they can only use them around Kursk. It’s meant to give the Ukrainians some bargaining chip when Trump does come into office that the Ukrainians own essentially Russian territory that they can negotiate to give back to the Russians under a Trump administration. There’s a lot of gamesmanship. There’s a lot of different tactics going on. There’s a lot of, you know, chess going on. But for people to just, you know, fly over the handle or handlebars and assume that nuclear war is coming is irresponsible at best and just ludicrous at worst.

[Ryan Robertson]

Matt Shoemaker, always a pleasure talking to you. I am sure in the next few weeks we’ll have more opportunities to pick your brain again.

Matthew Shoemaker:

Pleasure to be here. Thanks for having me on.

IF YOU WANT TO HEAR MORE FROM MATT SHOEMAKER, YOU CAN. JUST HEAD ON OVER TO SAN.COM OR CHECKOUT THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP TODAY. 

FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS, I’M RYAN ROBERTSON. 

U.S.

Texas offers 1,400 acres for Trump Administration deportation effort

Listen
Share

Texas Land Commissioner Dawn Buckingham is offering over 1,400 acres of land on a ranch in Starr County, Texas, to assist the incoming Trump administration with mass deportations of undocumented immigrants. Starr County, located along the U.S.-Mexico border, could become the site for deportation facilities and staging areas to help fulfill President-elect Donald Trump’s promise of mass deportations, Buckingham said.

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 17% Center 47% Right 36%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

“My office is fully prepared to enter into an agreement with the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or the United States Border Patrol to allow a facility to be built for the processing, detention, and coordination of the largest deportation of violent criminals in the nation’s history,” Buckingham wrote In a letter to Trump.

The Texas General Land Office acquired the ranch at the end of October 2024, originally to begin state border wall construction, according to a news release.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Buckingham said that the land was previously owned by someone who blocked law enforcement access and refused to allow border wall construction. She added that the previous owner’s actions “enabled cartel members and violent criminals to sexually abuse migrant women and children on this land for some time.”

Buckingham appeared on Fox News to discuss her offer of support to the Trump administration.

“There’s no doubt that we are losing too many of our children to these violent criminals that are coming across the border,” Buckingham said. “I am 100% on board with the Trump administration’s pledge to get these criminals out of our country and we are more than happy to offer our resources to facilitate those deportations of these violent criminals.”

Democratic governors of California and Arizona, both border states, have said they will not assist the Trump administration with mass deportations.

Leaders of some sanctuary states and cities for undocumented immigrants have also pledged not to cooperate.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

[Lauren Taylor]

TEXAS’ LAND COMMISSIONER DAWN BUCKINGHAM IS OFFERING THE INCOMING TRUMP ADMINISTRATION OVER 1,400 ACRES OF LAND ON A RANCH IN STARR COUNTY, TEXAS TO HELP CARRY OUT MASS DEPORTATIONS OF UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS.

STARR COUNTY IS LOCATED ALONG THE US-SOUTHERN BORDER WITH MEXICO AND COMMISSIONER BUCKINGHAM SAYS THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION CAN USE THE LAND TO CONSTRUCT DEPORTATION FACILITIES AND STAGING AREAS TO CARRY OUT TRUMP’S MASS DEPORTATION PROMISE.

IN A LETTER TO PRESIDENT-ELECT TRUMP, BUCKINGHAM WRITES “MY OFFICE IS FULLY PREPARED TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, OR THE UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL TO ALLOW A FACILITY TO BE BUILT FOR THE PROCESSING, DETENTION, AND COORDINATION OF THE LARGEST DEPORTATION OF VIOLENT CRIMINALS IN THE NATION’S HISTORY.”

THE TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE ACQUIRED THE RANCH AT THE END OF OCTOBER – ORIGINALLY TO BEGIN STATE BORDER WALL CONSTRUCTION, ACCORDING TO A NEWS RELEASE.

BUCKINGHAM SAYS THE LAND WAS PREVIOUSLY OWNED BY SOMEONE WHO WOULD NOT ALLOW BORDER WALL TO BE BUILT AND BLOCKED LAW ENFORCEMENT FROM ACCESSING THE PROPERTY AND THAT “HER ACTIONS ENABLED CARTEL MEMBERS AND VIOLENT CRIMINALS TO SEXUALLY ABUSE MIGRANT WOMEN AND CHILDREN ON THIS LAND FOR SOME TIME.”

BUCKINGHAM APPEARED ON FOX NEWS TO TALK ABOUT HELPING THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION.

“THERE’S NO DOUBT THAT WE ARE LOSING TOO MANY OF OUR CHILDREN TO THESE VIOLENT CRIMINALS THAT ARE COMING ACROSS THE BORDER,” BUCKINGHAM SAID ON FOX NEWS DIGITAL. “I AM 100% ON BOARD WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S PLEDGE TO GET THESE CRIMINALS OUT OF OUR COUNTRY AND WE ARE MORE THAN HAPPY TO OFFER OUR RESOURCES TO FACILITATE THOSE DEPORTATIONS OF THESE VIOLENT CRIMINALS.”

THE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS OF CALIFORNIA AND ARIZONA – BOTH BORDER STATES – HAVE SAID THEY WILL NOT HELP THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION CARRY OUT MASS DEPORTATIONS.

LEADERS OF SOME STATES AND CITIES WITH SANCTUARY STATUS FOR UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS HAVE SAID THEY, TOO, WILL NOT COOPERATE.

U.S.

Federal officials review permit after bald eagle nest removed in Alabama

Listen
Share

Federal wildlife officials are investigating the removal of a bald eagle nest in Alabama, one that they issued a permit for. The tree and nest were removed by a land developer over the weekend of Nov. 15, which locals say housed a bonded pair of the large birds.

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 29% Center 71% Right 0%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

Along with the permit being investigated by the Fish and Wildlife Service, Hughston Homes of Georgia, the land developer, is also under investigation. Wildlife officials say it was the responsibility of the permit holder to confirm that the nest was empty before taking it down.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The agency had determined the removal wouldn’t interfere with the overall eagle population. For its part, the developer stated it followed guidance from the Fish and Wildlife Service in the removal, stating that they believed the “nest in question is likely an alternate nest” for the pair of bonded eagles.

Locals of Auburn say there’s more to the story. The City of Auburn released a statement, saying the City Council was disappointed by the removal.

Residents say an investigation isn’t enough, and the Fish and Wildlife Service should’ve never issued the permit in the first place. Local Auburn officials say that eagle activity was reported in the area of the nest as early as January 2021. However, the city didn’t take their protection into consideration in approving or denying the developer’s requested application.

According to the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, disturbing gold or bald eagles is criminal, and can result in a fine of up to $200,000, and even imprisonment.

Tags: , , , , , ,

[Jack Aylmer]

FEDERAL WILDLIFE OFFICIALS ARE INVESTIGATING THE REMOVAL OF A BALD EAGLE NEST IN ALABAMA – A REMOVAL THEIR OWN AGENCY SIGNED OFF ON. 

A LAND DEVELOPER REMOVED THE TREE CONTAINING THE NEST LAST WEEK AFTER RECEIVING THE PERMIT IN OCTOBER.

ALONG WITH INVESTIGATING THE PERMIT – HUGHSTON HOMES IS UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE NEST IN AUBURN.

THE DEVELOPER SAYS THEY FOLLOWED GUIDANCE FROM THE FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE IN THE REMOVAL, STATING THAT THEY BELIEVED THE “NEST IN QUESTION IS LIKELY AN ALTERNATE NEST” FOR THE PAIR OF BONDED EAGLES.

SOME PEOPLE AREN’T BUYING IT.

THE CITY OF AUBURN ISSUED A STATEMENT DUE TO THE EVENTS, SAYING THE CITY COUNCIL WAS DISAPPOINTED BY THE REMOVAL.

RESIDENTS SAY AN INVESTIGATION ISN’T ENOUGH, AND THAT THE FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE SHOULD NEVER HAVE ISSUED THE PERMIT IN THE FIRST PLACE.

GIVEN EVIDENCE OF ACTIVE EAGLES PRESENT IN THE NEST, THE PERMIT AND REMOVAL COULD BE QUALIFIED AS A NEST “TAKE” UNDER THE BALD AND GOLDEN EAGLE PROTECTION ACT.

REPORTS OF EAGLE ACTIVITY IN THE NEST ALLEGEDLY DATE BACK TO 2021, ACCORDING TO LOCAL OFFICIALS.

THE FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE SAID THAT IT WAS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMIT HOLDER TO CONFIRM THAT THE NEST WAS EMPTY BEFORE TAKING IT DOWN, AND THAT OFFICIALS HAD DETERMINED THAT THE REMOVAL WOULD NOT INTERFERE WITH THE OVERALL EAGLE POPULATION.

FOR SAN, I’M JACK AYLMER.

DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS MOBILE APP FOR MORE UNBIASED UPDATES.

Business

Progress or poverty? Patience running out for Argentina’s Milei 1 year in

Listen
Share

Javier Milei promised pain for the people of Argentina, and they elected him president anyway, with the highest share of votes since Argentina’s return to democracy. One year removed from his resounding victory, are Argentines already running out of patience with Milei?

He’s still the most popular political leader in the inflation-ravaged nation, but popularity is fleeting. Now, more than half the country disapproves of how Milei is running Argentina, up from 48% in January. 

More than half the country also lives in poverty. In Milei’s first six months in office, the poverty rate has spiked from 42% to 53%. 

“It’s one long Groundhog Day over there,” said Monica de Bolle, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and expert on Argentina. “I’m a bit of an outlier, opinion-wise, in terms of what Milei has done. I know that most economists, or at least a lot of economists, think that he’s doing a great job, but my grading for him would be a four [out of 10] at best.”

“I would put maybe seven or eight,” said Martin Castellano, head of Latin America research at the Institute of International Finance. “They have done significant progress in terms of stabilizing the economy.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Milei inherited a terrible economy: hyperinflation in the triple digits, the poverty rate double what it was six years before, and a country on the brink of another economic crisis. Milei promised shock therapy and Argentina signed up. 

“The shock therapy approach that Milei implemented was in large part because of the failure of the gradualist approach,” de Bolle said. “But the risk with the shock therapy approach is always that you know things are going to get very bad, and it’s still going to take a very long time for them to improve if they do improve.”

When Milei first took office, he devalued the country’s currency while at the same time removing price controls and federal subsidies his people had come to rely on. That led to a surge in inflation while, at the same time, taking away safety nets. 

“You’re playing with fire in a sense because you’re doing all of these things at once,” de Bolle said. “They’re all going to hit the population in one go. That, I think, was correctly communicated to people, and I think they understood it, which is why they’ve been able to hold on to these policies for as long as they have, but now patience is running out.”

“Given that his support in Congress is quite limited, it’s important for him to keep the popular support,” Castellano pointed out.

“If things do not improve very quickly, we are going to be seeing people out in the streets protesting again, and we’re going to see social upheaval, and we’re going to see political upheaval,” de Bolle said. “That is how it usually plays out, and there’s no reason why this time will be any different from what it has been in the past.”

The protests have already begun. In October, hundreds of thousands of students took to the streets against budget cuts at public universities, where the salaries of most teachers now fall below the poverty line. 

“We are losing a lot of people that we cannot replace because they do not get enough to make a living,” University of Buenos Aires professor Nicolas Sirolli told Reuters.

State workers went on strike the same month, demanding better wages and denouncing Milei’s economic policies. The walkout coincided with a transportation worker strike, which ground the country to a halt.

“The perception is one where, ‘No, there’s no improvement here. They keep telling us that things are improving, but things are really not improving because I look at my purchasing power, and it’s going down,'” de Bolle said.

For the most part, wages in Argentina aren’t budging while inflation continues to soar. Spurred by Milei’s shock therapy, annual inflation reached nearly 300% in April. But for six straight months, that annual rate has worked its way down, though it’s still nearly 200% and higher than when Milei was elected. But in October, monthly inflation dipped below 3%, the lowest monthly price increase in the country in nearly three years. 

“I think that the progress on the inflation front has been quite, quite remarkable, and we will see inflation declining further in the coming months as particularly those high readings from last year are out of the picture,” Castellano said.

On top of it all, the economy is still in a recession and pushing deeper than expected. Estimates now have the economy contracting about 4% this year. But BBVA Research expects a 6% rebound next year, driven by investments, exports and private consumption. Milei’s budget projects a 5% expansion with inflation a little over 18% by the end of 2025. It hasn’t been that low since the mid-2010s. 

From the outside, there are many bright spots in what Milei has achieved so far. And his friendship with President-elect Donald Trump gives him an important international ally. But the view is mixed within the country’s borders.

“People are starting to do the mental calculation of what these policies have effectively cost them to date from the time that they were adopted, and then they’re looking ahead and doing the calculation of, ‘Well, when can I expect an improvement? I just can’t see it,'” de Bolle said. “And therefore, you get this turning point from relative optimism or cautionary optimism into pessimism.”

While Argentines voted for change, patience is wearing thin. But experts say measurable change is around the corner.

“The worst of the adjustment is behind,” Castellano said. “But I think fine-tuning and improving, particularly on the political front, is going to be more important, increasingly important, in the coming months.”

Simply put, Milei doesn’t have a lot of support in Congress, especially for his unpopular policies. His party holds a minority in both chambers, and the 2025 midterms will serve as a referendum on his progress.  

“That is why I ask you to move forward with faith and confidence,” Milei told a crowd of supporters. “Because from now on, we will only have good news, and in 2025, we will give an electoral blow.”

His austerity experiment may depend on it. 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

[Simone Del Rosario]

He promised pain for his people, and they elected him president anyway. And with the highest share of votes since Argentina’s return to democracy. 

One year removed from his resounding victory, are Argentines already running out of patience with Javier Milei? 

He’s still the most popular political leader in the inflation-ravaged nation, but popularity is fleeting. Now, more than half the country (51%) disapproves of how Milei is running Argentina, up from 48% in January

More than half the country also lives in poverty. In Milei’s first six months in office, the poverty rate has spiked from 42% to 53%. 

Monica De Bolle: It’s one long Groundhog Day over there. I‘m Monica de Bolle, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, macro economist and an expert on Argentina, given a long history looking at the country, including when I was working at the IMF. I’m a bit of an outlier, opinion wise, in terms of what Milei has done. I know that most economists, or at least a lot of economists, think that he’s doing a great job, but my grading for him would be a four at best.

Martin Castellano: I would put maybe seven or eight, they have done significant progress in terms of stabilizing the economy. Hi. I’m Martin Castellano. I’m the head of Latin America research at the Institute of International Finance, and I’m focused more mostly on macroeconomic policies in Latin America.

Simone Del Rosario: Javier Milei inherited a terrible economy: hyperinflation in the triple digits, the poverty rate double what it was six years before, a country on the brink of another economic crisis. Milei promised shock therapy and Argentina signed up. 

Monica De Bolle: The shock therapy approach that Milei implemented was in large part because of the failure of the gradualist approach. But the risk with the shock therapy approach is always that you know things are going to get very bad, and it’s still going to take a very long time for them to improve if they do improve.

Simone Del Rosario: When Milei first took office, he devalued the country’s currency while at the same time removing price controls and federal subsidies his people had come to rely on. That led to a surge in inflation while at the same time, taking away safety nets people had come to expect. 

Monica De Bolle: You’re playing with fire in a sense, because you’re doing all of these things at once, they’re all going to hit the population in one go. That I think was correctly communicated to people, and I think they understood it, which is why, you know, they’ve been able to hold on to these policies for as long as they have, but now patience is running out.

Martin Castellano: Given that his support in Congress is quite limited, It’s important for him to keep the popular support.

Monica De Bolle: If things do not improve very quickly, we are going to be seeing people out in the streets protesting again, and we’re going to see social upheaval, and we’re going to see political upheaval, and you know that that is how it usually plays out, and there’s no reason why this time will be any different from what it has been in the past.

Simone Del Rosario: The protests have already begun. In October, hundreds of thousands of students took to the streets against budget cuts at public universities, where the salaries of most teachers now fall below the poverty line. 

Nicolas Sirolli: We are losing a lot of people that we cannot replace because they do not get enough to make a living. 

Simone Del Rosario: State workers striked the same month, demanding better wages and denouncing Milei’s economic policies. The walkout coincided with a transportation worker strike, which ground the country to a halt.

Monica De Bolle: The perception is one where, no, you know, there’s no improvement. Here, they keep telling us that things are improving, but things are really not improving, because I look at my purchasing power and it’s going down.

Simone Del Rosario: See, wages aren’t budging while inflation continues to soar. Spurred by Milei’s shock therapy, annual inflation reached nearly 300% in April. But for six straight months, that annual rate has worked its way down, though it’s still nearly 200% and higher than when Milei was elected. But in October, monthly inflation dipped below 3%, the lowest monthly price increase in the country in nearly three years. 

Martin Castellano: I think that the progress on the inflation front has been quite, quite remarkable, and we will see inflation declining further in the coming months as particularly those high readings from last year are out of the picture.

Simone Del Rosario: On top of it all, the economy is still in a recession and pushing deeper than expected. Estimates now have the economy contracting about 4% this year. But BBVA Research expects a 6% rebound next year, driven by investments, exports and private consumption. Milei’s budget projects a 5% expansion, with inflation a little over 18% by the end of 2025. It hasn’t been that low since the mid-2010s. 

From the outside, there are many bright spots to what Milei has achieved so far. And his friendship with President-elect Donald Trump gives him an important international ally. But from the inside…

Monica De Bolle: People are starting to sort of do the mental calculation of what these policies have effectively cost them to date from the time that they were adopted, and then they’re looking ahead and doing the calculation of, well, when, when can I expect an improvement? Well, I just can’t see it. And therefore, you know, you get this, this sort of turning point from relative optimism or cautionary optimism into pessimism.

Simone Del Rosario: Wanting change, but wearing thin… 

Martin Castellano: The worst of the adjustment is behind. But I think fine tuning and improving, particularly on the on the political front, is going to be more important, increasingly important in the coming months.

Simone Del Rosario: Simply put, Milei doesn’t have a ton of support in Congress, especially for his unpopular policies. His party holds a minority in both chambers, and the 2025 midterms will serve as a referendum on his progress.  

Javier Milei: That is why I ask you to move forward with faith and confidence. Because from now on, we will only have good news, and in 2025, we will give an electoral blow. 

Simone Del Rosario: His austerity experiment may depend on it. 

Javier Milei: Viva la libertad, carajo.

U.S.

Chinese nationals ask Trump for asylum as hundreds of others get deported

Listen
Share

Hundreds of Chinese nationals are asking President-elect Donald Trump to let them stay in the United States. This comes as large groups of fellow migrants from China are being deported. 

The Department of Homeland Security deported 109 Chinese nationals from a charter flight on Saturday, Nov. 16.

It’s the third largest chartered removal flight to China within six months as more than 100 migrants got sent back to China in June and a further 130 in October.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“This removal flight is yet another example of the department’s ongoing cooperation with the People’s Republic of China and other international partners to reduce and deter irregular migration through enforcement of immigration law,” the DHS said in a statement

Trump is pledging to start a mass deportation of migrants once he’s in office. Sources told NBC News undocumented Chinese nationals of military age are high on Trump’s list to get deported, citing the potential risk to national security. 

The City reported a large group of Chinese asylum-seekers in New York wrote an open letter to Trump pleading with him to let them stay. They plan to send it to him on inauguration day with signatures that they are working to collect.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection says 78,000 undocumented Chinese nationals have been caught crossing the border this year. That’s up from 23,000 three years earlier.

The group Information for Chinese Immigrants says a large percentage of migrants are leaving China for political and economic reasons. 

According to the Migration Policy Institute, the Biden administration is on track to deport as many people as Trump did. Under Biden there have been 1.1 million removals since the beginning of 2021 through February 2024.

During Trump’s first term, there were 1.5 million deportations.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

[Lauren Taylor]

HUNDREDS OF CHINESE NATIONALS ARE ASKING PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP TO LET THEM STAY IN THE UNITED STATES … AS LARGE GROUPS OF FELLOW MIGRANTS FROM CHINA ARE BEING DEPORTED. 

THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY DEPORTED 109 CHINESE NATIONALS FROM A CHARTER FLIGHT SATURDAY. 

IT’S THE THIRD LARGEST CHARTERED REMOVAL FLIGHT TO CHINA WITHIN SIX MONTHS AS MORE THAN 100 MIGRANTS GOT SENT BACK TO CHINA IN JUNE … AND MORE THAN 130 IN OCTOBER. 

D-H-S RELEASING A STATEMENT SAYING ..

THIS REMOVAL FLIGHT IS YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE DEPARTMENT’S ONGOING COOPERATION WITH PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA” AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS TO REDUCE AND DETER IRREGULAR MIGRATION THROUGH ENFORCEMENT OF IMMIGRATION LAW.

THIS COMES AS TRUMP IS PLEDGING TO START A MASS DEPORTATION OF MIGRANTS ONCE HE’S IN OFFICE. 

SOURCES TELL N-B-C NEWS UNDOCUMENTED CHINESE NATIONALS OF MILITARY AGE ARE HIGH ON TRUMP’S LIST TO GET DEPORTED, CITING THE POTENTIAL RISK TO NATIONAL SECURITY. 

“THE CITY” REPORTS A LARGE GROUP OF CHINESE ASYLUM-SEEKERS IN NEW YORK WROTE AN OPEN LETTER TO TRUMP PLEADING WITH HIM TO LET THEM STAY.

THEY PLAN TO SEND IT TO HIM ON INAUGURATION DAY WITH SIGNATURES … THEY’RE NOW WORKING TO COLLECT.

U-S CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION SAYS 78-THOUSAND UNDOCUMENTED CHINESE NATIONALS HAVE BEEN CAUGHT CROSSING THE BORDER THIS YEAR.

THAT’S UP FROM 23-THOUSAND THREE YEARS EARLIER. 

THE GROUP ‘INFORMATION FOR CHINESE IMMIGRANTS’ ESTIMATES A LARGE PERCENTAGE OF MIGRANTS ARE LEAVING CHINA FOR POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC REASONS. 

FOR SAN – I’M LAUREN TAYLOR. 

FOR ALL YOUR LATEST NEWS HEADLINES – DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP TODAY.

Energy

Trump taps fossil fuel executive Chris Wright for energy secretary role

Listen
Share

President-elect Donald Trump has announced Chris Wright, CEO of Liberty Energy, the world’s second-largest provider of hydraulic fracturing services, as his nominee for secretary of energy. If confirmed, under Wright’s leadership, the Department of Energy is likely to adopt a much different approach to policy when compared to the previous four years.

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 31% Center 37% Right 32%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

“There is no climate crisis, and we’re not in the midst of an energy transition either,” Wright said. “The only thing resembling a crisis with respect to climate change is the regressive opportunity squelching policies justified in the name of climate change.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Wright’s career has spanned various energy sectors, including nuclear power, solar energy, geothermal energy and, most recently, oil and gas. In discussing his outlook on energy, the fossil fuel executive has stated that he does not “care where energy comes from” so long as it “is secure, reliable, affordable and betters human lives.″

“There is no such thing as clean energy or dirty energy. All energy sources have impacts on the world, both positive and negative,” Wright said. “Credible, honest dialog is sadly lacking in today’s discourse. These five terms, climate crisis, energy transition, carbon pollution, clean energy and dirty energy, are not only deceptive, they are in fact destructive.”

Wright has said that while he does not dispute the existence of climate change, the measures aimed at addressing it are “misguided and alarmist.” This opinion on climate policy falls in line with the Trump administration, which has signaled plans to reverse several renewable energy initiatives implemented during the Biden presidency.

“These policies have driven up energy prices, destabilized electrical grids and displaced high paying energy intensive jobs to other countries and states without these perverse energy policies,” Wright said of recent Biden-era climate actions. “No, these policies have not meaningfully reduced global greenhouse gas emissions. Simply moving emissions or jobs from the U.S. or U.K. to China or Vietnam is not a reduction in emissions.”

The Trump White House is expected to attempt to rescind unspent climate funds from the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, rollback incentives for electric vehicle adoption, resume U.S. natural gas exports, and ease emissions regulations on coal plants. Wright is now set to potentially play a key role in implementing these changes as part of the new administration’s National Energy Council.

Tags: , , , , ,

A FOSSIL FUEL EXECUTIVE IS PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP’S NOMINEE FOR ENERGY SECRETARY.

CHRIS WRIGHT IS THE CEO OF LIBERTY ENERGY, THE WORLD’S SECOND LARGEST FRACKING SERVICES COMPANY.

UNDER HIS LEADERSHIP, THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY COULD LOOK A LOT DIFFERENT THAN IT HAS OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS.

“There is no climate crisis, and we’re not in the midst of an energy transition either.”

WRIGHT HAS WORKED WITH A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT ENERGY SOURCES OVER THE COURSE OF HIS CAREER.

HE STARTED OUT IN THE NUCLEAR FIELD, THEN MOVED TO SOLAR AND GEOTHERMAL POWER, BEFORE EMBARKING ON HIS CURRENT EFFORTS IN OIL AND GAS.

“There is no such thing as clean energy or dirty energy. All energy sources have impacts on the world, both positive and negative.”

THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IS EXPECTED TO ROLLBACK MANY OF THE RENEWABLE ENERGY ACTIONS ADVANCED BY PRESIDENT BIDEN.

THIS INCLUDES RESCINDING UNSPENT CLIMATE FUNDS FROM THE 20-22 INFLATION REDUCTION ACT, CURBING THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION’S PUSH FOR MORE EVS, RESUMING US NATURAL GAS EXPORTS, AND REVERSING STRICT EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR COAL PLANTS.

IF CONFIRMED, WRIGHT IS EXPECTED TO PLAY A MAJOR ROLE IN THESE CHANGES TO BIDEN-ERA POLICIES AS A MEMBER OF TRUMP’S NEW NATIONAL ENERGY COUNCIL.

“These policies have driven up energy prices, destabilized electrical grids and displaced high paying energy intensive jobs to other countries and states without these perverse energy policies.”

TRUMP’S ENERGY SECRETARY PICK HAS SAID HE DOES NOT DISPUTE THE EXISTENCE OF CLIMATE CHANGE-

BUT ARGUES THAT POLICIES AIMED AT REDUCING ITS IMPACTS ARE MISGUIDED AND ALARMIST.

“The only thing resembling a crisis with respect to climate change is the regressive opportunity squelching policies justified in the name of climate change.”

WRIGHT HAS PREVIOUSLY STATED THAT HE DOESN’T CARE WHERE ENERGY COMES FROM-

SO LONG AS IT IS SECURE, RELIABLE, AFFORDABLE AND BETTERS HUMAN LIVES.

TO GET MORE STORIES ABOUT THE LATEST HAPPENING IN AMERICA’S ENERGY SECTOR, DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP AND SIGN UP FOR ALERTS FROM ME- JACK AYLMER.

Politics

Kamala Harris tops Newsom, Shapiro in early 2028 primary favorites: Poll

Listen
Share

Vice President Kamala Harris is the favored choice among Democratic voters to lead the party in the 2028 presidential election, according to a new poll. Despite losing to President-elect Donald Trump earlier this month, Harris outpaces potential contenders like California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro by wide margins.  

Kamala Harris’s positive energy is sweeping across the country. What’s her secret, and what do her real positions tell us about her?
Getty Images

Echelon Insights surveyed 1,010 likely voters between Nov. 14 and Nov. 18, 2024, finding that 41% of Democrats would back Harris in a hypothetical 2028 primary.

Newsom received 8% support, Shapiro received 7%, and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Harris’ running mate, both tied at 6%. Other notable names included Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., at 4%, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer at 3% and several others trailing below 2%.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Harris lost the 2024 presidential election, securing just 226 Electoral College votes to Trump’s 312. Trump also won the popular vote and swept key battleground states.

In her concession speech at Howard University, Harris emphasized resilience and called on Americans to “respect the results of the outcome.”

On the Republican side, 37% of GOP voters backed Vice President-elect JD Vance for 2028, with Nikki Haley and Vivek Ramaswamy tied at 9%. Ramaswamy has since been appointed to co-lead the Department of Government Efficiency alongside business magnate Elon Musk.  

Harris has not announced her political plans but has indicated she remains committed to public service. Sixteen percent of Democratic voters polled said they were undecided about their 2028 preferences. 

Tags: , , , , , ,

VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS MAY HAVE LOST THE 2024 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION EARLIER THIS MONTH, BUT A NEW POLL SUGGESTS SHE’S STILL THE FAVORITE AMONG DEMOCRATIC VOTERS FOR THE 2028 NOMINATION.  

ACCORDING TO A SURVEY BY ECHELON INSIGHTS, 41 PERCENT OF LIKELY DEMOCRATIC VOTERS WOULD BACK HARRIS IF THE PRIMARY WERE HELD TODAY… PUTTING HER FAR AHEAD OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM AT 8 PERCENT, AND PENNSYLVANIA GOVERNOR JOSH SHAPIRO AT 7 PERCENT. OTHER POTENTIAL CONTENDERS, LIKE PETE BUTTIGIEG, MINNESOTA GOVERNOR TIM WALZ, AND ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ, TRAILED EVEN FURTHER BEHIND.  

THE POLL ALSO REVEALED 16 PERCENT OF VOTERS REMAIN UNDECIDED, LEAVING SOME ROOM FOR THE FIELD TO SHIFT IN THE COMING YEARS.  

HARRIS’S RECENT LOSS TO DONALD TRUMP SAW HER WIN JUST 226 ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES COMPARED TO TRUMP’S 312. SHE ALSO LOST THE POPULAR VOTE AND KEY BATTLEGROUND STATES LIKE PENNSYLVANIA, WISCONSIN, MICHIGAN, AND GEORGIA. 

MEANWHILE, ON THE REPUBLICAN SIDE, VICE PRESIDENT-ELECT J.D. VANCE EMERGED AS THE TOP PICK FOR THE 2028 NOD, WITH 37 PERCENT OF GOP VOTERS SUPPORTING HIM. NIKKI HALEY AND VIVEK RAMASWAMY TIED FOR SECOND PLACE AT 9 PERCENT EACH.  

AS FOR HARRIS, SHE HAS YET TO ANNOUNCE ANY FUTURE PLANS AFTER HER TENURE AS VICE PRESIDENT ENDS IN JANUARY..  

FOR MORE UNBIASED UPDATES AND STRAIGHT FACTS… DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP OR VISIT SAN DOT COM.

 

FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS… I’M KARAH RUCKER.