Skip to main content

The debate to cut or to keep USAID: Bias Breakdown


  • USAID is facing heightened political scrutiny, with right-leaning media advocating for its elimination and left-leaning outlets fact-checking claims to justify its existence. The debate revolves around funding for controversial programs, including gender-affirming healthcare and alleged indirect support for Hamas.
  • Reports from conservative and liberal news sources present conflicting narratives on the agency’s oversight and spending priorities.
  • While some USAID programs remain operational, legal battles and media framing continue to shape public perception over whether USAID is necessary.

Full Story

The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is at the center of political controversy, with large portions of its spending facing scrutiny from right-leaning media outlets. The political right has called for the agency’s elimination, while left-leaning media outlets are fact-checking the spending claims, with the political left arguing in favor of preserving the agency.

As the debate intensifies, conflicting narratives from both sides shape public perception. This report examines key talking points from both perspectives and presents the facts surrounding USAID’s funding.

Senator, CBS anchor clash over USAID spending

Sunday’s episode of Face the Nation highlighted the growing divide over USAID. While speaking on CBS, an outlet identified as left-leaning by AllSides, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., criticized USAID’s spending, citing specific programs he deemed wasteful or dangerous. The program’s host, Margaret Brennan, challenged his claims, labeling them as “false.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“USAID has been out of control.,” Hagerty said. “I have demanded accountability out of USAID and they have refused it. As an appropriator, I’ve asked them to be very clear about – for example, their role funding Hamas and Gaza. They will not tell us what they do. Now that we start to find out some of the programs USAID has been funding – think about it, sex changes in Guatemala. LGBTQ programs in Serbia. This is ridiculous.”

“The U.S. does not fund sex change operations or fund Hamas,” Brennan contested.

Left-leaning outlets publish fact checks

One of the primary disputes centers on USAID’s alleged funding of sex-change operations in Guatemala. Brennan asserted this claim was false, and multiple left-leaning outlets, including The New York Times and The Washington Post, published fact-check reports on the matter.

The New York Times examined White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s claim that a $2 million USAID grant was allocated for gender-affirming surgeries in Guatemala. The outlet described the claim as “exaggerated” and noted that the grant supported gender-affirming healthcare broadly, encompassing services such as hormone therapy, counseling, hair removal and speech therapy.

“It remains unclear how much, if any, of the funding directly covered surgical interventions,” the Times report said.

Similarly, The Washington Post described the claim as “misleading,” suggesting that the grant was intended “to support trans-led organizations delivering gender-affirming healthcare” rather than funding sex-change surgeries outright.

Federal spending records confirm the $2 million award, with $350,000 already spent. While there is no itemized breakdown, the money was given to a Guatemalan group that assists with gender transitions.

Other USAID grants under scrutiny

Beyond the Guatemala grant, USAID has come under fire for additional spending. Some of the more high-profile grants include:

Right-leaning outlets criticized this expenditure as wasteful, while left-leaning sources justified it as an educational tool promoting health and peace in a region affected by extremism.

“It’s a show that helps teach values, helps teach public health, helps prevent kids from dying from disease and helps push values like collaboration, peacefulness, cooperation. Its pennies on the dollar,” Sen. Chris Coons, D-Conn., told CNN.

“They spent a whopping 20 million on a Sesame Street show in Iraq,” Fox News’ Sean Hannity said reading a list of USAID expenditures. “It would take us pretty much the entire night to read through the list of wasted taxpayer dollars.”

USAID’s potential indirect funding of Hamas

Another contentious issue is whether USAID funds have indirectly supported Hamas. In a 2023 Senate hearing, Hagerty questioned then-Secretary of State Antony Blinken about the possibility of U.S. taxpayer money benefiting Hamas. Blinken maintained that stringent safeguards were in place but did not provide an outright denial.

A 2021 State Department internal assessment obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request noted a “high risk” that Hamas could derive indirect, unintentional benefits from U.S. aid to Gaza.

“Due to its overall strength and level of control over Gaza, we assess there is a high risk Hamas could potentially derive indirect, unintentional benefit from U.S. assistance to Gaza,” the assessment said. “There is less but still some risk U.S. assistance would benefit other designated groups.”

Left-leaning media outlets argued that dismantling USAID could increase the risk of funds reaching extremist groups, while right-leaning news outlets said U.S. tax dollars already helped terror organizations.

Fox News: “‘Designated terrorists’: Extremist groups raked in millions from USAID, multiyear study reveals.”

CNN: “Watchdog warns Trump’s dismantling of vetting at USAID means US money could reach terror groups.”

A conservative think tank report highlighted by Fox News found that USAID awarded over $900,000 to the Bayader Association for Environment and Development, a Gaza-based group allegedly tied to Hamas.

“Founded in 2007, shortly after Hamas’s takeover of the Gaza Strip, Bayader operates in close cooperation with the Hamas regime,” the report said. “Its 2021 annual report notes ‘coordination’ and ‘meetings’ with Hamas’s Ministry of Interior.”

“USAID requires that programs in Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, the West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen receive “partner vetting,” in order to ensure that taxpayer funds do not end up supporting groups like Hamas,” CNN reported. “These vetting efforts have ground to a halt because of the reduction in staff at USAID.”

CNN’s report noted the USAID Office of Inspector General “has previously identified gaps in the scope of partner vetting.”

Expert testimony biases in media coverage

Coverage of USAID has largely mirrored the political divide. CNN interviewed a former USAID administrator who defended the agency’s work, calling its programs essential for global public health and humanitarian aid. Meanwhile, Fox News featured a USAID whistleblower who criticized the agency as rife with waste and bureaucratic inefficiency.

Both outlets presented expert testimonies supporting their respective political narratives, underscoring the importance of scrutinizing media framing when consuming news.

USAID’s future under the Trump Administration

USAID’s Washington headquarters recently had its signage removed as the Trump administration moves to dramatically scale down the agency. The moves started with evicting USAID and its employees from headquarters. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is now overseeing a review of USAID activities, with non-essential foreign aid programs frozen during the assessment.

A Rubio memo revealed plans to reduce staff from 14,000 to fewer than 300. However, court interventions temporarily paused these staffing directives amid legal battles with unions.

Essential programs, including food and medicine distribution, continue despite reports of disruptions in Boston and Houston due to confusion over which initiatives remain operational.

President Donald Trump, in a Fox News interview before the Super Bowl, indicated that while some beneficial USAID programs would remain, the agency’s responsibilities might be transferred to another department. He reiterated his stance on eliminating wasteful spending within USAID.

“We’re talking about hundreds of millions, even billions of dollars, it’s just a fraud,” Trump said. “It’s a big scam. Now, there’s some good money, and we can do that. I think I’d rather give it to Marco Rubio at the State Department, let him take care of the few good ones.”

Understanding the breakdown in media bias

The debate over USAID reflects broader partisan divisions. Left-leaning outlets largely defend the agency’s work, while right-leaning coverage supports deep cuts. Both sides frame facts differently, shaping public perception according to political ideology.

Understanding media bias is crucial in navigating these narratives. As this debate unfolds, discerning the full picture sometimes requires analyzing multiple sources and perspectives.

For more episodes of Bias Breakdown, click here.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

WELCOME TO BIAS BREAKDOWN.

I’M YOUR HOST KARAH RUCKER.

US-A-I-D.

A FEDERAL AGENCY GETTING “THE DOGE TREATMENT” AND A LOT OF MEDIA ATTENTION.

LARGE SUMS OF ITS SPENDING ARE BEING SCRUTINIZED BY RIGHT-LEANING NEWS OUTLETS.

THE RHETORIC FROM THE POLITICAL RIGHT – AXE THE AGENCY.

MEANWHILE LEFT-LEANING MEDIA – ARE FACT CHECKING THE SPENDING CLAIMS.

THE RHETORIC FROM THE POLITICAL LEFT – SAVE THE AGENCY.

IT’S A FAST MOVING NEWS CYCLE RIGHT NOW –

BUT WE’RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT SOME OF THE MOST IMPORTANT AND CONFLICTING TALKING POINTS COMING FROM THE LEFT AND RIGHT.

THE FACTS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT US-A-I-D.

THAT’S THE FOCUS OF TODAY’S BIAS BREAKDOWN.

LET’S SET THE TABLE WITH A CLIP FROM FACE THE NATION THAT CAPTURES THE POLITICAL DIVIDE.A REPUBLICAN SENATOR – SPEAKING ON CBS – A LEFT-LEANING NETWORK, ACCORDING TO ALL SIDES.

THE SENATOR MENTIONS A FEW EXAMPLES OF WHAT HE CALLS WASTEFUL AND DANGEROUS SPENDING.

WITH HOST MARGARET BRENNAN – PUSHING BACK AND CALLING HIS CLAIMS “FALSE.”

TAKE A LISTEN.

“USAID has been out of control. I have demanded accountability out of usaid they have refused it. As an appropriator i’ve asked them to be very clear about for example their role funding hamas and gaza. They will not tell us what they do. Now that we start to find out some of the programs usaid has been funding – think about it, sex changes in guatemala. Lgtbtq programs in serbia. This is ridiculous.

The us does not fund sex change operations or fund hamas. You know that though.

That is not true margaret. I asked the sec of state three times that we were not funding hamas and he couldn’t do it.”       

LET’S BREAK THIS DOWN.

FIRST – USAID FUNDING FOR SEX CHANGE OPERATIONS IN GUATEMALA.

BRENNAN SAYS THAT’S FALSE.

AND OTHER LEFT-LEANING OUTLETS – ALSO INCLUDING THIS IN THEIR “USAID FACT CHECK REPORTS.” WE’LL SHOW YOU A FEW EXAMPLES.

THE NEW YORK TIMES – A LEFT-LEANING OUTLET – FACT-CHECKED WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY KAROLINE LEAVITT’S CLAIM THAT A 2 MILLION DOLLAR USAID GRANT WAS GIVEN TO GUATEMALA FOR SEX CHANGES.

THE TIMES WROTE – “THIS IS EXAGGERATED”.

AND “SHE OMITTED CONTEXT OR MISSTATED KEY DETAILS IN HER DESCRIPTIONS OF 5 GRANTS.”

“A $2 million grant was awarded to Asociación Lambda, a Guatemalan group, to “deliver gender-affirming health care…” Gender-affirming care is an umbrella term that includes surgery as well as hormone therapy, counseling, hair removal and speech therapy; it is unclear how much of the $2 million, if any, specifically funded surgical interventions.”

THE WASHINGTON POST – ANOTHER LEFT-LEANING OUTLET – IN A PIECE CALLED “THE WHITE HOUSE’S WILDLY INACCURATE CLAIMS ABOUT USAID SPENDING.”

ONE CLAIM HIGHLIGHTED – “2 MILLION FOR SEX CHANGES IN GUATEMALA.”

THE POST WROTE “THIS IS MISLEADING AS IT SUGGESTS USAID ARRANGED FOR SEX CHANGES. THE THREE YEAR GRANT TO A GUATEMALA “LGBTIQ PLUS ORGANIZATION” WAS TO “STRENGTHEN TRANS-LED ORGANIZATIONS TO DELIVER GENDER-AFFIRMING HEALTH CARE.”

HERE’S A LOOK AT THE GRANT FROM THE OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT SITE FOR FEDERAL SPENDING DATA.

SHOWING THE 2 MILLION DOLLAR AWARD – 350 THOUSAND OF IT ALREADY SPENT.

IN THE DESCRIPTION “DELIVER GENDER-AFFIRMING HEALTH CARE.”

WHILE IT IS NOT ITEMIZED – TO SHOW HOW MUCH WENT SPECIFICALLY FOR SEX CHANGE SURGERIES – THE MONEY WAS GIVEN TO A GUATEMALAN GROUP THAT HELPS WITH GENDER TRANSITIONS.

ASIDE FROM THE 2 MILLION DOLLAR USAID GRANT –

THE GROUP RECEIVED TWO OTHER GOVERNMENT AWARDS WORTH OVER HALF A 

BILLION FROM THE AGENCY “INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION” – ALL DURING THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION.

SOME OTHER CONFIRMED USAID GRANTS HAVE GAINED A LOT OF ATTENTION –

INCLUDING 20 MILLION DOLLARS TO A NONPROFIT CALLED “SESAME WORKSHOP” TO PRODUCE SESAME STREET SHOWS IN IRAQ. THE SHOW BEGAN IN 2021.

THE SPENDING – JUSTIFIED ON SOME LEFT OUTLETS AND CALLED A WASTE BY THE RIGHT.

“It’s a show that helps teach values, helps teach public health, helps prevent kids from dying from disease and helps push values like collaboration, peacefulness, cooperation. In a society where the alternative is isis, extremism. And to your point, its pennies on the dollar.”

“They spent a whopping 20 million on a sesame street show in iraq, 49 million for dei scholarships in burma.”

“We could go on and on as you can see on your screen but it would take us pretty much the entire night to read through the list of wasted taxpayer dollars.”

NOW – DIGGING INTO SENATOR HAGERTY’S CLAIM THAT USAID MONEY COULD HAVE FUNDED THE TERROR GROUP HAMAS.

IN HIS INTERVIEW WITH MARGARET BRENNAN –

HAGERTY – REFERRED TO **THIS EXCHANGE HE HAD WITH BIDEN’S SECRETARY OF STATE ANTONY BLINKEN IN 2023 – TAKE A LISTEN.

“Can you guarantee that us tax payer money didn’t go to hamas to help fund this attack on oct. 7.” “so, everything we’re doing in terms of making sure that the assistance is used for purposes for which it’s designated, like i said, we have a robust system in place.”

SENATOR HAGERTY THEN POINTED TO A STATE DEPARTMENT INTERNAL ASSESSMENT FROM 2021 OBTAINED THROUGH A FOIA REQUEST.

IT STATES “Due to its overall strength and level of control over Gaza, we assess there is a high risk Hamas could potentially derive indirect, unintentional benefit from U.S. assistance to Gaza. There is less but still some risk U.S. assistance would benefit other designated groups.”

THIS DEBATE IS PLAYING OUT IN MEDIA HEADLINES TODAY.

HOW MUCH USAID MONEY HAS BENEFITED TERROR GROUPS?

RIGHT-LEANING NEWS OUTLETS LIKE FOX NEWS POINT TO A STUDY THAT FOUND “EXTREMIST GROUPS RAKED IN MILLIONS FROM USAID.”

 BUT LEFT-LEANING NEWS OUTLETS LIKE CNN – SUGGEST THE “DISMANTLING OF USAID MEANS US MONEY COULD REACH TERROR GROUPS.”

ONE SUGGESTING USAID PREVENTS TERRORISTS FROM ACCESSING FUNDS –

WHILE THE OTHER SUGGESTS ITS ALREADY HAPPENING UNDER USAID’S WATCH.

CNN WROTE – “USAID requires that programs in Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, the West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen receive “partner vetting,” in order to ensure that taxpayer funds do not end up supporting groups like Hamas. AND “these vetting efforts have ground to a halt because of the reduction in staff at USAID.”

BUT THE REPORT ALSO NOTES THE USAID OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL “has previously identified “gaps” in the scope of partner vetting.”

RIGHT-LEANING OUTLETS ARE HIGHLIGHTING THOSE “GAPS IN VETTING” IDENTIFIED BY A CONSERVATIVE THINK TANK GROUP.

WRITING “The think tank reported that among its top findings, USAID was found to have given more than $900,000 to a “Gaza-based terror charity” called Bayader Association for Environment and Development.”

“Founded in 2007, shortly after Hamas’s takeover of the Gaza Strip, Bayader operates in close cooperation with the Hamas regime. Its 2021 annual report notes ‘coordination’ and ‘meetings’ with Hamas’s Ministry of Interior” AND OTHER MINISTRIES. 

THESE CONTRASTING SENTIMENTS IN THE MEDIA OVER USAID ARE EVIDENT EVEN FURTHER.

TAKE THE CHOICE TO INTERVIEW FORMER USAID EMPLOYEES.

THIS IS SOMETHING TO BE CAUTIOUS ABOUT WHEN CONSUMING NEWS.

IT’S SOMETHING MY GRANDPA TOLD ME AND IT’S STUCK WITH ME FOR YEARS.

YOU CAN FIND AN EXPERT TO SAY ONE THING – AND ANOTHER EXPERT TO SAY THE EXACT OPPOSITE.

AND NETWORKS WILL OFTEN INTERVIEW AN EXPERT TO BUILD ONTO THEIR PREFERRED POLITICAL NARRATIVE.

THIS BEING ONE CASE.

CNN ON THE LEFT – INTERVIEWING A FORMER USAID ADMINISTRATOR WHO SAYS USAID IS CRUCIAL AND NECESSARY. 

FOX NEWS ON THE RIGHT – INTERVIEWING A USAID WHISTLEBLOWER WHO SAYS THE AGENCY IS FULL OF “TREMENDOUS WASTE.”

TAKE A LISTEN.

“These are programs that range from eradicating polio to fighting outbreaks that are occurring right now. Bird flu monitoring has already shut down. This is the unconstitutional demolition of a critical agency and its going to cost lives.” 

“There is tremendous waste within the aid industrial complex. This is well known. Its been well documented.”

“You’re a democrat, and you raised this issue at usaid. And you were punished for that, weren’t you? That’s right, i was elevated to be…during covid. I observed incredible delay and arrogance on the part of career bureaucrats”. 

HERE’S HOW THINGS STAND WITH USAID.

THE AGENCY’SWASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS HAS HAD ITS LETTERING STRIPPED FROM THE BUILDING.

THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION EVICTING  USAID AND ITS EMPLOYEES.

U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE MARCO RUBIO IS NOW THE ACTING DIRECTOR –

REVIEWING USAID ACTIVITIES.

RUBIO SAYING “HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE” CAN CONTINUE – AS OTHER FOREIGN AID PROGRAMS ARE FROZEN WHILE UNDER REVIEW.

LAST WEEK – ALL DIRECT-HIRE EMPLOYEES AT USAID WERE GOING TO BE PUT ON ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE BEFORE THE COURTS INTERVENED.

ACCORDING TO A RUBIO MEMO – HE PLANS TO KEEP FEWER THAN 300 ESSENTIAL USAID EMPLOYEES – A REDUCTION FROM 14 THOUSAND.

STAFFING DIRECTIVES HAVE BEEN PAUSED WHILE UNIONS FIGHT THE ADMINISTRATION IN COURT.

WHILE STAFFING QUESTIONS IN THE AGENCY REMAIN –

PROGRAMS DEEMED ESSENTIAL HAVE CONTINUED –

DESPITE BOSTON AND HOUSTON REPORTED FOOD DISTRIBUTIONS AT PORTS SLOWED DUE TO CONFUSION ON WHAT PROGRAMS WERE FROZEN AND WHICH ONES COULD PROCEED. 

RUBIO RE-ITERATED THERE IS A BLANKET WAIVER FOR ALL FOOD, MEDICINE, AND LIFESAVING PROGRAMS TO CONTINUE UNDER THE FEDERAL FREEZE. 

PRESIDENT TRUMP SUGGESTED IN A FOX INTERVIEW PRIOR TO THE SUPER BOWL – THE FUTURE OF USAID WILL SEE SOME OF THOSE BENEFICIAL PROGRAMS STAY –

BUT USAID RESPONSIBILITIES COULD BE MERGED WITHIN ANOTHER DEPARTMENT’S OVERSIGHT.

BUT TRUMP REITERATED USAID WASTE NEEDS TO BE CUT.

“We’re talking about hundreds of millions, even billions of dollars, it’s just a fraud. It’s a big scam. Now, there’s some good money, and we can do that through any one or a number – i think i’d rather give it to marco rubio at the state department, let him take care of the few good ones.”        

IN SUMMARY –

USAID WAS ONE OF DOGE’S FIRST TARGETS TO CUT FEDERAL SPENDING.

THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION – IS MAKING MOVES TO DRAMATICALLY SHRINK THE AGENCY – BUT SOME ISSUES OVER WHAT PROGRAMS AND WHICH STAFF STAY ARE  STILL BEING DECIDED BY A STATE DEPARTMENT REVIEW AND THE COURTS.

THEMES OF THE POLITICAL LEFT AND RIGHT ARE PLAYING OUT IN THE MEDIA.

WITH THE COVERAGE FROM LEFT-LEANING OUTLETS’ LARGELY DEFENDING USAID.

AND RIGHT-LEANING COVERAGELARGELY SUPPORTING DEEP CUTS TO THE DEPARTMENT.

FACTS ARE BEING FRAMED DIFFERENTLY DEPENDING ON AN OUTLET’S POLITICAL LEAN.

AND THAT MEANS YOU MIGHT NOT BE GETTING THE FULL PICTURE. 

HEY THANKS FOR WATCHING THE LATEST EPISODE OF BIAS BREAKDOWN. 

AT S-A-N WE’REON A MISSION TO DISSECT IMPORTANT STORIES THAT MATTER TO YOU –

BREAKING THEM DOWN IN A WAY THAT’S EASY TO UNDERSTAND –

AND EASY TO SPOT POLITICAL BIASES THAT CAN WARP THE TRUTH.

YOU CAN FIND OTHER EPISODES BY SEARCHING “BIAS BREAKDOWN” ON ANY OF YOUR FAVORITE PODCAST PLATFORMS.

AS ALWAYS – LEAVE YOUR FEEDBACK IN THE COMMENT SECTION SO WE CAN REVIEW IT AND USE IT AS WE NAVIGATE THIS BUSY NEWS CYCLE TOGETHER.

THANKS FOR WATCHING. I’LL SEE YOU NEXT TIME!