DEMOCRATIC REPRESENTATIVE ADAM SCHIFF SERVED AS THE CHAIR OF THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE. HE SHOULD KNOW WHAT A FREE PRESS MEANS.
BUT ACCORDING TO THE LATEST TWITTER FILES DUMP, THE CALIFORNIA CONGRESSMAN WANTED TWITTER TO BAN A JOURNALIST FROM THE PLATFORM FOR EXERCISING HIS FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.
INDEPENDENT JOURNALIST MATT TAIBBI PUBLISHED THE LATEST VOLUME OF THE TWITTER FILES TUESDAY NIGHT.
ONE OF THE POST HIGHLIGHTS AN EMAIL EXCHANGE BETWEEN TWITTER EMPLOYEES ABOUT A REQUEST FROM THEN CHAIRMAN SCHIFF’S OFFICE. SCHIFF WANTED TWITTER TO BAN JOURNALIST PAUL SPERRY AND OTHERS FROM THE SITE, ACCUSING THEM OF PROMOTING FALSE Q-ANON CONSPIRACIES AND HARASSMENT.
SCHIFF’S OFFICE ALSO WANTED TWITTER TO REMOVE ANY AND ALL CONTENT, QUOTES, RETWEETS AND REACTIONS TO CONTENT CONCERNING INTEL COMMITTEE STAFF MEMBERS.
TWITTER REFUSED THE REQUESTS, ALTHOUGH SPERRY WAS SUSPENDED FROM TWITTER LATER FOR OTHER VIOLATIONS. SPERRY’S ACCOUNT WAS REACTIVATED THIS WEEK AND HE IMMEDIATELY RESPONDED TO TAIBBI’S LATEST TWITTER FILES.
SPERRY SUGGESTED THE REAL REASON SCHIFF WANTED HIM OFF TWITTER WAS BECAUSE SPERRY WAS REPORTING ON THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE WHISTLEBLOWER, WHOSE REVELATIONS LED TO THE FORMER PRESIDENT’S FIRST IMPEACHMENT.
CONSERVATIVES ONLINE WERE QUICK TO LAMBAST CONGRESSMAN SCHIFF FOR APPARENTLY FORGETTING THAT U.S. JOURNALISTS, EVEN ONES HE MAY NOT LIKE, HAVE A FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT PLY THEIR TRADE.