VP nominee Walz supports national popular vote over Electoral College

Oct 9

Karah Rucker Reporter

By Karah Rucker (Reporter), Alex Delia (Producer), Jake Maslo (Video Editor)

Minnesota governor and Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz recently expressed support for abolishing the Electoral College in favor of a national popular vote. Speaking at a fundraiser hosted by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, Walz emphasized that while many share this sentiment, the likelihood of seeing such a change in the current political landscape remains slim.

Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News™

“I think all of us know the Electoral College needs to go,” Walz said. “We need a national popular vote, but that’s not the world we live in.”

The system, established by the framers of the Constitution as a compromise between electing the president by Congress or through a direct popular vote, produced controversial outcomes in recent elections.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

In both the 2000 and 2016 elections, the Electoral College awarded the presidency to candidates who lost the popular vote, raising questions about the fairness and modern relevance of the system.

Critics argue that the Electoral College allows presidential candidates to focus their campaigns on a few key battleground states, neglecting large parts of the country where outcomes are considered predictable.

Meanwhile, defenders of the system said it ensures that smaller states, which could be overlooked in a national popular vote, have a voice in presidential elections.

A significant movement has gained traction in recent years to work around the Electoral College without changing the Constitution. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is an agreement among a growing number of states to allocate their electoral votes to the candidate who wins the national popular vote, regardless of the state’s own outcome.

Currently, 17 states and the District of Columbia have signed on to the pact, but it will only go into effect once enough states have joined to represent at least 270 electoral votes, the number needed to win the presidency.

Public support for moving away from the Electoral College is strong. A Pew Research poll found that 63% of Americans favor a shift to the popular vote, though support varies significantly along party lines. Democrats are overwhelmingly in favor of the change, while Republicans are more divided on the issue, with some arguing that the Electoral College serves to balance the interests of smaller and rural states.

Since 1888, only two U.S. presidents have won the White House without securing the popular vote: George W. Bush in 2000 and Donald Trump in 2016.

Despite the increasing push for reform, political analysts caution that significant changes to the Electoral College are unlikely to happen in the near future. For now, the Electoral College remains a deeply entrenched part of U.S. elections.

Tags: 2024 Elections, Absentee Ballots, Ballots, California, Democratic Party, Democrats, Donald Trump, Early voting, Election, Electoral College, Electoral Count Act, Gavin Newsom, JD Vance, Kamala Harris, Mail-in voting, Minnesota, Republicans, Tim Walz, Voting, Voting machines, Voting Rights Act

MINNESOTA GOVERNOR AND DEMOCRATIC VICE PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE TIM WALZ SAYS HE SUPPORTS DROPPING THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE SYSTEM IN FAVOR OF A POPULAR VOTE DECISION.

AT A RECENT FUNDRAISER PUT ON BY CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM, WALZ CALLED FOR THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE TO BE ELIMINATED, STATING,

“I THINK ALL OF US KNOW THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE NEEDS TO GO… WE NEED NATIONAL POPULAR VOTE, BUT THAT’S NOT THE WORLD WE LIVE IN.”

WHILE ANY CHANGES TO THE SYSTEM SEEM UNLIKELY IN THE CURRENT POLITICAL LANDSCAPE, WALZ ISN’T ALONE. CALLS FOR CHANGE HAVE GAINED TRACTION IN RECENT YEARS.

THE U-S ELECTORAL COLLEGE SYSTEM CAN PRODUCE PRESIDENTS WHO DID NOT WIN THE POPULAR VOTE.

SOME KEY ELECTIONS, SUCH AS THOSE IN 2000 AND 2016, SAW THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE WINNER DIFFER FROM THE POPULAR VOTE.

THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE WAS ORIGINALLY CREATED BY THE FRAMERS OF THE CONSTITUTION AS A COMPROMISE BETWEEN ELECTING THE PRESIDENT BY A VOTE IN CONGRESS OR BY POPULAR VOTE. SUPPORTERS ARGUE THAT IT ENSURES ALL STATES, ESPECIALLY THOSE WITH SMALLER POPULATIONS, HAVE A VOICE IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS. BUT CRITICS SAY THE CURRENT SYSTEM ALLOWS CANDIDATES TO FOCUS THEIR EFFORTS ON JUST A FEW KEY BATTLEGROUND STATES, IGNORING LARGE PARTS OF THE COUNTRY WHERE THE OUTCOME IS SEEN AS PREDICTABLE.

IN RECENT YEARS, A NATIONAL MOVEMENT EMERGED TO WORK AROUND THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE SYSTEM.

“THE NATIONAL POPULAR VOTE INTERSTATE COMPACT” IS AN AGREEMENT AMONG A GROWING NUMBER OF STATES TO GIVE THEIR ELECTORAL VOTES TO THE CANDIDATE WHO WINS THE NATIONAL POPULAR VOTE.

SO FAR, 17 STATES AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HAVE JOINED THE PACT, BUT IT WON’T TAKE EFFECT UNTIL ENOUGH STATES SIGN ON TO CONTROL 270 ELECTORAL VOTES… THE NUMBER NEEDED TO WIN THE PRESIDENCY.

ACCORDING TO A RECENT PEW RESEARCH POLL, OVER 60% OF AMERICANS FAVOR ABANDONING THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE, THOUGH SUPPORT VARIES GREATLY ALONG PARTY LINES.

OTHER THAN DONALD TRUMP’S WIN IN 2016… THE ONLY OTHER PRESIDENT TO LOSE THE POPULAR VOTE AND WIN THE PRESIDENCY FROM THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE SINCE 1888 WAS GEORGE W. BUSH IN 2000.

FOR MORE UNBIASED UPDATES AND STRAIGHT FACTS… DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP OR VISIT SAN DOT COM.

FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS… I’M KARAH RUCKER.