Skip to main content
What in the World?

Brazil’s presidential election runoff will have global consequences

Peter Zeihan Geopolitical Strategist
Share

The former president of Brazil, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, is facing a runoff election for president against the incumbent, President Jair Bolsonaro. The winner will face difficult decisions surrounding the country’s monetary policy, devalued currency and environmental issues. As one of the largest exporters in the region, Brazil’s stability is important to countries like China, the United States and Argentina, the three largest importers of Brazilian goods. Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan discusses how any instability caused by Brazil’s presidential election runoff could have wide repercussions for its global partners.

Excerpted from Peter’s Oct. 4 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:

Brazilians will return to polls later this month to vote in a presidential runoff election between former President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, known popularly as Lula, and firebrand current President Jair Messias Bolsonaro. Runoffs aren’t usually this closely watched in Brazil, except for the fact that there has already been political violence and Bolsonaro has been campaigning on a steady message of anti-media, anti-institutional trust and claims that any election he does not win is one that has been stolen from him. That he did significantly better in the first round than many polls had predicted has given him and his supporters a shot in the arm. 

Brazil is the second largest economy in the Americas, after the United States. It is a significant exporter of industrial materials and agricultural commodities. Brazil’s constitution dates back to 1988, and the first elections it held after the 1964 military coup were in 1989, meaning Brazilian electoral traditions are only as old as Taylor Swift. We are seeing the greatest challenge to Brazil’s democratic norms and traditions since their implementation, and that is a sobering thought. It’s not so much what Bolsonaro might do, as much as what he has promised.

Everybody, Peter Zion here coming to you from where am I California? I believe it is October 3rd. Is it October 3rd? God I hope so. 

Anyway, we just got election results in from Brazil and the situation is they do a two rounder, you have to get 50% in order to avoid a runoff and no one got 50%. So we’re now going to have a runoff later this month between the front runner Lula, who is of the center left and the incumbent, Bolsanaro of the center right – although I guess calling center-left, center-right puts it in American terms, and Brazil is absolutely its own thing. 

Left and right. Let’s just work with that. Now the issue, see everyone thought it was going to be a blowout and that Lula was probably gonna get a first round win or at a minimum, just bury Bolsonaro that there was no chance of having any serious runoff. But that did not happen. Lulu only got 48%. Bolsanaro got 43%. So all of a sudden, Bolsonaro and his supporters have a very legitimate reason to think that they might win in the runoff. 

Now this is weird and problematic. Bolsanaro loves to say that the elections are rigged against him, and that any election that he’s ever lost is because of some sort of corruption. Sound familiar to anyone? 

As a result of the runoff, it’s going to be interesting, the instability is going to be very real. For those of you who are not familiar with the Brazilian situation, in many ways, it’s a little similar to the United States in the way that it’s set up. It’s a confederal to federal system where power is shared between the municipalities and the states, and then the states and the federal government. 

And there is a lot of wiggle room as to who controls what in what particular area. And in areas where local governments fail, the federal government steps in in areas where the federal government fails, sometimes localities step up. 

And the result from a legal point of view is real mishmash. So it makes it very difficult to play any sort of external approaches to looking at a political system to Brazil, because it really is its own thing. 

But there are some commonalities, most notably that polling does not seem to be all that right now in terms of accuracy. So we’ve had a number of very high profile elections and referendums across the world in the last several years, where the numbers just didn’t match what the poll said. 

This is true for both elections where Donald Trump was involved in the United States. This is true for the Colombian referendum on the FARC peace deal. This is true for Brexit. And now it is true for more than one run of elections in Brazil as well. 

Now, under normal circumstances, the concern, of course, would be that maybe Brazil is taking a page from the American book and is setting itself up for a period of extreme political acrimony and instability. 

But I would argue that’s not all that new. What I find far more concerning is that the United States, despite its many flaws, has over 200 years of jurisprudence and legal tradition, which makes it very difficult for an individual, no matter how unique, to tear things down in a single term. 

If you want to take the more conservative approach, not conservative left, right, just conservative like, you know, let’s not overreach here, you still have going back to the 1870s, with Reconstruction. That’s a lot of institutional heft to unwind. 

Brazil doesn’t have that. The Brazilian system was redesigned root and branch in the 1990s. As the military stepped back from direct governance, and bit by bit handed control back over to the people, part of that involved the currency and monetary part policy. Part of that involved the constitution. 

So we’re dealing here with a system that has had peaceful transfers of power, but in the single digits. So if we do get Lula and Bolsonaro, who are two, in my opinion, not particularly enlightened or intelligent individuals, duking it out over the future of the Brazilian state, well, then we get the second largest economy in the Western Hemisphere that suddenly falls in on itself. 

And that has implications that will reverberate throughout the region for decades to come. Because among many, many other things, Brazil is one of the world’s largest exporters of raw industrial commodities like iron ore and foodstuffs, most notably soy. And instability here, will shake out into extreme global damage in a way that the world really doesn’t need right now – what with everything that’s going on with China and Ukraine war.

Okay. So if you’re looking for something to worry about, I think this should qualify. That’s it for me. Until next time.

 

More from Peter Zeihan

Latest Commentary

We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.

The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.


Latest Opinions

In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.

The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.

Weekly Voices

Left Opinion Right Opinion
Tuesday
Left Opinion Right Opinion
Wednesday
Left Opinion Right Opinion
Thursday
Left Opinion Right Opinion
Friday
Left Opinion Right Opinion