Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Hello from home. Welcome to my home office. I haven’t been here in awhile. There’s been some really fun news out in the last few days. Specifically, I’m talking about the new deal between the United States and the United Kingdom to provide new military equipment to the Australians.
Now, this abrogates a deal that the Australians had with the French and provides the possibility of the Australians getting some nuclear powered submarines. So, I mean, it’s a very, very sexy story. It’s got submarines and it’s got nuclear propulsion. It’s got the French getting pissed off. I mean, there’s something for everybody here.
And of course, everybody in France is all up in arms and everyone in America is like, oh, we had no idea there was a deal.
And there’s a lot of stupid diplomacy going on and it’s just hot, hot, hot.
Everyone of course was looking at the wrong thing. This is not just a deal about providing Australia with some very high end submarines that’ll either be our Virginia class or based off of them.
This is a broader technological exchange in military technologies among the Australians, the United Kingdom, and the United States of which nuclear powered submarines are only one small part of it.
A far bigger piece is that the Australians will very soon have air- and sea-launched cruise missiles, some of which have a range in excess of 1500 miles. And that makes this deal all about China.
Now, for those of you who have been following me for a while, you know that I really don’t worry about the Chinese at all from a strategic point of view.
Yes, they’ve got a lot of ships in their Navy. Something like 600, 700, but only 10% of them can sail more than a thousand miles from shore. And that assumes no one’s shooting at them. So they really only have a handful of ships that can go a long distance that’s necessary to protect any sort of power. And it’s not enough ships to project power.
So you put that into the context of what’s happening here.
Right now, the United States can wipe the floor with the Chinese Navy, anytime, anywhere except in sight of the Chinese homeland. The Japanese can do it in the deep sea no problem. The Indians can do it in the Indian Ocean, but everyone else is either too far away or they’re a local power so that the Chinese can bring their air force to bear.
That means powers that actually punch well above their weight like Korea or Singapore or Taiwan can only take on the Chinese if they’re willing to suffer some very serious blows to the Homeland. And honestly that goes for the Japanese as well. So it’s really just India and the United States. Until now.
Australia is over 3000 miles away from the Chinese coast. The Chinese don’t have weapons systems that can strike in any meaningful volume at that range. I mean, if they took their entire long reach maybe, the very small handful part, and sailed it all at Darwin, they could do a lot of damage, but the Australians now have the ability to launch weapons systems from their homeland, not even using their outlying islands from their homeland and strike Malacca, which means that Australia is now one of three countries on the planet that can shatter Chinese supply lines and the Chinese political and economic system, because China is 100% dependent upon accessing raw materials the world over and accessing markets the world over, and now Australia has the capacity to interrupt shipments through Malacca, which means that tiny Australia with 26 million people now has China by the throat.
That is the biggest geopolitical development of the year to date.
-
Hurricane Helene hits US coast, Appalachia and beyond
Hurricane Helene hit Florida and Georgia overnight between Sept. 26 and 27 as a Category 4 hurricane, and accompanying storms will continue reaching deeper into the continental United States today. Dangerous flash flooding from the hurricane, known as storm surge, was some of the worst flooding that the Tampa Bay area has ever seen, and… -
Israel holds upper hand against Lebanon, Hezbollah and Iran
On Wednesday, Sept. 25, Hezbollah launched a ballistic missile at Tel Aviv in retaliation for Israel’s explosive pager attack that blew up devices across Lebanon. Although Israel’s defense systems intercepted the surface-to-surface missile, the attempted strike on Tel Aviv marked a significant escalation by Hezbollah. Since the siege on Gaza began, shortly after the Oct. 7, 2023,… -
The Sinaloa Cartel civil war
Fears of a civil war within the Sinaloa Cartel are growing as violence between competing factions within the cartel continues. The Mexican Army has dispatched around 600 elite troops to Sinaloa to help quell those fears, in addition to roughly 2,200 regular soldiers and National Guard. Watch the above video as Straight Arrow News contributor… -
New Ukrainian weapons hit Russia where it hurts
Ukrainian drones struck a major Russian ammunition depot, triggering a massive explosion that was captured on camera. According to the Ukrainian military, 2,000 tons of munitions had arrived at the depot before the attack. Over the past two years, Ukraine has significantly increased its domestic drone production, allowing it to scale up attacks on military… -
Weighing social costs vs. economic benefits on immigration
Global human migration is one of the defining elements of our current historical era, according to the United Nations. Migrants face both the incentives to leave — forced out by climate change, crime and corruption, extreme poverty or violence — and incentives for where to go, based on available job opportunities and so on. Migration…
Latest Stories
-
News headlines compared: Did Trump win by a landslide?
-
World’s first carbon capture facility powered by wind energy coming to TX
-
Conor McGregor ordered to pay $257K over sexual assault case
-
Study on link between COVID-19 and cancer causes buzz online
-
Researchers hope PigeonBot flying robot can inspire next generation of flight
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Latest Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.
The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Latest Commentary
We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.
The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Dr. Frank Luntz
Pollster and Political Analyst‘Extreme’ or ‘fake’: Swing voters weigh Trump or Harris
‘Strong’: Why some men say they’ll vote for Trump
‘Easy answer is China’: National security experts discuss gravest concerns