Skip to main content
Peter Zeihan Geopolitical Strategist
Share
Commentary

No reason to worry about China hitting back with new trade restrictions

Peter Zeihan Geopolitical Strategist
Share

The tech trade wars between the U.S. and China are heating up again. China is restricting U.S. access to two key metals — germanium and gallium — that are used to make solar panels and computer chips for mobile phones, cars and other products. China’s move is in response to the export controls the Biden administration put in place last October which prohibit Chinese companies from buying advanced chips and chip-making equipment from the U.S. without a license.

Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan explains why this particular restriction from China doesn’t worry him so much.

Excerpted from Peter’s July 7 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:

We’re continuing our conversation on China’s inability to govern itself, and this is the cherry on top of it all … China restricting the export of metals used in green tech and semiconductor tech to the United States.

If you’ve followed along for a while, you know that the US doesn’t have to worry about rare earths, but germanium and gallium don’t fall into that category. Spoiler alert – I’m not too worried about these either.

While the Chinese may dominate the production of these metals, it can be attributed to subsidies and no one else wanting to do the “dirty” work. There’s nothing uber-challenging about the process; it just requires someone that’s willing to get their hands dirty.

As the bilateral relationship with China grows more hostile by the day, knee-jerk reactions like this material export ban will do nothing but encourage Americans of all political stripes to cut ties. Ironically, China has become the biggest promoter of the US moving as fast and far away from Chinese dependency as possible.

If the Chinese really want to start a material input war, they might as well start the countdown sequence because they would be f****d.

Hey everybody, Peter Zion here coming to you, from extremely foggy Colorado. We are continuing kind of a two part one here and something that’s going on with the Chinese and their inability to Gov enter in negotiations. So the new news from the fifth of July is that the Chinese are restricting exports of a couple of materials to the United States materials that are used in green technologies and semiconductor industry, specifically germanium, and gallium. Now for those of you who’ve been following me for a while, you know that when it comes to things like rare earths, I’m really not concerned because all we have to do is kind of turn on the processing capacity that we’ve already built. And then within a few months, the Chinese supplies don’t matter at all. This doesn’t fall into that category. Gallium germanium are not rare earths. They are CO produced with other ores. So it’s not that the extraction is particularly difficult. But this is something where we would have to build up the processing capacity first, before we can get around this being a problem. I still don’t think it’s a major problem for two reasons. Number one, for people who are willing to admit something that’s becoming increasingly obvious, the bilateral relationship between the United States and China is hostile. It’s becoming more hostile by the second and the incapacity of the Chinese system to even enter into meaningful negotiations means it’s only going to get worse. Part of the issue is its chairman GE has so purged the system, that China is not even capable any longer having good faith negotiations. And even if it was capable of good faith that couldn’t handle the technical details, because Chairman Xi would have to do it personally. And they would have to implement it personally. Because he’s purged the system throughout China of anyone who is even marginally competent. So the capacity of China to even act as an actor, much less a good faith actors, pretty much fallen wave, which leaves us with things like this germanium and gallium band, because this this is like knee jerk. Grade d minus, not even freshman level, economic coercion. The Chinese said flat out that this was a hostile move designed to punish the United States and that more was coming. But when you look at what’s going on, you’ll see that it’s not something to be all that worried about. Now, germanium, gallium, the Chinese based on whose numbers you’re using produced between 50 and 80% of those two materials. And yes, the United States does have a weakness in terms of processing and access. But a few things to keep in mind. First of all, uranium is a byproduct of zinc mining and zinc refining. And zinc production globally, is pretty robust. Yes, the Chinese are the biggest player, but they’re also the biggest users. So if you were simply to add some processing capacity at a half a dozen places around the world, maybe a couple of United States would be nice. That would solve itself. Gallium is a byproduct of aluminum production, specifically, the first stop of aluminum production, where you turn bauxite into aluminum. That is also done in a number of places. The reason that the Chinese dominate the production of these two micro materials is that it’s a little dirty. And so the Chinese have just subsidize the production of that specific set. There’s nothing expensive or technologically competent, or even particularly time consuming about building replacement capacity. And so we might have some pressure for a few weeks to a few months, as people kind of sink in how serious the Chinese are or not about these bans. But replacing those materials is not particularly hard. Second, I would argue that this is a good thing that the Chinese are using a complete lowball flunky incompetent measure of intimidation, because you know, Americans are gonna blow this out of proportion. Things like the IRA in the chips act, were rare. And for a third one that is specifically about strategic materials production. And this plays right into that political drama, you’ll have Democrats and Republicans falling over each other, in order to put the money forward and put in regulations to encourage these productions within the North American system of the Chinese have really proven to be very helpful in that. And third, and most importantly, if the Chinese really are serious about an input war, oh my god, they’re fucked. Because 90% of the world’s semiconductor capable silicon comes from North freakin Carolina. And so if we’re really talking about a materials war as part of the struggle for the digital age, they’re not going to have computers, because they can’t get access to the raw materials that are necessary in mass to make the most basic technologies that make big air of run and that semiconductors. So this is not something where the Chinese have any more than a passing advantage and a couple of micro materials that are easily to produce and other places. And by doing this in this way, and this in your face wolf warrior way, for something that ultimately is easily replaced Support is probably the most effective way that I can think of, of getting the United States Past dependency on the Chinese in general, and honestly destroying the tech sector in its entirety. Now, there’s some political decisions that have to be made in the United States on both sides of the aisle, on Capitol Hill, in the White House, and on and on and on, but the United States is in the mood for this. The competition now that we’re entering political season for the next election cycle, is who can be most anti Chinese? It’s just a question of whether or not you’re going for huddling or de risking or resourcing, I mean, everyone has their own preferred term. But the bottom line for almost everyone is how to enter the dependency. And the Chinese are really been very helpful and encouraging us to move that forward. All right, that’s it. Take care

More from Peter Zeihan

Latest Commentary

We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.

The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.


Latest Opinions

In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.

The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.

Weekly Voices

Left Opinion Right Opinion
Tuesday
Left Opinion Right Opinion
Wednesday
Left Opinion Right Opinion
Thursday
Left Opinion Right Opinion
Friday
Left Opinion Right Opinion