Everybody here coming to you from Cove Bay in Barbados, it occurred to me that the Gulf of Mexico just got hit by a hurricane, and I wanted to tell you why it doesn’t really matter. Well, I mean, it does matter due to property damage, especially in an era of rising sea levels and bigger hurricanes, obviously, that has an insurance implication that hits us all, because insurance companies then have to make up for it, either by higher premiums or by charging everybody else more for insurance. So it does ripple through the system, but from an energy point of view, it doesn’t really matter. The United States is no longer simply energy independent. We are now a net exporter of over 4 million barrels per day, not of crude, of refined product, and that puts the United States into a category that no other country has ever been in terms of being an energy power. Now, the Gulf of Mexico used to be one of our major energy positions, and back when I was working at Stratfor in the aughts, part of my job was to basically chronicle how much stuff went offline, how long it would stay offline, and that gave us price increases that would last not for days or weeks, but months and even a couple of years sometimes, because it took a long time to repair the damage, to go and untangle what happened on the seabed with the pipelines. It was brutal, and we would feel it for a long time. Not anymore. One of the many weird things about the shale revolution is that all of the production sites are onshore. And unless you get so much rain that everything floods in your field, you’re talking about a time to bring them back on that if it goes off at all, is measured in days, and you can bring on a completely fresh well in weeks. So we have seen the price argument and the national security argument for energy production in the offshore Gulf of Mexico dwindle and dwindle and dwindle, and so even though the most recent hurricane just plowed through some of the best production real estate, the Gulf of Mexico has only taken off somewhere between 650 and 750,000 barrels per day, which is not that it’s an insignificant amount, but the United States, if you include things like associated production from natural gas liquids and condensate, we now produce close to 20 million barrels a day, so you’re talking about less than a 5% reduction, and the shale guys are already spinning up their drills to bring more production online to displace it, and it’ll be weeks to months before the offshore producers can even pretend to catch up. The price structure has just changed so dramatically. For natural gas, it’s actually even a little bit better. We’re talking about 750 million cubic feet per day. That is right around one to one and a half percent of U.S. natural gas production. So we’ll barely feel that outside of local markets at all. And same thing, the shale guys are going after gas wells to supplant it. So think of it this way, if you’re in the Gulf, you are now the piggy bank. Should anything go drastically wrong with U.S. shale production, the reserves in the Gulf will be there for another generation, but it’s probably going to be another generation or two before that’s relevant. All right, that’s it for me. Take care.
The impact of hurricanes on oil and energy supplies
By Straight Arrow News
Gulf hurricanes are notoriously devastating, carrying floods, storms and economic fallout deep into the interior of the continental United States, to say nothing of the coastal and island communities that they impact. But how much disruption do these hurricanes cause to oil production and energy supplies?
Watch the above video as Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan seeks to answer that question, and explores how U.S. oil and energy supplies might be impacted in the wake of a major hurricane.
Be the first to know when Peter Zeihan publishes a new commentary! Download the Straight Arrow News app and enable push notifications today!
The following is an excerpt from Peter’s Sept. 17 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:
The most recent hurricane that tore through the Gulf of Mexico has sent ripples through the insurance industry thanks to all the property damage, but what will its impact on the energy sector look like?
The U.S. has become a net exporter of refined products, moving over 4 million barrels per day. The shale revolution made this achievement possible, and in the process, helped to move most energy production onshore. So, when Hurricane Francine ripped through the Gulf, its impact on the energy sector was minimal.
Offshore production in the Gulf of Mexico only accounts for about 5% of U.S. production. To minimize the impact even further, shale producers can easily compensate for any temporary loss in offshore output. Shale is king, and offshore production just isn’t really needed… but at least future generations can tap into the Gulf reserves should they need it.
Everybody here coming to you from Cove Bay in Barbados, it occurred to me that the Gulf of Mexico just got hit by a hurricane, and I wanted to tell you why it doesn’t really matter. Well, I mean, it does matter due to property damage, especially in an era of rising sea levels and bigger hurricanes, obviously, that has an insurance implication that hits us all, because insurance companies then have to make up for it, either by higher premiums or by charging everybody else more for insurance. So it does ripple through the system, but from an energy point of view, it doesn’t really matter. The United States is no longer simply energy independent. We are now a net exporter of over 4 million barrels per day, not of crude, of refined product, and that puts the United States into a category that no other country has ever been in terms of being an energy power. Now, the Gulf of Mexico used to be one of our major energy positions, and back when I was working at Stratfor in the aughts, part of my job was to basically chronicle how much stuff went offline, how long it would stay offline, and that gave us price increases that would last not for days or weeks, but months and even a couple of years sometimes, because it took a long time to repair the damage, to go and untangle what happened on the seabed with the pipelines. It was brutal, and we would feel it for a long time. Not anymore. One of the many weird things about the shale revolution is that all of the production sites are onshore. And unless you get so much rain that everything floods in your field, you’re talking about a time to bring them back on that if it goes off at all, is measured in days, and you can bring on a completely fresh well in weeks. So we have seen the price argument and the national security argument for energy production in the offshore Gulf of Mexico dwindle and dwindle and dwindle, and so even though the most recent hurricane just plowed through some of the best production real estate, the Gulf of Mexico has only taken off somewhere between 650 and 750,000 barrels per day, which is not that it’s an insignificant amount, but the United States, if you include things like associated production from natural gas liquids and condensate, we now produce close to 20 million barrels a day, so you’re talking about less than a 5% reduction, and the shale guys are already spinning up their drills to bring more production online to displace it, and it’ll be weeks to months before the offshore producers can even pretend to catch up. The price structure has just changed so dramatically. For natural gas, it’s actually even a little bit better. We’re talking about 750 million cubic feet per day. That is right around one to one and a half percent of U.S. natural gas production. So we’ll barely feel that outside of local markets at all. And same thing, the shale guys are going after gas wells to supplant it. So think of it this way, if you’re in the Gulf, you are now the piggy bank. Should anything go drastically wrong with U.S. shale production, the reserves in the Gulf will be there for another generation, but it’s probably going to be another generation or two before that’s relevant. All right, that’s it for me. Take care.
Hurricane Helene hits US coast, Appalachia and beyond
Israel holds upper hand against Lebanon, Hezbollah and Iran
The Sinaloa Cartel civil war
New Ukrainian weapons hit Russia where it hurts
Weighing social costs vs. economic benefits on immigration
Underreported stories from each side
FEMA officials ‘view Trump supporters as domestic terrorists,’ whistleblower tells House Oversight Committee
19 sources | 0% from the left AP ImagesGaetz sent more than $10k to two women who testified in House investigation: Reports
21 sources | 0% from the right Getty ImagesLatest Stories
Florida man charged in plot to blow up New York Stock Exchange
DOJ asks judge to force Google to sell off its Chrome web browser
Ukraine says Russia fires intercontinental ballistic missile
‘Bomb cyclone’ whips US Northwest, California with intense winds and rain
NYC Mayor Adams Names Jessica Tisch as NYPD Head
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Trump poised to unleash transformative mandate
17 hrs ago Newt GingrichHow Gov. Gavin Newsom is ‘Trump-proofing’ his state
20 hrs ago Adrienne LawrenceTrump’s loyal cabinet picks to drive his policy agenda
Yesterday Ben WeingartenWhite identity politics scores another win
Yesterday Ruben Navarrette