And why do I care so much about agricultural shipments? I mean, Ukraine only has one waterfrontage, it’s got to pull into the Northwest and Romania to the southwest. Why can’t it ship stuff by land? Well, agricultural products really doesn’t matter what it is, have a very high weight and bulk to value ratio. So transport really is important from a cost point of view. And on average, as you know, for me, plus blah, blah, blah in forever, it costs about 12 times as much to ship anything by truck as it does by water. And so Odessa and KEARSON are the big blue water ports in the area has always been easier in the Russian and Ukrainian spaces to get the stuff on water wherever you can, and send it out. In this case, others another problem. There are real connections that go into the countries to Ukraine’s West, and some grain has gone there. But two problems number one, there’s not nearly enough of them and capacity is limited. So you’re talking about maybe one sis of Ukraine’s pre war grain could have made it out through the Western zones by rail. But problem number two, the rail gauge is different. So once these carriages get to the border, they either need to be on a special kind of carriage where you can adjust the rail gauge car by car at the border, or you need to switch the cargo to a new carriage in order to go into Europe. And I guess there’s a third problem to what has happened for the first year is in order to maximize that 20% They’d be going into Romania or Poland or Hungary, and then they dump their cargo and then the rail cars would come back empty to get loaded up again. That is what allows Ukraine to hit that 20% Number. The problem is Romania and Hungary and especially Poland are all green producers and exporters. And all this Ukrainian green getting dumped on the local market was pushing down the costs of local grain and forcing the poles the Hungarians and Romanians to then increase their shipments out. Well, that meant they had to pay the transport costs now as well. And it was starting to drive some local farmers out of business. So what we’ve seen in the last three months is most governments on the entire swath of European countries, that border or near Ukraine have stopped accepting Ukrainian cargo as an end destination, you can still trans ship, get it through, you can still get to a port no problem. But that means that the carriers it used to be able to do short back and forth now has to go all the way through these countries to get to another country or to get to the coast and then it takes up port space. And so that’s taking that 20% And probably cut it at least by a third, maybe as much as half. And the only solution to this that isn’t waterborne is to lay twice as many tracks or get a lot more rail cars. That’s not something you do in a few months. And so we are now looking at an environment where maybe 10% of Ukraine’s grain can out get out this year. And once the Russians actually start going after the infrastructure, especially in places like Odessa, those venues close off completely. So last year was probably the last year that Ukraine is going to be a significant producer of foodstuffs for the world. Next question.
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘System is rigged’: Black Americans on the American Dream
Nov 27 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Extremist’ or ‘phony’: Americans share who they voted for and why
Nov 21 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Extreme’ or ‘fake’: Swing voters weigh Trump or Harris
Nov 4 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Strong’: Why some men say they’ll vote for Trump
Oct 29 Dr. Frank LuntzWhy I’m concerned about Ukraine’s agriculture industry
By Straight Arrow News
The EU has announced a Ukraine grain deal after five member countries banned Ukrainian imports following protests from local farmers. The deal allows Ukraine to transit agricultural produce through EU countries but not to sell there.
Although Russia has just extended the Black Sea grain deal for two months, allowing Ukraine’s grain exports to be transported by water, Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan explains why he thinks there are more hurdles ahead for Ukraine’s agriculture industry.
Excerpted from Peter’s May 18 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:
The fourth question of the Q&A series is…why am I so worried about agriculture exports coming out of Ukraine?
Ukraine’s preferred route for its bulk wheat and maize exports has always been water — specifically via the Black Sea. Now you’re probably thinking, “Even with seaborne export routes being blocked by Russia, can’t Ukraine just send stuff by rail to neighboring countries?” Theoretically, yes, but there are a few problems.
There are two sizeable hurdles to overland transit. The first is limited rail capacity and differing infrastructure. Ukraine’s Soviet past means its rail lines are of a different gauge than most of Europe, forcing it to rely on aging legacy connectivity in Romania and Poland. And now there is a new issue on the horizon. As Ukraine started dumping more and more grain into its neighboring EU countries, the local economies took a hit, resulting in many of these countries refusing Ukrainian grain in support of their local farmers. It can still pass through, but it can’t stop there.
As Ukraine’s exports now need to go further, new infrastructure is required, and profits will get even lower. There isn’t a quick fix for this. To add insult to injury, Russia will soon target Ukrainian agricultural infrastructure — meaning last year was likely the last time Ukraine would be a significant producer of foodstuffs for the world.
And why do I care so much about agricultural shipments? I mean, Ukraine only has one waterfrontage, it’s got to pull into the Northwest and Romania to the southwest. Why can’t it ship stuff by land? Well, agricultural products really doesn’t matter what it is, have a very high weight and bulk to value ratio. So transport really is important from a cost point of view. And on average, as you know, for me, plus blah, blah, blah in forever, it costs about 12 times as much to ship anything by truck as it does by water. And so Odessa and KEARSON are the big blue water ports in the area has always been easier in the Russian and Ukrainian spaces to get the stuff on water wherever you can, and send it out. In this case, others another problem. There are real connections that go into the countries to Ukraine’s West, and some grain has gone there. But two problems number one, there’s not nearly enough of them and capacity is limited. So you’re talking about maybe one sis of Ukraine’s pre war grain could have made it out through the Western zones by rail. But problem number two, the rail gauge is different. So once these carriages get to the border, they either need to be on a special kind of carriage where you can adjust the rail gauge car by car at the border, or you need to switch the cargo to a new carriage in order to go into Europe. And I guess there’s a third problem to what has happened for the first year is in order to maximize that 20% They’d be going into Romania or Poland or Hungary, and then they dump their cargo and then the rail cars would come back empty to get loaded up again. That is what allows Ukraine to hit that 20% Number. The problem is Romania and Hungary and especially Poland are all green producers and exporters. And all this Ukrainian green getting dumped on the local market was pushing down the costs of local grain and forcing the poles the Hungarians and Romanians to then increase their shipments out. Well, that meant they had to pay the transport costs now as well. And it was starting to drive some local farmers out of business. So what we’ve seen in the last three months is most governments on the entire swath of European countries, that border or near Ukraine have stopped accepting Ukrainian cargo as an end destination, you can still trans ship, get it through, you can still get to a port no problem. But that means that the carriers it used to be able to do short back and forth now has to go all the way through these countries to get to another country or to get to the coast and then it takes up port space. And so that’s taking that 20% And probably cut it at least by a third, maybe as much as half. And the only solution to this that isn’t waterborne is to lay twice as many tracks or get a lot more rail cars. That’s not something you do in a few months. And so we are now looking at an environment where maybe 10% of Ukraine’s grain can out get out this year. And once the Russians actually start going after the infrastructure, especially in places like Odessa, those venues close off completely. So last year was probably the last year that Ukraine is going to be a significant producer of foodstuffs for the world. Next question.
Hurricane Helene hits US coast, Appalachia and beyond
Israel holds upper hand against Lebanon, Hezbollah and Iran
The Sinaloa Cartel civil war
New Ukrainian weapons hit Russia where it hurts
Weighing social costs vs. economic benefits on immigration
Underreported stories from each side
Patel FBI plans spark concern over agency independence, retribution
14 sources | 0% from the left AP ImagesJustice Department ignored some policies when seizing reporters’ phone records, watchdog finds
16 sources | 8% from the right AP ImagesLatest Stories
California aims to protect kids with social media warning labels
Macy’s activist investor may be ‘most truthful’ about retailer’s future
UN may consider removing terror label from top Syrian rebel group
Trump, Homan discuss the fate of ‘Dreamers’
Parents file lawsuit after AI companion suggested their son kill them
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Biden’s pardon of Hunter leaves questions unanswered
1 hr ago Ben WeingartenWhy Biden’s pardon of his son is justifiable
Yesterday David PakmanAs Trump plans to weaponize FBI, Biden had to pardon Hunter
Friday Dr. Rashad RicheyChina should not control American media
Friday Star Parker