Hi, everyone, Peter Zion here coming to you from just above Darkman Valley, an area that is almost never foggy, but here we are.
Considering the weather in the mood, I thought that it would be a great time to take the next in the ask Peter series, this time specifically about Scottish independence. What are my thoughts, especially in the context of Brexit? Well,
you know how I accuse people of not being very good at math, every once in a while, this is one of those situations and really on all sides. So Scotland has benefited hugely from Union in financial terms, you know, cultural it’s put that to the side, that’s a political question. No one can decide that except for the Scots themselves. But from a financial point of view, the financial transfers from London to Scotland over the last century, have been massive, especially in the last 30 years. And it’s going to become more and more important to their survival as the province of the United Kingdom, moving forward for simple demographic reasons. Now, for those of you who have travelled extensively in the United Kingdom, this is not going to be a surprise to you. But as you move north from London, the people you see become whiter, poorer, older, fatter, and unhealthier. And fact, if Scotland were to secede and become its own thing, it would be the demographically the oldest country in Europe would have the worst finances because of health care and pension costs.
And it would be the least healthy. And that alone means that the European will at let me say this very clearly never let Scotland in ever.
And that blows a hole in any of the arguments for Scottish independence in my mind, because they would lose the transfer payments, and they would be completely on their own. In a country that has to import almost all of their food and increasingly a substantial portion of their energy unless they want to go back to soft coal, the oil money from the North Sea is largely gone. So you know, maybe it made some sense for Scotland to break away in the 1980s when the oil money was flowing, and the population was younger. But now you’re left with a country that has very little in the way of manufacturing, most of the major banks are headquartered in London, even though you know, the Royal Bank of Scotland has not had a great couple of decades. And if we did have secession, the question then, of course, even if you could join the European Union is whether it would work out. There is talk, of course, in Scotland, of what happens with currencies and the current plan of the secessionist would be to continue to use the British pound until such time as they can make the full adaption to the euro. Now, it’s not so much that the Brits can stop someone from using their pound, they just won’t make policy with Scotland in mind in that scenario, it also means that this is fully a negotiated divorce kind of like the Czech Republic in the Slovak Republic seceding or the theoretical Quebec succeeding, which means they would have to take their proportion of things like the national debt. And if they’re doing that in an environment of a fixed currency that they can’t control, and they don’t have the oil money, there’s no manufacturing money. Yikes. And you were so mean here, that it which means that you’re going to be in a financial situation that B won’t touch anyway. So even if it did get the EU, they wouldn’t get into the euro, they wouldn’t be able to qualify. And then there’s the issue, of course, whether or not the Brits decide to punish them for some of these decisions. It doesn’t have to be anything. Strikingly overt. It could be just what say the Brits did. When all these protests in Hong Kong started a couple years ago, telling all the people in Hong Kong that if you want to apply for citizenship, we’ll push you to the front of the line that 300,000 People left 300,000 People leave Scotland young people that’d be enough to destroy what’s left of the economy almost overnight, and between economic likely destitution in the north and whatever’s going on in London, the South. If you’re under 30 and Scotland and you have an education, there’s really no decision to make. You’ve probably been living in London already. So you lose the diaspora. You lose basically what would be remittances. You lose population, you lose the financial transfers, you lose a stable currency, and all that so you can have fog by yourself. Economically speaking, geopolitically speaking, Scottish independence is a suicide pact. Does that mean it won’t happen? Of course not. People do dumb things all the time. I’m gonna go down there now.
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘Extremist’ or ‘phony’: Americans share who they voted for and why
Thursday Dr. Frank Luntz‘Extreme’ or ‘fake’: Swing voters weigh Trump or Harris
Nov 4 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Strong’: Why some men say they’ll vote for Trump
Oct 29 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Easy answer is China’: National security experts discuss gravest concerns
Oct 24 Dr. Frank LuntzWhy Scottish independence is never going to happen
By Straight Arrow News
In November 2022, Britain’s Supreme Court ruled that Scotland’s government cannot hold a referendum on whether or not Scotland should secede from the United Kingdom. Recent polls suggest the Scots who are against independence have a slight lead over those in favor of secession.
Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan says there’s little financial incentive for Scotland to secede. He believes Scotland greatly benefits from being part of the U.K. because the country does little manufacturing of its own, and imports almost all of its food and a substantial portion of its energy.
Excerpted from Peter’s July 4 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:
As the roman-candle-carrying-beer-drinkin’-red-white-and-blue-bald-eagles soar across the U.S. in honor of American independence, I figured we should talk about a country that will never experience that feeling… Scotland.
Beyond the cultural conversation (which I’ll leave for the Scots to duke out), Scottish independence is another situation where the math just doesn’t math. The financial transfers from London have been vital to Scotland over the past 30 years, and the importance of financial support is ever-growing based on Scotland’s demographics.
Secession means Scotland loses the diaspora, remittances, population, financial transfers and a stable currency… I don’t know who’s running the cost-benefit analysis, but is losing all that worth keeping the fog to yourself?
If that’s not convincing enough, an independent Scotland would have ZERO chance of entering the EU, which economically and geopolitically makes Scottish secession a suicide pact.
Hi, everyone, Peter Zion here coming to you from just above Darkman Valley, an area that is almost never foggy, but here we are.
Considering the weather in the mood, I thought that it would be a great time to take the next in the ask Peter series, this time specifically about Scottish independence. What are my thoughts, especially in the context of Brexit? Well,
you know how I accuse people of not being very good at math, every once in a while, this is one of those situations and really on all sides. So Scotland has benefited hugely from Union in financial terms, you know, cultural it’s put that to the side, that’s a political question. No one can decide that except for the Scots themselves. But from a financial point of view, the financial transfers from London to Scotland over the last century, have been massive, especially in the last 30 years. And it’s going to become more and more important to their survival as the province of the United Kingdom, moving forward for simple demographic reasons. Now, for those of you who have travelled extensively in the United Kingdom, this is not going to be a surprise to you. But as you move north from London, the people you see become whiter, poorer, older, fatter, and unhealthier. And fact, if Scotland were to secede and become its own thing, it would be the demographically the oldest country in Europe would have the worst finances because of health care and pension costs.
And it would be the least healthy. And that alone means that the European will at let me say this very clearly never let Scotland in ever.
And that blows a hole in any of the arguments for Scottish independence in my mind, because they would lose the transfer payments, and they would be completely on their own. In a country that has to import almost all of their food and increasingly a substantial portion of their energy unless they want to go back to soft coal, the oil money from the North Sea is largely gone. So you know, maybe it made some sense for Scotland to break away in the 1980s when the oil money was flowing, and the population was younger. But now you’re left with a country that has very little in the way of manufacturing, most of the major banks are headquartered in London, even though you know, the Royal Bank of Scotland has not had a great couple of decades. And if we did have secession, the question then, of course, even if you could join the European Union is whether it would work out. There is talk, of course, in Scotland, of what happens with currencies and the current plan of the secessionist would be to continue to use the British pound until such time as they can make the full adaption to the euro. Now, it’s not so much that the Brits can stop someone from using their pound, they just won’t make policy with Scotland in mind in that scenario, it also means that this is fully a negotiated divorce kind of like the Czech Republic in the Slovak Republic seceding or the theoretical Quebec succeeding, which means they would have to take their proportion of things like the national debt. And if they’re doing that in an environment of a fixed currency that they can’t control, and they don’t have the oil money, there’s no manufacturing money. Yikes. And you were so mean here, that it which means that you’re going to be in a financial situation that B won’t touch anyway. So even if it did get the EU, they wouldn’t get into the euro, they wouldn’t be able to qualify. And then there’s the issue, of course, whether or not the Brits decide to punish them for some of these decisions. It doesn’t have to be anything. Strikingly overt. It could be just what say the Brits did. When all these protests in Hong Kong started a couple years ago, telling all the people in Hong Kong that if you want to apply for citizenship, we’ll push you to the front of the line that 300,000 People left 300,000 People leave Scotland young people that’d be enough to destroy what’s left of the economy almost overnight, and between economic likely destitution in the north and whatever’s going on in London, the South. If you’re under 30 and Scotland and you have an education, there’s really no decision to make. You’ve probably been living in London already. So you lose the diaspora. You lose basically what would be remittances. You lose population, you lose the financial transfers, you lose a stable currency, and all that so you can have fog by yourself. Economically speaking, geopolitically speaking, Scottish independence is a suicide pact. Does that mean it won’t happen? Of course not. People do dumb things all the time. I’m gonna go down there now.
Hurricane Helene hits US coast, Appalachia and beyond
Israel holds upper hand against Lebanon, Hezbollah and Iran
The Sinaloa Cartel civil war
New Ukrainian weapons hit Russia where it hurts
Weighing social costs vs. economic benefits on immigration
Underreported stories from each side
MSNBC headline saying ‘Laken Riley’s killer never stood a chance’ sparks backlash
18 sources | 14% from the left AP ImagesLara Trump: Fears of retribution from president-elect result of ‘fearmongering’
6 sources | 0% from the right AP ImagesLatest Stories
News headlines compared: Did Trump win by a landslide?
World’s first carbon capture facility powered by wind energy coming to TX
Conor McGregor ordered to pay $257K over sexual assault case
Study on link between COVID-19 and cancer causes buzz online
Researchers hope PigeonBot flying robot can inspire next generation of flight
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Trump’s terrible judgment is to blame for Matt Gaetz drama
Yesterday Dr. Rashad RicheyDemocrats’ actions in Pennsylvania threaten democracy
Yesterday Star ParkerCelebrities are finally talking about perimenopause
Thursday Jordan ReidWhy the presidential election result wasn’t even close
Thursday Matthew Continetti