Hey everybody, Peter Zion here coming to you from the Monterey airport thunderstorms in Denver, I have delayed my departure, which means I’m stuck here for an extra four hours. And I’m going to get to know the bartender very well. But I figured I might as well record some thoughts. I had the time on the topic of waiting in the wings for other people to make a damn decision. But it was good time to talk about NATO membership and the case of Ukraine. Now, the NATO alliance is built by a series of countries that have unanimously agreed to look out for one another as a security. And that is something that has never happened in a multilateral environment before. Most security agreements that exist on the planet today and throughout human history have been at most bilateral pacts, where countries are willing to back away, it’s only article five of the NATO alliance that actually legally binds countries to look out for one another. Now, obviously, that’s the theory and practice can be somewhat different. But the issue is that this has always been the best security guarantee among countries at any point in human history. And Ukraine once in. And there was a great joke going on last year when the Ukrainians were doing a great job against the Russians like you know that NATO is seeking membership in Ukraine rather, the other way around, the conversation is again started about what might be necessary for the Ukrainians to actually join NATO. Let me start with the punch line, not this year, not next year, not the year after, not the year after that. for Ukraine to join NATO, one of the core issues has to be that you don’t have a border dispute with any of your neighbors. And that eliminates Ukraine or right off the bat. Even if the war were to end tomorrow, the Russians are certainly going to have some quibbles with the Ukrainians when it comes to where the international border is. And until that is resolved one way or another this is completely off the table. That was true for the Italians back in the immediate post World War Two environment that has been true for the Croatians and the post Yugoslav War scenarios. And that is true for the Ukrainians today. There’s the second issue that while NATO was formed to keep the Russians at arm’s length, NATO is not like giddy about the possibility of getting into a slug fest with a nuclear power. And so as long again, as we have these hostilities going on between Ukraine, and Russia, it’s not that the NATO countries are going to put their finger on the scale and try to adjust the outcome. That’s not what I’m saying at all. But they don’t want to get directly involved. And an Article Five guarantee would guarantee that NATO immediately goes into a state of general war. So if you’re Ukraine, I’m afraid you have to take what you can get and do what you can do on your own. NATO was there NATO was helping but the Article Five guarantee that is yours. I had an even if Russia were to be defeated completely tomorrow and its fangs removed, so can never launch another worry again. Only then could NATO begin the process of its 30 Odd members actually going through the accession process. And that all by itself is another five years. All right. I’ll see you in, I don’t know like 20 minutes or something.
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘A disturbing pick’: Americans debate Musk, Trump’s cabinet picks
Friday Dr. Frank Luntz‘Dysfunctional’: Americans share criticisms of Congress
Dec 27 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Instill optimism’: Americans on how future generations can succeed
Dec 20 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Have a little compassion’: Americans talk high holiday prices, anxiety
Dec 11 Dr. Frank LuntzWhy Ukraine won’t be joining NATO for many years to come
By Straight Arrow News
The NATO Summit has concluded with member nations working hard to demonstrate unity for Ukraine’s defense against Russia’s invasion. Still, tensions emerged among alliance members during the debate over what Ukraine’s path to NATO membership would look like.
As Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed his frustration with NATO’s conditions, Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan explains why Ukraine is years away from gaining acceptance into the alliance.
Excerpted from Peter’s July 13 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:
Note: This video was recorded back in June, but it helps paint a picture of what is going down at the NATO summit.
As the NATO summit in Vilnius wraps up, we’re left with a result that was more or less expected. Ukraine won’t be getting called up to the big leagues anytime soon, but it’s not all bad news for Zelensky…
Now you’re probably thinking that the main reason NATO was formed was to keep Russia (formerly the Soviet Union) at bay. While that may be true, NATO has no interest in getting into a direct conflict with Russia.
On top of that, Ukraine doesn’t quite cross off all the requirements on the list. So even if everything went perfectly at the summit, the accession process still requires unanimity…so don’t hold your breath.
Despite NATO leaving Ukraine out of the party, that doesn’t mean they won’t try to tip the scales in Ukraine’s favor; many NATO countries have already offered aid, supplies and support and that won’t be stopping anytime soon. A new wave of aid will be headed Ukraine’s way, so at least Zelensky wasn’t left completely high and dry.
Hey everybody, Peter Zion here coming to you from the Monterey airport thunderstorms in Denver, I have delayed my departure, which means I’m stuck here for an extra four hours. And I’m going to get to know the bartender very well. But I figured I might as well record some thoughts. I had the time on the topic of waiting in the wings for other people to make a damn decision. But it was good time to talk about NATO membership and the case of Ukraine. Now, the NATO alliance is built by a series of countries that have unanimously agreed to look out for one another as a security. And that is something that has never happened in a multilateral environment before. Most security agreements that exist on the planet today and throughout human history have been at most bilateral pacts, where countries are willing to back away, it’s only article five of the NATO alliance that actually legally binds countries to look out for one another. Now, obviously, that’s the theory and practice can be somewhat different. But the issue is that this has always been the best security guarantee among countries at any point in human history. And Ukraine once in. And there was a great joke going on last year when the Ukrainians were doing a great job against the Russians like you know that NATO is seeking membership in Ukraine rather, the other way around, the conversation is again started about what might be necessary for the Ukrainians to actually join NATO. Let me start with the punch line, not this year, not next year, not the year after, not the year after that. for Ukraine to join NATO, one of the core issues has to be that you don’t have a border dispute with any of your neighbors. And that eliminates Ukraine or right off the bat. Even if the war were to end tomorrow, the Russians are certainly going to have some quibbles with the Ukrainians when it comes to where the international border is. And until that is resolved one way or another this is completely off the table. That was true for the Italians back in the immediate post World War Two environment that has been true for the Croatians and the post Yugoslav War scenarios. And that is true for the Ukrainians today. There’s the second issue that while NATO was formed to keep the Russians at arm’s length, NATO is not like giddy about the possibility of getting into a slug fest with a nuclear power. And so as long again, as we have these hostilities going on between Ukraine, and Russia, it’s not that the NATO countries are going to put their finger on the scale and try to adjust the outcome. That’s not what I’m saying at all. But they don’t want to get directly involved. And an Article Five guarantee would guarantee that NATO immediately goes into a state of general war. So if you’re Ukraine, I’m afraid you have to take what you can get and do what you can do on your own. NATO was there NATO was helping but the Article Five guarantee that is yours. I had an even if Russia were to be defeated completely tomorrow and its fangs removed, so can never launch another worry again. Only then could NATO begin the process of its 30 Odd members actually going through the accession process. And that all by itself is another five years. All right. I’ll see you in, I don’t know like 20 minutes or something.
Hurricane Helene hits US coast, Appalachia and beyond
Israel holds upper hand against Lebanon, Hezbollah and Iran
The Sinaloa Cartel civil war
New Ukrainian weapons hit Russia where it hurts
Weighing social costs vs. economic benefits on immigration
Underreported stories from each side
Boebert, Burlison introduce bill to abolish the ATF
16 sources | 0% from the left Getty ImagesDenmark stresses Greenland not for sale after Trump Jr. arrives on island
23 sources | 8% from the right Getty ImagesLatest Stories
Met Police suggest classical music to stop crime
Police say Cybertruck bomber used ChatGPT to plan attack
Production underway on $40M Melania Trump documentary from Amazon
Johnny Depp, Kelly Rowland and Reba warn fans about AI scammers
Two inmates reject Biden commutations
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Mexicans should brace for Trump’s aggressive policies
11 hrs ago Ruben NavarretteTrump must confront jihadism and Islamist supremacism
12 hrs ago Ben WeingartenWhy Trump is unlikely to follow through on key economic promises
Yesterday David PakmanScott Turner is a great choice for Housing and Urban Development
Friday Star Parker