President Biden’s plummeting approval ratings are bad news for Democrats hoping to buck history and avoid big losses in the midterm elections. The fact that approximately a million voters have switched to the Republican Party in the last year is another sign of growing dissatisfaction with the Biden administration. Straight Arrow News contributor John Fortier says the president’s low job ratings plus historical election trends indicate the November midterms could be a bloodbath for the Democratic Party.
The party in control of the presidency tends to lose seats in state legislatures, the senate and statewide offices. The tendency is strongest in the institutions where the most seats are up for election, such as the House of Representatives and state legislatures, and not as strong for offices where only a small number are up for election–for example, the Senate. This tendency of the party in control of the executive branch losing seats is even seen in other countries.
Third, the losses that the president’s party suffers in the House of Representatives can be quite large. In 1894, with President Grover Cleveland in office, Democrats lost 125 seats in the House. The modern record is a loss of 63 seats by Democrats in the 2010 elections, while Barack Obama was president. And these midterm losses have frequently resulted in the change of party control of the House or Senate. In fact, since Ronald Reagan, all five presidents whose party controlled at least one house of Congress have lost a House or Senate majority at a midterm election.
Fourth, the job approval rating of the president is related to the loss of seats in Congress. The most basic point is that a president with low job approval ratings tends to lose a large number of House seats. Conversely, in the very rare occasion of a president’s party gaining seats, the president has had very high job approval ratings.
Take for example recent presidents who have suffered significant midterm losses. Ronald Reagan in 1982, Bill Clinton in 1994, George W. Bush in 2006, Barack Obama in 2010 and 2014, and Donald Trump in 2018. All saw their presidential job approval ratings in the mid to low 40% range. Each suffered losses of more than 20 seats in the House, and each saw his party lose majority control of the House.
In the two recent examples of a president’s party gaining seats in a midterm election, in 1998 and 2002, in those cases Bill Clinton and George W. Bush had job approval ratings above 60%. So what does all of this mean for the 2022 midterm election?
President Biden’s job approval rating currently sits at 40% or even slightly below. It is the lowest rating for a president at a first-term midterm election, slightly below the rating of President Trump at the same time in his presidency. If these ratings persist into the fall, history would tell us that Democrats are likely to lose seats in the House and likely the House majority as well. These ratings would likely be a negative factor for Democrats in other races, although the Senate with a small number of seats up for grabs could see the dynamics in individual races also affect the control of the majority.
What do we know about midterm elections?
This November, when Americans go to the polls, they will find many important offices on the ballot, but not the presidency. The federal elections will be for all of the members of the House of Representatives and approximately one third of senators. And states may also have their own elections for governor, other statewide offices, state legislators, and perhaps local officials and ballot questions.
These elections take place at exactly the mid-point between the previous and the next presidential election and are therefore called midterm elections. While midterm election results may vary from year to year, typically they follow certain patterns.
First, voter turnout rates. Midterm elections have lower turnout than presidential elections. Using two sources of voter turnout produced by Michael McDonald and Curtis Gans, the percentage of eligible voters turning out for a presidential election from 1972-2000 was approximately 55%. Since 2004, turnout has averaged approximately 60%. 2020 set a modern era record of nearly 67 percent of eligible voters casting ballots in a presidential election.
By contrast, midterm elections since 1974 have averaged approximately 40% of eligible voters casting ballots. But, just as our last presidential election set a modern turnout record, so did the last midterm election in 2018, with 50% of eligible voters voting.
A second characteristic of midterm elections is that the party that controls the presidency tends to lose seats in Congress. Since the 1840s, in midterm elections, the president’s party has had a net loss of seats in the House of Representatives in every election but three: 1934, 1998, and 2002. And even in those three exceptional years, the president’s party gained fewer than ten seats.
A similar tendency is seen in other offices. The party in control of the presidency tends to lose seats in state legislatures, the senate and statewide offices. The tendency is strongest in the institutions where the most seats are up for election, such as the House of Representatives and state legislatures and not as strong for offices where only a small number are up for election, for example, the Senate.
This tendency of the party in control of the executive branch losing seats is even seen in other countries.
Third, the losses that the president’s party suffers in the House of Representatives can be quite large. In 1894, with President Grover Cleveland in office, Democrats lost 125 seats in the House. The modern record is a loss of 63 seats by Democrats in the 2010 elections, while Barack Obama was president. And these midterm losses have frequently resulted in the change of party control of the House or Senate. In fact, since Ronald Reagan, all five presidents whose party controlled at least one house of Congress have lost a House or Senate majority at a midterm election.
Fourth, the job approval rating of the president is related to the loss of seats in Congress. The most basic point is that a president with low job approval ratings tends to lose a large number of House seats. Conversely, in the very rare occasion of a president’s party gaining seats, the president has had very high job approval ratings.
Take for example recent presidents who have suffered significant midterm losses. Ronald Reagan in 1982, Bill Clinton in 1994, George W. Bush in 2006, Barack Obama in 2010 and 2014, and Donald Trump in 2018. All saw their presidential job approval ratings in the mid to low 40% range. Each suffered losses of more than 20 seats in the House, and each saw his party lose majority control of the House.
In the two recent examples of a president’s party gaining seats in a midterm election, in 1998 and 2002, in those cases Bill Clinton and George W. Bush had job approval ratings above 60%.
So what does all of this mean for the 2022 midterm election?
President Biden’s job approval rating currently sits at 40% or even slightly below. It is the lowest rating for a president at a midterm election, slightly below the rating of President Trump at the same time in his presidency. If these ratings persist into the fall, history would tell us that Democrats are likely to lose seats in the House and likely the House majority as well. These ratings would likely be a negative factor for Democrats in other races, although the Senate with a small number of seats up for grabs could see the dynamics in individual races also affect the control of the majority.
Of course, we don’t know for sure if conditions might change between now and November, but the strong lesson of history is that a president with low job approval ratings will see midterm elections losses.
John Fortier
Senior Fellow, American Enterprise Institute
View Video LibraryShare
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Methane is the low-hanging fruit at COP28 climate summit
17 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
Can far-right Wilders consolidate his power in the Netherlands?
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Argentina President-elect Javier Milei is no Donald Trump
Friday
Peter Zeihan
Why I’m done with Twitter (X) … and Elon Musk
Thursday
Peter Zeihan
Biden’s low ratings signal bad news for Democrats in November
Jul 14, 2022
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
By Straight Arrow News
President Biden’s plummeting approval ratings are bad news for Democrats hoping to buck history and avoid big losses in the midterm elections. The fact that approximately a million voters have switched to the Republican Party in the last year is another sign of growing dissatisfaction with the Biden administration. Straight Arrow News contributor John Fortier says the president’s low job ratings plus historical election trends indicate the November midterms could be a bloodbath for the Democratic Party.
What do we know about midterm elections?
This November, when Americans go to the polls, they will find many important offices on the ballot, but not the presidency. The federal elections will be for all of the members of the House of Representatives and approximately one third of senators. And states may also have their own elections for governor, other statewide offices, state legislators, and perhaps local officials and ballot questions.
These elections take place at exactly the mid-point between the previous and the next presidential election and are therefore called midterm elections. While midterm election results may vary from year to year, typically they follow certain patterns.
First, voter turnout rates. Midterm elections have lower turnout than presidential elections. Using two sources of voter turnout produced by Michael McDonald and Curtis Gans, the percentage of eligible voters turning out for a presidential election from 1972-2000 was approximately 55%. Since 2004, turnout has averaged approximately 60%. 2020 set a modern era record of nearly 67 percent of eligible voters casting ballots in a presidential election.
By contrast, midterm elections since 1974 have averaged approximately 40% of eligible voters casting ballots. But, just as our last presidential election set a modern turnout record, so did the last midterm election in 2018, with 50% of eligible voters voting.
A second characteristic of midterm elections is that the party that controls the presidency tends to lose seats in Congress. Since the 1840s, in midterm elections, the president’s party has had a net loss of seats in the House of Representatives in every election but three: 1934, 1998, and 2002. And even in those three exceptional years, the president’s party gained fewer than ten seats.
A similar tendency is seen in other offices. The party in control of the presidency tends to lose seats in state legislatures, the senate and statewide offices. The tendency is strongest in the institutions where the most seats are up for election, such as the House of Representatives and state legislatures and not as strong for offices where only a small number are up for election, for example, the Senate.
This tendency of the party in control of the executive branch losing seats is even seen in other countries.
Third, the losses that the president’s party suffers in the House of Representatives can be quite large. In 1894, with President Grover Cleveland in office, Democrats lost 125 seats in the House. The modern record is a loss of 63 seats by Democrats in the 2010 elections, while Barack Obama was president. And these midterm losses have frequently resulted in the change of party control of the House or Senate. In fact, since Ronald Reagan, all five presidents whose party controlled at least one house of Congress have lost a House or Senate majority at a midterm election.
Fourth, the job approval rating of the president is related to the loss of seats in Congress. The most basic point is that a president with low job approval ratings tends to lose a large number of House seats. Conversely, in the very rare occasion of a president’s party gaining seats, the president has had very high job approval ratings.
Take for example recent presidents who have suffered significant midterm losses. Ronald Reagan in 1982, Bill Clinton in 1994, George W. Bush in 2006, Barack Obama in 2010 and 2014, and Donald Trump in 2018. All saw their presidential job approval ratings in the mid to low 40% range. Each suffered losses of more than 20 seats in the House, and each saw his party lose majority control of the House.
In the two recent examples of a president’s party gaining seats in a midterm election, in 1998 and 2002, in those cases Bill Clinton and George W. Bush had job approval ratings above 60%.
So what does all of this mean for the 2022 midterm election?
President Biden’s job approval rating currently sits at 40% or even slightly below. It is the lowest rating for a president at a midterm election, slightly below the rating of President Trump at the same time in his presidency. If these ratings persist into the fall, history would tell us that Democrats are likely to lose seats in the House and likely the House majority as well. These ratings would likely be a negative factor for Democrats in other races, although the Senate with a small number of seats up for grabs could see the dynamics in individual races also affect the control of the majority.
Of course, we don’t know for sure if conditions might change between now and November, but the strong lesson of history is that a president with low job approval ratings will see midterm elections losses.
Changing speakers isn’t actually going to help Republicans
After three weeks without a speaker and three unsuccessful attempts to secure the required votes for a new one, the U.S. House of Representatives elected a little-known Congressman from Louisiana, Rep. Mike Johnson. But was the decision to elect Rep. Johnson, who leans hard-right and pro-Trump, a wise move for the Republican Party? Straight Arrow
Nov 2
How a No Labels candidate might affect outcome of 2024 election
Amid increasing polarization in the United States and the anticipation of a rematch between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, a third-party organization is gaining momentum. The No Labels group has successfully registered 15,000 voters in the pivotal state of Arizona and is on a path to expand its presence to all 50
Sep 28
Voting reforms have minimal partisan impact on electoral turnout
As the 2024 presidential election approaches, politicians are questioning whether certain voting reforms may have impacted the 2020 presidential election. After their 2020 defeat, Republicans have made efforts to reverse an executive order issued by the Biden administration, which aimed to strengthen election accessibility. In a counter move, Democrats have reintroduced their own proposed legislation
Aug 31
Do we need new laws for AI-generated political ads?
It’s the Wild West when it comes to regulating AI-generated political advertising. As new technology explodes, many are questioning whether we need more oversight of ads made with artificial intelligence. Right now, campaign ads don’t have to disclose if they were created or manipulated by AI, and some Democratic lawmakers are hoping to change that.
Jul 20
Republican demands for changes to presidential debates warranted
The Republican National Committee (RNC) voted to leave the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) in 2022 due to what it perceived as biases against its party. Some critics of the RNC decision believe Republican candidates are simply afraid of tough questions and would rather see Fox News hosts as moderators. Straight Arrow News contributor John
Jun 15
Media Miss
Underreported stories from each side
Israel Issues Travel Alert for 80 Countries, Including UK and France
35 sources | 20% from the left
Special counsel outlines bid to show Trump motive, knowledge of plan to stay in power
13 sources | 0% from the right
AP Images
Latest Opinions
AP Images
Police update public on ‘major’ house explosion in Arlington
Watch 2:42
12 hrs ago
AP Images
Wind power poised to surpass coal; nuclear grabs international attention
Watch 1:26
13 hrs ago
@Maria_Drutska via X
Multiple fires destroy military manufacturing plants deep inside Russia
Watch :51
13 hrs ago
Getty Images
FBI interviewed priest, choir director when creating ‘anti-Catholic’ memo
Watch 1:43
14 hrs ago
Getty Images
Ukraine, low on most everything, enters ‘new phase’ of war
Watch 3:23
14 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
US officials corrupting Biden’s Israel-Hamas position
15 hrs ago
Ben Weingarten
Great journalists must be fearless in face of threats
17 hrs ago
Ruben Navarrette
GOP prediction of economic disaster under Biden never happened
Yesterday
David Pakman
Biden losing support of Black Americans, identity politics is to blame
Friday
Star Parker
Politics
FBI interviewed priest, choir director when creating ‘anti-Catholic’ memo
14 hrs ago
‘Blinking red lights everywhere’: FBI Director Wray warns of terror threats
White House warns U.S. is running out of money for Ukraine aid: The Morning Rundown, Dec. 5, 2023
Getty Images
U.S.
Police update public on ‘major’ house explosion in Arlington
12 hrs ago
Top economists say no recession likely in 2024 after predicting one for 2023
Inside Dave Chappelle’s ‘Art as Activism’ workshop he started after ‘The Closer’ controversy
AP Images
International
Multiple fires destroy military manufacturing plants deep inside Russia
13 hrs ago
Ukraine, low on most everything, enters ‘new phase’ of war
White House calls protest at Israeli restaurant in Philadelphia an act of antisemitism
@Maria_Drutska via X
Tech
Spotify’s latest round of layoffs to cut 1,500 jobs in battle to become profitable
Yesterday
Wireless-charging public road in Detroit expands range of EVs
Ex-Google CEO warns of AI threats to humanity within 5-10 years
Getty Images