Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
House progressives are detached from Senate reality. Rep. Cori Bush, a Democrat “squad” member in the House, attacked Democrat Sen. Joe Manchin for his opposition to the multi-trillion dollar Build Back Better Act.
Manchin is “anti-black, anti-child, according to Bush because of his opposition to this mega-spending welfare bill. He’s not even opposed to it; he just wants to know what’s in it before he signs off on it. If Bush wants to identify politicians hurting blacks, children, women, and immigrants, she needn’t go further than to look in the mirror.
Bush represents Missouri’s 1st Congressional district, which includes a big chunk of St. Louis. The district is 49 percent black. According to Census Reporter, median household income in the district is $50,163, compared with a U.S. average of $65,712; the poverty rate is 16.4 percent, compared with a national average of 12.3 percent; and 41 percent of households are headed by a married couple, compared with a 60 percent nationwide average. Only someone who thinks history is irrelevant would believe that plunging low-income Americans deeper into government dependency will free them from the cycle of poverty and underachievement.
The Build Back Better Act, with child care subsidies that progressives like Bush are touting as critical for women and low-income families, is effectively a rebirth of the old welfare program, Aid to Families With Dependent Children. Remember that? We had to reform it in the 90s because it devastated black families by penalizing marriage and work to qualify for welfare. According to University of Chicago economist Casey Mulligan, the child care subsidies are structured such that single parenthood will be rewarded and marriage punished. Per Mulligan, a single mother earning 75 percent of median income in her state would pay nothing for child care. But a married couple each earning 75 percent of median income would pay full-price.
Further, that “full price” will cost more than today because the bill regulates how much child care providers must be paid — “equivalent to wages for elementary educators with similar credentials and experience.” The babysitter makes what the teacher makes. Mulligan estimates this would increase the cost of child care providers by some 151 percent.
He also notes that various subsidies in the bill for Medicaid and “affordable housing” will discourage work because subsidies disappear as earned income increases. Mulligan summarizes, saying the result of all this will be “more kids will come home from a regulated child-care facility to an unmarried parent who is out of work.” The Commerce Department just reported horrible third-quarter results for the American economy, showing growth at a dismal two percent.
We’re already seeing inflation at higher rates than we’ve seen in years.
So larding our country down with trillions in ill-conceived welfare state spending spree is not what we need now, or ever.
Perhaps moderate Democrats in the Senate should awaken into reality before they allow progressives like Cori Bush to cost them their jobs in Election 2022.
-
Don’t blame Israel, and keep the pressure on Hamas
Negotiators working to achieve a permanent cease-fire in the Israel-Hamas war have experienced a roller coaster of highs and lows since the Oct. 7 attack, at times coming close to a workable deal. Complicating their work is the difficulty of establishing any long-term political and security framework that meets the needs of both the Israeli… -
Harris-Walz extreme abortion views out of step with Americans
Abortion is poised to be a central issue in the 2024 presidential election. As a senator, presidential nominee Kamala Harris was a strong advocate for abortion rights, including cosponsoring legislation that would have banned state-level restrictions like mandatory medical tests. Harris’s vice-presidential pick, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, signed a law in early 2023 safeguarding abortion… -
Democrats’ double standard when selectively building security walls
During Donald Trump’s presidency, many progressives opposed building a wall along the southern border, which was intended to prevent illegal crossings from Mexico into the United States. Recently, another “wall” was constructed around the National Democratic Convention in Chicago to manage potential pro-Palestinian protests. In the video above, Straight Arrow News contributor Star Parker argues… -
Pro-life conservatives must reject Tim Walz
Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota has a celebrated record among his constituents, and has wide-ranging support from progressives, moderates and conservatives. On the Right, however, some Republicans have argued that Walz’s positions on abortion access and transgender rights are too far Left. Watch the above video as Straight Arrow News contributor Star Parker criticizes Walz… -
Harris’ record of failure and divisiveness makes her unfit for presidency
Now that Vice President Kamala Harris is the Democratic presidential nominee, both critics and supporters are scrutinizing her record on key issues to either bolster or undermine her campaign. Immigration, crime, reproductive rights and the economy are among the key topics being analyzed. Those topics will likely continue to be debated in the three months…
Latest Opinions
-
Michigan’s first ‘I Voted’ sticker contest draws inspiration from folklore and more
-
IRS recovers $1.3B in unpaid taxes from high-income Americans
-
Rome considers timed ticket system for Trevi Fountain
-
NOAA says Vineyard Wind won’t kill sea life, issues permits for it to do just that
-
Trump campaign staffers involved in Arlington cemetery altercation identified
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.