Native children are more likely than White children to be taken from their parents and put into foster homes. The Indian Child Welfare Act, a federal law enacted in 1978, was designed to protect indigenous youth and keep them with Indian families. In a Nov. 9 hearing, the nine Supreme Court justices questioned plaintiff attorneys about whether the law violates the constitution. Straight Arrow News contributor Adrienne Lawrence argues that the SCOTUS case, Brackeen v. Haaland, could have disastrous effects not only basic child custody but tribal sovereignty altogether.
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments challenging indigenous children rights not to be separated from their people.
Basically, a White couple in Texas want to be able to adopt an indigenous child but that whole Indian Child Welfare Act prioritizes placing a child with other indigenous families. This case, Brackeen versus Haalland, may seem like a basic child custody case, but it’s far bigger than that, and it’s also pretty heinous what’s going on.
In short, the Republicans are using this case to try to gut laws protecting tribal sovereignty. It’s really just a means of gaining access to tribal lands and resources. This attack on the Indian Child Welfare Act is all about securing a boon to the fossil fuel industry. That’s the true end goal here, but the way the GOP is going about it is equally disgusting. The Republicans are looking to erode the Indian Child Welfare Act — that’s this law put into place 44 years ago — because White people couldn’t stop stealing Native kids.
From at least 1869 and until the 1960s, hundreds of thousands of indigenous children were taken from their homes and families and placed in boarding schools operated by the government and churches. State child welfare agencies made it a practice of seizing indigenous children from their homes, forcing them to assimilate to White American culture. Indian children were put in foster care systems at far higher rates than other children, and they were rarely placed in indigenous homes. As a result of these inhumane and incredibly disturbing acts of child acts, children would be severed from their Native culture, tongue, practices.
Last week, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments challenging indigenous children’s right not to be separated from their families. Basically, a white couple in Texas wants to be able to adopt an indigenous child but the Indian Child Welfare Act prioritizes placing the child with other indigenous families. The case, Brackeen versus Holland, may seem like basic child custody stuff but far more is going on here and it’s utterly heinous. In short, with the help of our conservative leaning Supreme Court, the republicans are using this case to try to gut laws protecting tribal sovereignty as a means of gaining access to Tribal lands and resources. This attack on the Indian Child Welfare Act is all about securing a boon to the fossil fuel industry. That’s the true end goal here, but how the GOP is getting to that end goal is equally disgusting. The republicans are looking to erode the Indian Child Welfare Act. This law was put into place 44 years ago because white people couldn’t stop stealing native kids. From at least 1869 and until the 1960s, hundreds of thousands of indigenous children were taken from their homes and families and placed in the boarding schools operated by the government and churches. State child welfare agencies made it a practice of seizing indigenous children from their homes and forcing them to assimilate to white American culture. Indian children were put in the foster care system at far higher rates than other children, and they rarely were placed in Indigenous homes. As a result, these inhumane and incredibly disturbing acts of child theft would sever the ties between the child and their native culture, tongue, practices. That wasn’t accidental, but intentional because anything but white culture has been unacceptable. This practice of stealing children was a slowly calculated genocide of a peoples orchestrated through the acts of colonialism. The Indian Child Welfare Act was supposed to help ameliorate some of this harm by basically giving Tribes the first right of refusal to care for an indigenous child should their parent be unable. Yet this white Texas couple clearly doesn’t care about the history and the reality of what will happen to the child they’re intent on tearing away from their people. It’s as though there aren’t other children out there that this white couple could adopt. Sure, there are people out there who will try to say “the best interest of the child” should govern here. And I completely agree but that standard is impotent here as our colonized society does not appreciate the value of a non-white race, culture and ethnicity. These things are far more valuable and beneficial to a child who derives from a people who will go extinct unless their autonomy is preserved. Let’s not pretend that exploitation and extinction of indigenous people hasn’t been the goal in this country since white settlers took to New England shores. Today indigenous peoples, including Alaskan natives, compose just two percent of the US population. It was ethnic cleansing, enslavement, force assimilation, biological warfare all at the hands of white people over the centuries that has killed an estimated ninety percent of all indigenous people in the United States. You’d think that these people have suffered enough and could simply be left alone to raise their children on what meager land they’ve been “given” from our government after it’s been stripped of resources. But no, now white America is coming again for indigenous children and any sense of sovereignty they have left. And it’s worthwhile to note that in this case, Brackeen versus Holland… the Holland is Deb Holland, the U.S. Interior Secretary who also happens to be the first Native American cabinet secretary in the history of the United States. So she’s not only defending the laws of the United States but also the right of her people to not have their children stolen from them. The GOP should be ashamed.
Adrienne Lawrence
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
More from Adrienne
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict paused, not over
Friday
Peter Zeihan
Hydrogen as clean energy source not ready for prime time
Thursday
Peter Zeihan
Railroads are more about political power than economic
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
Why Azerbaijan launched a military operation against Armenia
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
Indigenous families at risk in upcoming SCOTUS ruling
Nov 16, 2022
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
By
Native children are more likely than White children to be taken from their parents and put into foster homes. The Indian Child Welfare Act, a federal law enacted in 1978, was designed to protect indigenous youth and keep them with Indian families. In a Nov. 9 hearing, the nine Supreme Court justices questioned plaintiff attorneys about whether the law violates the constitution. Straight Arrow News contributor Adrienne Lawrence argues that the SCOTUS case, Brackeen v. Haaland, could have disastrous effects not only basic child custody but tribal sovereignty altogether.
Last week, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments challenging indigenous children’s right not to be separated from their families. Basically, a white couple in Texas wants to be able to adopt an indigenous child but the Indian Child Welfare Act prioritizes placing the child with other indigenous families. The case, Brackeen versus Holland, may seem like basic child custody stuff but far more is going on here and it’s utterly heinous. In short, with the help of our conservative leaning Supreme Court, the republicans are using this case to try to gut laws protecting tribal sovereignty as a means of gaining access to Tribal lands and resources. This attack on the Indian Child Welfare Act is all about securing a boon to the fossil fuel industry. That’s the true end goal here, but how the GOP is getting to that end goal is equally disgusting. The republicans are looking to erode the Indian Child Welfare Act. This law was put into place 44 years ago because white people couldn’t stop stealing native kids. From at least 1869 and until the 1960s, hundreds of thousands of indigenous children were taken from their homes and families and placed in the boarding schools operated by the government and churches. State child welfare agencies made it a practice of seizing indigenous children from their homes and forcing them to assimilate to white American culture. Indian children were put in the foster care system at far higher rates than other children, and they rarely were placed in Indigenous homes. As a result, these inhumane and incredibly disturbing acts of child theft would sever the ties between the child and their native culture, tongue, practices. That wasn’t accidental, but intentional because anything but white culture has been unacceptable. This practice of stealing children was a slowly calculated genocide of a peoples orchestrated through the acts of colonialism. The Indian Child Welfare Act was supposed to help ameliorate some of this harm by basically giving Tribes the first right of refusal to care for an indigenous child should their parent be unable. Yet this white Texas couple clearly doesn’t care about the history and the reality of what will happen to the child they’re intent on tearing away from their people. It’s as though there aren’t other children out there that this white couple could adopt. Sure, there are people out there who will try to say “the best interest of the child” should govern here. And I completely agree but that standard is impotent here as our colonized society does not appreciate the value of a non-white race, culture and ethnicity. These things are far more valuable and beneficial to a child who derives from a people who will go extinct unless their autonomy is preserved. Let’s not pretend that exploitation and extinction of indigenous people hasn’t been the goal in this country since white settlers took to New England shores. Today indigenous peoples, including Alaskan natives, compose just two percent of the US population. It was ethnic cleansing, enslavement, force assimilation, biological warfare all at the hands of white people over the centuries that has killed an estimated ninety percent of all indigenous people in the United States. You’d think that these people have suffered enough and could simply be left alone to raise their children on what meager land they’ve been “given” from our government after it’s been stripped of resources. But no, now white America is coming again for indigenous children and any sense of sovereignty they have left. And it’s worthwhile to note that in this case, Brackeen versus Holland… the Holland is Deb Holland, the U.S. Interior Secretary who also happens to be the first Native American cabinet secretary in the history of the United States. So she’s not only defending the laws of the United States but also the right of her people to not have their children stolen from them. The GOP should be ashamed.
California’s vital food safety ban takes aim at America’s health crisis
California’s State Senate has passed the California Food Safety Act into law, the first of its kind in the nation. This law prohibits the production, sale, or distribution of certain harmful food additives, including brominated vegetable oil, potassium bromate, propylparaben, and red dye No. 3, an additive found in products like Peeps, the marshmallow snack associated
Wednesday
Some lawmakers are just too old to effectively do their jobs
Commercial pilots face mandatory retirement at 67. Foreign Service employees at the State Department are forced to retire at 65. Why, then, don’t members of Congress face mandatory retirement after a certain age? As some senior lawmakers grapple with health issues in public and with at least 20 members of Congress aged 80 or older,
Sep 13
NYPD’s drone surveillance sparks civil rights violations
Shortly before Labor Day weekend, the New York Police Department announced its intention to deploy drones for monitoring potential disruptions at parties and similar large gatherings. Some privacy advocates have expressed concerns that this practice could potentially breach local surveillance laws. Straight Arrow News contributor Adrienne Lawrence goes on to argue that the NYPD’s recent
Sep 6
Stop human nitrogen execution experiments in Alabama
Alabama’s attorney general has requested permission from the state’s Supreme Court to execute Kenneth Eugene Smith using nitrogen-induced hypoxia, a method that involves depriving the individual of oxygen using nitrogen gas. While nitrogen hypoxia is permitted in three states, it remains untested and has not been employed previously for executions. Straight Arrow News contributor Adrienne
Aug 30
Spain’s soccer president was wrong to kiss World Cup champion
Royal Spanish Football Federation President Luis Rubiales has had to apologize for kissing Spanish player Jennifer Hermoso on the mouth during the medal ceremony after Spain won the Women’s World Cup. The kiss was widely viewed as inappropriate given the sport’s long-standing allegations of sexual misconduct by male soccer presidents and coaches against female players
Aug 23
Stories each side is underreporting
Matt Gaetz, Maria Bartiromo spar over government funding stalemate, Biden probes
18 sources | 22% from the left
Oil prices have risen. That’s making gas more expensive for US drivers and helping Russia’s war
13 sources | 10% from the right
Latest Opinions
AP News
Hollywood writers and studios reach tentative deal to end strike: The Morning Rundown, Sept. 25, 2023
Watch 5:52
1 hr ago
Current Media
Whale strandings fuel controversy: Are offshore wind farms to blame?
Watch 14:49
Yesterday
AP Images
Surging migrant crisis is overwhelming US cities from Eagle Pass, TX, to NYC
Watch 3:42
Friday
AP Images
Brightline opens first US passenger line in a century with high-speed Florida train
Watch 1:57
Friday
Reuters
Pentagon explains how government shutdown would impact defense
Watch 2:26
Friday
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Weak House Speaker McCarthy controlled by far-right colleagues
Friday
Dr. Rashad Richey
Wasteful government spending not the answer to America’s problems
Friday
Star Parker
Old age aside, it’s clear why Biden trumps Trump
Thursday
Jordan Reid
Trump’s immigration deterrence policy more humane than Biden’s
Thursday
Timothy Carney
Politics
Pentagon explains how government shutdown would impact defense
Friday
Biden admin sending $325 million in military resources to Ukraine
Senate confirms top military nominees, Tuberville says his hold will continue
Reuters
U.S.
Hollywood writers and studios reach tentative deal to end strike: The Morning Rundown, Sept. 25, 2023
1 hr ago
Surging migrant crisis is overwhelming US cities from Eagle Pass, TX, to NYC
Watchdog: US troops living in unsafe barracks with sewage, methane gas, filth
AP News
International
Authorities say China is actively training to block US assistance to Taiwan
Thursday
Railway stops operations after migrants injured as thousands hop trains to US border
Ukraine’s Zelenskyy to UN: Russia should be removed from Security Council
AP Images
Tech
Family sues Google over man’s death after he followed Maps’ directions
Thursday
Is it alive? How AI’s uncanny valley could threaten human interaction
Israel Prime Minister urges Elon Musk to stop hate speech on X
Philip Paxson via FaceBook