Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
What do Lindsey Graham and Chrissy Tiegen have in common? Very, very little – except they’re both on my mind today. Chrissy Tiegen recently came under unsurprising but still wildly demoralizing online fire because she “came out” as saying that what she underwent when she tragically lost her child two years ago was not, as she initially believed, a miscarriage, but rather an abortion. To, quote, “save her life for a baby that had absolutely no chance.”
Where does Lindsey Graham factor into this? He recently introduced a bill prohibiting abortions after 15 weeks at the federal level. Nation-wide.
Now, this bill will not pass – right now, anyway – but what this signals is devastating to me both generally, as a woman who believes in her right to her own body, and specifically, as a woman who has also lost a baby, and who would have, like Tiegen, have undergone an abortion had that option been presented to me.
I’ve discussed my ectopic pregnancy here before, but here’s what makes it pertinent to this conversation: I did not end up having an abortion, because I was misdiagnosed. I ended up having a life-threatening ruptured fallopian tube, and had to have emergency surgery to remove both the fetal tissue and part of my own reproductive organs.
So *would* I have had an abortion? Would I have removed fetal tissue with absolutely zero chance of sustained life in order to prevent severe health consequences to myself? Absolutely.
If you want to put it in a more selfless context, which I shouldn’t have to, but sure – would I have had an abortion to save my own life and prevent my two existing children from potentially growing up without their mother? Yes. And it shouldn’t be up to the state to decide just how much risk I’m willing to take with my own – and my children’s – lives. That’s my choice, if I want to risk my life or not.
Not according to Lindsey Graham. Granted, his bill includes exceptions for rape, incest, and pregnancies that threaten maternal health, but my question to Graham would be how, precisely, he defines maternal health. What risk is risk “enough”?
I’ll tell you right now, if I were – as an example – forced to carry a baby to term that had no chance of survival simply because my body would be able to physically survive the delivery, saying that my health – my mental health, and my ability to function as a caregiver for my children – would be at significant risk would be a vast understatement.
Even Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell last week distanced himself from Graham’s bill, saying “most of the members of my conference prefer that this be dealt with at the state level.” Will a 15-week ban pass on a national scale? Probably not.
But the willingness of Republican congresspeople to suggest – increasingly – that their beliefs about women’s bodies are more important than the beliefs – and health, and agency – of women themselves…that’s not going anywhere, unless we use our voices in November to tell them where they can stick their policies.
-
Americans must reject Trump to defend our democracy
At the end of the Republican National Convention, Donald Trump accepted the nomination as the GOP candidate for president. In the first part of his acceptance speech, Trump called for unity and healing, although he derailed into partisanship as he continued. Critics have debated the media’s role in handling Trump’s speech. Some argued he was…
-
It’s time for Kamala Harris to pick up the torch
Debates have continued among Democrats about whether President Joe Biden is the best candidate for the 2024 election or whether an alternative Democratic leader might be more electable. While there’s no shortage of fellow Democratic leaders to choose from, President Biden and his supporters have continued to assert that Biden can and will win as…
-
Republicans want to sabotage US education
Former President Donald Trump’s official educational policy platform reveals plans to eliminate the Department of Education and seize the financial assets and endowments of elite U.S. universities. These proposals and others have convinced some liberal critics that the true goal of Republicans is to intentionally weaken U.S. education. Watch the above video as Straight Arrow…
-
Despite poor debate performance, Biden deserves our support
President Joe Biden himself admits that he delivered a “bad” performance in the first 2024 presidential debate. About a week after what some consider to be the worst debate performance in the history of televised debates, polls indicate that more voters than ever have an unfavorable opinion of the president, believe he is too old…
-
The modern-day Republican woman has terrifying role models
In a recent New York Magazine cover story entitled, “How Did Republican Women End Up Like This,” Rebecca Traister writes about some of the more polarizing examples of female Republican leaders and their positions on abortion, the transgender movement and women in general. With Republican women set to play a major role in the November…
Latest Opinions
-
Congress still trying to figure out how to reduce wasteful military spending
-
US Navy, Air Force making waves with new weapons at RIMPAC
-
Israeli PM Netanyahu meets with Trump at Mar-a-Lago
-
Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation’s heartland
-
Beer from the sun, other solar thermal projects get government funding
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.