What do Lindsey Graham and Chrissy Teigen have in common? Very, very little – except they’re both on my mind today. Chrissy Teigen recently came under unsurprising, but still wildly demoralizing, online fire because she “came out” as saying that what she underwent when she tragically lost her child two years ago was not, as she initially believed, a miscarriage, but rather an abortion, to “save her life for a baby that had absolutely no chance.”
Where does Lindsey Graham factor into this? He recently introduced a bill prohibiting abortions after 15 weeks at the federal level. Nationwide.
Now, this bill will not pass – right now, anyway – but what this signals is devastating to me both generally, as a woman who believes in her right to her own body, and specifically, as a woman who has also lost a baby, and who would have, like Teigen, have undergone an abortion had that option been presented to me.
I’ve discussed my ectopic pregnancy here before, but here’s what makes it pertinent to this conversation: I did not end up having an abortion, because I was misdiagnosed. I ended up having a life-threatening ruptured fallopian tube, and had to have emergency surgery to remove both the fetal tissue and part of my own reproductive organs.
So would I have had an abortion? Would I have removed fetal tissue with absolutely zero chance of sustained life in order to prevent severe health consequences to myself? Absolutely.
If you want to put it in a more selfless context, which I shouldn’t have to, but sure – would I have had an abortion to save my own life and prevent my two existing children from potentially growing up without their mother? Yes. And it shouldn’t be up to the state to decide just how much risk I’m willing to take with my own – and my children’s – lives. That’s my choice, if I want to risk my life or not.
Not according to Lindsey Graham. Granted, his bill includes exceptions for rape, incest and pregnancies that threaten maternal health, but my question to Graham would be how, precisely, he defines maternal health. What risk is risk “enough”?
What do Lindsey Graham and Chrissy Tiegen have in common? Very, very little – except they’re both on my mind today. Chrissy Tiegen recently came under unsurprising but still wildly demoralizing online fire because she “came out” as saying that what she underwent when she tragically lost her child two years ago was not, as she initially believed, a miscarriage, but rather an abortion. To, quote, “save her life for a baby that had absolutely no chance.”
Where does Lindsey Graham factor into this? He recently introduced a bill prohibiting abortions after 15 weeks at the federal level. Nation-wide.
Now, this bill will not pass – right now, anyway – but what this signals is devastating to me both generally, as a woman who believes in her right to her own body, and specifically, as a woman who has also lost a baby, and who would have, like Tiegen, have undergone an abortion had that option been presented to me.
I’ve discussed my ectopic pregnancy here before, but here’s what makes it pertinent to this conversation: I did not end up having an abortion, because I was misdiagnosed. I ended up having a life-threatening ruptured fallopian tube, and had to have emergency surgery to remove both the fetal tissue and part of my own reproductive organs.
So *would* I have had an abortion? Would I have removed fetal tissue with absolutely zero chance of sustained life in order to prevent severe health consequences to myself? Absolutely.
If you want to put it in a more selfless context, which I shouldn’t have to, but sure – would I have had an abortion to save my own life and prevent my two existing children from potentially growing up without their mother? Yes. And it shouldn’t be up to the state to decide just how much risk I’m willing to take with my own – and my children’s – lives. That’s my choice, if I want to risk my life or not.
Not according to Lindsey Graham. Granted, his bill includes exceptions for rape, incest, and pregnancies that threaten maternal health, but my question to Graham would be how, precisely, he defines maternal health. What risk is risk “enough”?
I’ll tell you right now, if I were – as an example – forced to carry a baby to term that had no chance of survival simply because my body would be able to physically survive the delivery, saying that my health – my mental health, and my ability to function as a caregiver for my children – would be at significant risk would be a vast understatement.
Even Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell last week distanced himself from Graham’s bill, saying “most of the members of my conference prefer that this be dealt with at the state level.” Will a 15-week ban pass on a national scale? Probably not.
But the willingness of Republican congresspeople to suggest – increasingly – that their beliefs about women’s bodies are more important than the beliefs – and health, and agency – of women themselves…that’s not going anywhere, unless we use our voices in November to tell them where they can stick their policies.
Jordan Reid
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
More from Jordan
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
How shifting Russian targets impact global economy
23 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
What explains West African coups? Will France respond?
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Chinese housing overbuild may erode support for Xi Jinping
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
Americans debate government shutdowns, spending priorities
Wednesday
Dr. Frank Luntz
Lindsey Graham’s proposed 15-week abortion bill puts women at risk
Sep 29, 2022
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
By
Just eight weeks before the midterm elections, Senator Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., introduced a bill that would ban abortion after 15 weeks in most cases. With Democrats in control of Congress, the bill has little chance of passing and may have even given voters more incentive to turn out in November.
Straight Arrow News contributor Jordan Reid refers to American model Chrissy Teigen’s story to highlight the risks such a law would pose to women who find themselves with compromised pregnancies:
What do Lindsey Graham and Chrissy Tiegen have in common? Very, very little – except they’re both on my mind today. Chrissy Tiegen recently came under unsurprising but still wildly demoralizing online fire because she “came out” as saying that what she underwent when she tragically lost her child two years ago was not, as she initially believed, a miscarriage, but rather an abortion. To, quote, “save her life for a baby that had absolutely no chance.”
Where does Lindsey Graham factor into this? He recently introduced a bill prohibiting abortions after 15 weeks at the federal level. Nation-wide.
Now, this bill will not pass – right now, anyway – but what this signals is devastating to me both generally, as a woman who believes in her right to her own body, and specifically, as a woman who has also lost a baby, and who would have, like Tiegen, have undergone an abortion had that option been presented to me.
I’ve discussed my ectopic pregnancy here before, but here’s what makes it pertinent to this conversation: I did not end up having an abortion, because I was misdiagnosed. I ended up having a life-threatening ruptured fallopian tube, and had to have emergency surgery to remove both the fetal tissue and part of my own reproductive organs.
So *would* I have had an abortion? Would I have removed fetal tissue with absolutely zero chance of sustained life in order to prevent severe health consequences to myself? Absolutely.
If you want to put it in a more selfless context, which I shouldn’t have to, but sure – would I have had an abortion to save my own life and prevent my two existing children from potentially growing up without their mother? Yes. And it shouldn’t be up to the state to decide just how much risk I’m willing to take with my own – and my children’s – lives. That’s my choice, if I want to risk my life or not.
Not according to Lindsey Graham. Granted, his bill includes exceptions for rape, incest, and pregnancies that threaten maternal health, but my question to Graham would be how, precisely, he defines maternal health. What risk is risk “enough”?
I’ll tell you right now, if I were – as an example – forced to carry a baby to term that had no chance of survival simply because my body would be able to physically survive the delivery, saying that my health – my mental health, and my ability to function as a caregiver for my children – would be at significant risk would be a vast understatement.
Even Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell last week distanced himself from Graham’s bill, saying “most of the members of my conference prefer that this be dealt with at the state level.” Will a 15-week ban pass on a national scale? Probably not.
But the willingness of Republican congresspeople to suggest – increasingly – that their beliefs about women’s bodies are more important than the beliefs – and health, and agency – of women themselves…that’s not going anywhere, unless we use our voices in November to tell them where they can stick their policies.
Why is accused sexual predator Russell Brand getting right-wing support?
British actor Russell Brand is under investigation for sexual assault allegations, leading some conservatives, including Tucker Carlson, to support him by suggesting that his right-leaning political beliefs triggered the investigation. Social media influencer Andrew Tate, currently awaiting trial in Romania on charges of rape and human trafficking, has also expressed support for Brand. Straight Arrow
Yesterday
Old age aside, it’s clear why Biden trumps Trump
In the upcoming 2024 election, President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump lead in the polls, but both face criticism regarding their age. Biden often receives heightened attention for displaying signs of aging in public, including moments of stuttering and occasional tripping. Straight Arrow News contributor Jordan Reid wants to remind voters to steer
Sep 21
How should America respond to the latest COVID-19 surge?
The recent increase in COVID-19 cases has again brought the virus into the spotlight, reigniting discussions about vaccines, lockdowns and mask mandates. As new variants emerge and a new vaccine rollout is imminent, the familiar debates between Democrats and Republicans have resurfaced. Straight Arrow News contributor Jordan Reid looks back at America’s initial response to
Sep 14
Vivek Ramaswamy is making me nervous
Following the first Republican presidential debate, candidate Vivek Ramaswamy’s controversial viewpoints and characterizations of certain events are garnering both notoriety and support. In response to the heightened scrutiny, rival candidates are launching attacks on Ramaswamy’s campaign. Straight Arrow News contributor Jordan Reid argues Ramaswamy’s far-right, inflammatory positions have found unexpected traction with both the media
Sep 7
Biden impeachment is political distraction from Trump crimes
Republicans have explored a number of ways to impeach President Biden. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s newfound support for impeachment, however, represents a significant new shift in U.S. politics. Straight Arrow News contributor Jordan Reid argues that McCarthy’s flip comes from the need to distract American attention away from the criminal cases against former President Donald
Aug 31
Media Miss
Stories each side is underreporting
Former Loudoun schools chief guilty of retaliating against teacher
12 sources | 17% from the left
Local members of Congress weigh in on potential government shutdown
11 sources | 0% from the right
Latest Opinions
Getty Images
Biden proposes limited offshore oil and gas leases to support wind energy
Watch 2:20
18 hrs ago
The Elephant Sanctuary
California city first in nation to recognize legal rights of elephants
Watch 2:15
19 hrs ago
Getty Images
Sen. Feinstein’s death leaves Senate vacancy Gov. Newsom needs to fill
Watch 2:54
19 hrs ago
Premier of Ontario
Climate advocates, indigenous tribes protest efforts to mine $67B of minerals in Canada
Watch 2:50
19 hrs ago
Getty Images
Retailers report record $112B in lost inventory amid theft, violence
Watch 2:22
22 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Politics of lesser evils is bad for all Americans
Yesterday
Dr. Rashad Richey
How a No Labels candidate might affect outcome of 2024 election
Yesterday
John Fortier
Why is accused sexual predator Russell Brand getting right-wing support?
Yesterday
Jordan Reid
High housing mortgage costs are a risk to whole economy
Wednesday
Newt Gingrich
Politics
Sen. Feinstein’s death leaves Senate vacancy Gov. Newsom needs to fill
19 hrs ago
Members of Congress still get paid during government shutdown
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, longest serving woman senator, dies at 90
Getty Images
U.S.
California city first in nation to recognize legal rights of elephants
19 hrs ago
Elon Musk weighs in on immigration policy in visit to US-Mexico border
DHS collects migrants’ DNA for growing database, raising privacy concerns
The Elephant Sanctuary
International
Cuban officials call Molotov cocktail attack on its US embassy terrorism
Tuesday
Canadian lawmakers apologize after celebrating Ukrainian Nazi fighter
Nicaragua’s Catholic president is persecuting members of his own religion
Reuters
Tech
TikTok workers: China may have more control over user data than we think
Yesterday
Musk makes cuts to X election integrity team
Ford pauses construction on $3.5 billion EV battery plant
Getty Images