I believe I can speak for many liberals when I say that Merrick Garland’s speech to the Justice Department on January 5 was long overdue. Considering the gravity of the matter — an actual siege on our nation’s capital — it’s been more than bewildering and disappointing to hear virtually nothing from the Attorney General of the United States. Yes, we’ve seen hundreds of people be arrested, charged and sentenced for taking part in the Jan. 6 insurrection, but we’ve heard not a word about the probe from the top law enforcement official in the country.
While the January 6th commission seems to be doing a fairly bang-up job – albeit a slower one than some might prefer – Garland has been close to radio-silent on the topic, which some (myself included) interpreted as a lack of desire to engage with the issue. Sort of a “they’ll deal with it; I’m going to stay above the fray” attitude.
While we obviously can’t be sure this is what happened, it certainly seems like someone got in Garland’s ear to tell him the silent act was getting old. His speech appeared to be crafted to talk some progressives off the ledge and assure us that the DOJ was not close to being done with its investigation.
One part I found very interesting was when he pointed out that prosecutorial strategy calls for tackling the so-called “low hanging fruit” first before going after the bigger targets. It wasn’t a direct message that investigators were going after former President Trump, but it certainly seemed to be a message in that direction.
“We build investigations by laying a foundation. We resolve more straightforward cases first because they provide the evidentiary foundation for more complex cases,” Garland said.
That’s exactly what many Americans, not just liberals, wanted to hear…at least those of us who believe justice should be applied equally, no matter how rich or how powerful you are.
THANK YOU, Merrick Garland. Also: Finally.
I, along with many fellow progressives, have been borderline infuriated by the lack of action on the part of the DOJ with regards to the ongoing assault on small-d democracy. While the January 6th commission seems to be doing a fairly bang-up job – albeit a slower one than some might prefer – Garland has been close to radio-silent on the topic, which some (myself included) interpreted as a lack of desire to engage with the issue. Sort of a “they’ll deal with it; I’m going to stay above the fray” attitude.
Which I don’t personally think is the right approach to an attempted coup that is still basically…happening. The right – and especially the far-right, – are barely even trying to hide what they’re doing to ensure control over the next election. They’re altering voting districts, putting in place sympathetic officials, tightening voting rights – all in the effort to disenfranchise those who are less likely to vote for them.
So when I heard Merrick Garland’s speech to the Justice Department, I just about ran laps around my apartment in joy. Because he might not have said overtly what I’m dying to hear – that Trump and his coconspirators will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law – if you pay attention to the subtext…isn’t that kinda what he’s saying?
First, he addresses public frustration with the “small fry” arrests – how it seems like the DOJ is only aiming for the lowest hanging fruit, rather than the big fish (sorry, mixed metaphor) who masterminded the whole thing.
“A necessary consequence of the prosecutorial approach of charging less serious offenses first is that courts impose shorter sentences before they impose longer ones.”
“We build investigations by laying a foundation. We resolve more straightforward cases first because they provide the evidentiary foundation for more complex cases.”
He sends what, to my ears, sounds like a warning to anyone who might be considering additional acts of violence, and lays out the difference between First Amendment speech (protected) and threats of violence against another person (not):
“The Justice Department will continue to investigate violence and illegal threats of violence, disrupt that violence before it occurs, and hold perpetrators accountable. We have marshaled the resources of the department to address the rising violence and criminal threats of violence against election workers, against flight crews, against school personnel, against journalists, against members of Congress, and against federal agents, prosecutors, and judges. Peacefully expressing a view or ideology — no matter how extreme — is protected by the First Amendment. But illegally threatening to harm or kill another person is not. There is no First Amendment right to unlawfully threaten to harm or kill someone.”
I have to wonder, since this speech was on January 5, whether he was speaking to any credible threats made in relation to January 6, or whether he was speaking to insurrection and violence more generally – but I’ll take either and both for the win.
Garland also directly encourages cooperation with investigators, underscoring why this cooperation isn’t just patriotic – which should be enough, but apparently not #ahem Mark Meadows #ahem – but the better choice even on a selfish level.
“In charging the perpetrators, we have followed well-worn prosecutorial practices. Those who assaulted officers or damaged the Capitol face greater charges. Those who conspired with others to obstruct the vote count also face greater charges. Those who did not undertake such conduct have been charged with lesser offenses — particularly if they accepted their responsibility early and cooperated with the investigation.”
In short, Garland is appealing to the baser sensibilities – the fundamental desire of most people who aren’t Steve Bannon to not want to go to jail. Way to take a page out of the right-wing playbook, Mer.
(I do actually mean that as a compliment – people are, unfortunately, way more likely to heed threats to their personal autonomy than they are to some abstract sense of “what’s right and wrong.”)
Most uplifting, perhaps, were his comments on the scope of the investigation, and his assurance that it doesn’t stop at the yahoo who stole Nancy Pelosi’s lectern.
“The Justice Department remains committed to holding all January 6th perpetrators, at any level, accountable under law — whether they were present that day or were otherwise criminally responsible for the assault on our democracy. The central norm is that, in our criminal investigations, there cannot be different rules depending on one’s political party or affiliation. There cannot be different rules for friends and foes. And there cannot be different rules for the powerful and the powerless.”
I mean, he’s not talking about Trump…but isn’t he? I really enjoy Merrick Garland’s version of throwing shade. It’s very satisfying.
And finally, his most heartening statement in that hopefully-prescient speech:
“The actions we have taken thus far will not be our last.”
Jordan Reid
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
More from Jordan
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict paused, not over
Friday
Peter Zeihan
Hydrogen as clean energy source not ready for prime time
Thursday
Peter Zeihan
Railroads are more about political power than economic
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
Why Azerbaijan launched a military operation against Armenia
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
Worth the wait: Trump and his right-wingers may pay the price for January 6
Jan 13, 2022
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
By
I believe I can speak for many liberals when I say that Merrick Garland’s speech to the Justice Department on January 5 was long overdue. Considering the gravity of the matter — an actual siege on our nation’s capital — it’s been more than bewildering and disappointing to hear virtually nothing from the Attorney General of the United States. Yes, we’ve seen hundreds of people be arrested, charged and sentenced for taking part in the Jan. 6 insurrection, but we’ve heard not a word about the probe from the top law enforcement official in the country.
While we obviously can’t be sure this is what happened, it certainly seems like someone got in Garland’s ear to tell him the silent act was getting old. His speech appeared to be crafted to talk some progressives off the ledge and assure us that the DOJ was not close to being done with its investigation.
One part I found very interesting was when he pointed out that prosecutorial strategy calls for tackling the so-called “low hanging fruit” first before going after the bigger targets. It wasn’t a direct message that investigators were going after former President Trump, but it certainly seemed to be a message in that direction.
“We build investigations by laying a foundation. We resolve more straightforward cases first because they provide the evidentiary foundation for more complex cases,” Garland said.
That’s exactly what many Americans, not just liberals, wanted to hear…at least those of us who believe justice should be applied equally, no matter how rich or how powerful you are.
THANK YOU, Merrick Garland. Also: Finally.
I, along with many fellow progressives, have been borderline infuriated by the lack of action on the part of the DOJ with regards to the ongoing assault on small-d democracy. While the January 6th commission seems to be doing a fairly bang-up job – albeit a slower one than some might prefer – Garland has been close to radio-silent on the topic, which some (myself included) interpreted as a lack of desire to engage with the issue. Sort of a “they’ll deal with it; I’m going to stay above the fray” attitude.
Which I don’t personally think is the right approach to an attempted coup that is still basically…happening. The right – and especially the far-right, – are barely even trying to hide what they’re doing to ensure control over the next election. They’re altering voting districts, putting in place sympathetic officials, tightening voting rights – all in the effort to disenfranchise those who are less likely to vote for them.
So when I heard Merrick Garland’s speech to the Justice Department, I just about ran laps around my apartment in joy. Because he might not have said overtly what I’m dying to hear – that Trump and his coconspirators will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law – if you pay attention to the subtext…isn’t that kinda what he’s saying?
First, he addresses public frustration with the “small fry” arrests – how it seems like the DOJ is only aiming for the lowest hanging fruit, rather than the big fish (sorry, mixed metaphor) who masterminded the whole thing.
He sends what, to my ears, sounds like a warning to anyone who might be considering additional acts of violence, and lays out the difference between First Amendment speech (protected) and threats of violence against another person (not):
I have to wonder, since this speech was on January 5, whether he was speaking to any credible threats made in relation to January 6, or whether he was speaking to insurrection and violence more generally – but I’ll take either and both for the win.
Garland also directly encourages cooperation with investigators, underscoring why this cooperation isn’t just patriotic – which should be enough, but apparently not #ahem Mark Meadows #ahem – but the better choice even on a selfish level.
In short, Garland is appealing to the baser sensibilities – the fundamental desire of most people who aren’t Steve Bannon to not want to go to jail. Way to take a page out of the right-wing playbook, Mer.
(I do actually mean that as a compliment – people are, unfortunately, way more likely to heed threats to their personal autonomy than they are to some abstract sense of “what’s right and wrong.”)
Most uplifting, perhaps, were his comments on the scope of the investigation, and his assurance that it doesn’t stop at the yahoo who stole Nancy Pelosi’s lectern.
I mean, he’s not talking about Trump…but isn’t he? I really enjoy Merrick Garland’s version of throwing shade. It’s very satisfying.
And finally, his most heartening statement in that hopefully-prescient speech:
…Gonna hold you to that one, sir.
Old age aside, it’s clear why Biden trumps Trump
In the upcoming 2024 election, President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump lead in the polls, but both face criticism regarding their age. Biden often receives heightened attention for displaying signs of aging in public, including moments of stuttering and occasional tripping. Straight Arrow News contributor Jordan Reid wants to remind voters to steer
Thursday
How should America respond to the latest COVID-19 surge?
The recent increase in COVID-19 cases has again brought the virus into the spotlight, reigniting discussions about vaccines, lockdowns and mask mandates. As new variants emerge and a new vaccine rollout is imminent, the familiar debates between Democrats and Republicans have resurfaced. Straight Arrow News contributor Jordan Reid looks back at America’s initial response to
Sep 14
Vivek Ramaswamy is making me nervous
Following the first Republican presidential debate, candidate Vivek Ramaswamy’s controversial viewpoints and characterizations of certain events are garnering both notoriety and support. In response to the heightened scrutiny, rival candidates are launching attacks on Ramaswamy’s campaign. Straight Arrow News contributor Jordan Reid argues Ramaswamy’s far-right, inflammatory positions have found unexpected traction with both the media
Sep 7
Biden impeachment is political distraction from Trump crimes
Republicans have explored a number of ways to impeach President Biden. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s newfound support for impeachment, however, represents a significant new shift in U.S. politics. Straight Arrow News contributor Jordan Reid argues that McCarthy’s flip comes from the need to distract American attention away from the criminal cases against former President Donald
Aug 31
DeSantis’ awkward personality overshadows his policies
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) aspires to become the Republican candidate for U.S. president but is often accused of being awkward and anti-social. His own staff is concerned that this will hamstring campaign efforts and fundraising, while some supporters say they actually see themselves in his awkwardness. Straight Arrow News contributor Jordan Reid argues that
Aug 24
Stories each side is underreporting
Matt Gaetz, Maria Bartiromo spar over government funding stalemate, Biden probes
18 sources | 22% from the left
Oil prices have risen. That’s making gas more expensive for US drivers and helping Russia’s war
13 sources | 10% from the right
Latest Opinions
AP News
Hollywood writers and studios reach tentative deal to end strike: The Morning Rundown, Sept. 25, 2023
Watch 5:52
1 hr ago
Current Media
Whale strandings fuel controversy: Are offshore wind farms to blame?
Watch 14:49
Yesterday
AP Images
Surging migrant crisis is overwhelming US cities from Eagle Pass, TX, to NYC
Watch 3:42
Friday
AP Images
Brightline opens first US passenger line in a century with high-speed Florida train
Watch 1:57
Friday
Reuters
Pentagon explains how government shutdown would impact defense
Watch 2:26
Friday
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Weak House Speaker McCarthy controlled by far-right colleagues
Friday
Dr. Rashad Richey
Wasteful government spending not the answer to America’s problems
Friday
Star Parker
Old age aside, it’s clear why Biden trumps Trump
Thursday
Jordan Reid
Trump’s immigration deterrence policy more humane than Biden’s
Thursday
Timothy Carney
Politics
Pentagon explains how government shutdown would impact defense
Friday
Biden admin sending $325 million in military resources to Ukraine
Senate confirms top military nominees, Tuberville says his hold will continue
Reuters
U.S.
Hollywood writers and studios reach tentative deal to end strike: The Morning Rundown, Sept. 25, 2023
1 hr ago
Surging migrant crisis is overwhelming US cities from Eagle Pass, TX, to NYC
Watchdog: US troops living in unsafe barracks with sewage, methane gas, filth
AP News
International
Authorities say China is actively training to block US assistance to Taiwan
Thursday
Railway stops operations after migrants injured as thousands hop trains to US border
Ukraine’s Zelenskyy to UN: Russia should be removed from Security Council
AP Images
Tech
Family sues Google over man’s death after he followed Maps’ directions
Thursday
Is it alive? How AI’s uncanny valley could threaten human interaction
Israel Prime Minister urges Elon Musk to stop hate speech on X
Philip Paxson via FaceBook