In both Gaza and Ukraine, we’re seeing how dramatically different President Donald Trump is going to be, not just from President Biden, but frankly, from virtually all previous presidents in the post world war two era. President Trump doesn’t rely on the so called foreign policy establishment. He doesn’t rely on the traditional indirect patterns of diplomacy. He pointed out one time that he doesn’t actually need the ambassador to deliver a message to a head of state. If he wants to deliver a message, he picks up the phone and calls him, and he knows virtually all these people by name, because he was president for four years and got to know them all. In the case of
Ukraine, what makes him very different is he wants to get to peace. He’s very worried about the danger of nuclear war. He’s also very worried that Putin not believe he can go around and randomly attack people. He does not believe it is possible for Ukraine to recapture most of the lost ground, because there’s just simply not a strong enough military in Ukraine, and he’s not prepared in any way to use American forces against Russian forces in Ukraine. So I think what you’ll see happening is a series of meetings in which, ultimately there is probably some kind of compromise in place, probably with an understanding that Ukraine is a sovereign country, that it can have defensive alliances, and that it can rebuild its military. There will certainly be very tough negotiations about who’s going to pay to rebuild all the damage that the Russians have done, and there may be some adjustments along various lines to make the Ukrainians a little more comfortable. But the objective reality is, unless Europe or the United States, are prepared to send troops and engage in a really big war. You’re not going to be able to push the Russians back very far, and Ukrainians are more likely to run out of fighting people than Russia is. Russia is a much bigger country. It has an ability to mobilize a lot more resources,
which doesn’t mean that we should in any way regard what Putin did as acceptable or appropriate. And I think President Trump’s probably right that had he been president, it would never have happened. So he’s just trying to stop the killing and get back to a more peaceful world. In Gaza, he has broken with all of the deals of the last 80 years, he said, Look, having people who support Hamas live next to Israel is going to guarantee another massacre, another war. It’s just not going to work. And so he’s come up with a very bold proposal to move everybody out, not necessarily as the final agreement, although he did say he was prepared for the United States to take a major role. But he’s also saying to Egypt and Jordan and others, if you don’t like this answer, tell me what your answer is. But we’re not going to go on with the kind of war and bitterness with that. It’s an amazing tour by a remarkable man, and we have to keep tuned to see what he does next. Do.
On Gaza and Ukraine, Trump’s answers are better than none
By Straight Arrow News
America’s allies in Europe expressed concerns after U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth ruled out the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO and broadcasted an eagerness to end the Russia-Ukraine war on terms that they say favor Moscow. NATO allies, including France and the United Kingdom, rejected Hegseth’s position, asserting that Ukraine must and will join NATO, and convened an emergency summit in response to the Trump administration’s rhetoric. One day later, on Feb. 18, President Donald Trump blamed Ukraine for being invaded by Russia, further dividing the U.S. from its allies.
Trump also recently suggested that the U.S. should “just clean out” Gaza and forcibly displace surviving Palestinians to other countries, remarks which were met with unanimous condemnation even from close U.S. allies, with the lone exception of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who embraced the idea.
Watch the above video as Straight Arrow News contributor Newt Gingrich reviews President Trump’s positions on Ukraine and Gaza and argues that Trump’s answers for some of the world’s toughest conflicts are better than continuing to fight without any answers at all.
Be the first to know when Newt Gingrich publishes a new opinion every Wednesday!
Download the Straight Arrow News app and follow Newt to receive push notifications.
The following is an excerpt from the above video:
[On] Ukraine, what makes [Trump] very different is he wants to get to peace. He’s very worried about the danger of nuclear war. He’s also very worried that Putin not believe he can go around and randomly attack people. He does not believe it is possible for Ukraine to recapture most of the lost ground, because there’s just simply not a strong enough military in Ukraine, and he’s not prepared in any way to use American forces against Russian forces in Ukraine.
So I think what you’ll see happening is a series of meetings in which, ultimately, there is probably some kind of compromise in place, probably with an understanding that Ukraine is a sovereign country, that it can have defensive alliances, and that it can rebuild its military. There will certainly be very tough negotiations about who’s going to pay to rebuild all the damage that the Russians have done, and there may be some adjustments along various lines to make the Ukrainians a little more comfortable. But the objective reality is, unless Europe or the United States are prepared to send troops and engage in a really big war, you’re not going to be able to push the Russians back very far, and Ukrainians are more likely to run out of fighting people than Russia is. Russia is a much bigger country. It has an ability to mobilize a lot more resources, which doesn’t mean that we should in any way regard what Putin did as acceptable or appropriate.
In both Gaza and Ukraine, we’re seeing how dramatically different President Donald Trump is going to be, not just from President Biden, but frankly, from virtually all previous presidents in the post world war two era. President Trump doesn’t rely on the so called foreign policy establishment. He doesn’t rely on the traditional indirect patterns of diplomacy. He pointed out one time that he doesn’t actually need the ambassador to deliver a message to a head of state. If he wants to deliver a message, he picks up the phone and calls him, and he knows virtually all these people by name, because he was president for four years and got to know them all. In the case of
Ukraine, what makes him very different is he wants to get to peace. He’s very worried about the danger of nuclear war. He’s also very worried that Putin not believe he can go around and randomly attack people. He does not believe it is possible for Ukraine to recapture most of the lost ground, because there’s just simply not a strong enough military in Ukraine, and he’s not prepared in any way to use American forces against Russian forces in Ukraine. So I think what you’ll see happening is a series of meetings in which, ultimately there is probably some kind of compromise in place, probably with an understanding that Ukraine is a sovereign country, that it can have defensive alliances, and that it can rebuild its military. There will certainly be very tough negotiations about who’s going to pay to rebuild all the damage that the Russians have done, and there may be some adjustments along various lines to make the Ukrainians a little more comfortable. But the objective reality is, unless Europe or the United States, are prepared to send troops and engage in a really big war. You’re not going to be able to push the Russians back very far, and Ukrainians are more likely to run out of fighting people than Russia is. Russia is a much bigger country. It has an ability to mobilize a lot more resources,
which doesn’t mean that we should in any way regard what Putin did as acceptable or appropriate. And I think President Trump’s probably right that had he been president, it would never have happened. So he’s just trying to stop the killing and get back to a more peaceful world. In Gaza, he has broken with all of the deals of the last 80 years, he said, Look, having people who support Hamas live next to Israel is going to guarantee another massacre, another war. It’s just not going to work. And so he’s come up with a very bold proposal to move everybody out, not necessarily as the final agreement, although he did say he was prepared for the United States to take a major role. But he’s also saying to Egypt and Jordan and others, if you don’t like this answer, tell me what your answer is. But we’re not going to go on with the kind of war and bitterness with that. It’s an amazing tour by a remarkable man, and we have to keep tuned to see what he does next. Do.
My White House visit left me more hopeful than ever
Trump moves at breakneck speed to enact bold changes
Breaking down Trump’s incredible inaugural address
Pete Hegseth is the right man to lead Department of Defense
Underreported stories from each side
Trump invites ‘Governor Trudeau’ to watch 4 Nations hockey final with him
14 sources | 17% from the left Getty ImagesNew poll says 27% of Canadians view the United States as an ‘enemy’ country
27 sources | 11% from the right Getty ImagesLatest Stories
Google’s ad tools enable marketers to target sensitive user data: Report
US response to ICBM from North Korea would be ‘overwhelming’
Republican bill could lead to higher overdraft fees
Trump says federal government should retake control of DC government
LA mayor says overseas trip prior to Palisades wildfire ‘was a mistake’
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Trump’s baby-faced bulldozers just getting started
2 hrs ago Matthew ContinettiLoss of USAID makes America and the world less safe
3 hrs ago Jordan ReidOn Gaza and Ukraine, Trump’s answers are better than none
Yesterday Newt GingrichFCC investigation into Comcast a blatant attack on free speech
Yesterday Adrienne Lawrence