Ever since justice, Sonia Sotomayor joined the US Supreme Court, she has been a powerful voice for justice, but now that Donald Trump is heading back to the White House, well, there are some out there who seem to be pressuring Sotomayor to retire so President Biden can appoint a replacement before leaving office. Let’s be real here, people, this pressure is sexist ablest and downright foolish Given the timing, Democrats really need to leave that woman alone and focus on their own problems first. Although, as you know, I am not a fan of lifetime tenure for judges or justices. For that matter, Justice Sotomayor should be allowed to serve as long as she wants just like her male counterparts, the woman isn’t even that old, really. She’s 70, if it weren’t for Amal George Clooney be in her dating pool, and Sotomayor is younger than justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, plus her soul is intact, and I hear that that enhances youth, yet no one’s pressuring the men to retire. Historically, justices have served well into their 80s and beyond. Justice John Paul Stevens, for example, retired at 90, and Chief Justice William Rehnquist, well, he served until he died at 80. The idea that sotomayors health should end her career, while that’s also unfounded, she has had type one diabetes since she was a child, and sotomayors managed it without any issue in her 15 years on the court, Holly Berry has the same thing, and the woman still does most of her own stunts. So get real here, this pressure to what ask Sotomayor to step down over diabetes that’s rooted in ableism, plain and simple, her diabetes do not prevent her from doing her job, just as it does not stop millions of Americans from doing theirs and coming at. Sotomayor simply confirms that there is a double standard when it comes to women serving in the judiciary. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was pressured to retire constantly in her later years, even when she was only in her early 80s, it wasn’t her fault that a minority of America chose Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton. And speaking of gender based double standards, what about the men here, Justices like William Brennan, Thurgood Marshall and even Antonin Scalia, they served into old age without the same pressure to step down for this greater good. Yet Sandra Day O’Connor, the first woman who was appointed to the US Supreme Court, well, she faced similar pressure as Sotomayor is getting now, women are often expected to make sacrifices, even if there’s no sacrifice to be made. Justice. Sotomayor earned her seat on the court just like her male colleagues, and she deserves to decide when to pack it up on her own terms and at her own time, not based on when gendered expectations come calling. And let’s be honest here, this last minute push for her to retire is foolish Given the timing. There are less than 75 days until Trump takes office. When President Obama nominated Merrick Garland to the court, that was what March 16, 2016, well, there were over 300 days left in his term, and we all remember how that ended. Trying to force out Sotomayor now would likely end the exact same way, with no appointment, and Trump would get to fill the seat anyway. Trying to force her out for political convenience is both unrealistic and risky. Justice. Sotomayor deserves the same respect and autonomy as any other justice receives without added pressure based on her gender or her health. So to those out there talking retirement for Sotomayor, all I have to say is, go be silly elsewhere.
Sonia Sotomayor can and should remain on Supreme Court
By Straight Arrow News
American public trust in the U.S. Supreme Court — and Americans’ belief that the court can behave free from the influence of politics — is low and getting lower. The court has a conservative majority, and recently ruled in favor of Donald Trump against the United States itself. Some liberals, concerned that Trump might move the court even further toward the political right, have suggested that Justice Sonia Sotomayor should retire so that President Biden can replace her prior to Trump’s return. Sotomayor has insisted that she has no interest in stepping down, and a wide range of Democrats have stepped up to defend her.
Watch the above video as Straight Arrow News contributor Adrienne Lawrence reviews the arguments for and against Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s retirement, and argues that Sotomayor can and should remain on the court.
Be the first to know when Adrienne Lawrence publishes a new opinion! Download the Straight Arrow News app and enable push notifications today!
The following is an excerpt from the above video:
Sotomayor simply confirms that there is a double standard when it comes to women serving in the judiciary. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was pressured to retire constantly in her later years, even when she was only in her early 80s. It wasn’t her fault that a minority of America chose Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton. And speaking of gender-based double standards, what about the men here? Justices like William Brennan, Thurgood Marshall, and even Antonin Scalia, they served into old age without the same pressure to step down for this greater good. Yet Sandra Day O’Connor, the first woman who was appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court, well, she faced similar pressure as Sotomayor is getting now.
Women are often expected to make sacrifices, even if there’s no sacrifice to be made. Justice Sotomayor earned her seat on the court just like her male colleagues, and she deserves to decide when to pack it up on her own terms and at her own time, not based on when gendered expectations come calling.
And let’s be honest here, this last-minute push for her to retire is foolish, given the timing. There are less than 75 days until Trump takes office. When President Obama nominated Merrick Garland to the court, that was what, March 16, 2016? Well, there were over 300 days left in his term, and we all remember how that ended. Trying to force out Sotomayor now would likely end the exact same way, with no appointment, and Trump would get to fill the seat anyway. Trying to force her out for political convenience is both unrealistic and risky. Justice Sotomayor deserves the same respect and autonomy as any other justice receives without added pressure based on her gender or her health.
Ever since justice, Sonia Sotomayor joined the US Supreme Court, she has been a powerful voice for justice, but now that Donald Trump is heading back to the White House, well, there are some out there who seem to be pressuring Sotomayor to retire so President Biden can appoint a replacement before leaving office. Let’s be real here, people, this pressure is sexist ablest and downright foolish Given the timing, Democrats really need to leave that woman alone and focus on their own problems first. Although, as you know, I am not a fan of lifetime tenure for judges or justices. For that matter, Justice Sotomayor should be allowed to serve as long as she wants just like her male counterparts, the woman isn’t even that old, really. She’s 70, if it weren’t for Amal George Clooney be in her dating pool, and Sotomayor is younger than justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, plus her soul is intact, and I hear that that enhances youth, yet no one’s pressuring the men to retire. Historically, justices have served well into their 80s and beyond. Justice John Paul Stevens, for example, retired at 90, and Chief Justice William Rehnquist, well, he served until he died at 80. The idea that sotomayors health should end her career, while that’s also unfounded, she has had type one diabetes since she was a child, and sotomayors managed it without any issue in her 15 years on the court, Holly Berry has the same thing, and the woman still does most of her own stunts. So get real here, this pressure to what ask Sotomayor to step down over diabetes that’s rooted in ableism, plain and simple, her diabetes do not prevent her from doing her job, just as it does not stop millions of Americans from doing theirs and coming at. Sotomayor simply confirms that there is a double standard when it comes to women serving in the judiciary. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was pressured to retire constantly in her later years, even when she was only in her early 80s, it wasn’t her fault that a minority of America chose Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton. And speaking of gender based double standards, what about the men here, Justices like William Brennan, Thurgood Marshall and even Antonin Scalia, they served into old age without the same pressure to step down for this greater good. Yet Sandra Day O’Connor, the first woman who was appointed to the US Supreme Court, well, she faced similar pressure as Sotomayor is getting now, women are often expected to make sacrifices, even if there’s no sacrifice to be made. Justice. Sotomayor earned her seat on the court just like her male colleagues, and she deserves to decide when to pack it up on her own terms and at her own time, not based on when gendered expectations come calling. And let’s be honest here, this last minute push for her to retire is foolish Given the timing. There are less than 75 days until Trump takes office. When President Obama nominated Merrick Garland to the court, that was what March 16, 2016, well, there were over 300 days left in his term, and we all remember how that ended. Trying to force out Sotomayor now would likely end the exact same way, with no appointment, and Trump would get to fill the seat anyway. Trying to force her out for political convenience is both unrealistic and risky. Justice. Sotomayor deserves the same respect and autonomy as any other justice receives without added pressure based on her gender or her health. So to those out there talking retirement for Sotomayor, all I have to say is, go be silly elsewhere.
Give time, love and togetherness for the holidays
‘Hero’ label for CEO killer reveals health care system outrage
Conservative activist Leonard Leo a danger to American culture
Linda McMahon is bad news for US education system
How Gov. Gavin Newsom is ‘Trump-proofing’ his state
Underreported stories from each side
Trump representative criticizes Biden’s decision to commute most death row sentences, citing impact on victims
16 sources | 0% from the left Getty ImagesTrump’s FCC pick sends stern letter to Bob Iger, blasting ‘erosion in public trust’
11 sources | 0% from the right Getty ImagesLatest Stories
Former President Bill Clinton hospitalized
Lara Trump bows out of consideration for Florida senate seat
Denzel Washington baptized, receives minister’s license in New York
China warns US 'playing with fire' with Taiwan aid
Minneapolis amends ordinance regarding anti-abortion sidewalk counselors
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
We need a Trump opposition akin to the Republican 2020 playbook
9 hrs ago David PakmanTime to say goodbye to DEI
Friday Star ParkerIt’s time to take failed capitalism out of Christmas
Friday Dr. Rashad RicheyMusk-Ramaswamy DOGE initiative overdue and full of challenges
Thursday John Fortier