Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Tennessee bill would allow LGBTQ, racial discrimination
All right, let’s talk about it — out-of-control legislation, we got more.
Tennessee House Bill 0878, presented by Representative Monty Fritts, would allow a government worker to discriminate against members of the LGBTQ community, against interracial marriages … yes, the wording of the bill would allow for a county clerk to not solemnize a marriage based on personal belief alone.
This has gone too far. The wording of this bill provides the framework for legal government discrimination. You see, there was a time in our country’s history when discrimination was part of the culture of America. Now it is becoming part of the actual statutory record.
The bill being proposed allows for a clerk to insert personal belief over the element of non-discrimination. Let me tell you why this is imperative to pay attention to and to oppose. You see, the individuals that the clerk may disagree with — for example, an interracial couple — the clerk may hold a personal belief that interracial marriage is a no-no to them. And by allowing that personal belief to extend to the level of discrimination or discriminatory action, keep in mind that creates an issue for taxpayers. Because everyone — straight, gay, lesbian, black, white, brown — everyone pays taxes.
You pay taxes in order to receive government services without discrimination. You may not like a particular dynamic of American culture. Deal with it. It’s part of a free democracy. See, these things are permissible.
When you pay taxes, you should be able to receive benefits from the money they take from you, everybody. Your personal beliefs can be exercised in ways that are appropriate, but this would be an inappropriate way to exercise that belief. Why would anyone want to utilize their faith in the context of a taxpayer job or tax-paid job, in order to say no to somebody?
You know, I’m waiting for the day when one of these faith-based bills would actually create coalition rather than discrimination; would allow for unity, rather than disunity. Isn’t it ironic that every time a Republican presents one of these personal belief bills or one of these faith-based bills, they do one thing; they allow you to legally discriminate against somebody else. Should it not be the other way around? Should not these bills, if they are faith based, provide opportunity and connection rather than disconnection?
Let me know your thoughts.
Trump’s push to prosecute Capitol Police reveals anti-democracy stance
On Jan. 6, 2021, over 2,000 pro-Trump insurrectionists stormed the Capitol following President Joe Biden’s election victory. A House committee investigated the attack, and in its final report, accused former President Donald Trump of inciting violence. Hundreds of insurrectionists have been charged, and now — despite previously touting a pro-law enforcement position — Trump seems
Rosalynn Carter’s humanitarian legacy transcends her first lady role
Rosalynn Carter, the United States First Lady from 1977 to 1981, passed away on Nov. 19 at the age of 96. As a vocal first lady, her lasting impact was marked by her efforts to diminish the stigma associated with mental illnesses. Straight Arrow News contributor Dr. Rashad Richey reflects on the legacy of the
Trump’s proposed policies violate 14th Amendment
Former President Donald Trump is reportedly considering expanding his first-term immigration policies should he win a second term. Initially reported by The New York Times, the proposed changes would involve gathering undocumented immigrants in the U.S. and holding them in large camps while awaiting deportation. Some critics have referred to these detention centers as “concentration
Trump, like Hitler, aspires for dictatorship
Hillary Clinton recently said former President Trump returning to power in 2024 would mark “the end of our country” and has consistently warned Americans of Trump’s aspirations of becoming a dictator. She reminded Americans that the people of Germany likewise elected Adolf Hitler before he consolidated power into a dictatorship and overthrew the German government.
Trump’s immigration plan is anti-American
Donald Trump, the former U.S. president and current frontrunner in the Republican presidential primary, recently promised to implement comprehensive ideological testing for immigrants seeking to come to the United States. He indicated that these tests will also screen for religion and referred to Christianity as “our religion” in his statement. Straight Arrow News contributor Dr.
Underreported stories from each side
UPenn loses $100 million donation after antisemitism hearing
13 sources | 15% from the left
Post-Roe, nearly 1 in 5 people seeking an abortion traveled out of state, analysis finds
10 sources | 0% from the right
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.