
Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
All right, let’s talk about it — out-of-control legislation, we got more.
Tennessee House Bill 0878, presented by Representative Monty Fritts, would allow a government worker to discriminate against members of the LGBTQ community, against interracial marriages … yes, the wording of the bill would allow for a county clerk to not solemnize a marriage based on personal belief alone.
This has gone too far. The wording of this bill provides the framework for legal government discrimination. You see, there was a time in our country’s history when discrimination was part of the culture of America. Now it is becoming part of the actual statutory record.
The bill being proposed allows for a clerk to insert personal belief over the element of non-discrimination. Let me tell you why this is imperative to pay attention to and to oppose. You see, the individuals that the clerk may disagree with — for example, an interracial couple — the clerk may hold a personal belief that interracial marriage is a no-no to them. And by allowing that personal belief to extend to the level of discrimination or discriminatory action, keep in mind that creates an issue for taxpayers. Because everyone — straight, gay, lesbian, black, white, brown — everyone pays taxes.
You pay taxes in order to receive government services without discrimination. You may not like a particular dynamic of American culture. Deal with it. It’s part of a free democracy. See, these things are permissible.
When you pay taxes, you should be able to receive benefits from the money they take from you, everybody. Your personal beliefs can be exercised in ways that are appropriate, but this would be an inappropriate way to exercise that belief. Why would anyone want to utilize their faith in the context of a taxpayer job or tax-paid job, in order to say no to somebody?
You know, I’m waiting for the day when one of these faith-based bills would actually create coalition rather than discrimination; would allow for unity, rather than disunity. Isn’t it ironic that every time a Republican presents one of these personal belief bills or one of these faith-based bills, they do one thing; they allow you to legally discriminate against somebody else. Should it not be the other way around? Should not these bills, if they are faith based, provide opportunity and connection rather than disconnection?
Let me know your thoughts.
-
How Democrats should combat Trump’s illegal takeover
In a recent “Dear Colleague” letter, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., laid out a strategic roadmap for Democrats to counter the Trump administration, calling its actions a “coordinated assault” against the interests of the American people. While the Democratic minority has had little power to stop Trump’s efforts to dismantle federal agencies and expand… -
Republicans need to take a stand against Elon Musk
Elon Musk has come under heavy public criticism lately for a number of bold actions that experts say are illegal, unconstitutional and dangerous to national security. While Democrats have been pushed hard by their constituents to raise protests against Musk’s moves, Republicans in Congress have been quiet, at times even defensive of Elon Musk. Watch… -
Trump’s mass pardons of Capitol rioters undermines US democracy
Over 200 rioters serving prison sentences for their roles in the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol have begun to be released shortly after President Trump began his second term as president. Trump issued pardons to more than 1,500 individuals, including those who had assaulted police officers. The “full, complete and unconditional” pardons… -
A lame-duck presidency awaits Donald Trump’s second term
Incoming President-elect Donald Trump enjoys the considerable advantages of Republican majorities in both the House and Senate, as well as a conservative majority on the Supreme Court and GOP control over 29 state legislatures. From a distance, it would seem that these advantages might clear the way for Donald Trump to make rapid and substantial… -
For those disillusioned by election, 2025 is the year to reengage
In the aftermath of the divisive 2024 U.S. presidential election, a majority of Republicans describe their reaction to President-elect Donald Trump’s victory as “optimistic.” On the other side, Democrats are more pessimistic about their party’s future now than at any time in the past eight years. Watch the video above as Straight Arrow News contributor…
Latest Opinions
-
Getty Images
Death toll expected to rise after southeast is hit with severe storm
-
AP Images
Trump team to meet with Russian officials to discuss Ukraine peace deal
-
AP Images
Utah bans collective bargaining for public workers amid union protests
-
Getty Images
Trump references famous French dictator in post amid judicial firings
-
Getty Images
Hiring freeze and layoffs leave national parks struggling to operate
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.