Okay, I want to talk to you about this legal doctrine called qualified immunity. Please understand qualified immunity is not a law. Let me say it again, qualified immunity for cops, not a law. It is a legal principle, a legal doctrine really fictional. If you look at the creation of it in the 1960s by the United States Supreme Court, it basically said that police officers who do egregious things cannot be held civilly liable for those egregious things they have done. That means they get to keep the house and the cars and the money and the assets and the pension. But the reality is, this has never been rooted in law. Guess what a federal judge from the Mississippi circuit has just said, the exact same thing I’ve been saying for years, there is no basis for qualified immunity in law, it is not constitutional, as a matter of fact, is adverse to constitution. When you look at the actual rulings that have been predicated on other rulings, we call their case law. But see, courts are not supposed to make policy. They’re supposed to enforce the policies or laws that are already established. So here we are, you know, the vast majority of Americans, Democrats, Republicans and independents actually agree on one thing that police reform police reform is necessary. Over 90% of Americans believe that police reform should happen on some level, even though those levels may vary. But the vast majority of individuals, Democrats and Republicans, they believe that we need to relook at this element called qualified immunity. And many times, politicians who still support this adversarial policy will say the reason cops need qualified immunity is because they have a dangerous job. And due to the fact they have a dangerous job, people will sue them. People will make frivolous accusations against them. Really? Well, let’s talk about the dangerous job aspect because according to data, the most dangerous job in America is being a logger is more dangerous. Being a miner is more dangerous, being a roofer than being a cop. That’s according to data and statistics. Now, outside of that context. Does, does a medical doctor have qualified immunity? If a medical doctor does something that’s adverse to the standards of practice of that profession, they get sued, and typically successfully, so if it is adverse to the standards of the profession. So why all of these protections for cops when these protections do not exist for other professionals, who are in fact held to a higher standard? You see, I have this simple notion, call me an outside of the box thinker, but I believe when you are a professional, you should have a higher standard of accountability and responsibility, not a lower one. What say you?
Dr. Rashad Richey
National TV Political Analyst, Talk Radio Host, Univ. Prof.
To reform police, end qualified immunity
Dr. Rashad Richey
National TV Political Analyst, Talk Radio Host, Univ. Prof.
By Straight Arrow News
Public debates on police reform have often tackled the issue of qualified immunity, a policy that protects police officers from lawsuits filed by victims or citizens. A recent ruling in Mississippi even raised concerns that this policy of qualified immunity might be unconstitutional.
Watch the video above as Straight Arrow News contributor Dr. Rashad Richey explores some of the arguments against qualified immunity and dismantles one of the major arguments in favor of the policy.
Be the first to know when Dr. Rashad Richey publishes a new opinion every Friday! Download the Straight Arrow News app and enable push notifications today!
The following is an excerpt of the above video:
But the reality is, this has never been rooted in law. Guess what? A federal judge from the Mississippi circuit has just said the exact same thing I’ve been saying for years: There is no basis for qualified immunity in law. It is not constitutional. As a matter of fact, it is adverse to [the] Constitution. When you look at the actual rulings that have been predicated on other rulings, we call that case law. But see, courts are not supposed to make policy. They’re supposed to enforce the policies or laws that are already established.
So here we are. You know, the vast majority of Americans, Democrats, Republicans and independents actually agree on one thing, that police reform police reform is necessary. Over 90% of Americans believe that police reform should happen on some level, even though those levels may vary. But the vast majority of individuals, Democrats and Republicans, they believe that we need to relook at this element called qualified immunity.
And many times, politicians who still support this adversarial policy will say the reason cops need qualified immunity is because they have a dangerous job. And due to the fact they have a dangerous job, people will sue them. People will make frivolous accusations against them. Really? Well, let’s talk about the dangerous job aspect, because according to data, the most dangerous job in America is being a logger. It’s more dangerous being a miner. It’s more dangerous being a roofer, than being a cop. That’s according to data and statistics.
Okay, I want to talk to you about this legal doctrine called qualified immunity. Please understand qualified immunity is not a law. Let me say it again, qualified immunity for cops, not a law. It is a legal principle, a legal doctrine really fictional. If you look at the creation of it in the 1960s by the United States Supreme Court, it basically said that police officers who do egregious things cannot be held civilly liable for those egregious things they have done. That means they get to keep the house and the cars and the money and the assets and the pension. But the reality is, this has never been rooted in law. Guess what a federal judge from the Mississippi circuit has just said, the exact same thing I’ve been saying for years, there is no basis for qualified immunity in law, it is not constitutional, as a matter of fact, is adverse to constitution. When you look at the actual rulings that have been predicated on other rulings, we call their case law. But see, courts are not supposed to make policy. They’re supposed to enforce the policies or laws that are already established. So here we are, you know, the vast majority of Americans, Democrats, Republicans and independents actually agree on one thing that police reform police reform is necessary. Over 90% of Americans believe that police reform should happen on some level, even though those levels may vary. But the vast majority of individuals, Democrats and Republicans, they believe that we need to relook at this element called qualified immunity. And many times, politicians who still support this adversarial policy will say the reason cops need qualified immunity is because they have a dangerous job. And due to the fact they have a dangerous job, people will sue them. People will make frivolous accusations against them. Really? Well, let’s talk about the dangerous job aspect because according to data, the most dangerous job in America is being a logger is more dangerous. Being a miner is more dangerous, being a roofer than being a cop. That’s according to data and statistics. Now, outside of that context. Does, does a medical doctor have qualified immunity? If a medical doctor does something that’s adverse to the standards of practice of that profession, they get sued, and typically successfully, so if it is adverse to the standards of the profession. So why all of these protections for cops when these protections do not exist for other professionals, who are in fact held to a higher standard? You see, I have this simple notion, call me an outside of the box thinker, but I believe when you are a professional, you should have a higher standard of accountability and responsibility, not a lower one. What say you?
Don’t fall for GOP’s cheap racist attacks on Kamala Harris
Republican rhetorical attacks on Vice President Kamala Harris, the leading Democratic candidate for president, escalated as soon as President Biden announced that he was stepping back from the election. Many Republicans accused Harris of being “a DEI hire” and indicated that she only got her position because of her skin color or gender, not her…
9 hrs ago
Violent rhetoric in politics amplified by Republican leaders
In the wake of the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump, some Republicans were quick to blame Democrats for the attack, linking it to “incendiary rhetoric” about Trump. One recent example cited by his supporters is President Joe Biden’s comment: “It’s time to put Trump in the bullseye. He’s gotten away with doing nothing…
Jul 19
America is in trouble
President Biden’s debate performance drew a variety of reactions from Democrats, with some calling for him to step down, others saying that he should support another candidate, and some still insisting that Biden remains the best choice. Meanwhile, the U.S. Supreme Court expanded presidential powers and criminal immunity in its Trump v. United States decision…
Jul 12
Americans deserve younger candidates, better ideas
On March 7, President Joe Biden delivered a well-received State of the Union address, speaking clearly and in detail about the challenges that the nation must confront. Less than four months later, on June 28, a very different-looking president took the stage to debate Donald Trump. In both speech and physical appearance, this Biden suddenly…
Jul 5
Time for Christian evangelicals to part ways with Trump
As former President Trump vies for another shot at the White House, one loyal demographic he is counting on is white Christian evangelicals. More than 80% of evangelicals backed Trump in the 2020 election, and after endorsing a Louisiana law requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed in public school classrooms, he’s gearing up for…
Jun 28
Underreported stories from each side
Group accuses Pa. teachers union of illegally using money to back Shapiro’s 2022 campaign
8 sources | 0% from the left
Getty Images
Some House Republicans slam Vance as Trump’s VP pick: ‘The worst choice’
8 sources | 0% from the right
Reuters
Latest Stories
Congress still trying to figure out how to reduce wasteful military spending
Watch 2:29
3 hrs ago
US Navy, Air Force making waves with new weapons at RIMPAC
Watch 6:03
3 hrs ago
Israeli PM Netanyahu meets with Trump at Mar-a-Lago
Watch 2:54
3 hrs ago
Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation’s heartland
Watch 1:19
3 hrs ago
Beer from the sun, other solar thermal projects get government funding
Watch 2:04
3 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Trump has an excellent opportunity with Black voters
8 hrs ago
Star Parker
Don’t fall for GOP’s cheap racist attacks on Kamala Harris
9 hrs ago
Dr. Rashad Richey
Americans must reject Trump to defend our democracy
Yesterday
Jordan Reid
Why all the changes in European parliamentary governments?
Wednesday
Newt Gingrich