Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Everyone’s freaking out about Elon Musk buying Twitter. And yes, the rich usurping modes of public expression – a “digital town square,” as Musk himself has called it – is problematic.
But Musk presents an interesting – and completely unique – problem of his very own design. Musk positions himself as a rogue billionaire – a kind of Batman, willing and able to deploy his high-tech toys in pursuit of, if not justice, at least Mars. The rules don’t apply to him, and if he’s going to save us, they can’t! And somehow – well, we know how, because it’s profitable for those looking the other way to let Elon go be Elon – this has, so far, worked.
Basically, Musk sets himself apart from earlier incarnations of this “billionaire without limits” trope because unlike his predecessors, he doesn’t even pretend to play by the rules. In fact, he thinks the arbiters of said rules – the government institutions that at least strive for a free and fair market – are not heroes of capitalism, but rather enemies of progress.
Musk also demonstrates zero fear of involving himself in the political melee. He has stated that he intends to allow Trump back on Twitter – and whether you agree with that choice or not, it’s for sure a political statement with significant political consequences.
As the New York Times wrote in a recent opinion piece: “It is not unreasonable to expect that a Musk-owned and controlled Twitter will, in the name of free speech, allow disinformation and misinformation to be tweeted ad infinitum so long as it discredits his political opponents and celebrates and enriches himself and his allies.”
Musk believes in free speech. Wholly unregulated speech. And that’s a hard argument to counter because who doesn’t believe in free and open self-expression? Except technology has advanced far more rapidly than our ability to address the very real dangers that come along with this instantaneous and widespread dissemination of false information.
When we provided a platform from which anyone and everyone could proselytize, I’m not sure we realized the Pandora’s Box we were opening up. But we sure do see it now.
I personally hate Twitter. To me, it feels like standing in the center of a massive room and screaming at thousands of other people who are also screaming back at you. In other words, largely unproductive, and more than a little stressful. It’s confusing to me why Musk felt the need to own it in the first place, but that’s possibly because I don’t seem to have a sense of narcissism that’s quite as highly developed as Musk’s.
But even if you’re anti-Tweet, it is a fact that Twitter possesses outsized influence over American politics and public life. It’s a fact that, for users, is highly addictive, like many social media sites operating under an intermittent reinforcement schedule that’s not dissimilar from Skinner’s box. The company’s own research has demonstrated that its algorithm amplifies right-wing accounts and news outlets with greater frequency than left-wing ones. And placing Musk – with his fondness for trolling and disruption and documented disdain for “wokeness” – will likely only exacerbate that finding.
That said, Musk has very often proven himself to be pure, walking chaos. He likes to break down existing realities with the hope of crafting new ones. Here’s hoping his takeover shatters Twitter like a twig, repelling existing users and leaving the site a shadow version of its former self.
The world – or at least my news feed – will be more peaceful for it.
-
Careful Left, campus protests will end up benefiting Trump
Protests against the Israel-Hamas war have flared up at universities across the United States and around the world. Some universities resorted to calling the police to break up larger protests, leading to mass arrests at places like the University of Southern California and the use of tear gas in Florida, among others. At the University…
-
Portraying far-left and far-right as equal in ‘Civil War’ is wrong
The movie “Civil War,” which depicts Texas and California seceding from the nation to wage war on Washington, D.C., reflects a what-if scenario fueled by memories of the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. But as the presidential election looms, discussions about civil war have moved beyond theoretical debates to become a serious consideration among some voters.…
-
Why I doubt Trump will be convicted in hush money case
Donald Trump is the first former president to face trial on criminal charges. In the first of potentially four trials, Trump entered a plea of not guilty to 34 counts of falsifying business records. These charges stem from a $130,000 payment made to the adult actress and stripper Stormy Daniels, which aimed to keep her…
-
Political comedy has a role to play in Gaza
Political comedians in the U.S. have sometimes struggled to cover the war in Gaza, which has been defined by tremendous human suffering and high political polarization, none of which seems particularly funny. Comedian Ramy Youssef attempted to tackle some of those issues in an opening monologue of a recent “Saturday Night Live” (SNL) episode. Straight…
-
Republicans don’t care about female voters
Women make up the largest demographic among registered voters in America and consistently participate in elections, with over 68% turning out to vote in the 2020 presidential election. Some political analysts suggest that with the recent reversal of Roe v. Wade, abortion has become a key issue among voters, benefiting Democratic candidates. However, in the…
Latest Opinions
-
EPA says San Francisco dumped billions of gallons of wastewater into ocean
-
Bill would have immigrants reported to ICE if they illegally try to buy guns
-
A US county is seeing success with 32-hour workweeks
-
VP hopeful Kristi Noem faces further backlash for memoir yet to be released
-
New EV tax credit exemption will benefit US consumers, but also China
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.