Looking back on the 2020 election, regardless of what you think about the outcome, we have plenty to learn from a primary and general election during a pandemic. Yes, record turnout is certainly an achievement, especially with COVID raging nationwide, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t room for some fixes. Straight Arrow News contributor John Fortier outlines the big features of voting that states should work to improve.
Even after years of improvement, voter lists don’t include all eligible voters, and they are not as clean and up to date as they should be.
We should improve the process for voters to register, especially at DMVs, to ensure that eligible voters get registered in the normal flow of their visit to the DMV, that they can update their information and that we can take voters off of lists where they no longer live.
We have some tools to compare registration lists with other states, but more sharing of data across states would improve the quality of lists.
Another area is the polling place. The polling place is not dead, so improve the experience at the polling place.
There has been a long-term trend to more voting by mail and an even more dramatic increase in the last election.
But voting at polling places, either before or on election day, is not dead. Polling places provide privacy and other voter protections and are convenient for many voters. All states, but especially those that are not moving to extensive voting by mail, have an interest in improving the voting experience for in-person voters.
Another area is to counting Votes Accurately, Transparently and Quickly.
Votes are counted more slowly than they were twenty five years ago.
The slowing is related to the number of votes cast by mail cast, but even more importantly, by the policies around voting by mail.
Three key reforms are:
An earlier processing of mail ballots
Requiring that ballots be submitted by election day, not mailed by that date.
Ensuring transparency in the counting process
These reforms will not wipe away all doubts about election results, but they will contribute to voter confidence in the election outcome.
What should we make of the 2020 election? What does it tell us about improving the way we run elections in the future? First, we ran the 2020 election under adverse conditions.
A pandemic hit. It arrived without warning, during primary season. And we made major changes in the way we vote.
One example: voting by mail exploded to over 45% of votes cast, early voting in person increased, and election day voting plummeted.
Despite all of these changes, we had the highest voter turnout by far in modern history. Nearly 160 million voters and 67% of eligible voters.
So whatever you think about the election outcome or specific election controversies, running an election during a pandemic and processing the largest number of votes ever cast, is an accomplishment. Were there problems and controversies? Of course.
And some of the divisions between the two political parties as to how we should vote were exacerbated. For example, Democrats became much more favorable towards voting by mail and Republicans more skeptical.
The greatest controversies arose in states with divided leadership where political actors from opposing parties clashed, and often the emergency changes to voting left one party or the other feeling unhappy with the changes made.
Looking forward to an election run under more normal circumstances, what are the important lessons for how we vote in the future?
States are still the key place for running elections and states will continue to have different forms of voting (and that includes states having very different mixes of voting by mail, early voting and election day voting).
This means the real debate about how we vote will happen in the states, not in Washington.
One of the mistakes that Democrats made after the election was pushing an enormous package of national reforms.
We do have some national laws on elections, but they have been passed by big majorities and with strong bipartisan support.
The federal Democratic reform bill pushed with only Democratic support and narrow majorities was destined to fail.
The debate over these issues will really continue in the states, not at the federal level.
What are the big features of voting that states should work to improve?
Voter registration.
Even after years of improvement, voter lists don’t include all eligible voters, and they are not as clean and up to date as they should be.
We should improve the process for voters to register, especially at DMVs, to ensure that eligible voters get registered in the normal flow of their visit to the DMV, that they can update their information and that we can take voters off of lists where they no longer live.
We have some tools to compare registration lists with other states, but more sharing of data across states would improve the quality of lists.
Another area is the polling place. The polling place is not dead, so improve the experience at the polling place.
There has been a long-term trend to more voting by mail and an even more dramatic increase in the last election.
But voting at polling places, either before or on election day, is not dead. Polling places provide privacy and other voter protections and are convenient for many voters. All states, but especially those that are not moving to extensive voting by mail, have an interest in improving the voting experience for in-person voters.
Another area is to counting Votes Accurately, Transparently and Quickly.
Votes are counted more slowly than they were twenty five years ago.
The slowing is related to the number of votes cast by mail cast, but even more importantly, by the policies around voting by mail.–
Three key reforms are:
An earlier processing of mail ballots
Requiring that ballots be submitted by election day, not mailed by that date.
Ensuring transparency in the counting process
These reforms will not wipe away all doubts about election results, but they will contribute to voter confidence in the election outcome.
John Fortier
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
More from John
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict paused, not over
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Hydrogen as clean energy source not ready for prime time
Thursday
Peter Zeihan
Railroads are more about political power than economic
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
Why Azerbaijan launched a military operation against Armenia
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
What can we learn from 2020 election? And what can we do about it?
May 31, 2022
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
By
Looking back on the 2020 election, regardless of what you think about the outcome, we have plenty to learn from a primary and general election during a pandemic. Yes, record turnout is certainly an achievement, especially with COVID raging nationwide, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t room for some fixes. Straight Arrow News contributor John Fortier outlines the big features of voting that states should work to improve.
What should we make of the 2020 election? What does it tell us about improving the way we run elections in the future? First, we ran the 2020 election under adverse conditions.
A pandemic hit. It arrived without warning, during primary season. And we made major changes in the way we vote.
One example: voting by mail exploded to over 45% of votes cast, early voting in person increased, and election day voting plummeted.
Despite all of these changes, we had the highest voter turnout by far in modern history. Nearly 160 million voters and 67% of eligible voters.
So whatever you think about the election outcome or specific election controversies, running an election during a pandemic and processing the largest number of votes ever cast, is an accomplishment. Were there problems and controversies? Of course.
And some of the divisions between the two political parties as to how we should vote were exacerbated. For example, Democrats became much more favorable towards voting by mail and Republicans more skeptical.
The greatest controversies arose in states with divided leadership where political actors from opposing parties clashed, and often the emergency changes to voting left one party or the other feeling unhappy with the changes made.
Looking forward to an election run under more normal circumstances, what are the important lessons for how we vote in the future?
States are still the key place for running elections and states will continue to have different forms of voting (and that includes states having very different mixes of voting by mail, early voting and election day voting).
This means the real debate about how we vote will happen in the states, not in Washington.
One of the mistakes that Democrats made after the election was pushing an enormous package of national reforms.
We do have some national laws on elections, but they have been passed by big majorities and with strong bipartisan support.
The federal Democratic reform bill pushed with only Democratic support and narrow majorities was destined to fail.
The debate over these issues will really continue in the states, not at the federal level.
What are the big features of voting that states should work to improve?
Voter registration.
Even after years of improvement, voter lists don’t include all eligible voters, and they are not as clean and up to date as they should be.
We should improve the process for voters to register, especially at DMVs, to ensure that eligible voters get registered in the normal flow of their visit to the DMV, that they can update their information and that we can take voters off of lists where they no longer live.
We have some tools to compare registration lists with other states, but more sharing of data across states would improve the quality of lists.
Another area is the polling place. The polling place is not dead, so improve the experience at the polling place.
There has been a long-term trend to more voting by mail and an even more dramatic increase in the last election.
But voting at polling places, either before or on election day, is not dead. Polling places provide privacy and other voter protections and are convenient for many voters. All states, but especially those that are not moving to extensive voting by mail, have an interest in improving the voting experience for in-person voters.
Another area is to counting Votes Accurately, Transparently and Quickly.
Votes are counted more slowly than they were twenty five years ago.
The slowing is related to the number of votes cast by mail cast, but even more importantly, by the policies around voting by mail.–
Three key reforms are:
These reforms will not wipe away all doubts about election results, but they will contribute to voter confidence in the election outcome.
Voting reforms have minimal partisan impact on electoral turnout
As the 2024 presidential election approaches, politicians are questioning whether certain voting reforms may have impacted the 2020 presidential election. After their 2020 defeat, Republicans have made efforts to reverse an executive order issued by the Biden administration, which aimed to strengthen election accessibility. In a counter move, Democrats have reintroduced their own proposed legislation
Aug 31
Do we need new laws for AI-generated political ads?
It’s the Wild West when it comes to regulating AI-generated political advertising. As new technology explodes, many are questioning whether we need more oversight of ads made with artificial intelligence. Right now, campaign ads don’t have to disclose if they were created or manipulated by AI, and some Democratic lawmakers are hoping to change that.
Jul 20
Republican demands for changes to presidential debates warranted
The Republican National Committee (RNC) voted to leave the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) in 2022 due to what it perceived as biases against its party. Some critics of the RNC decision believe Republican candidates are simply afraid of tough questions and would rather see Fox News hosts as moderators. Straight Arrow News contributor John
Jun 15
Debt ceiling standoff between Biden and GOP must end quickly
On Tuesday, May 16, President Biden met with top Republican and Democratic leaders to deliberate on raising the debt ceiling, underscoring lawmakers’ focus on avoiding default. Though Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) rarely see eye to eye, sources say they understand that a deal must be hammered out. Straight Arrow News contributor John
May 18
It’s time for Congress to break the cycle of political payback
Political polarization has split families, ruined friendships, and even decimated swing seats in congressional elections. It’s even become fodder for a recent M&M’s Candy campaign. It’s also created a contentious environment in Washington. When House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) removed Reps. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) and Adam Schiff (D-CA) from the Intelligence Committee, Democrats argued it
Apr 20
Stories each side is underreporting
Border apprehensions up nearly 27 percent from July to August
11 sources | 0% from the left
Six young activists devote years to climate fight with 32 governments. Now comes their day in court
13 sources | 9% from the right
Latest Opinions
Current Media
Whale strandings fuel controversy: Are offshore wind farms to blame?
Watch 14:49
18 hrs ago
AP Images
Surging migrant crisis is overwhelming US cities from Eagle Pass, TX, to NYC
Watch 3:42
Yesterday
AP Images
Brightline opens first US passenger line in a century with high-speed Florida train
Watch 1:57
Yesterday
Reuters
Pentagon explains how government shutdown would impact defense
Watch 2:26
Yesterday
Government Accountability Office
Watchdog: US troops living in unsafe barracks with sewage, methane gas, filth
Watch 2:12
Yesterday
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Weak House Speaker McCarthy controlled by far-right colleagues
Yesterday
Dr. Rashad Richey
Wasteful government spending not the answer to America’s problems
Yesterday
Star Parker
Old age aside, it’s clear why Biden trumps Trump
Thursday
Jordan Reid
Trump’s immigration deterrence policy more humane than Biden’s
Thursday
Timothy Carney
Politics
Pentagon explains how government shutdown would impact defense
Yesterday
Biden admin sending $325 million in military resources to Ukraine
Senate confirms top military nominees, Tuberville says his hold will continue
Reuters
U.S.
Surging migrant crisis is overwhelming US cities from Eagle Pass, TX, to NYC
Yesterday
Watchdog: US troops living in unsafe barracks with sewage, methane gas, filth
US Air Force needs to ‘reoptimize’ or it could lose to China
AP Images
International
Authorities say China is actively training to block US assistance to Taiwan
Thursday
Railway stops operations after migrants injured as thousands hop trains to US border
Ukraine’s Zelenskyy to UN: Russia should be removed from Security Council
AP Images
Tech
Family sues Google over man’s death after he followed Maps’ directions
Thursday
Is it alive? How AI’s uncanny valley could threaten human interaction
Israel Prime Minister urges Elon Musk to stop hate speech on X
Philip Paxson via FaceBook