Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
What can we learn from 2020 election? And what can we do about it?
What should we make of the 2020 election? What does it tell us about improving the way we run elections in the future? First, we ran the 2020 election under adverse conditions.
A pandemic hit. It arrived without warning, during primary season. And we made major changes in the way we vote.
One example: voting by mail exploded to over 45% of votes cast, early voting in person increased, and election day voting plummeted.
Despite all of these changes, we had the highest voter turnout by far in modern history. Nearly 160 million voters and 67% of eligible voters.
So whatever you think about the election outcome or specific election controversies, running an election during a pandemic and processing the largest number of votes ever cast, is an accomplishment. Were there problems and controversies? Of course.
And some of the divisions between the two political parties as to how we should vote were exacerbated. For example, Democrats became much more favorable towards voting by mail and Republicans more skeptical.
The greatest controversies arose in states with divided leadership where political actors from opposing parties clashed, and often the emergency changes to voting left one party or the other feeling unhappy with the changes made.
Looking forward to an election run under more normal circumstances, what are the important lessons for how we vote in the future?
States are still the key place for running elections and states will continue to have different forms of voting (and that includes states having very different mixes of voting by mail, early voting and election day voting).
This means the real debate about how we vote will happen in the states, not in Washington.
One of the mistakes that Democrats made after the election was pushing an enormous package of national reforms.
We do have some national laws on elections, but they have been passed by big majorities and with strong bipartisan support.
The federal Democratic reform bill pushed with only Democratic support and narrow majorities was destined to fail.
The debate over these issues will really continue in the states, not at the federal level.
What are the big features of voting that states should work to improve?
Even after years of improvement, voter lists don’t include all eligible voters, and they are not as clean and up to date as they should be.
We should improve the process for voters to register, especially at DMVs, to ensure that eligible voters get registered in the normal flow of their visit to the DMV, that they can update their information and that we can take voters off of lists where they no longer live.
We have some tools to compare registration lists with other states, but more sharing of data across states would improve the quality of lists.
Another area is the polling place. The polling place is not dead, so improve the experience at the polling place.
There has been a long-term trend to more voting by mail and an even more dramatic increase in the last election.
But voting at polling places, either before or on election day, is not dead. Polling places provide privacy and other voter protections and are convenient for many voters. All states, but especially those that are not moving to extensive voting by mail, have an interest in improving the voting experience for in-person voters.
Another area is to counting Votes Accurately, Transparently and Quickly.
Votes are counted more slowly than they were twenty five years ago.
The slowing is related to the number of votes cast by mail cast, but even more importantly, by the policies around voting by mail.–
Three key reforms are:
- An earlier processing of mail ballots
- Requiring that ballots be submitted by election day, not mailed by that date.
- Ensuring transparency in the counting process
These reforms will not wipe away all doubts about election results, but they will contribute to voter confidence in the election outcome.
Changing speakers isn’t actually going to help Republicans
After three weeks without a speaker and three unsuccessful attempts to secure the required votes for a new one, the U.S. House of Representatives elected a little-known Congressman from Louisiana, Rep. Mike Johnson. But was the decision to elect Rep. Johnson, who leans hard-right and pro-Trump, a wise move for the Republican Party? Straight Arrow
How a No Labels candidate might affect outcome of 2024 election
Amid increasing polarization in the United States and the anticipation of a rematch between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, a third-party organization is gaining momentum. The No Labels group has successfully registered 15,000 voters in the pivotal state of Arizona and is on a path to expand its presence to all 50
Voting reforms have minimal partisan impact on electoral turnout
As the 2024 presidential election approaches, politicians are questioning whether certain voting reforms may have impacted the 2020 presidential election. After their 2020 defeat, Republicans have made efforts to reverse an executive order issued by the Biden administration, which aimed to strengthen election accessibility. In a counter move, Democrats have reintroduced their own proposed legislation
Do we need new laws for AI-generated political ads?
It’s the Wild West when it comes to regulating AI-generated political advertising. As new technology explodes, many are questioning whether we need more oversight of ads made with artificial intelligence. Right now, campaign ads don’t have to disclose if they were created or manipulated by AI, and some Democratic lawmakers are hoping to change that.
Republican demands for changes to presidential debates warranted
The Republican National Committee (RNC) voted to leave the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) in 2022 due to what it perceived as biases against its party. Some critics of the RNC decision believe Republican candidates are simply afraid of tough questions and would rather see Fox News hosts as moderators. Straight Arrow News contributor John
Underreported stories from each side
UPenn loses $100 million donation after antisemitism hearing
13 sources | 15% from the left
Post-Roe, nearly 1 in 5 people seeking an abortion traveled out of state, analysis finds
10 sources | 0% from the right
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.