Fans of baseball and Atlanta residents heard some good news last month. Major League Baseball’s All-Star game will be played in Atlanta in 2026. But this is not a story about baseball. This is a story about voting, and about how an overreaction to Georgia’s voting law — fueled by over the top rhetoric about the return of Jim Crow — led Major League Baseball to pull the All-Star game from Atlanta in 2021. And now, two and a half years after the decision to pull the All-Star game, Major League Baseball’s decision to bring the All-Star game back to Atlanta is proof that the criticisms of Georgia’s voting law were off the mark. And that the frenzy fueled by the incendiary rhetoric of politicians was a destructive exercise.
Why did this all happen? First, remember that voting is decentralized. States have leeway in the way they run elections. Only rarely do we pass federal laws on voting, but at the state level, there’s a lot of legislating, and states controlled by Republicans and those by Democrats generally produce different kinds of election laws. Some favor more voting by mail, others more in-person voting, some require photo ID identification, others do not. But underlying these differences is the big picture that none of our state’s laws look remotely like what we saw in the Jim Crow South, where there was mass disenfranchisement, especially by race.
Our states all allow some form of male voting. The ability to register and vote is pretty easy. There are differences to be sure, but it’s the right of voters to advocate for change in election policy. But the rhetoric of a return to the dark past with mass disenfranchisement is overstated.
Second, COVID heightened the intensity of the debate. Running an election under COVID caused many states to change their voting laws and processes quickly, and we saw a very large rise in the number of people who voted by mail rather than at a polling place. In some states, Republicans and Democrats clashed as to how much of an expansion of mail voting to put in place. But even in many Republican states like Georgia, there were at least minor loosening of regulations on voting by mail as an emergency measure for COVID. Deadlines for requesting or returning ballots were eased, but in many of these states, the changes were seen as emergency changes that would only be in place in 2020. In 2022 and after, they returned to regular procedures. When states like Georgia returned to some of their pre-COVID procedures, they were accused of restricting voting. Again, this kind of argument was an exaggeration.
Third, at the end of the day, Georgia’s election law made some changes which Democrats objected to. The return of deadlines to pre-COVID levels, small regulation of voting and registration procedures. But amazingly, the greatest heat came over the charge that Georgia was denying water to citizens waiting in line.
Georgia indeed had a law that created a zone around the polling place where parties and outside groups cannot solicit voters, or provide them with any gifts including food and water. Some form of these laws exist in every state. They are meant to protect the voter from solicitation or influence very close to the polling place. And this was the argument that was most heard in the media, and fed the claim by Joe Biden that the law was Jim Crow 2.0. We should have robust debate over our voting laws, but the excessive reaction to the Georgia voting law should be a caution to business leaders and the American people. One milestone in the move to a more rational debate over our voting laws will be when the umpire yells “play ball” at the 2026 All-Star game in Atlanta.
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘System is rigged’: Black Americans on the American Dream
Nov 27 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Extremist’ or ‘phony’: Americans share who they voted for and why
Nov 21 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Extreme’ or ‘fake’: Swing voters weigh Trump or Harris
Nov 4 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Strong’: Why some men say they’ll vote for Trump
Oct 29 Dr. Frank LuntzWhy the frenzy over Georgia’s voting laws was misplaced
By Straight Arrow News
Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R) changed state voting laws after President Joe Biden narrowly won Georgia’s electoral votes over former President Donald Trump in 2020. Voting advocacy groups responded and the U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the legislation. These lawsuits alleged that the Georgia GOP in the state legislature aimed to restrict equal access to the ballot box for Black individuals, violating the U.S. Constitution.
Straight Arrow News contributor John Fortier analyzed the “over-the-top rhetoric” surrounding Georgia’s voting laws against the backdrop of the Major League Baseball All-Star Game.
Fans of baseball and Atlanta residents heard some good news last month. Major League Baseball’s All-Star Game will be played in Atlanta in 2026. But this is not a story about baseball. This is a story about voting and about how an overreaction to Georgia’s voting law — fueled by over-the-top rhetoric about the return of Jim Crow — led Major League Baseball to pull the All-Star Game from Atlanta in 2021. And now, two and a half years after the decision to pull the All-Star Game, Major League Baseball’s decision to bring the All-Star Game back to Atlanta is proof that the criticisms of Georgia’s voting law were off the mark and that the frenzy fueled by the incendiary rhetoric of politicians was a destructive exercise.
Why did this all happen? First, remember that voting is decentralized. States have leeway in the way they run elections. Only rarely do we pass federal laws on voting, but at the state level, there’s a lot of legislating, and states controlled by Republicans and those by Democrats generally produce different kinds of election laws. Some favor more voting by mail, others more in-person voting. Some require photo ID identification, others do not. But underlying these differences is the big picture that none of our states’ laws look remotely like what we saw in the Jim Crow South, where there was mass disenfranchisement, especially by race.
Fans of baseball and Atlanta residents heard some good news last month. Major League Baseball’s All-Star game will be played in Atlanta in 2026. But this is not a story about baseball. This is a story about voting, and about how an overreaction to Georgia’s voting law — fueled by over the top rhetoric about the return of Jim Crow — led Major League Baseball to pull the All-Star game from Atlanta in 2021. And now, two and a half years after the decision to pull the All-Star game, Major League Baseball’s decision to bring the All-Star game back to Atlanta is proof that the criticisms of Georgia’s voting law were off the mark. And that the frenzy fueled by the incendiary rhetoric of politicians was a destructive exercise.
Why did this all happen? First, remember that voting is decentralized. States have leeway in the way they run elections. Only rarely do we pass federal laws on voting, but at the state level, there’s a lot of legislating, and states controlled by Republicans and those by Democrats generally produce different kinds of election laws. Some favor more voting by mail, others more in-person voting, some require photo ID identification, others do not. But underlying these differences is the big picture that none of our state’s laws look remotely like what we saw in the Jim Crow South, where there was mass disenfranchisement, especially by race.
Our states all allow some form of male voting. The ability to register and vote is pretty easy. There are differences to be sure, but it’s the right of voters to advocate for change in election policy. But the rhetoric of a return to the dark past with mass disenfranchisement is overstated.
Second, COVID heightened the intensity of the debate. Running an election under COVID caused many states to change their voting laws and processes quickly, and we saw a very large rise in the number of people who voted by mail rather than at a polling place. In some states, Republicans and Democrats clashed as to how much of an expansion of mail voting to put in place. But even in many Republican states like Georgia, there were at least minor loosening of regulations on voting by mail as an emergency measure for COVID. Deadlines for requesting or returning ballots were eased, but in many of these states, the changes were seen as emergency changes that would only be in place in 2020. In 2022 and after, they returned to regular procedures. When states like Georgia returned to some of their pre-COVID procedures, they were accused of restricting voting. Again, this kind of argument was an exaggeration.
Third, at the end of the day, Georgia’s election law made some changes which Democrats objected to. The return of deadlines to pre-COVID levels, small regulation of voting and registration procedures. But amazingly, the greatest heat came over the charge that Georgia was denying water to citizens waiting in line.
Georgia indeed had a law that created a zone around the polling place where parties and outside groups cannot solicit voters, or provide them with any gifts including food and water. Some form of these laws exist in every state. They are meant to protect the voter from solicitation or influence very close to the polling place. And this was the argument that was most heard in the media, and fed the claim by Joe Biden that the law was Jim Crow 2.0. We should have robust debate over our voting laws, but the excessive reaction to the Georgia voting law should be a caution to business leaders and the American people. One milestone in the move to a more rational debate over our voting laws will be when the umpire yells “play ball” at the 2026 All-Star game in Atlanta.
This is the dawn of a new national Republican coalition
Why are transitions of power so complicated in the United States?
The 25th Amendment should remain above politics
Uncensored political content like Trump-Musk on X is a win for free speech
How do presidential debates work?
Underreported stories from each side
JK Rowling derides NY Times piece downplaying transgender backlash against her: ‘Rewriting of history’
8 sources | 13% from the left AP ImagesEU condemns reported Taliban move to suspend medical education for women and girls
8 sources | 13% from the right AP ImagesLatest Stories
Solar panels costing California residents, why energy bills increased in 2024
Millions in Cuba without power after electrical grid collapse
Airlines may use algorithms, AI for ‘customer specific’ pricing
DC accuses Amazon of ‘secretly’ excluding zip codes from 2-day delivery
Satanic Temple offers religious program to Ohio students
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Trump can nominate Patel, Hegseth, but will Senate confirm?
1 hr ago Newt GingrichConservative activist Leonard Leo a danger to American culture
1 hr ago Adrienne LawrenceJack Smith drops Trump cases, but witch hunt may not be over
22 hrs ago Ben WeingartenTrump’s plan for mass deportation is a guaranteed disaster
Yesterday Ruben Navarrette