Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Let’s talk about the Respect for Marriage Act. That’s that landmark legislation that was passed with bipartisan support to protect the right for couples of the same sex and couples of different races to marry. Now, most people thought that it was unnecessary to codify such protections into law. Supreme Court precedent has protected marriage for gay couples since 2015. And also what interracial marriage since 1967. But with today’s right wing Supreme Court, overturning the right to abortion last summer, it’s become essential to protect our civil rights that rests on court rulings. We cannot become complacent when our civil rights are under attack. Way too many Americans fail to appreciate how much their basic civil rights rest in the fickle hands of the US Supreme Court, the right to access contraception, to enjoy racial integration to have an attorney present when you’re in a felony case to know your Miranda rights and so on. These protections and more are all rooted in Supreme Court precedent, and they can be reversed with the stroke of a right wing conservative justices pen. Today’s Supreme Court is gunning to undermine the advancements of the Warren Court. From 1953 to 1969, Chief Judge Earl Warren ushered in a new era, a constitutional revolution that gave us the protections every democracy should enjoy. Warren did not wait for Congress to get it right. He rallied the court to bring our nation into the light, ensuring that the Founding Fathers vision actually extended to all regardless of gender, race and wealth. Warren’s court gave us Brown v Board of Education, Gideon v. Wainwright, Miranda V. Arizona. Warren’s court cut through the Founding Fathers’ hypocrisy. But today’s court, the one led by Chief Justice John Roberts, they’re on another mission. Instead of expanding our civil rights, they want to take us back into the dark ages where inequity reigned. That’s why they 117 Congress came together, Republicans and Democrats to pass the Respect for Marriage Act, because they know that our civil rights secured by Supreme Court precedent are vulnerable. The current High Court was strategically crafted by the right and our rights aren’t protected. But don’t get it twisted just because the GOP jumped on board to protect gay and interracial marriage. That doesn’t mean that the right isn’t out to undermine our civil rights and to harm those most vulnerable in our society. For the GOP the Respect for Marriage Act was nothing more than a concession to advance appearances. The right wants to appear reasonable to distract us from reality. That is that the right which is about to control the House is coming for our basic civil rights. Rolling back abortion was just the beginning.
Don’t let the Respect for Marriage Act make you think that the fight is over. If you want to control your own destiny, you need to pay attention. Don’t get complacent with the superficial seeming acts of democracy. Stay alert, stay focused, stay invested. Without our civil rights. There can be no life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.
-
Students learning brutal lesson on how police respond to protests
Student protests against Israel’s war in Gaza have escalated in the United States and around the world as civilian death counts in both Gaza and the West Bank continue to climb. Estimates show Israeli forces killed at least 42,500 Palestinians since Oct. 7, 2023, and another two million survivors have been displaced from their homes.…
-
Supreme Court must end criminalization of homelessness
On April 22, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the nation’s homelessness crisis, considering whether an Oregon city had the right to ban homeless people from camping in public spaces. A majority of justices appeared inclined to support the city’s efforts to regulate homeless encampments on public grounds. This decision carries significant implications for the growing…
-
Why are non-consensual pelvic exams still happening?
More states are beginning to crack down on the surprisingly common practice of medical students and professional staff performing non-consensual pelvic exams on unconscious men and women in hospitals, universities and other medical facilities. Just one year ago today, those practices remained legal in a majority of U.S. states. Now, however, a new directive from…
-
Congress should repeal the Foreign Dredge Act
The collapse of Baltimore’s Key Bridge presents challenges for cleanup and construction crews who rely on dredging vessels to complete their work. That’s partly because of the Foreign Dredge Act, a 1906 law that prohibits foreign-made dredging vessels. Congress is now introducing a measure to revise parts of that law, although previous attempts to do…
-
Gen Z women must fight for their rights
Gen Z, the first “digital native” U.S. generation, is entering the workforce, studying at university and serving in the military. From school shootings and cyber-bullying to COVID-19 and the overturning of Roe v. Wade, this generation has been shaped by unique trends and events, and how they will behave as citizens and voters is an…
Latest Opinions
-
EPA says San Francisco dumped billions of gallons of wastewater into ocean
-
Bill would have immigrants reported to ICE if they illegally try to buy guns
-
A US county is seeing success with 32-hour workweeks
-
VP hopeful Kristi Noem faces further backlash for memoir yet to be released
-
New EV tax credit exemption will benefit US consumers, but also China
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.