![A new Tennessee bill would allow county clerks to refuse to solemnize same-sex or interracial marriage based on their personal beliefs.](https://san.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Tennessee-bill-would-allow-LGBTQ-discrimination.png?w=1920)
Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
All right, let’s talk about it — out-of-control legislation, we got more.
Tennessee House Bill 0878, presented by Representative Monty Fritts, would allow a government worker to discriminate against members of the LGBTQ community, against interracial marriages … yes, the wording of the bill would allow for a county clerk to not solemnize a marriage based on personal belief alone.
This has gone too far. The wording of this bill provides the framework for legal government discrimination. You see, there was a time in our country’s history when discrimination was part of the culture of America. Now it is becoming part of the actual statutory record.
The bill being proposed allows for a clerk to insert personal belief over the element of non-discrimination. Let me tell you why this is imperative to pay attention to and to oppose. You see, the individuals that the clerk may disagree with — for example, an interracial couple — the clerk may hold a personal belief that interracial marriage is a no-no to them. And by allowing that personal belief to extend to the level of discrimination or discriminatory action, keep in mind that creates an issue for taxpayers. Because everyone — straight, gay, lesbian, black, white, brown — everyone pays taxes.
You pay taxes in order to receive government services without discrimination. You may not like a particular dynamic of American culture. Deal with it. It’s part of a free democracy. See, these things are permissible.
When you pay taxes, you should be able to receive benefits from the money they take from you, everybody. Your personal beliefs can be exercised in ways that are appropriate, but this would be an inappropriate way to exercise that belief. Why would anyone want to utilize their faith in the context of a taxpayer job or tax-paid job, in order to say no to somebody?
You know, I’m waiting for the day when one of these faith-based bills would actually create coalition rather than discrimination; would allow for unity, rather than disunity. Isn’t it ironic that every time a Republican presents one of these personal belief bills or one of these faith-based bills, they do one thing; they allow you to legally discriminate against somebody else. Should it not be the other way around? Should not these bills, if they are faith based, provide opportunity and connection rather than disconnection?
Let me know your thoughts.
-
The reckoning of the Trump campaign has begun
In response to declining poll numbers, former President Trump is adjusting his strategy, cutting back on campaigning in several states that were a major focus just weeks ago. This is a sharp departure from late July, when Trump left the Republican convention confidently predicting a landslide victory over an aging President Biden. Trump’s new challenger,… -
Kamala Harris’ theme is that she is not Donald Trump
Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris are locked in what promises to be a tight presidential race, with the economy, as usual, taking center stage. In recent speeches, Trump outlined his economic plans, while Harris is set to reveal her own agenda, including a proposed federal ban on price gouging of food… -
Harris-Walz has all the momentum for 2024 election
On Tuesday, Aug. 6, Democratic presidential candidate and current U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris selected Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate. The choice paints a stark contrast between Democratic and Republican ballots after GOP nominee Donald Trump tapped Sen. J.D. Vance as his own running mate. On Aug. 8, Harris and Trump agreed… -
Political momentum shifts in favor of Kamala Harris
A majority of Americans polled earlier this year said that they were disappointed with an anticipated Biden v. Trump rematch for the 2024 presidential election, indicating they were not particularly happy with either option. As those concerns mounted and President Joe Biden’s health visibly declined, President Biden announced that he would not seek reelection, and… -
Don’t fall for GOP’s cheap racist attacks on Kamala Harris
Republican rhetorical attacks on Vice President Kamala Harris, the leading Democratic candidate for president, escalated as soon as President Biden announced that he was stepping back from the election. Many Republicans accused Harris of being “a DEI hire” and indicated that she only got her position because of her skin color or gender, not her…
Latest Opinions
-
Michigan State Department
Michigan’s first ‘I Voted’ sticker contest draws inspiration from folklore and more
-
Getty Images
IRS recovers $1.3B in unpaid taxes from high-income Americans
-
Getty Images
Rome considers timed ticket system for Trevi Fountain
-
Getty Images
NOAA says Vineyard Wind won’t kill sea life, issues permits for it to do just that
-
Reuters
Trump campaign staffers involved in Arlington cemetery altercation identified
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.