Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Okay, let’s talk facts. Do you want to be told a narrative or do you want to be told the truth? Do you want to know what really happened or do you want to know somebody’s false version of it? Would you like your tax dollars to go to what actually solves a problem, not going to what creates one? Let’s talk about the difference between policing and public safety.
I interviewed a police officer just a few days ago and I posed that question to him. I said, “Do you see a distinction between policing and public safety in the United States of America?” This man told me that policing and public safety are one in the same. How? How can policing and public safety be the exact same thing? Well police officers will say they’re not trained to handle certain issues that may adversely impact public safety. For example, responding to a person that may have a mental health disorder. You see, that person should not be treated like a criminal; they are in fact, a patient. And they should be treated as such.
But police officers will say they don’t have the proper training. Well, that’s a public safety dynamic, right? Let’s understand what these two are. You see, public safety is the overall goal. Your goal is to get to a place where the public can be safe. That’s your public safety model. That’s your goal. Policing is one avenue in that model. That’s one way to get there. But there are many ways you can get to better public safety.
For example, investing into programs that prevent crime. Let’s go over the numbers with policing in America. Police solve roughly 2%, a little less, of actual crimes. Police really don’t stop crime; they are reactionary agents by design. But there are some stats that show for every new cop a city hires, they effectively decreased their crime rate by 0.01%. Yeah, less than 1%. Those are numbers, those are facts, I encourage you to look them up for what it means for your local community.
Let’s talk about things that actually do work. CVI’s, CVI’s, Community Based Violence Intervention programs. These programs work. Let me give you some examples. Homicides or non-fatal shootings have been reduced by as much as 60% in areas where group violence intervention models have been implemented. That’s a big number. Let me give you more. Cities like Baltimore, New York, Philadelphia, Chicago, have each implemented a Cure Violence Program, and they have seen more than 30% reductions in shootings and killings from these programs. Oakland, California, CVI programs have helped reduce the city’s gun violence by half over a seven-year period. There’s more.
Chicago’s Cred program, which combines street outreach, coaching, which is mentoring, counseling, which is therapy, and workforce, which is a job. Okay. These are advocacy programs basically that advocate for the individual and provides wraparound services. They saw a 50%, 50% reduction in gunshot injuries among its participants in only 18 months of implementation. These stats are much better than a police officer’s ability to stop or decrease crime.
So the question is, why are we having the debate? Let’s be very clear. Public safety is your goal once again. Police well, they are part of that method to reach your goal. CVI programs are wholly underfunded, under resourced; they’re not sexy. Politicians don’t really talk about them. The numbers can get complex. Programming can be let’s say, it could take some time. But it’s worth it. Because the end result is a safer community. Which by the way, is what public safety is about.
-
Today’s college protesters are tomorrow’s world leaders
Protests against Israel’s actions in Gaza have spread across cities and campuses around the world as accusations of genocide continue to mount. And while U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken works to negotiate a peaceful resolution, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continues to promise more violence, proclaiming that Israel will invade Rafah with or without…
-
Trump’s own behavior betrays his guilt
Donald Trump recently summoned his supporters to show up and disrupt the criminal proceedings against him in court. Although few supporters actually showed up to defend the former president, the call reminded some Americans of his rhetoric surrounding Jan. 6, 2021. Straight Arrow News contributor Dr. Rashad Richey argues that Trump is revealing himself as…
-
Support democracy or Trump, but you can’t do both
U.S. liberals trace their original suspicion and distrust of Donald Trump back to a series of red flags raised early in the 2016 campaigns. The red flags include several instances where Trump said that he would only accept the results of an election if he wins. Years later, on January 6, 2021, Americans watched that…
-
There is no GOP, there is only MAGA
Donald Trump faces a range of potential criminal charges across numerous cases, from minor civil suits all the way up to sedition and conspiracy against the United States. The former president has consistently portrayed himself as a victim of political “witch hunts” and has sought to delay his court dates to avoid criminal sentencing prior…
-
Narrative of Jan. 6 attack reveals conservative bias, spin
On Jan. 6, 2021, supporters of then-President Donald Trump overpowered police and federal officers, broke into the U.S. Capitol, and then searched the Capitol and surrounding areas for specific Congress members to kill or take hostage in an attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 election. While some took to social media and threatened…
Latest Stories
-
EPA says San Francisco dumped billions of gallons of wastewater into ocean
-
Bill would have immigrants reported to ICE if they illegally try to buy guns
-
A US county is seeing success with 32-hour workweeks
-
VP hopeful Kristi Noem faces further backlash for memoir yet to be released
-
New EV tax credit exemption will benefit US consumers, but also China
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Latest Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.
The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Latest Commentary
We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.
The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.
Peter Zeihan
Geopolitical StrategistTexas heat challenges a strained energy grid
Japan’s navy gets an upgrade
How could RFK Jr. impact 2024 election?
Dr. Frank Luntz
Pollster and Political Analyst‘We want to find common ground’: Gen Z’s stubborn optimism
‘Take the job seriously’: Why Americans are fed up with Congress
‘If we can shrink it, it will stop growing’: Americans talk debt, deficit
Pete Ricketts
U.S. Senator for Nebraska