Skip to main content
Business

Apple and Google lose billions in back taxes, EU fines across the pond


The European Commission scored two big wins against major U.S. tech companies on Tuesday, Sept. 10. Both Apple and Google will have to pay billions of euros after nearly a decade of fighting in EU courts. 

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 53% Center 20% Right 27%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

Apple lost its final appeal to avoid paying $14.34 billion in back taxes to Ireland. The European Court of Justice ruled the iPhone-maker received too sweet of a deal to make Ireland its European headquarters.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The ruling stems from a practice known as a “Double Irish” scheme.

For U.S. companies that operate in multiple countries, it was a way for them to shield non-U.S. profits from U.S. corporate tax. But they didn’t pay much in Ireland either; the money would get funneled from Ireland to a tax haven. 

The tax loophole was used by Ireland to attract major tech companies to its shores for European headquarters. After pressure from the EU and U.S., Ireland was forced to close the loophole in 2014. However, existing companies like Apple were grandfathered in and could take advantage of the law until 2020.

In 2016, the European Commission ruled Ireland provided illegal state aid to Apple by not collecting 13 billion euros in taxes from 2004 to 2014.

“No one did anything wrong here and we need to stand together,” Apple CEO Tim Cook told the Irish Independent back in 2016. “Ireland is being picked on and this is unacceptable.”

Cook also called claims made by European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager that the company only paid 0.005% in taxes “total political crap.” He said the company paid $400 million in taxes in 2014, making Apple the highest taxpayer in Ireland that year. 

Eight years later, Vestager said winning the final appeal against Apple made her cry.

“Today marks a step forward and it’s encouraging,” Vestager said Tuesday. “It’s encouraging for us to do more. The commission will continue its work on harmful tax competition and aggressive tax planning, both in terms of legislative proposals but also enforcement.”

Other major multinational companies, like Amazon and Starbucks, have avoided paying back taxes, unlike Apple. But the commission’s case against Ireland and Apple proved stronger after getting documents where Irish officials were upfront about just how good of a deal they gave Apple.

The Luxembourg-based court also upheld a $2.7 billion antitrust fine against Google on the same day, giving the commission its second victory in 24 hours. 

The Google fine has been in limbo since it was levied back in 2017. At the time, the commission accused Google of giving prominent placement to its own comparison shopping service and burying its rivals in the same results. Google had a 90% market share for search in the EU when the case first started. 

“The Google shopping case is a landmark in the history of regulatory actions against Big Tech companies,” Vestager said. “It was one of the first significant antitrust cases brought by a competition agency against a major digital company. And I think this case marked a pivotal shift in how digital companies were regulated and also perceived.”

“In essence, the Google shopping case was a catalyst for change, inspiring a more vigilant and proactive approach to regulating Big Tech and of course, ensuring also a fairer digital marketplace,” she added.

Google is a frequent target of the competition committee and has been fined more than 8 billion euros in the last 10 years. Google is still waiting for final rulings on challenges to cases involving the Android operating system for mobile phones and its advertising platform

Google also has antitrust concerns to deal with in the U.S. In a trial that started Monday, Sept. 9, over its advertising practices, the Department of Justice argued, “Google has used anticompetitive, exclusionary, and unlawful means to eliminate or severely diminish any threat to its dominance over digital advertising technologies.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

MARGRETHE VESTAGER:

“Today is a big win for European citizens and for tax justice.”

SIMONE DEL ROSARIO:

That big win for the European Union is a Big L for Apple. Apple is forced to cough up nearly $14.5 billion in back taxes to Ireland.

It’s the end of an 8-year legal battle. The European Court of Justice ruled Tuesday the tech giant got too sweet of a deal from Dublin to be the home of its European headquarters. And now it’s all going sour.

It stems from something known as the “Double Irish” scheme. For U.S. companies that operate in multiple countries, it was a way for them to shield non-U.S. profits from U.S. corporate tax. But they didn’t pay much in Ireland either, that money would get funneled from Ireland to a tax haven.

Don’t get me started on a “Double Irish with a Dutch Sandwich.” I’m gonna Irish exit before we get too deep into these tax terms.

The Double Irish scheme was alive and well until 2014 when the EU and US pressured Ireland to close the loophole. But existing companies that used the scheme grandfathered in until 2020.

In 2016, the European Commission first ruled Ireland illegally provided state aid to Apple by not collecting 13 billion euros in taxes between 2004 and 2014. European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager also claimed Apple paid just 0.005% in taxes in 2014.

Apple CEO Tim Cook hit back, saying it was “total political crap” and claimed they paid $400 million in taxes in 2014, making them the highest taxpayer in Ireland.

He made the comments to the Irish Independent in 2016, saying, “No one did anything wrong here and we need to stand together. Ireland is being picked on and this is unacceptable.”

Eight years later, Vestager on Tuesday said her victory against Apple made her cry. It’s the final ruling by the court and cannot be appealed despite Apple claiming “the European Commission is trying to retroactively change the rules.”

MARGRETHE VESTAGER:

“Today marks a step forward, and it’s encouraging. It’s encouraging for us to do more. The Commission will continue its work on harmful tax competition and aggressive tax planning, both in terms of legislative proposals, but also enforcement.”

SIMONE DEL ROSARIO:

Other international businesses like Amazon and Starbucks have beat similar charges in the EU. But the Commission’s case against Ireland and Apple proved stronger after getting documents where Irish officials were rather upfront about just how good Apple’s deal was.

The Competition Commission also notched a smaller victory Tuesday as the Luxembourg-based court upheld a $2.7 billion antitrust fine against Google.

MARGRETHE VESTAGER:

“The Google Shopping case is a landmark in the history of regulatory actions against big tech companies. It was one of the first significant antitrust cases brought by a competition agency against a major digital company. And I think this case marked a pivotal shift in how digital companies were regulated and also perceived.”

SIMONE DEL ROSARIO:

The fine’s been in limbo since it was levied back in 2017. At the time, the commission accused Google of giving prominent placement to its own comparison shopping service and burying its rivals in the same results. At the time, Google had a 90% market share for search in the EU.

In the ruling, the judges made clear they weren’t punishing success, a defense often used in antitrust cases.

MARGRETHE VESTAGER:

“In essence, the Google Shopping case was a catalyst for change. Inspiring more vigilant and proactive approach to regulating big tech and of course, of course, ensuring also a fairer digital marketplace.”

SIMONE DEL ROSARIO:

Google is a frequent target of the competition committee and has been fined more than 8 billion Euros in the last ten years. They are still waiting for final rulings on challenges to cases involving the Android operating system for mobile phones and its advertising platform.

Google is also in trouble at home. For more on the monopoly charges against the search giant, search “Google antitrust” for stories like this at SAN.com.