Jack Aylmer
THE OFFSHORE WIND FARM THAT SPILLED DEBRIS INTO THE ATLANTIC OCEAN THIS SUMMER IS AT THE CENTER OF A LEGAL BATTLE THAT COULD BE HEADING TO THE SUPREME COURT.
A GROUP OF NANTUCKET RESIDENTS ARE BEHIND THE EFFORT
THAT HAS BEEN THREE YEARS IN THE MAKING-
THEIR ORGANIZATION, ACK FOR WHALES, SAYS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IGNORED ASPECTS OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT IN THEIR DEVELOPMENT OF THE VINEYARD WIND PROJECT OFF THE COAST OF MASSACHUSETTS.
DEVELOPERS CONTEND THE REVIEW PROCESS WAS RIGOROUS AND THOROUGH.
BEFORE SOMETHING LIKE AN OFFSHORE WIND FARM CAN BE BUILT-
THE NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE IS REQUIRED UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT TO ISSUE A BIOLOGICAL OPINION ON THE IMPACT IT WILL HAVE ON NEARBY THREATENED ANIMALS.
BUT ACK FOR WHALES ARGUES THEY ONLY CONSIDERED THE EFFECTS OF WHAT A HANDFUL OF OFFSHORE WIND TURBINES WOULD HAVE ON THE ENDANGERED RIGHT WHALE POPULATION.
EVEN THOUGH THE AGENCY WAS ALREADY SET TO APPROVE OVER 300 ADDITIONAL TURBINES-
IN ITS OWN WORDS, THE NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE HAS SAID THE LOSS OF EVEN ONE RIGHT WHALE A YEAR MAY REDUCE THE LIKELIHOOD OF SPECIES RECOVERY.
AN ANALYSIS THAT ACK FOR WHALES CLAIMS WAS DISREGARDED WHEN THE AGENCY INTENTIONALLY EXCLUDED THE POTENTIAL HARM CAUSED TO THEM BY HUNDREDS OF MORE TURBINES.
THE GROUP SAYS A BLADE FAILURE AT THE WIND FARM OVER THE SUMMER THAT CAUSED FIBERGLASS DEBRIS TO WASH UP ON SURROUNDING BEACHES FOR WEEKS QUOTE-
MAKES CLEAR THE COST OF THE GOVERNMENT’S DECISION TO IGNORE ITS OWN LAWS.
THEIR LEGAL CHALLENGE OF THE VINEYARD WIND PROJECT WAS MOST RECENTLY DISMISSED BY THE U.S. FIRST CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS IN APRIL-
SO NOW THESE NANTUCKETERS ARE FILING A PETITION WITH THE NATION’S HIGHEST COURT TO HEAR THEIR CASE.
BUT WHETHER OR NOT SCOTUS DECIDES TO TAKE IT UP STILL REMAINS TO BE SEEN.