Skip to main content
U.S.

Federal judge rules Illinois’ concealed carry public transit ban unconstitutional

Share

This report was created with support from enhanced software.


A federal judge ruled it’s unconstitutional for the state of Illinois to prohibit residents with concealed carry permits from carrying on public transportation. The judge cited the Supreme Court’s 2022 Bruen decision.

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 17% Center 35% Right 48%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

The ruling currently applies only to the four plaintiffs who challenged the law in a 2022 lawsuit. They argued that the ban infringed upon their Second Amendment right to self-defense while using buses and trains.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The Bruen decision mandates that firearms regulations be evaluated using the test of the “historical tradition of firearm regulation,” setting a new standard for constitutional scrutiny.

Under this new standard, governments must demonstrate that gun control measures align with U.S. historical traditions. This requirement is reshaping firearms legislation nationwide.

U.S. District Judge Iain Johnston made the decision based on examination of historical records. The judge concluded that the state failed to demonstrate a founding-era tradition of firearm regulation that would justify prohibiting concealed carry on public transit for permit holders.

Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul’s office is preparing to challenge the recent ruling, indicating a likely appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. Raoul’s office said that until there’s a final decision, Illinois residents should continue to abide by the state’s concealed carry law on the books.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Lauren Taylor

A FEDERAL JUDGE RULED – IT’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL FOR THE STATE OF ILLINOIS TO PROHIBIT RESIDENTS WITH CONCEALED CARRY PERMITS FROM CARRYING ON PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, CITING THE SUPREME COURT’S 2022 BRUEN DECISION.

 

THE RULING CURRENTLY APPLIES ONLY TO THE FOUR PLAINTIFFS WHO CHALLENGED THE LAW IN A 2022 LAWSUIT, ARGUING THAT THE BAN INFRINGED UPON THEIR second amendment RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE WHILE USING BUSES AND TRAINS.

 

THE BRUEN DECISION MANDATES THAT FIREARMS REGULATIONS BE EVALUATED USING THE TEST OF THE ‘HISTORICAL TRADITION OF FIREARM REGULATION,’ SETTING A NEW STANDARD FOR CONSTITUTIONAL SCRUTINY.

 

UNDER THIS NEW STANDARD, GOVERNMENTS MUST DEMONSTRATE THAT GUN CONTROL MEASURES ALIGN WITH U.S. HISTORICAL TRADITIONS, A REQUIREMENT THAT IS RESHAPING FIREARMS LEGISLATION NATIONWIDE.

 

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE IAIN JOHNSTON MADE THE DECISION BASED ON EXAMINATION OF HISTORICAL RECORDS, CONCLUDING THAT THE STATE FAILED TO DEMONSTRATE A FOUNDING-ERA TRADITION OF FIREARM REGULATION THAT WOULD JUSTIFY PROHIBITING CONCEALED CARRY ON PUBLIC TRANSIT FOR PERMIT HOLDERS.

 

ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL KWAME RAOUL’S OFFICE IS PREPARING TO CHALLENGE THE RECENT RULING, INDICATING A LIKELY APPEAL TO THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS.

 

RAOUL’S OFFICE SAYS UNTIL THERE’S A FINAL DECISION – ILLINOIS RESIDENTS SHOULD CONTINUE TO ABIDE BY THE STATE’S CONCEALED CARRY LAW ON THE BOOKS.

 

FOR SAN, I’M LT..