Feds accuse Sheetz of discrimination for using criminal records when hiring

Apr 23

Lauren Taylor Anchor

By Lauren Taylor (Anchor), Evan Hummel (Producer), Jake Maslo (Video Editor)

Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News™

The U.S. federal government launched a lawsuit against Sheetz, alleging racial discrimination in its hiring process due to use of criminal records. According to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the gas station and convenience store chain allegedly discriminated against minority applicants by refusing to hire some individuals with criminal convictions.

The lawsuit contends that Sheetz unintentionally screened out minority candidates at higher rates than white applicants. Failed criminal background checks caused 13%-14.5% of minority applicants to be denied. The system only denied 8% of white applicants.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Although the EEOC said Sheetz wasn’t motivated by prejudice, the agency claimed the chain violated federal law by denying employment to a group of job candidates based on their race. This hiring practice allegedly violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which outlaws even unintentional discrimination based on sex, religion and national origin.

While the EEOC uses similar background checks, it is urging Sheetz to revise its approach to avoid unfairly excluding applicants with prior offenses.

Sheetz responded by saying it is dedicated to diversity and inclusion. The company worked with the EEOC for nearly eight years to find common ground.

Media coverage of the issue varied. Right-leaning sources highlighted President Joe Biden’s recent visit to a Sheetz location followed by the lawsuit. Left-leaning outlets focused more on the legal proceedings.

Tags: Discrimination, Joe Biden, Pennsylvania

[LAUREN TAYLOR]

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS GOING AFTER SHEETZ FOR ALLEGED RACIAL DISCRIMINATION FOR USING CRIMINAL RECORDS IN ITS HIRING PROCESS.

THE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION SAYS THE GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE CHAIN IS DISCRIMINATING AGAINST MINORITY APPLICANTS BY REFUSING TO HIRE APPLICANTS WITH CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS.

THE SUIT CLAIMS SHEETZ UNINTENTIONALLY SCREENED OUT MINORITY CANDIDATES AT A HIGHER RATE THAN WHITE APPLICANTS.

FAILED CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS CAUSED 13 TO 14.5 PERCENT OF MINORITY APPLICANTS TO BE DENIED, BUT ONLY 8 PERCENT OF WHITE APPLICANTS

ALTHOUGH THE E-E-O-C SAID SHEETZ WASN’T MOTIVATED BY PREJUDICE–

THE AGENCY SAID THE CHAIN BROKE FEDERAL LAW BY DENYING EMPLOYMENT TO A CLASS OF JOB CANDIDATES BECAUSE OF THEIR RACE. THE E-E-O-C SAYING THE HIRING PRACTICES VIOLATED TITLE 7 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT THAT BARS EVEN UNINTENTIONAL DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX, RELIGION AND NATIONAL ORIGIN.

THE E-E-O-C USES SIMILAR BACKGROUND CHECKS.

BUT IS REQUESTING SHEETZ REVISE ITS APPROACH TO AVOID UNFAIRLY EXCLUDING APPLICANTS WITH PREVIOUS OFFENSES.

SHEETZ RESPONDED BY EMPHASIZING ITS COMMITMENT TO DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION.

SAYING THEY’VE WORKED WITH THE E-E-O-C FOR NEARLY EIGHT YEARS TO FIND COMMON GROUND.

WE NOTICED THIS STORY GOT A LOT OF COVERAGE BY RIGHT LEANING SOURCES – SOME HIGHLIGHTING PRESIDENT BIDEN’S RECENT VISIT TO A SHEETZ AND THE LAWSUIT THAT SOON FOLLOWED. WHILE ON THE LEFT – MOST OUTLETS FOCUSED ON THE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

AT STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS, WE AIM TO PROVIDE YOU WITH THE UNBIASED, STRAIGHT FACTS.

WE PRESENT THESE EXAMPLES SO YOU CAN FORM YOUR OWN OPINION.