Skip to main content
U.S.

Montana Supreme Court upholds ruling in landmark youth climate case

Listen
Share

Young climate activists are celebrating another victory after Montana’s Supreme Court ruled in their favor for a second time. A lawsuit brought by the activists claimed the government violated their constitutional right to a clean environment.

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 28% Center 71% Right 2%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

Sixteen plaintiffs, now ages 7 to 23, sued the state of Montana in 2020. The case highlighted the state’s significant carbon dioxide emissions despite its Constitution guaranteeing “a clean and healthful environment … for present and future generations,” thus compelling the government to address global warming.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Montana obtains most of its energy from burning coal, making it a top oil and gas producer.

In 2023, a state judge sided with the climate activists. The judge ruled that the state violated their right to a “clean and healthful” environment. On Wednesday, Dec. 18, Montana‘s Supreme Court upheld that ruling in a 6-1 vote.

The court ultimately rejected the state’s argument that fossil fuel projects only produce a small amount of greenhouse gases. Montana also cited other states and countries contributing to carbon dioxide emissions in the Earth’s atmosphere.

Melissa Hornbein, an attorney for the activists, said the ruling will push Montana to pursue clean and renewable energy practices.

“This ruling clarifies that the Constitution sets a clear directive for Montana to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, which are among the highest in the nation on a per capita basis, and to transition to a clean, renewable energy future.”

Statement by the attorney for the plaintiffs, Melissa Hornbein

A plaintiff named in the case, Rikki Held, said the landmark ruling serves as a victory for every young person whose future is threatened by climate change.

Meanwhile, Montana’s attorney general said the lawsuit was meaningless, and the overall argument has no effect on the rest of the world.

Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte said the decision is under review, but lawsuits like these are a waste of taxpayer money and will increase energy bills across the state instead.

Hawaii, New York and Pennsylvania are among states that have environmental protections enshrined in their constitutions, similar to Montana.

Tags: , , , , , ,

[Lauren Taylor]

YOUNG CLIMATE ACTIVISTS CELEBRATING ANOTHER VICTORY AFTER MONTANA’S SUPREME COURT RULES IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFFS…FOR A SECOND TIME. 

THE LAWSUIT CLAIMS THE GOVERNMENT VIOLATED THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO AN ENVIRONMENT FREE OF FOSSIL FUELS.  

SIXTEEN PLAINTIFFS SUED THE STATE OF MONTANA, AT THE TIME OF THE LAWSUIT IN 2020, THEY WERE ALL UNDER THE AGE OF 18. . 

THE CASE DREW ATTENTION TO THE STATE’S MAJOR PRODUCTION OF CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS, IN AN ATTEMPT TO FORCE THE GOVERNMENT TO STOP HARMING THE PLANET. 

MONTANA OBTAINS MOST OF ITS ENERGY FROM BURNING COAL–MAKING THE STATE A TOP OIL AND GAS PRODUCER. 

IN 2023, A STATE JUDGE SIDED WITH THE CLIMATE ACTIVISTS THAT THE STATE VIOLATED THEIR RIGHT TO A “CLEAN AND HEALTHFUL” ENVIRONMENT

ON WEDNESDAY, MONTANA JUSTICES UPHELD THAT RULING IN A SIX TO ONE VOTE. 

THE COURT REJECTED THE STATE’S ARGUMENT THAT FOSSIL FUEL PROJECTS ONLY PRODUCE SMALL AMOUNTS OF GREENHOUSE GASES. MONTANA CITED OTHER STATES AND COUNTRIES THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CO2 IN EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE. 

THE ATTORNEY FOR THE ACTIVISTS CALLS IT A MONUMENTAL MOMENT THAT PUSHES  MONTANA TO START PURSUING  CLEAN AND RENEWABLE ENERGY PRACTICES. 

ONE OF THE PLAINTIFFS SAYS THE LANDMARK RULING SERVES AS A VICTORY FOR EVERY YOUNG PERSON WHOSE FUTURE IS THREATENED BY CLIMATE CHANGE 

MONTANA’S ATTORNEY GENERAL SAID THE LAWSUIT WAS MEANINGLESS AND THE OVERALL ARGUMENT HAS NO EFFECT ON THE REST OF THE WORLD. 

HAWAII, NEW YORK, PENNSLYVANIA, ARE SOME OF THE STATES THAT HAVE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONS ENSHRINED IN THEIR CONSTITUTION SIMILAR TO MONTANA. 

GOVERNOR GREG GIANFORTE SAID THE DECISION IS UNDER REVIEW BUT LAWSUITS LIKE THESE ARE A WASTE TO TAXPAYERS AND INSTEAD WILL INCREASE ENERGY BILLS ACROSS THE STATE. 

FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS, I’M LAUREN TAYLOR