US shifts to air power strategy in Middle East, USS Lincoln departs

The Pentagon is reshaping its military presence in the Middle East, with the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier set to leave the region. For the first time since the onset of the Gaza war, the U.S. won’t have an aircraft carrier in the area.

Defense officials, however, stress this change doesn’t signal a reduction in America’s ability to respond to threats. Instead, the U.S. is leaning on air power to maintain its readiness.

B-52 bombers, known for their long-range strike capabilities, and additional fighter squadrons are being deployed across the region. Naval destroyers and other assets will also remain in place to provide flexibility and rapid response capabilities.

Pentagon officials state this configuration offers deterrence and readiness comparable to an aircraft carrier group, though through a different approach.

Pentagon spokesperson Maj. Gen. Patrick Ryder emphasized the new deployments provide a “significant amount of capability on par with what we’ve been doing in the Middle East.”

The shift comes amid mounting global pressures, as U.S. forces balance ongoing support for Ukraine, rising tensions in the South China Sea and operations in the Red Sea.

Recent months have stretched resources thin, with U.S. forces intercepting missiles and drones launched by Iran-backed Houthi militants and supporting allies like Israel.

Defense officials cite efficiency as a key driver behind the shift. Bombers and fighter jets, paired with advanced surveillance systems, offer robust air power without overextending resources. This adaptation is part of the Pentagon’s broader strategy to manage multiple global security challenges simultaneously.

The departure of the Lincoln marks a significant moment in U.S. strategy. The ship had been stationed in the region to help deter threats from Iran and its proxies. The carrier’s presence has been pivotal in reinforcing security and projecting strength during a volatile time in the Middle East.

Still, officials argue that bombers and land-based fighters, supported by naval destroyers, can effectively maintain the U.S. deterrence mission. They highlight the flexibility of air power in addressing threats ranging from maritime instability to regional conflict.

This recalibration reflects a strategic balancing act as the Pentagon juggles global demands. By reallocating resources, the U.S. aims to sustain its commitments in the Middle East while remaining prepared for challenges elsewhere.