Bus after bus, major cities far from the border are starting to buckle under budgetary pressures of the nation’s migrant crisis. S&P Global Ratings is monitoring the credit health of New York, Denver and Chicago as they face sheltering tens of thousands of asylum-seekers.
“The issue will destroy New York City,” Mayor Eric Adams said last year.
Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
New York
For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023, New York City spent $1.5 billion in asylum-seeker costs. In the current fiscal year, which ends June 30, 2024, the city expects costs to nearly triple.
The city budgeted $4.2 billion to care for incoming migrants, most bused from the border. In fiscal year 2025, that category will increase to $4.9 billion.
To offset costs, Adams announced 5% budget cuts for every city agency, from education to public safety.
“It’s really the cities that are on the hook to cover the majority of the expenses,” said Felix Winnekens, lead analyst of public finance for S&P Global Ratings.
“New York City is in a bit of a unique situation because of its right to shelter,” Winnekens told Straight Arrow News. “So basically, anyone in the city – could be a homeless person, could be a migrant or an asylum-seeker – that needs shelter, the city has to provide shelter. That’s part of a consent decree that the city entered into back in the 1980s.”
Adams has moved to suspend aspects of right-to-shelter while the city currently houses more than 60,000 asylum-seekers.
The state, which supports Adams’ request to suspend, has had to dip into reserves to help shoulder costs, Winnekens said.
Chicago
In Illinois, a battle is brewing between governments. The state, Cook County and Chicago officials estimated it will cost $321 million to support migrant operations through the end of the year.
While the state and Cook County have pledged $250 million, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has reportedly backed away from the city committing to $71 million to cover the shortfall.
“I don’t believe anyone in Chicago is questioning my commitment to this mission,” Johnson said.
According to the city, there are currently more than 12,000 migrants in Chicago shelters as of Feb. 20.
Denver
Denver is facing a $180 million gap in the city budget that must be filled to shelter existing and incoming asylum-seekers.
“Without any federal support, without any work authorization, without changes to policy, we are going to have to make changes to what we can do in terms of our city budget,” Denver Mayor Mike Johnston said earlier this month. “This is a plan for shared sacrifice.”
The Department of Motor Vehicles and Parks and Recreation are the first areas in the city to see cuts, but they won’t be the last, Johnston warned.
In 2023, the city received more migrants per capita than any other city in the nation.
A national problem without a national response
Unlike the federal government, most cities and states are required to pass balanced budgets. When migrant costs surge, money has to be cut from other services to make ends meet.
“We do not see any near-term pressure on the ratings, but I think it’ll be a continued struggle for those cities to find the right balance between cutting expenditures and making ends meet to address the increase in asylum-seeker costs,” Winnekens said.
Meanwhile, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has vowed to continue busing migrants to these cities, saying they’ve seen only a fraction of what overwhelmed Texas border towns face daily.
While Abbott criticized the federal government’s border policies, the Democratic mayors of these affected cities also took issue with the federal response.
“We’re getting no support on this national crisis,” Adams said last year.
With Congress at a perceived impasse, Winnekens said cities could be on their own to shoulder costs at least through the election. While New York, Chicago and Denver have faced the brunt of migration after border towns, S&P is also eyeing Washington, D.C., Boston, Los Angeles and San Francisco as asylum-seekers seek out more big cities.
Tags: asylum seekers, Border, Border crossings, Brandon Johnson, Chicago, Denver, Eric Adams, Greg Abbott, Migrant buses, migrants, Mike Johnston, New York, New York City, S&P, Texas, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S.-Mexico Border
Eric Adams: This issue will destroy New York City.
Simone Del Rosario: New York, Chicago, Denver…Bus after bus after bus, these cities are starting to buckle under the budgetary pressures of the nation’s migrant crisis.
Mike Johnston: Without any federal support, without any work authorization, without changes to policy, we are going to have to make changes to what we can do in terms of our city budget.
Simone Del Rosario: In Denver, that means a $180 million gap in the city budget that must be filled to shelter existing and incoming asylum seekers.
Mike Johnston: This is a plan for shared sacrifice.
Simone Del Rosario: The Department of Motor Vehicles and Parks and Rec are the first to see cuts, but certainly won’t be the last. In 2023, the midsized city received more migrants per capita than any other city in the nation.
Eric Adams: The curveball though was the migrant crisis. Curveball? That’s not even a curveball. That’s a brushback pitch that knocked us to the ground but we gotta get back up and knock it out of the park.
Simone Del Rosario: For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023, New York City spent $1.5 billion in asylum-seeker costs. In the current fiscal year, which ends June 30th of this year, the city expects costs to nearly triple, budgeting $4.2 billion to care for incoming migrants, most bused from the border. To offset, Mayor Adams announced 5% budget cuts for every city agency, from education to public safety.
Felix Winnekens: It’s really the cities that are on the hook to cover the majority of the expenses.
Simone Del Rosario: Felix Winnekens of S&P Global is closely monitoring cities’ credit health as they face abnormal migrant pressures.
Felix Winnekens: New York City is in a bit of a unique situation because of its right to shelter. So basically, anyone in the city, could be a homeless person, could be a migrant or an asylum seeker that needs shelter, the city has to provide shelter. That’s part of a consent decree that the city entered into back in the 1980s.
Simone Del Rosario: Mayor Adams has moved to suspend right-to-shelter, while they currently house more than 60,000 asylum seekers in the city. The state, which supports Adams’ request to suspend, has had to dip into reserves to help shoulder costs.
Meanwhile in Illinois, a battle is brewing between governments. While the state and Cook County have pledged $250 million to support migrant operations, it’s $71 million shy of what is reportedly needed to keep migrant programs running through the year.
Brandon Johnson: I don’t believe anyone in Chicago is questioning my commitment to this mission.
Reporter: Well they are because you didn’t put in the $70 million that you promised you would give them at that meeting and then walked away from it.
Brandon Johnson: Were you at that meeting?
Simone Del Rosario: Unlike the federal government, most cities and states are required to pass balanced budgets. So when migrant costs surge, money has to be cut from other services. Winnekens said there’s no near-term pressure on cities’ ratings so long as those cuts are made.
Felix Winnekens: But I think it’ll be a continued struggle for those cities to find the right balance between sort of cutting expenditures, making ends meet to address the increase in asylum seeker costs.
Simone Del Rosario: Meanwhile, Texas Governor Greg Abbott has vowed to continue busing migrants to these cities, saying they’ve seen only a fraction of what overwhelmed Texas border towns face daily. While he criticizes the federal government’s border policies, these Democratic mayors also have federal beef.
Eric Adams: We’re getting no support on this national crisis.
Simone Del Rosario: And with Congress at a perceived impasse, Winnekens says cities could be on their own to shoulder costs at least through the election. While New York, Chicago and Denver have faced the brunt of migration after border towns, S&P is also eyeing D.C., Boston, LA and San Francisco as asylum seekers seek out more big cities.
MOST POPULAR
-
Getty Images
Harvey Weinstein’s rape conviction overturned, victims could see new trial
-
Getty Images
Pythons decimate Florida’s wildlife, is eating them the answer?
-
Getty Images
Trump could lose Secret Service protection if found guilty
-
AP Images
Argentina asks to join NATO as Milei looks to enhance security, strengthen ties