Hey, everybody, Peter Zion here coming to you from Milwaukee where I’m doing a little street hiking along the convicted mica River, which is, you know, say that five times fast. This used to be one of the great industrial heartlands of the United States, big into steel, big into heavy manufacturing. And the reason was because of what’s right here. Next to me, will be things on water is about 112, the cost of moving the Milan and courtesy of Kentucky. And the nearby Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, just like Chicago, just like Oshkosh and Green Bay were part of a broader transport network that include the entirety of the Upper Midwest of the United States and the New England states and the Mid Atlantic states. Basically, from here in Chicago, you can take your local rivers and canals out to the Great Lakes go through the Great Lakes until you get to Erie, and then you’ve got two choices. You can either take the Mohawk River, Erie Canal, and Hudson to New York direct, or you can go the long way, which goes through Quebec and Ontario, in order to reach the Atlantic Ocean that will loop back around from New York, you go south through the barrier island system, all the way to Miami, from Miami, you can go through the barrier island systems all the way to metamorphose or you can hit New Orleans and go up the Mississippi River and go all the way back up to Chicago via canal that links into the Illinois River. It’s the great circle of North America. And it has long been one of the great manufacturing zones of the world. Until about 1920. And then an 1820 as part of a discretionary protection system, the United States put in place a law called the Jones Act, which says that any cargo transported on any vessel that goes between any two American ports has to be on a vessel that is American owned Captain crude and built. And over the course of the next century, we saw cargo transport on America’s waterways drop by 97 98%, something like that. Anyway, so we basically taken what has been the world’s most beneficial natural geographic feature from an economic point of view, and crushed it into a relevance. Now that we are entering an environment where the United States wants to double the size of its industrial plant, in the aftermath, or the soon to be aftermath of the European and especially Chinese failures, we need to start thinking a little bit differently. And that means we need to start looking for things that are very, very, very low hanging fruit. In this case, that means getting the waterways back up and running again. Because when you think about the sort of manufacturing that the United States traditionally is not good at things like electronics, it’s largely because you have different price points for different types of work. The person who does injection molding is not the same as the person who does the coding for the wire is not the same who does the software work. You need multiple skill sets in different places. And if you can drop the transport costs for getting those intermediate products among those places, well, then you’re looking at something pretty special. And we actually have that built in to the American heartland itself just requires changing one law, not abolishing changing part of the Jones Act, the Interstate Commerce Act, if you will, is about regulating commerce among the states on the water and some of that we still need we clearly need a national regulator. But the rest of it really honestly can go away. And if you think that this is a nationalist issue, that you know, we should have this all in American hands, consider that we don’t do that for truck. And we don’t do that for rail. And we don’t do that for air only for water only for the thing where we have a massive geographic advantage. So if you’re looking for a quick and easy way to stimulate economic growth, and Wisconsin and Illinois, in New York, anywhere in New England, anywhere in the south, anywhere in the Midwest, this is the low hanging fruit. All we have to do is get out of her own way
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘Extremist’ or ‘phony’: Americans share who they voted for and why
Thursday Dr. Frank Luntz‘Extreme’ or ‘fake’: Swing voters weigh Trump or Harris
Nov 4 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Strong’: Why some men say they’ll vote for Trump
Oct 29 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Easy answer is China’: National security experts discuss gravest concerns
Oct 24 Dr. Frank LuntzAmend the Jones Act to revitalize US waterways
By Straight Arrow News
In the wake of deglobalization and international conflict, the United States seeks to regrow its domestic manufacturing and industrial base. Fortunately, the United States already has one of the largest and most developed industrial waterway systems in the world. Unfortunately, that system is not currently living up to its full potential.
Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan argues one of the first and easiest steps the U.S. should take to unlock this potential is to amend the Jones Act, which limits the kinds of vessels (and their crews) permitted on U.S. commercial and industrial waterways. Zeihan cites an enormous drop in the use of these waterways following the Jones Act and reminds us that transporting goods by water is still a small fraction of the cost of transporting by land.
An excerpt from Peter’s Oct. 31 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:
The U.S. is blessed with one of the most prolific water networks in the world, yet it operates at sub-optimal levels. You’ve all heard my thoughts on the Jones Act, so you can probably guess where the blame falls once again.
Something will have to change as the U.S. reshores its industry and attempts to build out its manufacturing footprint. Thankfully, reviving water transport in the U.S. is a low-hanging fruit. All it requires is some amendments to the Jones Act and its regulations on waterborne commerce.
If we can manage that, we’ll all enjoy some nice economic growth thanks to reduced product transport costs and a boost to U.S. manufacturing.
Hey, everybody, Peter Zion here coming to you from Milwaukee where I’m doing a little street hiking along the convicted mica River, which is, you know, say that five times fast. This used to be one of the great industrial heartlands of the United States, big into steel, big into heavy manufacturing. And the reason was because of what’s right here. Next to me, will be things on water is about 112, the cost of moving the Milan and courtesy of Kentucky. And the nearby Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, just like Chicago, just like Oshkosh and Green Bay were part of a broader transport network that include the entirety of the Upper Midwest of the United States and the New England states and the Mid Atlantic states. Basically, from here in Chicago, you can take your local rivers and canals out to the Great Lakes go through the Great Lakes until you get to Erie, and then you’ve got two choices. You can either take the Mohawk River, Erie Canal, and Hudson to New York direct, or you can go the long way, which goes through Quebec and Ontario, in order to reach the Atlantic Ocean that will loop back around from New York, you go south through the barrier island system, all the way to Miami, from Miami, you can go through the barrier island systems all the way to metamorphose or you can hit New Orleans and go up the Mississippi River and go all the way back up to Chicago via canal that links into the Illinois River. It’s the great circle of North America. And it has long been one of the great manufacturing zones of the world. Until about 1920. And then an 1820 as part of a discretionary protection system, the United States put in place a law called the Jones Act, which says that any cargo transported on any vessel that goes between any two American ports has to be on a vessel that is American owned Captain crude and built. And over the course of the next century, we saw cargo transport on America’s waterways drop by 97 98%, something like that. Anyway, so we basically taken what has been the world’s most beneficial natural geographic feature from an economic point of view, and crushed it into a relevance. Now that we are entering an environment where the United States wants to double the size of its industrial plant, in the aftermath, or the soon to be aftermath of the European and especially Chinese failures, we need to start thinking a little bit differently. And that means we need to start looking for things that are very, very, very low hanging fruit. In this case, that means getting the waterways back up and running again. Because when you think about the sort of manufacturing that the United States traditionally is not good at things like electronics, it’s largely because you have different price points for different types of work. The person who does injection molding is not the same as the person who does the coding for the wire is not the same who does the software work. You need multiple skill sets in different places. And if you can drop the transport costs for getting those intermediate products among those places, well, then you’re looking at something pretty special. And we actually have that built in to the American heartland itself just requires changing one law, not abolishing changing part of the Jones Act, the Interstate Commerce Act, if you will, is about regulating commerce among the states on the water and some of that we still need we clearly need a national regulator. But the rest of it really honestly can go away. And if you think that this is a nationalist issue, that you know, we should have this all in American hands, consider that we don’t do that for truck. And we don’t do that for rail. And we don’t do that for air only for water only for the thing where we have a massive geographic advantage. So if you’re looking for a quick and easy way to stimulate economic growth, and Wisconsin and Illinois, in New York, anywhere in New England, anywhere in the south, anywhere in the Midwest, this is the low hanging fruit. All we have to do is get out of her own way
Hurricane Helene hits US coast, Appalachia and beyond
Israel holds upper hand against Lebanon, Hezbollah and Iran
The Sinaloa Cartel civil war
New Ukrainian weapons hit Russia where it hurts
Weighing social costs vs. economic benefits on immigration
Underreported stories from each side
MSNBC headline saying ‘Laken Riley’s killer never stood a chance’ sparks backlash
18 sources | 14% from the left AP ImagesLara Trump: Fears of retribution from president-elect result of ‘fearmongering’
6 sources | 0% from the right AP ImagesLatest Stories
News headlines compared: Did Trump win by a landslide?
World’s first carbon capture facility powered by wind energy coming to TX
Conor McGregor ordered to pay $257K over sexual assault case
Study on link between COVID-19 and cancer causes buzz online
Researchers hope PigeonBot flying robot can inspire next generation of flight
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Trump’s terrible judgment is to blame for Matt Gaetz drama
Yesterday Dr. Rashad RicheyDemocrats’ actions in Pennsylvania threaten democracy
Yesterday Star ParkerCelebrities are finally talking about perimenopause
Thursday Jordan ReidWhy the presidential election result wasn’t even close
Thursday Matthew Continetti