Everyone Good morning from Chile, Colorado, it’s a balmy 10 degrees today,
I got some bad news. So for those of you who’ve been following me for a bit, you know that over the summer, I recorded a video of the five technologies that I was most hopeful one for, the issue we’re facing is that we’re entering into a period of extreme capital dearth and a shortage of people in the 20s and the 30s, while the 20s people in the 20s, and the 30s are the folks who get together, imagine the future and develop the technology, and a lot of cheap capital is required to bring it to mass manufacture. And without those two factors, the pace of technological change that we’ve been used to seeing these last 2025 years, is going to slow considerably. And that’s before you consider any sort of general dislocations because of demographic aging or drops of consumption, or breakdowns and globalization. So the pace is way too slow, incredibly, and the question is, which technologies are kind of already at the hump, whether we’re just right on the edge of mass manufacturing mass application, and one of the technologies that I identified was something called Small Modular nuclear reactors. The idea is you have a reactor that’s small enough to fit on the back of a semi trailer. And you can just plug it into any other power system. So if you’ve got a coal plant, for example, that you were looking to decommission, you can pull one of these in or two of these based on the size, you know, up to 10. And just plug them in, and they’re good to go. And the 20% of electricity that the United States gets from nuclear currently could continue in perpetuity.
Well, over the course of the last couple of weeks, the companies that were involved in building the prototype of abandoned the project, they see the numbers no longer makes sense, they could get no sponsors. So if this technology is going to continue, it’s going to continue at a later time with different players in an environment of even sharper limitations on technological development and capital availability, which means it’s probably not going to happen this decade at all, which means the 20% of the electrical grid that is supplied by nuclear right now is going to fade away because with a couple of exceptions, all of those reactors are older than I am, and I turned 50 Very, very soon. So not only do we need to massively increase the amount of power generation, we have to double the size of the industrial plants as a Chinese break apart, and we need even more power. In order to do the green transition and maybe move to a more electric future. We also have to replace 20% of our total energy supply, which is at the moment all baseload which is something that wind and solar can’t come up with, or can’t work with because they’re too intermittent. So we just saw our overall challenge for the next decade become inordinately more difficult unless of course, someone picks up this technology very, very soon
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘Instill optimism’: Americans on how future generations can succeed
Friday Dr. Frank Luntz‘Have a little compassion’: Americans talk high holiday prices, anxiety
Dec 11 Dr. Frank Luntz‘System is rigged’: Black Americans on the American Dream
Nov 27 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Extremist’ or ‘phony’: Americans share who they voted for and why
Nov 21 Dr. Frank LuntzSmall nuclear reactors are not the future of energy
By Straight Arrow News
As the United States seeks to shift away from the fossil fuels that have been the backbone of its economy for over a century, many Americans now favor using nuclear power. Companies are investing in the development of small, modular nuclear reactors, with the belief that they can be constructed more quickly and cost-effectively. However, the industry has consistently faced challenges in building plants within specified timelines and budgets.
Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan reveals why he no longer sees modular nuclear reactors as the technology that could fix the energy crunch. He’s doubtful that significant progress will occur even within this decade.
Excerpted from Peter’s Nov. 28 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:
A while back, I talked about a few technologies I was most hopeful for — small modular nuclear reactors being one of those. Unfortunately, we’ll be drawing a line through it (for now).
As we enter a period of capital scarcity and top-heavy demographics, many companies working on these modular nuclear reactors have been forced to abandon ship. This complication adds another layer of complexity to the growing energy demands of the next decade.
So, if you were hoping to go off the grid with a reactor strapped to the back of your truck in 2030, it might be time to change your plans…
Everyone Good morning from Chile, Colorado, it’s a balmy 10 degrees today,
I got some bad news. So for those of you who’ve been following me for a bit, you know that over the summer, I recorded a video of the five technologies that I was most hopeful one for, the issue we’re facing is that we’re entering into a period of extreme capital dearth and a shortage of people in the 20s and the 30s, while the 20s people in the 20s, and the 30s are the folks who get together, imagine the future and develop the technology, and a lot of cheap capital is required to bring it to mass manufacture. And without those two factors, the pace of technological change that we’ve been used to seeing these last 2025 years, is going to slow considerably. And that’s before you consider any sort of general dislocations because of demographic aging or drops of consumption, or breakdowns and globalization. So the pace is way too slow, incredibly, and the question is, which technologies are kind of already at the hump, whether we’re just right on the edge of mass manufacturing mass application, and one of the technologies that I identified was something called Small Modular nuclear reactors. The idea is you have a reactor that’s small enough to fit on the back of a semi trailer. And you can just plug it into any other power system. So if you’ve got a coal plant, for example, that you were looking to decommission, you can pull one of these in or two of these based on the size, you know, up to 10. And just plug them in, and they’re good to go. And the 20% of electricity that the United States gets from nuclear currently could continue in perpetuity.
Well, over the course of the last couple of weeks, the companies that were involved in building the prototype of abandoned the project, they see the numbers no longer makes sense, they could get no sponsors. So if this technology is going to continue, it’s going to continue at a later time with different players in an environment of even sharper limitations on technological development and capital availability, which means it’s probably not going to happen this decade at all, which means the 20% of the electrical grid that is supplied by nuclear right now is going to fade away because with a couple of exceptions, all of those reactors are older than I am, and I turned 50 Very, very soon. So not only do we need to massively increase the amount of power generation, we have to double the size of the industrial plants as a Chinese break apart, and we need even more power. In order to do the green transition and maybe move to a more electric future. We also have to replace 20% of our total energy supply, which is at the moment all baseload which is something that wind and solar can’t come up with, or can’t work with because they’re too intermittent. So we just saw our overall challenge for the next decade become inordinately more difficult unless of course, someone picks up this technology very, very soon
Hurricane Helene hits US coast, Appalachia and beyond
Israel holds upper hand against Lebanon, Hezbollah and Iran
The Sinaloa Cartel civil war
New Ukrainian weapons hit Russia where it hurts
Weighing social costs vs. economic benefits on immigration
Underreported stories from each side
Scott Jennings: The biggest scandal in America is the cover-up of Biden’s condition
19 sources | 13% from the left Getty ImagesSinema reflects on criticism in exit interview: ‘Don’t give a s‑‑‑’
11 sources | 10% from the right Getty ImagesLatest Stories
Biden considers commuting death row: Report
Louisville police issue citation to homeless woman in labor
New book accuses Spotify of promoting fake artists
Andrew Cuomo sues for defamation after sexual harassment allegations
Driver kills at least two in Germany Christmas market attack
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Time to say goodbye to DEI
Friday Star ParkerIt’s time to take failed capitalism out of Christmas
Friday Dr. Rashad RicheyMusk-Ramaswamy DOGE initiative overdue and full of challenges
Thursday John FortierTrump’s Mar-a-Lago interview is a preview of troubles ahead
Thursday Jordan Reid