Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Alright, let’s talk about the latest Alex Jones settlement. As some of you may have followed, there was a first Alex Jones defamation case in Texas. That is the case that led to a verdict of nearly $50 million dollars. And we actually spoke to the plaintiff’s attorney Mark Bankston after that. And his belief was that that was only the start, that, in fact, there were going to be multiple more awards that Mark Bankston believed would end Infowars. And it appears as though that is indeed the direction that is going. We now have the Connecticut defamation case in which the total awards against Alex Jones, that he will have to pay a number of families related to victims of Sandy Hook, $965 million dollars. Now, in all of these types of cases, there are questions about what can you collect? A jury verdict is one thing but what can you collect?
The attorneys are going to deal with that. But there has been a real confusion maybe, or I’m kind of putting the most positive spin on it. Maybe some bad faith claims made around these verdicts, that people like me, are taking joy in what is essentially the censorship of Alex Jones, by destroying his livelihood, by making him pay out all this money that he doesn’t even have.
That could not be further from what is actually going on. So let’s actually talk about that.
When I say things, on the platforms I have, I have a responsibility. And depending on how potentially injurious or damaging what I am saying is, if untrue, I take even more seriously my responsibility.
So to give just like a banal example, if I’m mentioning who I think was in a particular movie from 20 years ago, I want to get that right. But it’s not really a high stakes thing. If I say, oh, you know, was it, uh, who played Batman in the 1990-ish Batman movie with Jack Nicholson? Oh, if I said instead of Michael Keaton, I named some other actors, you know, it’s kind of like no big deal.
And that’s fine. Nobody’s really damaged by that. On the other hand, if I’m going to start making claims about whether alleged victims of a crime are faking it, or are crisis actors, or any of the things that Alex Jones said, I want to be 110% sure that I’m getting that right. And if I get it wrong, as soon as I know that I got it wrong, or might have gotten it wrong, I’m going to do everything I can to find the truth and to correct that truth on the record.
And that responsibility was so ignored and squandered by Alex Jones, that it is correct that there be a serious penalty. So this isn’t about censorship. This isn’t about free speech. This is about, first of all, we have something called defamation. And when you can prove defamation in a court of law, it’s by definition not about free speech.
And beyond that, there should be consequences commensurate with the bad act. Now, it’s always the case with civil suits and jury verdicts, that people can get involved in this sort of like, is the verdict fair? Is it too high? Is it too low?
Well, how do you compare what the families of the Sandy Hook victims should get to the woman who had the hot coffee spilled on her from McDonald’s and all these different things? It is extraordinarily fraught to do that as an outsider both because there are jurisdictional differences between states when it comes to defamation suits and awards. There are factual differences.
The law is different where a defamation versus a negligent incident like a slippery walkway or hot coffee. These are all completely different things. And so while, from our point of view, we could say, well, what would be tougher for me getting burned with coffee or having Alex Jones lie about Sandy Hook? Well, I don’t know, it feels this way or that way. It’s very fraught. That’s not really the way we should be approaching it.
The way that this should be approached is Alex Jones has a platform on which he can say whatever he wants. Sometimes, what you say can be incorrect. And sometimes, depending on the context of the incorrect things that you say, it can be defamatory. And by its nature, states put a cap on what can be awarded.
What Alex Jones did is such a misuse of a public platform that the punishment should be very serious financially and that’s what juries have so far found. What will be collected remains to be seen.
Will this end Infowars? Remains to be seen. But this is not an issue of free speech. And it’s not an issue of censorship.
-
My final predictions for the 2024 US elections
The outcomes of the U.S. 2024 elections will likely be called later this week, although the presidential race is projected to be tight, coming down to just a handful of states in the Electoral College. Both the Democratic and Republican campaigns have polls they can cite in their favor, but nearly all of those polls… -
Georgia or Pennsylvania could decide the 2024 election
With roughly one week until Election Day, polls indicate an exceptionally tight race, with close calls in many battleground states. Georgia, in particular, is again expected to play a pivotal role. Four years ago, President Joe Biden barely won the state, flipping it from former President Trump’s 2016 victory. In response, Trump attempted to pressure… -
Polls projecting Trump victory should alarm American voters
With less than two weeks until Election Day, and early voting already underway in certain states, polls show a razor-thin race. Polling averages in key battleground states like Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin indicate the margins between Harris and Trump are within a single point. Some polling points to Trump being narrowly ahead in North Carolina… -
Why Republicans won’t admit who won 2020 election
President Joe Biden defeated former President Donald Trump in the U.S. 2020 election by margins of 74 votes in the Electoral College and over 7 million votes in the national popular vote count. Despite these outcomes, many elected Republican officials continue to refuse to acknowledge the winner of the 2020 election. During his debate with… -
Future of GOP will be determined in 2024 election
Former President Donald Trump delivered surprise victories in 2016, both in the Republican primaries and in the U.S. presidential election. Since then, however, some on the Right have blamed him for the GOP’s losses in 2018, 2020, and 2022, as well as for deepening the divide within the Republican Party between the far-right and center-right…
Latest Opinions
-
Clean energy sector reacts to potential policy shifts after Trump victory
-
8 states overwhelmingly approve noncitizen voting ballot measures
-
RFK Jr. talks potential role in Trump admin, says he won’t take away vaccines
-
Category 3 Hurricane Rafael threatens Cuba, the Gulf in rare November storm
-
MI officials dismiss voter fraud claims in viral Project Veritas video
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.