The deadly shooting in Buffalo in which ten people were killed after a white teenager went on a rampage inside a supermarket renewed focus on “the great replacement theory.” That idea suggests that white people are being replaced by minorities. The suspect in that massacre referenced the theory in a manifesto he allegedly wrote before the shooting. Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman argues that the attack in Buffalo is another example of how stochastic terrorism may be fueling these acts of violence.
Now, when I say stochastic terrorism, I’m not saying that the individual in the media has broken a law. I’m not a lawyer. And I don’t believe that that’s the case. I’m not saying you could charge anybody in particular, because of a shooting that someone else did, through the media, that is people in the media. This is not an issue of saying their speech is against the law. It’s more an issue of responsibility. And of us as people in the media, understanding the effect that our words can have. I make every effort not to make irresponsible speech on my program. And when I get something factually wrong, I make every effort to correct it right away and not to bury the correction at the back of whatever. And, of course, I make every effort never to make a speech on my show, that could be misinterpreted, as inciting or suggesting that any kind of violence should be done.
We are now seeing panic from those on the right, who have been espousing this great replacement theory ideology, distancing themselves from it. Ben Shapiro recently said, actually, the great replacement theory stuff, it’s it’s really woke ism, a left wing ideology. That’s not true. But that’s how Ben Shapiro has chosen to deal with it. Tucker Carlson recently said, on on his first program after the Buffalo shooting, that this is just a mentally ill person, and that we can ascribe a politics to their ideology. That’s very convenient for Tucker because it just so happens that all of the ideology, all of the people espousing the ideology, that the shooter included in the alleged manifesto, are right wing individuals. So it would be very inconvenient for Tucker Carlson for anybody to be connecting it to politics, but of course there is politics in it. So this is where it comes from.
I want to talk today about a term called stochastic terrorism, stochastic terrorism. It’s a term many are not familiar with. And it is very relevant now, in thinking about the aftermath of this horrible racist, terrorist attack, targeting black people in Buffalo, New York, I first that I was able to find I first talked about stochastic terrorism on my show back in 2011. And stochastic terrorism is a mechanism through which anybody with an audience a large enough audience can put messages out there, which over time become increasingly likely to cause someone in the real world to go out and commit a terrorist attack.
And I and many others are arguing that the constant drumbeat of rhetoric from right wing media from extreme right wing media pushing generally, the idea is under what’s called the great replacement theory, this has significant overlap with white supremacy, this has significant overlap with white nationalism, are exactly what ultimately inspired the shooter to go and target black people in Buffalo, New York recently, the way that this works is as follows. You go on air and you’ve got an audience, the audience is 100 people, you going on air and saying, they’re sending brown people to replace us white people, they’re going to take over, they’re going to reshape America, they’re going to change our culture, they’re going to make the country dirtier and poorer, as Tucker Carlson once said, If your audience is and we really got to do something about it, if your audience has 100 people, and you do one show, it’s not super likely that any of those 100 people are going to go out and commit real world violence on the basis of what you’ve said. But if your audience is 10,000, and you do a show for a year, the odds that someone in your audience is going to take that message and act on it starts to go up.
And when your audience gets large enough, if you have an audience in the millions over a period of years, because of the realities of the United States, there’s lots of people predisposed to violence, there’s lots of radicalized people. If you pump that message out to millions of people, every day for a decade, it starts to become almost likely that someone in the audience is going to go out and commit an act of real world violence we saw this years ago, there’s a guy named Glenn Beck, who used to rant and rave on his old show about an organization called the Tides Foundation doesn’t even matter what the organization does, you don’t need to know anything about it, other than you can research it if you want. But what you need to know is that after ranting and raving about the Tides Foundation for so long, a viewer inspired by Glenn Beck was actually stopped by California Highway Patrol on his way to the Tides Foundation to deal with the problem that Glenn Beck told him about. So there’s numerous examples of this.
Now, when I say stochastic terrorism, I’m not saying that the individual in the media has broken a law. I’m not a lawyer. And I don’t believe that that’s the case. I’m not saying you could charge anybody in particular, because of a shooting that someone else did, through the media, that is people in the media. This is not an issue of saying their speech is against the law. It’s more an issue of responsibility. And of us as people in the media, understanding the effect that our words can have. I make every effort not to make irresponsible speech on my program. And when I get something factually wrong, I make every effort to correct it right away and not to bury the correction at the back of whatever. And, of course, I make every effort never to make a speech on my show, that could be misinterpreted, as inciting or suggesting that any kind of violence should be done.
We are now seeing panic from those on the right, who have been espousing this great replacement theory ideology, distancing themselves from it. Ben Shapiro recently said, actually, the great replacement theory stuff, it’s it’s really woke ism, a left wing ideology. That’s not true. But that’s how Ben Shapiro has chosen to deal with it. Tucker Carlson recently said, on his first program after the buffalo shooting, that this is just a mentally ill person, and that we can ascribe a politics to their ideology. That’s very convenient for Tucker because it just so happens that all of the ideology, all of the people espousing the ideology, that the shooter included in the alleged manifesto, are right wing individuals. So it would be very inconvenient for Tucker Carlson for anybody to be connecting it to politics, but of course there is politics in it. So this is where it comes from.
This is the term stochastic terrorism that can be used to explain this mechanism that we’re not saying is is a crime, although in certain cases If you are so directly inciting a particular individual, there might be a crime. That’s not what what these right wing media people are doing. They’re speaking to everybody. And you never know who it is in their audience that might hear it, and might go act on it in the real world. And now we’re dealing with it in a very real way. 10 people are dead, three injured as a result of that ideology that has been pervasively beaten into people over the years by many and right wing media.
David Pakman
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
More from David
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
How shifting Russian targets impact global economy
22 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
What explains West African coups? Will France respond?
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Chinese housing overbuild may erode support for Xi Jinping
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
Americans debate government shutdowns, spending priorities
Wednesday
Dr. Frank Luntz
America has a growing problem with stochastic terrorism
Jun 07, 2022
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
By
The deadly shooting in Buffalo in which ten people were killed after a white teenager went on a rampage inside a supermarket renewed focus on “the great replacement theory.” That idea suggests that white people are being replaced by minorities. The suspect in that massacre referenced the theory in a manifesto he allegedly wrote before the shooting. Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman argues that the attack in Buffalo is another example of how stochastic terrorism may be fueling these acts of violence.
I want to talk today about a term called stochastic terrorism, stochastic terrorism. It’s a term many are not familiar with. And it is very relevant now, in thinking about the aftermath of this horrible racist, terrorist attack, targeting black people in Buffalo, New York, I first that I was able to find I first talked about stochastic terrorism on my show back in 2011. And stochastic terrorism is a mechanism through which anybody with an audience a large enough audience can put messages out there, which over time become increasingly likely to cause someone in the real world to go out and commit a terrorist attack.
And I and many others are arguing that the constant drumbeat of rhetoric from right wing media from extreme right wing media pushing generally, the idea is under what’s called the great replacement theory, this has significant overlap with white supremacy, this has significant overlap with white nationalism, are exactly what ultimately inspired the shooter to go and target black people in Buffalo, New York recently, the way that this works is as follows. You go on air and you’ve got an audience, the audience is 100 people, you going on air and saying, they’re sending brown people to replace us white people, they’re going to take over, they’re going to reshape America, they’re going to change our culture, they’re going to make the country dirtier and poorer, as Tucker Carlson once said, If your audience is and we really got to do something about it, if your audience has 100 people, and you do one show, it’s not super likely that any of those 100 people are going to go out and commit real world violence on the basis of what you’ve said. But if your audience is 10,000, and you do a show for a year, the odds that someone in your audience is going to take that message and act on it starts to go up.
And when your audience gets large enough, if you have an audience in the millions over a period of years, because of the realities of the United States, there’s lots of people predisposed to violence, there’s lots of radicalized people. If you pump that message out to millions of people, every day for a decade, it starts to become almost likely that someone in the audience is going to go out and commit an act of real world violence we saw this years ago, there’s a guy named Glenn Beck, who used to rant and rave on his old show about an organization called the Tides Foundation doesn’t even matter what the organization does, you don’t need to know anything about it, other than you can research it if you want. But what you need to know is that after ranting and raving about the Tides Foundation for so long, a viewer inspired by Glenn Beck was actually stopped by California Highway Patrol on his way to the Tides Foundation to deal with the problem that Glenn Beck told him about. So there’s numerous examples of this.
Now, when I say stochastic terrorism, I’m not saying that the individual in the media has broken a law. I’m not a lawyer. And I don’t believe that that’s the case. I’m not saying you could charge anybody in particular, because of a shooting that someone else did, through the media, that is people in the media. This is not an issue of saying their speech is against the law. It’s more an issue of responsibility. And of us as people in the media, understanding the effect that our words can have. I make every effort not to make irresponsible speech on my program. And when I get something factually wrong, I make every effort to correct it right away and not to bury the correction at the back of whatever. And, of course, I make every effort never to make a speech on my show, that could be misinterpreted, as inciting or suggesting that any kind of violence should be done.
We are now seeing panic from those on the right, who have been espousing this great replacement theory ideology, distancing themselves from it. Ben Shapiro recently said, actually, the great replacement theory stuff, it’s it’s really woke ism, a left wing ideology. That’s not true. But that’s how Ben Shapiro has chosen to deal with it. Tucker Carlson recently said, on his first program after the buffalo shooting, that this is just a mentally ill person, and that we can ascribe a politics to their ideology. That’s very convenient for Tucker because it just so happens that all of the ideology, all of the people espousing the ideology, that the shooter included in the alleged manifesto, are right wing individuals. So it would be very inconvenient for Tucker Carlson for anybody to be connecting it to politics, but of course there is politics in it. So this is where it comes from.
This is the term stochastic terrorism that can be used to explain this mechanism that we’re not saying is is a crime, although in certain cases If you are so directly inciting a particular individual, there might be a crime. That’s not what what these right wing media people are doing. They’re speaking to everybody. And you never know who it is in their audience that might hear it, and might go act on it in the real world. And now we’re dealing with it in a very real way. 10 people are dead, three injured as a result of that ideology that has been pervasively beaten into people over the years by many and right wing media.
Trump is behind Biden impeachment inquiry
Mounting pressure from House Republicans has led House Speaker Kevin McCarthy to officially endorse an impeachment inquiry against President Joe Biden. These impeachment efforts have escalated alongside another unfolding legal drama — that of former President Donald Trump. Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman argues that Trump, himself, is behind the scheme to impeach Biden.
Monday
McCarthy’s impeachment stunt lacks any evidence
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) recently announced his support for an impeachment inquiry against President Joe Biden. McCarthy’s announcement contradicts his prior position and aligns with the far-right’s ongoing push for impeachment. Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman breaks down GOP arguments and concerns, concluding that no evidence exists to merit the inquiry in the
Sep 18
Are Trump’s lawyers really going to make these legal arguments?
Former President Donald Trump faced his fourth indictment, centered on his attempts to overturn his 2020 general election loss in Georgia, in August. Trump’s legal team is portraying this indictment as an assault on his freedom of speech, while prosecutors hold a different perspective. Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman questions whether Trump’s legal team
Sep 11
Be mindful of Ramaswamy’s lying techniques
Following the first Republican presidential debate, Vivek Ramaswamy has climbed to the third position in the polls, trailing former President Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. In an effort to impede his momentum, other candidates have initiated a barrage of negative attacks against Ramaswamy, highlighting his shifting stance on critical issues. Straight Arrow News
Sep 5
Polling predicts Trump-Biden rematch, but key questions remain
Early polling for the 2024 presidential election reveals Donald Trump dominating the GOP field with no contender in sight, while President Joe Biden is performing evenly against him. Yet with so much of Trump’s near-term future now in question, critics have wondered how helpful or relevant this polling data can be. Straight Arrow News contributor
Aug 28
Media Miss
Stories each side is underreporting
Pope to appoint 21 new cardinals, looking past the West
10 sources | 13% from the left
Local members of Congress weigh in on potential government shutdown
11 sources | 0% from the right
Latest Opinions
Getty Images
Biden proposes limited offshore oil and gas leases to support wind energy
Watch 2:20
17 hrs ago
The Elephant Sanctuary
California city first in nation to recognize legal rights of elephants
Watch 2:15
18 hrs ago
Getty Images
Sen. Feinstein’s death leaves Senate vacancy Gov. Newsom needs to fill
Watch 2:54
18 hrs ago
Premier of Ontario
Climate advocates, indigenous tribes protest efforts to mine $67B of minerals in Canada
Watch 2:50
18 hrs ago
Getty Images
Retailers report record $112B in lost inventory amid theft, violence
Watch 2:22
21 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Politics of lesser evils is bad for all Americans
23 hrs ago
Dr. Rashad Richey
How a No Labels candidate might affect outcome of 2024 election
Yesterday
John Fortier
Why is accused sexual predator Russell Brand getting right-wing support?
Yesterday
Jordan Reid
High housing mortgage costs are a risk to whole economy
Wednesday
Newt Gingrich
Politics
Sen. Feinstein’s death leaves Senate vacancy Gov. Newsom needs to fill
18 hrs ago
Members of Congress still get paid during government shutdown
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, longest serving woman senator, dies at 90
Getty Images
U.S.
California city first in nation to recognize legal rights of elephants
18 hrs ago
Elon Musk weighs in on immigration policy in visit to US-Mexico border
DHS collects migrants’ DNA for growing database, raising privacy concerns
The Elephant Sanctuary
International
Cuban officials call Molotov cocktail attack on its US embassy terrorism
Tuesday
Canadian lawmakers apologize after celebrating Ukrainian Nazi fighter
Nicaragua’s Catholic president is persecuting members of his own religion
Reuters
Tech
TikTok workers: China may have more control over user data than we think
Yesterday
Musk makes cuts to X election integrity team
Ford pauses construction on $3.5 billion EV battery plant
Getty Images