Just days after federal Judge Terry Doughty issued a stirring Independence Day injunction freezing government speech policing efforts in the landmark Missouri v. Biden case, an appellate court temporarily stayed his order, restoring the fed-led censorship regime.
So for now, the Biden administration can resume the speech-stifling activities that led social media companies to suppress Wrongthink at industrial scale, perpetrating what Judge Doughty had called perhaps the “most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history.”
These activities might include pushing the platforms to censor Americans at the request of foreign powers – even hostile ones – if a stunning new report from the House Judiciary Committee’s Government Weaponization Subcommittee is any indication.
The report shows that in March 2022, after Russia invaded Ukraine, the FBI conveyed requests from Ukraine’s intelligence agency, the SBU, to social media platforms to take down thousands of accounts and posts purportedly tied to Russian influence operations.
But the FBI seemingly didn’t vet the “anti-disinformation” requests to see who the SBU was targeting, or what it was targeting.
Otherwise, the beyond disturbing conclusion, based on the report, is that the FBI knowingly worked with the foreign intelligence service to violate Americans’ First Amendment rights, and advance not only that foreign intel service’s interests, but Russia’s interests.
How?
Well, as the Weaponization Subcommittee’s report shows, the SBU’s takedown requests included Americans’ accounts and posts. Amazingly, one account was @usaporusski, the official Russian-language account of the U.S. State Department.
Other accounts targeted for censorship belonged to American journalists.
Twitter flagged this issue for the FBI. When it did, the Bureau showed little concern. “Understood,” said the FBI agent who had forwarded the SBU’s censorship request. “Whatever your review determines and action Twitter deem is appropriate (sic).”
As for the nature of the content the SBU targeted, the agency flagged accounts for censorship for “discrediting the SBU leadership” in the agencies’ words.
That is, a foreign security agency brazenly asked an American security agency to silence people to protect the foreign security agency’s reputation – and our government apparently honored that request.
More astonishing is that despite the U.S. government’s support for Ukraine, the FBI passed along censorship requests to purge content supportive of Ukraine, and speech “critical of Vladimir Putin and Russia’s invasion,” according to the Weaponization Subcommittee’s probe.
Why was the FBI effectively doing the Kremlin’s bidding when cooperating with Ukraine’s intelligence agency?
Apparently because that agency itself was corrupted by the Kremlin.
The SBU was birthed from the KGB after the Soviet Union’s collapse. It inherited “its original staff, structure, and modus operandi,” according to the report.
Since its advent, it’s not only closely cooperated Russia’s FSB, but Russia has penetrated SBU.
This could be seen in Russian forces’ February 2022 success in capturing Chernobyl with ease. This has been attributed largely to Russia’s influence over the SBU and Ukraine’s security apparatus.
Russia’s infiltration of the SBU seems to have persisted through the period during which it was issuing the takedown requests to the FBI.
In July 2022, President Volodymyr Zelensky suspended the head of the SBU due to widespread findings of suspected treason in the agency’s ranks. Zelensky disclosed that authorities had opened “651 cases of alleged treason and collaboration…against individuals in law enforcement and in the prosecutor’s office.”
The day prior to the suspension, authorities arrested the former head of the SBU’s Main Department in Crimea on charges of treason. The close confidante of the soon-to-be-suspended SBU head had reportedly withheld knowledge of Russia’s plans to invade the Ukraine from his agency’s central office.
It is worth noting that the FBI was no mere passive observer as a conduit for the SBU’s takedown requests. In at least one instance, after Meta did not immediately respond to such a request, an FBI official asked the platform “if these accounts were taken down,” or “if you need some legal process from us” – which is to say, FBI-concocted justification to legitimize the censorship.
“Put simply,” the Weaponization Subcommittee report says, “the FBI worked with and on behalf of a foreign intelligence agency—widely known to be compromised by Moscow at the time—and directly abetted efforts to censor Americans engaging in protected speech. As a result, the FBI agents’ actions had the potential to render substantial aid to the Kremlin’s war effort.”
The report raises myriad questions, none of which FBI Director Christopher Wray provided sufficient answers to during a recent hearing before the House Judiciary Committee.
Among them:
- Have other U.S. national security or foreign policy agencies received censorship requests from foreign counterparts and conveyed them to social media platforms?
- Which foreign counterparts sent those requests?
- On what grounds did they call for the targets to be censored?
- Did they target Americans?
- Did the U.S. government recipients of the censorship requests diligence them before forwarding the requests along to social media platforms?
- What further action did the U.S. counterparts take after originally forwarding said requests?
- How did social media companies’ respond to those requests?
- Are these efforts still ongoing?
In pursuing the mass public-private censorship regime foisted on Americans, congressional investigators appear now to have stumbled upon another scandal: That of either the gross negligence or rank incompetence of national security authorities in handling information received by foreign counterparts, and perhaps worse, their total disregard for Americans targeted by them.
Related
Ben Weingarten
Federalist Senior Contributor; Claremont Institute Fellow
View Video LibraryCommentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘The worst it’s ever been’: Young Americans on democracy
2 hrs ago
Dr. Frank Luntz
How to handle plunging US birth rate before it’s too late
2 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
Japan must confront reality of military threats
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
US may need to find new sources of uranium
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
Disturbing House report exposes FBI’s First Amendment violations
Jul 25, 2023
By Straight Arrow News
On July 10, the House Judiciary Committee and the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government released a report titled “The FBI’s Collaboration with a Compromised Ukrainian Intelligence Agency to Censor American Speech.” According to the report, the FBI allegedly collaborated with the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) to take down social media accounts with the goal of blocking the spread of Russian disinformation.
Straight Arrow News contributor Ben Weingarten contends that this action raises constitutional concerns and amounts to a violation of Americans’ First Amendment rights to free speech.
Just days after Federal Judge Terry Doughty issued a stirring Independence Day injunction freezing government speech policing efforts in the landmark Missouri v. Biden case, an appellate court temporarily stayed his order, restoring the Fed-led censorship regime.
So for now, the Biden administration can resume the speech-stifling activities that led social media companies to suppress wrongthink at industrial scale, perpetrating what Judge Doughty had called perhaps the “most massive attack against free speech in United States history.”
These activities might include pushing the platforms to censor Americans at the request of foreign powers — even hostile ones — if a stunning new report from the House Judiciary Committee’s Government Weaponization Subcommittee is any indication.
The report shows that in March 2022, after Russia invaded Ukraine, the FBI conveyed requests from Ukraine’s intelligence agency, the SBU, to social media platforms to take down thousands of accounts and posts purportedly tied to Russian influence operations.
But the FBI seemingly didn’t vet the “anti-disinformation” requests to see who the SBU was targeting, or what it was targeting.
Otherwise, the beyond disturbing conclusion, based on the report, is that the FBI knowingly worked with the foreign intelligence service to violate Americans’ First Amendment rights and advance not only that foreign intel service’s interests, but Russia’s interests.
Just days after federal Judge Terry Doughty issued a stirring Independence Day injunction freezing government speech policing efforts in the landmark Missouri v. Biden case, an appellate court temporarily stayed his order, restoring the fed-led censorship regime.
So for now, the Biden administration can resume the speech-stifling activities that led social media companies to suppress Wrongthink at industrial scale, perpetrating what Judge Doughty had called perhaps the “most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history.”
These activities might include pushing the platforms to censor Americans at the request of foreign powers – even hostile ones – if a stunning new report from the House Judiciary Committee’s Government Weaponization Subcommittee is any indication.
The report shows that in March 2022, after Russia invaded Ukraine, the FBI conveyed requests from Ukraine’s intelligence agency, the SBU, to social media platforms to take down thousands of accounts and posts purportedly tied to Russian influence operations.
But the FBI seemingly didn’t vet the “anti-disinformation” requests to see who the SBU was targeting, or what it was targeting.
Otherwise, the beyond disturbing conclusion, based on the report, is that the FBI knowingly worked with the foreign intelligence service to violate Americans’ First Amendment rights, and advance not only that foreign intel service’s interests, but Russia’s interests.
How?
Well, as the Weaponization Subcommittee’s report shows, the SBU’s takedown requests included Americans’ accounts and posts. Amazingly, one account was @usaporusski, the official Russian-language account of the U.S. State Department.
Other accounts targeted for censorship belonged to American journalists.
Twitter flagged this issue for the FBI. When it did, the Bureau showed little concern. “Understood,” said the FBI agent who had forwarded the SBU’s censorship request. “Whatever your review determines and action Twitter deem is appropriate (sic).”
As for the nature of the content the SBU targeted, the agency flagged accounts for censorship for “discrediting the SBU leadership” in the agencies’ words.
That is, a foreign security agency brazenly asked an American security agency to silence people to protect the foreign security agency’s reputation – and our government apparently honored that request.
More astonishing is that despite the U.S. government’s support for Ukraine, the FBI passed along censorship requests to purge content supportive of Ukraine, and speech “critical of Vladimir Putin and Russia’s invasion,” according to the Weaponization Subcommittee’s probe.
Why was the FBI effectively doing the Kremlin’s bidding when cooperating with Ukraine’s intelligence agency?
Apparently because that agency itself was corrupted by the Kremlin.
The SBU was birthed from the KGB after the Soviet Union’s collapse. It inherited “its original staff, structure, and modus operandi,” according to the report.
Since its advent, it’s not only closely cooperated Russia’s FSB, but Russia has penetrated SBU.
This could be seen in Russian forces’ February 2022 success in capturing Chernobyl with ease. This has been attributed largely to Russia’s influence over the SBU and Ukraine’s security apparatus.
Russia’s infiltration of the SBU seems to have persisted through the period during which it was issuing the takedown requests to the FBI.
In July 2022, President Volodymyr Zelensky suspended the head of the SBU due to widespread findings of suspected treason in the agency’s ranks. Zelensky disclosed that authorities had opened “651 cases of alleged treason and collaboration…against individuals in law enforcement and in the prosecutor’s office.”
The day prior to the suspension, authorities arrested the former head of the SBU’s Main Department in Crimea on charges of treason. The close confidante of the soon-to-be-suspended SBU head had reportedly withheld knowledge of Russia’s plans to invade the Ukraine from his agency’s central office.
It is worth noting that the FBI was no mere passive observer as a conduit for the SBU’s takedown requests. In at least one instance, after Meta did not immediately respond to such a request, an FBI official asked the platform “if these accounts were taken down,” or “if you need some legal process from us” – which is to say, FBI-concocted justification to legitimize the censorship.
“Put simply,” the Weaponization Subcommittee report says, “the FBI worked with and on behalf of a foreign intelligence agency—widely known to be compromised by Moscow at the time—and directly abetted efforts to censor Americans engaging in protected speech. As a result, the FBI agents’ actions had the potential to render substantial aid to the Kremlin’s war effort.”
The report raises myriad questions, none of which FBI Director Christopher Wray provided sufficient answers to during a recent hearing before the House Judiciary Committee.
Among them:
In pursuing the mass public-private censorship regime foisted on Americans, congressional investigators appear now to have stumbled upon another scandal: That of either the gross negligence or rank incompetence of national security authorities in handling information received by foreign counterparts, and perhaps worse, their total disregard for Americans targeted by them.
Related
Governments could be censoring social media content
U.S. policymakers have struggled to agree on the rules of engagement with social media platforms, especially regarding violent, threatening or otherwise dangerous content. In the wake of recent events — namely the COVID-19 pandemic and the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection, both of which were amplified by online dis- and mis-information — some have also argued…
Tuesday
Action required to combat anti-Jewish sentiment at elite schools
On Tuesday, April 30, student protesters took over a building on Columbia University’s main campus and demanded that the university divest from Israel, which the university has so far refused to do. This occupation at Columbia follows months of similar protests by pro-Palestinian demonstrators around the country. The occupied building, Hamilton Hall, holds a significant…
Apr 30
Biden greenlit Iranian strike on Israel
The past 30 days have witnessed tense exchanges of airstrikes between Israel and Iran, beginning with Israel’s alleged bombing of the Iranian consulate in Damascus on April 1. Iran retaliated in a widely telegraphed response designed to minimize human casualties and to provide room for de-escalation. Israel responded similarly with an even smaller second strike,…
Apr 23
Why misguided Biden is siding with Iran over Israel
The situation in the Middle East is becoming more complex, and President Biden faces a delicate situation as he seeks to prevent a broader conflict in the region. Following Iran’s unprecedented airstrikes on Israel, prompted by Israel’s alleged destruction of Iran’s consulate in Damascus, Biden asserts that he’s against participating in Israeli retaliatory strikes on…
Apr 16
Democratic voter registration scheme gains momentum
Over 158 million Americans voted in the 2020 elections, representing roughly two-thirds of all eligible U.S. voters. Despite this historic engagement, U.S. voter participation continues to lag behind that of similarly advanced democracies around the world. Straight Arrow News contributor Ben Weingarten argues that in their efforts to mobilize more voters, various U.S. organizations, including…
Apr 9
Underreported stories from each side
Republican House members suggest laws sending campus protesters to Gaza
13 sources | 15% from the left
Reuters
Trump vows to target EVs, LNG exports in meeting with oil CEOs: Report
10 sources | 0% from the right
Getty Images
Latest Stories
UK PM Sunak warns of spread in antisemitism as European protests grow
Watch 2:40
32 mins ago
Russia V-Day parade raises questions about military capabilities, supplies
Watch 3:07
1 hr ago
Lawyer: Airman killed by Florida deputy who burst into wrong apartment
Watch 1:00
5 hrs ago
House Speaker Mike Johnson survives attempt to oust him
Watch 0:57
5 hrs ago
Biden says US will not supply weapons to Israel for Rafah operation
Watch 6:14
6 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Putin’s promise of a long war might be hollow threat
2 hrs ago
Leon Aron
Why the Trump family is missing from court appearances
3 hrs ago
Jordan Reid
Arizona bill legalizing shooting migrants is part of GOP brand
Yesterday
Ruben Navarrette
NYPD’s lack of lawsuit disclosure shields it from accountability
Yesterday
Adrienne Lawrence