Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Instead of addressing issues that would advance their constituents, Missouri Republicans decided that they needed to spend time debating what women can wear on the House floor. Apparently, Missouri’s GOP was disturbed by the potential sight of women not wearing blazers while doing their jobs. As if women lawmakers can’t be trusted to dress professionally. Even though Missouri’s House ultimately decided to require women and men to wear blazers, cardigans, or knit blazers, the entire exercise speaks to how patriarchy prevents our representatives from actually serving the people.
Seriously, these people have been elected to office and they ought not spend hours of their time debating what’s appropriate for a professional woman lawmaker to wear to work. Missouri’s House should have gotten a jump on raising the base salary for teachers, adding literacy programs and water led testing in schools, providing accessible and affordable childcare or maybe even supporting infrastructure projects, like widening Interstate 70. There are so many important issues that those in Missouri need their legislature to focus on fixing right now.
Yeah, GOP lawmakers in the Show Me state couldn’t help but show they’re asses by making women’s wardrobe their first priority. Yeah, these antics are just another unnecessary effort to exercise control over the female body. And it’s really to the detriment of the state, much like Missouri’s ban on abortion. Yeah, as of June 24 of last year, abortions are illegal in Missouri, except in cases of medical emergency. And at the same time, as there is still ranks 42nd maternal mortality rates. Because we know it’s not about preserving life but controlling women’s bodies, which would be consistent with the recent change of House rules.
And proponents of the rule change, well they do love to argue that they were just clarifying the existing rules. But that would suggest something was unclear about what women could wear. Or said another way, that women lawmakers were dressing unprofessionally by not covering up their arms with a blazer. Yeah, that sounds pretty much like the patriarchy to me. And yes, I am well aware that Republican Representative Ann Kelly was the one to advance the rule change. But that doesn’t change my opinion in the least.
The fact remains that women uphold the patriarchy with just as much vigor as men. So it’s no surprise that it was a woman who was looking to police the bodies of her fellow female members of legislature. And I also wouldn’t be shocked if, when pushing the rule change. Representative Kelly used terms like decency to mirror and distraction. Because it’s all a part of the patriarchal playbook to reinforce antiquated, sexist beliefs that there’s some kind of inherent impropriety with the body of a woman, thus requiring men to maintain control of it.
In Missouri’s legislature, men have always maintained control, and the House in particular, women hold less than 1/3 of the seats in a state where women make up 50% of the population. Male domination in both public and private spaces must come to an end if we want to advance as a society. Otherwise, we’re going to keep wasting time debating nonsense, like whether and how women in Missouri’s house can bare arms.
-
Students learning brutal lesson on how police respond to protests
Student protests against Israel’s war in Gaza have escalated in the United States and around the world as civilian death counts in both Gaza and the West Bank continue to climb. Estimates show Israeli forces killed at least 42,500 Palestinians since Oct. 7, 2023, and another two million survivors have been displaced from their homes.…
-
Supreme Court must end criminalization of homelessness
On April 22, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the nation’s homelessness crisis, considering whether an Oregon city had the right to ban homeless people from camping in public spaces. A majority of justices appeared inclined to support the city’s efforts to regulate homeless encampments on public grounds. This decision carries significant implications for the growing…
-
Why are non-consensual pelvic exams still happening?
More states are beginning to crack down on the surprisingly common practice of medical students and professional staff performing non-consensual pelvic exams on unconscious men and women in hospitals, universities and other medical facilities. Just one year ago today, those practices remained legal in a majority of U.S. states. Now, however, a new directive from…
-
Congress should repeal the Foreign Dredge Act
The collapse of Baltimore’s Key Bridge presents challenges for cleanup and construction crews who rely on dredging vessels to complete their work. That’s partly because of the Foreign Dredge Act, a 1906 law that prohibits foreign-made dredging vessels. Congress is now introducing a measure to revise parts of that law, although previous attempts to do…
-
Gen Z women must fight for their rights
Gen Z, the first “digital native” U.S. generation, is entering the workforce, studying at university and serving in the military. From school shootings and cyber-bullying to COVID-19 and the overturning of Roe v. Wade, this generation has been shaped by unique trends and events, and how they will behave as citizens and voters is an…
Latest Opinions
-
Divisive college protests bring out bipartisan unity in Congress
-
Anticipated offshore wind rebound faces test after Biden admin proposal
-
US gray wolves in danger of being taken off endangered species list
-
Violence on UCLA campus over war in Gaza forces cancellation of classes
-
Tesla may have made EV charging harder, even for other car brands
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.