In very green Scotland, governments from all over the world are meeting for their periodic climate summit.
There will be plenty of talk of green energy, green finance, green building—and all of it will mean green for big, politically connected companies in Europe and the U.S.
The countries are trying to implement the Paris Accords, which were agreements among nations to reduce emissions and otherwise fight climate change and its effects.
One topic that will get extra attention this year is what’s called “Climate Finance.” In short, it’s rich countries paying poorer countries to deal with emissions or climate change.
There’s some sense here. Green energy, such as solar and wind energy, is more expensive and less reliable than fossil-fuel energy such as natural gas and coal.
The U.S., Canada, Australia, and much of Western Europe got rich in part by using these God-given resources to get cheap and reliable energy that allows industries and communities to flourish.
Now that poor countries are starting to rise out of poverty and develop a middle class and more industries, are the rich countries really going to bar them from using the same affordable energy and instead force luxury green energy on them?
Or will rich countries simply let poor countries do what they want?
In that case, the climate fight would be a story of coal-fired plants moving from Michigan and Bavaria to Mongolia and Botswana. This will hardly reduce pollution or greenhouse gas emissions.
So a deal was cut: Wealthy countries would pay the poor countries to go green.
The wealthy countries last decade pledged to give ahundred billion dollars a year in “climate finance” to fund poor countries’ climate mitigation and adaptation.
We can expect in Glasgow, governments to agree to increase that hundred-billion-a-year goal.
These payments function in part as bribes, to get the poor countries—many of whom face far more pressing issues—enthusiastically on board with the rich countries’ whole climate fight.
But the billions and billions in global “climate finance” ought to be seen mostly as payoffs to politically connected companies in rich countries.
Here’s what “climate finance” means in practice: The government of, say, Germany, send money to a foreign government on the condition that foreign country hires a German company to install wind farms or solar panels. Or rich governments subsidize poor countries’ purchase of electric cars.
The Big Banks get in on this, too. Often “climate finance” means a rich government guarantees a loan made by a Big Bank to a poor country buying something like energy-efficient building materials. For the Big Banks, this is free money — if the poor country can’t pay back the loan, the rich country’s taxpayers foot the bill.
It’s the same as the United States’ domestic climate-change efforts.
Look at Joe Biden’s proposals: massive subsidies for rich people to buy electric cars — this is effectively transferring tax dollars to Tesla.
Biden’s main new climate proposal is a $150 billion dollar boondoggle called the Clean Electricity Performance Program, which mostly amounts to paying utilities for increasing their investment in wind and solar — which in turn is another subsidy from U.S. taxpayers to the companies that build and install wind and solar.
Often, when you follow the money, you realize how these environmentalist programs don’t actually help the planet that much.
For instance, rules forcing American automakers to make their cars lighter weight, resulted in them replacing steel with aluminum.
Guess who loved this proposal: Alcoa, the world’s largest aluminum company.
Timothy Carney
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
More from Timothy
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict paused, not over
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Hydrogen as clean energy source not ready for prime time
Thursday
Peter Zeihan
Railroads are more about political power than economic
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
Why Azerbaijan launched a military operation against Armenia
Tuesday
Peter Zeihan
Opinion: “Climate Finance” means green for big business
Nov 03, 2021
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
By
What does the color green mean to you?
In very green Scotland, governments from all over the world are meeting for their periodic climate summit.
There will be plenty of talk of green energy, green finance, green building—and all of it will mean green for big, politically connected companies in Europe and the U.S.
The United Nations is hosting a climate meeting in Glasgow starting on October 31. It’s called “COP-26,” as it’s the 26th annual “Conference of the Parties” to the UN’s climate-change framework.
The countries are trying to implement the Paris Accords, which were agreements among nations to reduce emissions and otherwise fight climate change and its effects.
One topic that will get extra attention this year is what’s called “Climate Finance.” In short, it’s rich countries paying poorer countries to deal with emissions or climate change.
There’s some sense here. Green energy, such as solar and wind energy, is more expensive and less reliable than fossil-fuel energy such as natural gas and coal.
The U.S., Canada, Australia, and much of Western Europe got rich in part by using these God-given resources to get cheap and reliable energy that allows industries and communities to flourish.
Now that poor countries are starting to rise out of poverty and develop a middle class and more industries, are the rich countries really going to bar them from using the same affordable energy and instead force luxury green energy on them?
Or will rich countries simply let poor countries do what they want?
In that case, the climate fight would be a story of coal-fired plants moving from Michigan and Bavaria to Mongolia and Botswana. This will hardly reduce pollution or greenhouse gas emissions.
So a deal was cut: Wealthy countries would pay the poor countries to go green.
The wealthy countries last decade pledged to give a hundred billion dollars a year in “climate finance” to fund poor countries’ climate mitigation and adaptation.
Rich countries didn’t quite meet their hundred-billion goal in 2020, but they did pump more than 80 billion into “climate finance” in poor countries.
We can expect in Glasgow, governments to agree to increase that hundred-billion-a-year goal.
These payments function in part as bribes, to get the poor countries—many of whom face far more pressing issues—enthusiastically on board with the rich countries’ whole climate fight.
But the billions and billions in global “climate finance” ought to be seen mostly as payoffs to politically connected companies in rich countries.
Here’s what “climate finance” means in practice: The government of, say, Germany, send money to a foreign government on the condition that foreign country hires a German company to install wind farms or solar panels. Or rich governments subsidize poor countries’ purchase of electric cars.
The Big Banks get in on this, too. Often “climate finance” means a rich government guarantees a loan made by a Big Bank to a poor country buying something like energy-efficient building materials. For the Big Banks, this is free money — if the poor country can’t pay back the loan, the rich country’s taxpayers foot the bill.
It’s the same as the United States’ domestic climate-change efforts.
Look at Joe Biden’s proposals: massive subsidies for rich people to buy electric cars — this is effectively transferring tax dollars to Tesla.
Biden’s main new climate proposal is a $150 billion dollar boondoggle called the Clean Electricity Performance Program, which mostly amounts to paying utilities for increasing their investment in wind and solar — which in turn is another subsidy from U.S. taxpayers to the companies that build and install wind and solar.
Often, when you follow the money, you realize how these environmentalist programs don’t actually help the planet that much.
For instance, rules forcing American automakers to make their cars lighter weight, resulted in them replacing steel with aluminum.
Guess who loved this proposal: Alcoa, the world’s largest aluminum company.
Of course making aluminum car parts uses much more energy and creates more greenhouse gasses than making steel car parts.
So when you see billions pledged in global climate finance, or an expensive Biden green energy plan, remember that Green is the color of money.
Trump’s immigration deterrence policy more humane than Biden’s
During his presidency, Donald Trump launched an immigration policy requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico until their scheduled immigration court date. President Joe Biden later terminated this policy and introduced his own approach, which has sparked controversy among some who argue that Biden’s changes have resulted in an influx of migrants and dangerous conditions.
Thursday
Partisan divide makes a new national service corps impossible
Most Americans have less confidence in the country’s future, and many attribute that sentiment to an extreme partisan divide. To mend these relationships, some experts believe mandating national service could be unifying. Straight Arrow News contributor Timothy Carney says a new national service corps would likely prove ineffective. He asserts America’s polarizing climate would prevent
Aug 24
What Democrats get wrong about misinformation and free speech
College students protesting conservative campus speakers. The media arguing that all Hunter Biden critics are biased. Government officials promoting COVID-19 misinformation. These are just some of the examples many conservatives believe illustrate how “woke” liberals are promoting misinformation and threatening free speech in America. Straight Arrow News contributor Timothy Carney explains why some of what
Jul 13
DeSantis is right to oppose government subsidies for Disney
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis‘ feud with Disney shows no signs of slowing down. They’ve been locking horns ever since the entertainment company publicly opposed a state law banning classroom discussion of sexuality and gender identity in younger school grades. DeSantis said that opposition went too far. After Disney canceled a $1 billion development project in central Florida,
May 25
Blame lockdowns for urban doom loop in Portland, San Francisco
Some studies show the COVID-19 lockdowns had a negative effect on mental health in the U.S. There is also evidence that stay-at-home mandates helped spur spikes in crime and the general deterioration of conditions in once-thriving cities. Straight Arrow News contributor Tim Carney says lockdowns are to blame for the urban doom loop afflicting cities
May 4
Stories each side is underreporting
Border apprehensions up nearly 27 percent from July to August
11 sources | 0% from the left
Mexico pledges to set up checkpoints to ‘dissuade’ migrants from hopping freight trains to US border
15 sources | 8% from the right
Latest Opinions
Current Media
Whale strandings fuel controversy: Are offshore wind farms to blame?
Watch 14:49
15 hrs ago
AP Images
Surging migrant crisis is overwhelming US cities from Eagle Pass, TX, to NYC
Watch 3:42
Yesterday
AP Images
Brightline opens first US passenger line in a century with high-speed Florida train
Watch 1:57
Yesterday
Reuters
Pentagon explains how government shutdown would impact defense
Watch 2:26
Yesterday
Government Accountability Office
Watchdog: US troops living in unsafe barracks with sewage, methane gas, filth
Watch 2:12
Yesterday
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Weak House Speaker McCarthy controlled by far-right colleagues
Yesterday
Dr. Rashad Richey
Wasteful government spending not the answer to America’s problems
Yesterday
Star Parker
Old age aside, it’s clear why Biden trumps Trump
Thursday
Jordan Reid
Trump’s immigration deterrence policy more humane than Biden’s
Thursday
Timothy Carney
Politics
Pentagon explains how government shutdown would impact defense
Yesterday
Biden admin sending $325 million in military resources to Ukraine
Senate confirms top military nominees, Tuberville says his hold will continue
Reuters
U.S.
Surging migrant crisis is overwhelming US cities from Eagle Pass, TX, to NYC
Yesterday
Watchdog: US troops living in unsafe barracks with sewage, methane gas, filth
US Air Force needs to ‘reoptimize’ or it could lose to China
AP Images
International
Authorities say China is actively training to block US assistance to Taiwan
Thursday
Railway stops operations after migrants injured as thousands hop trains to US border
Ukraine’s Zelenskyy to UN: Russia should be removed from Security Council
AP Images
Tech
Family sues Google over man’s death after he followed Maps’ directions
Thursday
Is it alive? How AI’s uncanny valley could threaten human interaction
Israel Prime Minister urges Elon Musk to stop hate speech on X
Philip Paxson via FaceBook