Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Hi, I’m star Parker. And I am here to tell you that corporate social justice programs don’t work. According to a new report from the Washington post, America’s corporations have committed at least $49.5 billion to the cause of racial justice since the George Floyd murder last year riveted our national attention on race.
These corporate executives nationwide have concluded that they can justify taking huge chunks of their shareholders’ funds, an amount equal to the entire economy of the state of Alaska, and spend these funds in a way that will produce more racial justice.
It’s reasonable to ask why they believe they can achieve this because it goes against all experience that we have had with government trying to do the same thing.
The federal government has been spending trillions since the war on poverty began in the sixties, $20 trillion by some estimates, $900 billion a year. And the incidents of poverty over these years has hardly budged.
Apparently these corporate executives feel that they have some insight that has eluded politicians for all this time.
A large percentage of the funds that they’re committing now are earmarked for loans and investments in housing and in business.
According to the report, $28 billion flows from a pledge by JP Morgan Chase to move 40,000 families into home ownership over the next five years.
Didn’t we try this already? But again, special loans and grants to encourage minority home ownership are nothing new. Government’s been doing this for years, causing much more damage than good.
According to the research at the American Enterprise Institute, the financial collapse of 2008 was driven by this type of activity, driven by a bursting of a highly inflated bubble in housing prices.
The result was widespread devastation, and it hit hardest black citizens. These government programs to help those that can’t help themselves. Those that were designed to help the poor have disproportionately hurt everyone.
And especially when housing prices collapsed. This is not a great mystery.
The great mystery is why the principles that have made and make this country great are nowhere to be found in the various ideas and programs that these corporates think that they want to fund.
Why have so many corporate Americans signed off on left-wing dogma that American principles, principles of protection of life and liberty and property, are the problem rather than the solution.
You know, part of the Census Bureau’s recent annual report — it’s called income and poverty in the United States — in the 2019 report, a larger percentage of black households, 29.4% specifically, were earning $75,000 or more, a larger percentage than the households earning 25,000 or less, because that was at 28.7%.
It’s close, but it’s progress.
So rather than portraying the traditions of free enterprise capitalism that built corporate America, America’s corporations should be promoting the values of diligent work and personal responsibility, values that offer more justice and prosperity for all Americans, including all African-Americans.
-
SCOTUS does not need reform or expansion
Democratic demands to reform the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) have grown louder in recent years but reached a crescendo after the court’s July 1, 2024 ruling in Trump v. United States. Later that month, President Biden officially announced his support for SCOTUS reforms, including a binding code of ethics, 18-year term limits… -
False abortion penalty claims by Left endanger women’s lives
Following a report of preventable deaths in Georgia, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden, D-Ore., sent letters to nine hospitals to investigate whether state abortion laws have delayed or prevented pregnant women from receiving life-saving medical care during miscarriages or other emergencies. Senate Republicans denied that state abortion laws impact women’s care in the U.S.,… -
In Harris-Trump debate, who checks the fact-checkers?
Following the second presidential debate, ABC News hosts David Muir and Linsey Davis faced some criticism for focusing their fact-checking on former President Trump while appearing lenient toward Vice President Kamala Harris. In contrast to the first presidential debate hosted by CNN where the moderators Jake Tapper and Dana Bash did not address potential false… -
Congress must pass SAVE Act without delay
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., is currently pushing for the passage of the controversial SAVE Act, a bill that would require voters to show proof of citizenship at the polls. Democrats have pledged to oppose it. Former President Donald Trump has urged congressional Republicans to pursue a government shutdown if they can’t secure passage of… -
Don’t blame Israel, and keep the pressure on Hamas
Negotiators working to achieve a permanent cease-fire in the Israel-Hamas war have experienced a roller coaster of highs and lows since the Oct. 7 attack, at times coming close to a workable deal. Complicating their work is the difficulty of establishing any long-term political and security framework that meets the needs of both the Israeli…
Latest Opinions
-
Why Wisconsin is so important in the upcoming presidential election
-
Frontier Airlines plane catches fire while landing in Las Vegas
-
Supreme Court returns to hear cases on guns, porn, transgender rights
-
One year since Hamas attacks on Israel started war
-
2% of residents in Hurricane Helene’s hardest-hit counties had flood insurance
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.