The leaked draft of the Supreme Court’s opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade has sparked endless debate, not just over the leak itself, but over who is to blame and what the immediate impact would be. For liberals, the key question now is: What, if anything, can be done about it? Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman delves into the options.
Many people have been writing to me…what should leftists do? Should leftists all leave these red states, sort of vote with their dollars and go to blue states? Well, sure. If that’s what you want to do, but many people can’t afford to do that. And that’s fundamentally where a lot of this problem is. Laura Ingraham, a Fox News host said on the air minutes after this story leaked that you can now just move to a state that has abortion if that’s what you want. Well, the whole point is a lot of the people that already struggle to afford medical services can’t afford to move to another state. That’s part and parcel of one of the problems we have in this country when we say vote with your dollar and move. Many people can’t afford to.
The counterpoint would be, no, the leftists should flood the red states, vote for Democrats and leftists, and have them change the laws when it comes to abortion. Well, that’s a fine plan. I have no problem with that, but understand that that takes years. And what happens in the meantime to women who would seek such services, but will be unable to? It’s a very personal decision. There’s not one right answer, and I can see both sides. But immediately in blue states, nothing will change in some red states, nothing will immediately change, but there are places, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Mississippi, and others, where things will become medieval very, very quickly.
We only have sort of a certain number of truly massive political stories each year in the United States. And one of those stories this year, and you could even argue of the last five years of the last 10 years, is that it is leaked.
Thanks to a political reporter that the Supreme Court, as of right now does plan to overturn Roe V. Wade, as well as Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
These are the two big pieces of legislation that in the United States make abortion a right and accessible to women in most cases, without placing an undue burden on them. And this is where that’s the, the bit of the law that is subject to interpretation. When we say here’s a state abortion law, does it violate Roe v Wade or doesn’t it? Well, the Supreme court, unless things change, unless the opinion changes between now and when they ultimately release it, which could happen, but is not super likely, will be overturning that precedent.
This will uphold the anti-abortion law in Mississippi. This will leave in place the recent Kentucky and Oklahoma anti-abortion laws. And this is a major, major thing.
A few important things to talk about here.
Who’s responsible for this? Well, we have to always assign blame or responsibility in proportion. There are some who have written to me and said, David, this is, this is the fault of the people on the left who in 2016 didn’t vote or voted third party, wrote someone in or even people who said, I, I dislike Hillary so much that even though I’m on the left, I’m gonna vote for Donald Trump. We have to go in order.
The people primarily responsible for this Supreme Court decision are the people who voted for Donald Trump.
Donald Trump himself for selecting these Supreme Court justices and the justices for making this decision.
That’s where the primary blame goes.
And yes, it was such a tight election in 2016 that we also would say, well, if there had been more people on the left who recognized the urgency of the situation, people like me who were saying, Trump could get two or three Supreme Court picks, and then that Supreme Court might ban abortion, or at least overturn Roe v. Wade.
It, it doesn’t ban abortion. It overturns Roe v. Wade, allowing states to ban it. If they so choose. And many of you wrote to me and said, that’s not that big of a deal. It’s not likely to happen. And, or it’s not that big of a deal. Well, now we see that it is. So let’s assign blame proportionately.
Now, on the other hand, it’s also important to remember what this decision will and won’t do. This decision will not make abortion illegal anywhere, but it will allow states to do that.
So if you live in a blue state that has pro-choice, a pro-choice framework currently, that is not going to change as a result of this decision. What may change is that the anti-abortion activists in your state become more emboldened and more impassioned at harassing women going to family planning clinics. That may happen, but strictly speaking, this won’t change the law in blue states. It also doesn’t automatically change the law in red states in that many of those states don’t have oppressive anti-abortion legislation on the books because they’re aware of Roe v. Wade. So even in red states, nothing immediately changes except in cases where anti-choice bills have been passed and have been in the court system and have been in the process of being legislated. Or there are states that have old anti-choice bills on the books as law, but they’re not enforced because they violate Roe v. Wade. Those will go and immediately be active and enforceable right away.
So one question, many people have been writing to me about is what should leftists do? Should leftists all leave these red states, sort of vote with their dollars and go to blue states? Well, sure. If that’s what you want to do, but many people can’t afford to do that. And that’s fundamentally where a lot of this problem is. Laura Ingraham, a Fox News host said on the air minutes after this story leaked that you can now just move to a state that has abortion, if that’s what you want. Well, the whole point is a lot of the people that already struggle to afford medical services can’t afford to move to another state. That’s part and parcel of one of the problems we have in this country when we say vote with your dollar and move, many people can’t afford to.
The counterpoint would be, no, the leftists should flood the red states, vote for Democrats and leftists, and have them change the laws when it comes to abortion. Well, that’s a fine plan. I have no problem with that, but understand that that takes years. And what happens in the meantime to women who would seek such services, but will be unable to? It’s a very personal decision. There’s not one right answer, and I can see both sides. But immediately in blue states, nothing will change in some red states, nothing will immediately change, but there are places, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Mississippi, and others, where things will become medieval very, very quickly.
David Pakman
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
More from David
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
What will happen if Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov dies?
16 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict paused, not over
Friday
Peter Zeihan
Hydrogen as clean energy source not ready for prime time
Thursday
Peter Zeihan
Railroads are more about political power than economic
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
SCOTUS is poised to overturn Roe v. Wade. What should liberals do?
May 05, 2022
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
By
The leaked draft of the Supreme Court’s opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade has sparked endless debate, not just over the leak itself, but over who is to blame and what the immediate impact would be. For liberals, the key question now is: What, if anything, can be done about it? Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman delves into the options.
We only have sort of a certain number of truly massive political stories each year in the United States. And one of those stories this year, and you could even argue of the last five years of the last 10 years, is that it is leaked.
Thanks to a political reporter that the Supreme Court, as of right now does plan to overturn Roe V. Wade, as well as Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
These are the two big pieces of legislation that in the United States make abortion a right and accessible to women in most cases, without placing an undue burden on them. And this is where that’s the, the bit of the law that is subject to interpretation. When we say here’s a state abortion law, does it violate Roe v Wade or doesn’t it? Well, the Supreme court, unless things change, unless the opinion changes between now and when they ultimately release it, which could happen, but is not super likely, will be overturning that precedent.
This will uphold the anti-abortion law in Mississippi. This will leave in place the recent Kentucky and Oklahoma anti-abortion laws. And this is a major, major thing.
A few important things to talk about here.
Who’s responsible for this? Well, we have to always assign blame or responsibility in proportion. There are some who have written to me and said, David, this is, this is the fault of the people on the left who in 2016 didn’t vote or voted third party, wrote someone in or even people who said, I, I dislike Hillary so much that even though I’m on the left, I’m gonna vote for Donald Trump. We have to go in order.
The people primarily responsible for this Supreme Court decision are the people who voted for Donald Trump.
Donald Trump himself for selecting these Supreme Court justices and the justices for making this decision.
That’s where the primary blame goes.
And yes, it was such a tight election in 2016 that we also would say, well, if there had been more people on the left who recognized the urgency of the situation, people like me who were saying, Trump could get two or three Supreme Court picks, and then that Supreme Court might ban abortion, or at least overturn Roe v. Wade.
It, it doesn’t ban abortion. It overturns Roe v. Wade, allowing states to ban it. If they so choose. And many of you wrote to me and said, that’s not that big of a deal. It’s not likely to happen. And, or it’s not that big of a deal. Well, now we see that it is. So let’s assign blame proportionately.
Now, on the other hand, it’s also important to remember what this decision will and won’t do. This decision will not make abortion illegal anywhere, but it will allow states to do that.
So if you live in a blue state that has pro-choice, a pro-choice framework currently, that is not going to change as a result of this decision. What may change is that the anti-abortion activists in your state become more emboldened and more impassioned at harassing women going to family planning clinics. That may happen, but strictly speaking, this won’t change the law in blue states. It also doesn’t automatically change the law in red states in that many of those states don’t have oppressive anti-abortion legislation on the books because they’re aware of Roe v. Wade. So even in red states, nothing immediately changes except in cases where anti-choice bills have been passed and have been in the court system and have been in the process of being legislated. Or there are states that have old anti-choice bills on the books as law, but they’re not enforced because they violate Roe v. Wade. Those will go and immediately be active and enforceable right away.
So one question, many people have been writing to me about is what should leftists do? Should leftists all leave these red states, sort of vote with their dollars and go to blue states? Well, sure. If that’s what you want to do, but many people can’t afford to do that. And that’s fundamentally where a lot of this problem is. Laura Ingraham, a Fox News host said on the air minutes after this story leaked that you can now just move to a state that has abortion, if that’s what you want. Well, the whole point is a lot of the people that already struggle to afford medical services can’t afford to move to another state. That’s part and parcel of one of the problems we have in this country when we say vote with your dollar and move, many people can’t afford to.
The counterpoint would be, no, the leftists should flood the red states, vote for Democrats and leftists, and have them change the laws when it comes to abortion. Well, that’s a fine plan. I have no problem with that, but understand that that takes years. And what happens in the meantime to women who would seek such services, but will be unable to? It’s a very personal decision. There’s not one right answer, and I can see both sides. But immediately in blue states, nothing will change in some red states, nothing will immediately change, but there are places, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Mississippi, and others, where things will become medieval very, very quickly.
Trump is behind Biden impeachment inquiry
Mounting pressure from House Republicans has led House Speaker Kevin McCarthy to officially endorse an impeachment inquiry against President Joe Biden. These impeachment efforts have escalated alongside another unfolding legal drama — that of former President Donald Trump. Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman argues that Trump, himself, is behind the scheme to impeach Biden.
19 hrs ago
McCarthy’s impeachment stunt lacks any evidence
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) recently announced his support for an impeachment inquiry against President Joe Biden. McCarthy’s announcement contradicts his prior position and aligns with the far-right’s ongoing push for impeachment. Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman breaks down GOP arguments and concerns, concluding that no evidence exists to merit the inquiry in the
Sep 18
Are Trump’s lawyers really going to make these legal arguments?
Former President Donald Trump faced his fourth indictment, centered on his attempts to overturn his 2020 general election loss in Georgia, in August. Trump’s legal team is portraying this indictment as an assault on his freedom of speech, while prosecutors hold a different perspective. Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman questions whether Trump’s legal team
Sep 11
Be mindful of Ramaswamy’s lying techniques
Following the first Republican presidential debate, Vivek Ramaswamy has climbed to the third position in the polls, trailing former President Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. In an effort to impede his momentum, other candidates have initiated a barrage of negative attacks against Ramaswamy, highlighting his shifting stance on critical issues. Straight Arrow News
Sep 5
Polling predicts Trump-Biden rematch, but key questions remain
Early polling for the 2024 presidential election reveals Donald Trump dominating the GOP field with no contender in sight, while President Joe Biden is performing evenly against him. Yet with so much of Trump’s near-term future now in question, critics have wondered how helpful or relevant this polling data can be. Straight Arrow News contributor
Aug 28
Stories each side is underreporting
Germany to halve federal aid for refugees next year
11 sources | 0% from the left
Biden is headed to Michigan to join the UAW picket line. He’s all-in on showing his union bona fides
28 sources | 4% from the right
Latest Opinions
AP
2nd Republican primary debate field set: The Morning Rundown, Sept. 26, 2023
Watch 5:33
23 mins ago
Straight Arrow News
Wind energy expansion raises concerns over fishing industry’s future
Watch 9:24
7 hrs ago
AP Images
Officials sought probe into illegal China-linked California biolab long before raid
Watch 4:50
13 hrs ago
Boeing
New US Air Force training jet Red Hawk augments reality
Watch 4:15
14 hrs ago
Getty Images
Indicted Sen. Menendez says he’ll be exonerated, kept cash in clothes for ’emergencies’
Watch 2:09
15 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Trump is behind Biden impeachment inquiry
19 hrs ago
David Pakman
Weak House Speaker McCarthy controlled by far-right colleagues
Friday
Dr. Rashad Richey
Wasteful government spending not the answer to America’s problems
Friday
Star Parker
Old age aside, it’s clear why Biden trumps Trump
Thursday
Jordan Reid
Politics
2nd Republican primary debate field set: The Morning Rundown, Sept. 26, 2023
23 mins ago
Indicted Sen. Menendez says he’ll be exonerated, kept cash in clothes for ’emergencies’
Calls for Sen. Bob Menendez resignation grow amid bribery charges
AP
U.S.
Officials sought probe into illegal China-linked California biolab long before raid
13 hrs ago
New US Air Force training jet Red Hawk augments reality
Hollywood writers and studios reach tentative deal to end strike: The Morning Rundown, Sept. 25, 2023
AP Images
International
Canadian lawmakers apologize after celebrating Ukrainian Nazi fighter
17 hrs ago
Nicaragua’s Catholic president is persecuting members of his own religion
Authorities say China is actively training to block US assistance to Taiwan
Reuters
Tech
NASA: Asteroid sample from 200 million miles away lands in Utah
22 hrs ago
Family sues Google over man’s death after he followed Maps’ directions
Is it alive? How AI’s uncanny valley could threaten human interaction
NASA