If there is one thing we should all know by now, it’s that Donald Trump is all about projection. The former president has spent much of the past six years saying Hillary Clinton couldn’t be trusted with U.S. secrets, that she should be locked up for a non-existent email scandal Trump and his allies still cling to. It’s like that girl in the movie Mean Girls who kept trying to “make fetch happen.”
Dear Republicans: Stop. It’s not going to happen.
And you know why? Because it’s clear to anyone not brainwashed by right-wing media that it’s Trump himself who can’t be trusted to safeguard American secrets. The news that Trump reportedly flushed official documents down the toilet and removed classified material when he left the White House, in blatant defiance of the Presidential Records Act, proves that case. It’s why the National Archives had to go down to Mar-a-Lago to retrieve boxes of documents it was determined were improperly moved out of the White House.
This shouldn’t surprise anyone who paid any sort of attention to the Trump White House during his chaotic four-year presidency. Look at the carelessness with which most of the people he surrounded himself with dealt with state secrets. Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump were found to use personal email to conduct official White House business. Should we start the “Lock them up” chants now? The same goes for one of Trump’s numerous chiefs of staff, Mark Meadows. And Trump reportedly had the habit of ripping documents up, which staffers would then grab later to tape them up, because they knew what he did was against the law. But it’s Toiletgate that may well be the defining scandal of the Trump era.
You may recall that during his presidency, Trump, numerous times talked about people having to flush toilets 10 to 15 times. And I wondered and many in my audience wondered what Trump was doing that he thinks people are flushing toilets 10 to 15 times. It doesn’t make any sense. Well, it might have been that he was trying to flush documents, and that’s why he was having to flush the toilet 10 to 15 times.
So as usual, the case he made against Hillary Clinton was pure projection. It was he who could not be trusted. It was he who was irresponsible with these documents. And then of course, there’s the question of consequences.
I’m doubtful myself that Trump will be held accountable for his blatant disregard for official policy. He’s made a career of dodging accountability, so until something actually occurs, I will remain skeptical. But one thing is certain: Trump’s accusations against Hillary Clinton are officially down the drain.
So remember that the main reason, one of the main reasons why Donald Trump and Republicans told us back in 2015 and 2016, you can’t vote for Hillary Clinton, you shouldn’t vote for Hillary Clinton, was her emails. And it was the claim that she couldn’t be trusted with secret sends or classified information. She was using private email and thus, you should not vote for Hillary Clinton. And over the four years that followed, we have seen every single opportunity at handling or managing information mismanaged either by Donald Trump or people working for him or his family up to this now almost cartoonish crescendo… climax in which he was flushing documents down the White House toilet to the point of it getting clogged and having to call maintenance to unclog it.
Now, these claims were initially reported by the New York Times’ Maggie Haberman in her forthcoming book. And there is a fair criticism to make of Maggie Haberman, which is if you knew this for a while, why did you wait until you could monetize it in a book to make it public?
That’s not a unique criticism to Maggie Haberman. Many authors do and did exactly this, which is they knew about all sorts of stuff. You know, Stephanie Grisham did it. I’m blanking on other names, but many Trump era journalists, acolytes reporters, et cetera, knew stuff which they held to then make money off of in a book.
Okay. That would be a criticism of Maggie Haberman. It is not a fair criticism of her that she publishes unsourced stuff. And while Donald Trump has said this is not true, that he was not flushing documents down the toilet. I do not believe for a second that Maggie Haberman would publish this without the sources that she claims to have. And think back now to the sequence and the context is this cloud put over Hilary Clinton’s head that she, her emails and documents and et cetera, within the first year of Trump’s presidency year and a half year he was in the oval office, revealing secrets that we received from our ally Israel to Russian spy recruiter, Sergey KAK in the oval office for me, other than the fact that Trump was obviously lying.
That incident was the first one where I realized Trump’s terrible with secret classified information disaster. I’m starting to think that it was projection what he was saying about Hillary Clinton. We then found out that Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and Ivanka Trump, Trump’s daughter, were using private email to conduct white house business. Now why they were even conducting white house business is another very fair question. Nepotism seemingly not preventing Donald Trump from having them work for him, but they were using private email and others were using private email as well. Mark Meadows and others that we’ve learned. So check that off the list. We then learned that Donald Trump would regularly rip up documents and throw ’em on the floor in the white house. And staffers would come in, pick up the shreds of paper and tape them back together. We then learned, what is this number four, number five.
We then learned that they would send documents from the white house in burn bags to the Pentagon to be incinerated, even though documents from the white house are supposed to be preserved as part of the presidential records act. And then the kind of cherry on top, that’s just a cartoon is the imagery of Trump flushing documents down the toilet, and then having to call maintenance to unclog the thing I can, I can imagine it now. And unfortunately, it’s not even a surprise. You may recall that during his presidency, Trump, numerous times talked about people having to flush toilets 10 to 15 times. And I wondered and many in my audience wondered what Trump was doing that he thinks people are flushing toilets 10 to 15 times. It doesn’t make any sense. Well, it might have been that he was trying to flush documents, and that’s why he was having to flush the toilet 10 to 15 times.
So as usual, the case he made against Hillary Clinton was pure projection. It was he who could not be trusted. It was he who was irresponsible with these documents. And then of course, there’s the question of consequences. Sandy Berger, who was Bill Clinton’s national security advisor, took four documents with him inappropriately. He was fined $50,000. He was put on multiple years probation. He lost his law license.
That was four documents. Trump’s burning documents, ripping documents, flushing documents, and taking documents to his house at Mar-a-Lago, which the national archives had to go and then retrieve. So at the end of the day, of course, Trump was lying about Hillary. Of course, Trump is the one we really couldn’t trust with the documents, but will there be any consequences because people have suffered serious consequences for far less? Unfortunately I think the answer is no. There has been no evident willingness from the current Justice Department to really hold this guy accountable. And there are political reasons and legal reasons which can, can be stated as to why.
But I do not believe Trump will be held accountable for this. Let me know what you think. Is there a path to accountability? And if so, what does it look like?
David Pakman
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
More from David
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
How shifting Russian targets impact global economy
23 hrs ago
Peter Zeihan
What explains West African coups? Will France respond?
Yesterday
Peter Zeihan
Chinese housing overbuild may erode support for Xi Jinping
Wednesday
Peter Zeihan
Americans debate government shutdowns, spending priorities
Wednesday
Dr. Frank Luntz
Toiletgate proves Trump can’t be trusted
Feb 25, 2022
Share
. . .
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
By
If there is one thing we should all know by now, it’s that Donald Trump is all about projection. The former president has spent much of the past six years saying Hillary Clinton couldn’t be trusted with U.S. secrets, that she should be locked up for a non-existent email scandal Trump and his allies still cling to. It’s like that girl in the movie Mean Girls who kept trying to “make fetch happen.”
Dear Republicans: Stop. It’s not going to happen.
And you know why? Because it’s clear to anyone not brainwashed by right-wing media that it’s Trump himself who can’t be trusted to safeguard American secrets. The news that Trump reportedly flushed official documents down the toilet and removed classified material when he left the White House, in blatant defiance of the Presidential Records Act, proves that case. It’s why the National Archives had to go down to Mar-a-Lago to retrieve boxes of documents it was determined were improperly moved out of the White House.
This shouldn’t surprise anyone who paid any sort of attention to the Trump White House during his chaotic four-year presidency. Look at the carelessness with which most of the people he surrounded himself with dealt with state secrets. Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump were found to use personal email to conduct official White House business. Should we start the “Lock them up” chants now? The same goes for one of Trump’s numerous chiefs of staff, Mark Meadows. And Trump reportedly had the habit of ripping documents up, which staffers would then grab later to tape them up, because they knew what he did was against the law. But it’s Toiletgate that may well be the defining scandal of the Trump era.
I’m doubtful myself that Trump will be held accountable for his blatant disregard for official policy. He’s made a career of dodging accountability, so until something actually occurs, I will remain skeptical. But one thing is certain: Trump’s accusations against Hillary Clinton are officially down the drain.
So remember that the main reason, one of the main reasons why Donald Trump and Republicans told us back in 2015 and 2016, you can’t vote for Hillary Clinton, you shouldn’t vote for Hillary Clinton, was her emails. And it was the claim that she couldn’t be trusted with secret sends or classified information. She was using private email and thus, you should not vote for Hillary Clinton. And over the four years that followed, we have seen every single opportunity at handling or managing information mismanaged either by Donald Trump or people working for him or his family up to this now almost cartoonish crescendo… climax in which he was flushing documents down the White House toilet to the point of it getting clogged and having to call maintenance to unclog it.
Now, these claims were initially reported by the New York Times’ Maggie Haberman in her forthcoming book. And there is a fair criticism to make of Maggie Haberman, which is if you knew this for a while, why did you wait until you could monetize it in a book to make it public?
That’s not a unique criticism to Maggie Haberman. Many authors do and did exactly this, which is they knew about all sorts of stuff. You know, Stephanie Grisham did it. I’m blanking on other names, but many Trump era journalists, acolytes reporters, et cetera, knew stuff which they held to then make money off of in a book.
Okay. That would be a criticism of Maggie Haberman. It is not a fair criticism of her that she publishes unsourced stuff. And while Donald Trump has said this is not true, that he was not flushing documents down the toilet. I do not believe for a second that Maggie Haberman would publish this without the sources that she claims to have. And think back now to the sequence and the context is this cloud put over Hilary Clinton’s head that she, her emails and documents and et cetera, within the first year of Trump’s presidency year and a half year he was in the oval office, revealing secrets that we received from our ally Israel to Russian spy recruiter, Sergey KAK in the oval office for me, other than the fact that Trump was obviously lying.
That incident was the first one where I realized Trump’s terrible with secret classified information disaster. I’m starting to think that it was projection what he was saying about Hillary Clinton. We then found out that Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and Ivanka Trump, Trump’s daughter, were using private email to conduct white house business. Now why they were even conducting white house business is another very fair question. Nepotism seemingly not preventing Donald Trump from having them work for him, but they were using private email and others were using private email as well. Mark Meadows and others that we’ve learned. So check that off the list. We then learned that Donald Trump would regularly rip up documents and throw ’em on the floor in the white house. And staffers would come in, pick up the shreds of paper and tape them back together. We then learned, what is this number four, number five.
We then learned that they would send documents from the white house in burn bags to the Pentagon to be incinerated, even though documents from the white house are supposed to be preserved as part of the presidential records act. And then the kind of cherry on top, that’s just a cartoon is the imagery of Trump flushing documents down the toilet, and then having to call maintenance to unclog the thing I can, I can imagine it now. And unfortunately, it’s not even a surprise. You may recall that during his presidency, Trump, numerous times talked about people having to flush toilets 10 to 15 times. And I wondered and many in my audience wondered what Trump was doing that he thinks people are flushing toilets 10 to 15 times. It doesn’t make any sense. Well, it might have been that he was trying to flush documents, and that’s why he was having to flush the toilet 10 to 15 times.
So as usual, the case he made against Hillary Clinton was pure projection. It was he who could not be trusted. It was he who was irresponsible with these documents. And then of course, there’s the question of consequences. Sandy Berger, who was Bill Clinton’s national security advisor, took four documents with him inappropriately. He was fined $50,000. He was put on multiple years probation. He lost his law license.
That was four documents. Trump’s burning documents, ripping documents, flushing documents, and taking documents to his house at Mar-a-Lago, which the national archives had to go and then retrieve. So at the end of the day, of course, Trump was lying about Hillary. Of course, Trump is the one we really couldn’t trust with the documents, but will there be any consequences because people have suffered serious consequences for far less? Unfortunately I think the answer is no. There has been no evident willingness from the current Justice Department to really hold this guy accountable. And there are political reasons and legal reasons which can, can be stated as to why.
But I do not believe Trump will be held accountable for this. Let me know what you think. Is there a path to accountability? And if so, what does it look like?
Trump is behind Biden impeachment inquiry
Mounting pressure from House Republicans has led House Speaker Kevin McCarthy to officially endorse an impeachment inquiry against President Joe Biden. These impeachment efforts have escalated alongside another unfolding legal drama — that of former President Donald Trump. Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman argues that Trump, himself, is behind the scheme to impeach Biden.
Monday
McCarthy’s impeachment stunt lacks any evidence
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) recently announced his support for an impeachment inquiry against President Joe Biden. McCarthy’s announcement contradicts his prior position and aligns with the far-right’s ongoing push for impeachment. Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman breaks down GOP arguments and concerns, concluding that no evidence exists to merit the inquiry in the
Sep 18
Are Trump’s lawyers really going to make these legal arguments?
Former President Donald Trump faced his fourth indictment, centered on his attempts to overturn his 2020 general election loss in Georgia, in August. Trump’s legal team is portraying this indictment as an assault on his freedom of speech, while prosecutors hold a different perspective. Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman questions whether Trump’s legal team
Sep 11
Be mindful of Ramaswamy’s lying techniques
Following the first Republican presidential debate, Vivek Ramaswamy has climbed to the third position in the polls, trailing former President Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. In an effort to impede his momentum, other candidates have initiated a barrage of negative attacks against Ramaswamy, highlighting his shifting stance on critical issues. Straight Arrow News
Sep 5
Polling predicts Trump-Biden rematch, but key questions remain
Early polling for the 2024 presidential election reveals Donald Trump dominating the GOP field with no contender in sight, while President Joe Biden is performing evenly against him. Yet with so much of Trump’s near-term future now in question, critics have wondered how helpful or relevant this polling data can be. Straight Arrow News contributor
Aug 28
Media Miss
Stories each side is underreporting
Former Loudoun schools chief guilty of retaliating against teacher
12 sources | 17% from the left
Local members of Congress weigh in on potential government shutdown
11 sources | 0% from the right
Latest Opinions
Getty Images
Biden proposes limited offshore oil and gas leases to support wind energy
Watch 2:20
19 hrs ago
The Elephant Sanctuary
California city first in nation to recognize legal rights of elephants
Watch 2:15
19 hrs ago
Getty Images
Sen. Feinstein’s death leaves Senate vacancy Gov. Newsom needs to fill
Watch 2:54
19 hrs ago
Premier of Ontario
Climate advocates, indigenous tribes protest efforts to mine $67B of minerals in Canada
Watch 2:50
19 hrs ago
Getty Images
Retailers report record $112B in lost inventory amid theft, violence
Watch 2:22
23 hrs ago
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Politics of lesser evils is bad for all Americans
Yesterday
Dr. Rashad Richey
How a No Labels candidate might affect outcome of 2024 election
Yesterday
John Fortier
Why is accused sexual predator Russell Brand getting right-wing support?
Yesterday
Jordan Reid
High housing mortgage costs are a risk to whole economy
Wednesday
Newt Gingrich
Politics
Sen. Feinstein’s death leaves Senate vacancy Gov. Newsom needs to fill
19 hrs ago
Members of Congress still get paid during government shutdown
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, longest serving woman senator, dies at 90
Getty Images
U.S.
California city first in nation to recognize legal rights of elephants
19 hrs ago
Elon Musk weighs in on immigration policy in visit to US-Mexico border
DHS collects migrants’ DNA for growing database, raising privacy concerns
The Elephant Sanctuary
International
Cuban officials call Molotov cocktail attack on its US embassy terrorism
Tuesday
Canadian lawmakers apologize after celebrating Ukrainian Nazi fighter
Nicaragua’s Catholic president is persecuting members of his own religion
Reuters
Tech
TikTok workers: China may have more control over user data than we think
Yesterday
Musk makes cuts to X election integrity team
Ford pauses construction on $3.5 billion EV battery plant
Getty Images