Opinion

Victims of ‘cancel culture’ don’t stay canceled for long


All opinions expressed in this article are solely the opinions of the contributors.

According to a 2022 Pew Research Center survey, 61% of U.S. adults say they’ve heard of the term “cancel culture,” up from 44% in 2020, the first time the Center began asking about the term. But it seems that the more people are exposed to it, the less they seem to agree on its meaning. Democrats are far more likely to believe canceling people for posting offensive content holds them accountable while the majority of Republicans believe this type of action generally punishes people who don’t deserve it. Straight Arrow News contributor David Pakman argues that not all cancelations are the same. 

So what it ultimately comes down to is that when we talk about cancelation, there are two aspects to it. There are: is the action worthy of a consequence? Did they really say something worthy of criticism or not? That’s step one. 

I would argue in my case, when I made that tweet, about how even prayer didn’t protect a Christian school from a shooting, therefore guns [sic], therefore gun violence won’t be prevented by prayer, the Right wrongly claimed I was blaming the kids who died. Of course, I would never do that.

So part one is figuring out was something deplorable actually said? In some cases, the answer is yes. In some cases, the answer is no. But when cancelation is claimed, we then have to go further and we have to say, what do we mean by canceled? Like people on Twitter harassed them for a few days and maybe they lost the gig, but six months later gained another one?

Now there are people who have not successfully come back to public life. Milo Yiannopoulos is an example. He was dropped by his publisher and lost a bunch of speaking engagements after he condemned, if not pedophilia, hebephilia. It’s been tough for him since and some would argue deservedly so. He ended up interning, I guess, for Marjorie Taylor Greene or whatever, but Milo has not recovered so far. What some would argue: it is correct, based on what he did. 

Mel Gibson, after his insane anti-semitic episode, he did do some work but he’s not where his career once was. But he did it. He did still get some work.

So let’s categorize these. Let’s understand them. Let’s explain them. Let’s understand when repercussions make sense and when they don’t. But “oh, they canceled everybody” — we’ve got to get beyond those headlines.

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.