![The Supreme Court appears sympathetic to a a Christian web designer who's refusing to perform services for a same-sex wedding.](https://san.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/image-67.jpg?w=1280)
Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
In 2018, the Supreme Court heard the case of Masterpiece Cakeshop versus Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the controversial and well-covered case about a Christian baker, Jack Phillips, being punished for refusing to bake a gay wedding cake. The Christian Baker won that case. So you think that would be the end of it? It would settle the debate on the issue? Well, not quite.
The decision is what constitutional scholars call a narrow ruling. This means that the decision made in that case only applies to that case and is not a precedent for future rulings. The court noted that the commission’s open hostility toward Phillips religious claims, but they stopped far short of answering the critical questions related to anti-discrimination law and our constitutionally protected religious liberties.
This is a debate that continues. So now, four years later, the Supreme Court is once again faced with this issue, as is the Congress. Recently, the court heard oral arguments regarding a devoutly Christian Colorado web designer, Lorie Smith, and Colorado’s pro-gay laws. Lorie wants to expand her business to serve online wedding registries, but wants to do so in a way that complements her faith.
Unfortunately, that Colorado law makes it nearly impossible. And there at the Supreme Court and the court heard those arguments this past Monday. And sadly, the antics and actions didn’t stop with Lorie. Jack Phillips, the Christian baker, he’s also back in court after being targeted by LGBTQ advocates for refusing to bake a transgender reveal cake. The Supreme Court’s attempt to avoid this issue and kick the can down the road has hurt us.
It’s only served the purpose of making both sides really, really angry. And now it’s spilling out into the Congress. Both the gay rights lobby and the religious community are at odds with each other. And the big question for all of society is, can we co-exist? Can these two groups live in the same country? One can only hope this time that they’ll be a difference, that there’ll be a reconciliation, that religious liberties are religious liberties protected in the Constitution regardless of what the gay activists want.
And as we await the court’s decision, it’s important that all Americans realize what is at risk, because in a free country, you can be compelled to act. However, you can’t be compelled, though, to act against your own faith and have threats from government action. We’re a free country. People are able to choose how they want to live. But now we’re talking about a conflicting worldview.
Is it acceptable for the government to force anyone to promote speech they fundamentally disagree with? We can only hope the court will answer these questions this time with a resounding no. We’ll know next summer. The left will have you believe that intrusions on religious liberties are necessary to protect the LGBTQ community. Similarly, advocates have argued that refusing to subject the religious community to harsh penalties will unleash a wave of racist, sexist and homophobic hate.
This is the lie we should all reject. Both Jack and Lorie never refuse services to the LGBTQ community. They just refused to endorse, promote or facilitate messages that defied their faith. America is a tolerant and loving country. We can have civil disagreements without demonizing each other. Or can we? Because this is coming to a head. Because at core, Lorie Smith and Jack Phillips are simply Christian business owners seeking to earn a living within the bounds of their faith in a free country.
They should be able to do so. They should be able to protect their religious liberties while serving their public without invoking such hatred response from the alphabet mafia that is now attempting to pass their agenda in Congress and have the president of the United States sign it into law.
-
Trump has an excellent opportunity with Black voters
Former President Donald Trump’s gains with Black voters have narrowed since President Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 race. Prior to his dropping out, polling indicated that Biden was losing support among Black voters, who had been vital to his 2020 victory. The Trump campaign has been courting Black voters, using the recent Republican…
-
Biden is wrong to support Supreme Court reform
The Supreme Court’s public legitimacy crisis continues to escalate after it issued a series of major recent decisions perceived by many Americans as overtly partisan, most recently the July 1 ruling in Trump v. United States. Calls to reform the Supreme Court long predate these rulings but have gained significant momentum and popularity in their…
-
Liberals stir fear over Supreme Court immunity decision
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court ruled July 1 in Trump v. United States that presidents are immune from prosecution for any presumably “official” act taken while in office, including criminal acts. Some legal experts and liberal justices were “horrified” by the opinion and warned of grave consequences, while Chief Justice John Roberts, in…
-
Debate disaster raises questions about Biden’s capacity to lead
Even former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has stated that it’s valid for voters to question President Joe Biden’s mental health given his recent debate performance. Lawmakers from the opposing party are calling for a select committee to examine his mental health. Watch the video above as Straight Arrow News contributor Star Parker argues that,…
-
Black Americans should vote for Donald Trump
In the 2020 elections, 92% of single-race Black, non-Hispanic voters cast their ballots for President Joe Biden, while only 8% voted for Donald Trump. That one-sided turnout followed a summer of nationwide protests against police violence largely organized by Black Americans in the wake of George Floyd’s murder, and then-President Trump’s crackdown on those protests…
Latest Opinions
-
U.S. Department of Defense
Congress still trying to figure out how to reduce wasteful military spending
-
DVIDS
US Navy, Air Force making waves with new weapons at RIMPAC
-
Getty Images
Israeli PM Netanyahu meets with Trump at Mar-a-Lago
-
Getty Images
Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation’s heartland
-
Getty Images
Beer from the sun, other solar thermal projects get government funding
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.