We are on the cusp of the commencement of the first of former president Donald Trump’s four trials. As someone who would like nothing more than for this horrible man – this criminal, who has caused so much pain to so many – to be locked away for the remainder of his life, I should be…if not “eagerly anticipating” the trial, certainly looking forward to the opportunity to have Trump pay for his actions.
But I do not feel very optimistic about the outcome here. Because here’s the thing: This first trial, the so-called “hush money” trial – it actually doesn’t seem to offer an especially strong case against Trump.
Trump paid off adult film star Stormy Daniels to keep her from talking about their affair in the leadup to the 2016 election – I don’t think anyone doubts that. Trump knew about the payment; of course he did. But there are several worrying factors that I fear will lead to either an acquittal, a mistrial, or – at the worst – some fines and a slap on the wrist.
First, hush money payments aren’t actually illegal; they’re just gross. What would be illegal would be the fact that the payments were marked as “legal expenses” on Trump’s records. Trump’s attorneys will almost certainly argue that the former president had no knowledge or understanding of the bookkeeping process or how these payments were recorded.
And even if the prosecution can prove that he did…falsification of business records is a misdemeanor, not a felony. It’s not the kind of thing that results in jail time. It’s not the kind of thing that I can imagine his rabid supporters abandoning him because of. If the prosecution can prove that these hush money payments amounted to campaign finance violations, the charges could rise to the level of a felony…but a conviction is still very unlikely to result in anything more than a fine, or probation.
Another problem is the credibility of the man who appears likely to be the primary witness in this case, Trump’s former attorney and friend Michael Cohen. Michael Cohen has lied in court. A lot. By his own admission. He also hates Donald Trump. A lot. By his own admission. And these factors combined may make the jury view him as an unreliable witness.
This case was never going to be the strongest one against Trump – the classified-documents case, the January 6 case and the Fulton County, Georgia case all allege more serious crimes, with vaster consequences should he be convicted. But those cases, more than ever, are looking unlikely to see verdicts before the presidential election. Which, of course, is what Trump is hoping for.
So I suppose we’ll just have to wait and see. I just wonder whether this case will have much of an impact on…well…anything at all.
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘Instill optimism’: Americans on how future generations can succeed
Friday Dr. Frank Luntz‘Have a little compassion’: Americans talk high holiday prices, anxiety
Dec 11 Dr. Frank Luntz‘System is rigged’: Black Americans on the American Dream
Nov 27 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Extremist’ or ‘phony’: Americans share who they voted for and why
Nov 21 Dr. Frank LuntzWhy I doubt Trump will be convicted in hush money case
By Straight Arrow News
Donald Trump is the first former president to face trial on criminal charges. In the first of potentially four trials, Trump entered a plea of not guilty to 34 counts of falsifying business records. These charges stem from a $130,000 payment made to the adult actress and stripper Stormy Daniels, which aimed to keep her allegations of a sexual encounter with Trump quiet.
Straight Arrow News contributor Jordan Reid expresses pessimism about the trial’s outcome, citing various reasons why the former president might have a strong chance of being acquitted.
First, hush money payments aren’t actually illegal, they’re just gross. What would be illegal would be the fact that the payments were marked as “legal expenses” on Trump’s records. Trump’s attorneys will almost certainly argue that the former president had no knowledge or understanding of the bookkeeping process or how these payments were recorded.
And even if the prosecution can prove that he did, falsification of business records is a misdemeanor, not a felony. It’s not the kind of thing that results in jail time. It’s not the kind of thing that I can imagine his rabid supporters abandoning him because of. If the prosecution can prove that these hush money payments amounted to campaign finance violations, the charges could rise to the level of a felony, but a conviction for a first time offender — not that he is one but whatever — a conviction is still very unlikely to result in anything more than a fine or probation.
Another problem is the credibility of the man who appears likely to be the primary witness in this case, Trump’s former attorney and friend Michael Cohen. Michael Cohen has lied in court, a lot, by his own admission. He also hates Donald Trump, a lot, by his own admission. And these factors combined may make the jury view him as an unreliable witness.
This case was never going to be the strongest one against Trump — the classified documents case, the January 6 case, and the Fulton County, Georgia, case all allege more serious crimes, with vaster consequences should he be convicted. But those cases, more than ever, are looking unlikely to see verdicts before the presidential election, which, of course, is what Trump is hoping for.
So I suppose we’ll just have to wait and see. I just wonder whether this case will have much of an impact on…well…anything at all.
We are on the cusp of the commencement of the first of former president Donald Trump’s four trials. As someone who would like nothing more than for this horrible man – this criminal, who has caused so much pain to so many – to be locked away for the remainder of his life, I should be…if not “eagerly anticipating” the trial, certainly looking forward to the opportunity to have Trump pay for his actions.
But I do not feel very optimistic about the outcome here. Because here’s the thing: This first trial, the so-called “hush money” trial – it actually doesn’t seem to offer an especially strong case against Trump.
Trump paid off adult film star Stormy Daniels to keep her from talking about their affair in the leadup to the 2016 election – I don’t think anyone doubts that. Trump knew about the payment; of course he did. But there are several worrying factors that I fear will lead to either an acquittal, a mistrial, or – at the worst – some fines and a slap on the wrist.
First, hush money payments aren’t actually illegal; they’re just gross. What would be illegal would be the fact that the payments were marked as “legal expenses” on Trump’s records. Trump’s attorneys will almost certainly argue that the former president had no knowledge or understanding of the bookkeeping process or how these payments were recorded.
And even if the prosecution can prove that he did…falsification of business records is a misdemeanor, not a felony. It’s not the kind of thing that results in jail time. It’s not the kind of thing that I can imagine his rabid supporters abandoning him because of. If the prosecution can prove that these hush money payments amounted to campaign finance violations, the charges could rise to the level of a felony…but a conviction is still very unlikely to result in anything more than a fine, or probation.
Another problem is the credibility of the man who appears likely to be the primary witness in this case, Trump’s former attorney and friend Michael Cohen. Michael Cohen has lied in court. A lot. By his own admission. He also hates Donald Trump. A lot. By his own admission. And these factors combined may make the jury view him as an unreliable witness.
This case was never going to be the strongest one against Trump – the classified-documents case, the January 6 case and the Fulton County, Georgia case all allege more serious crimes, with vaster consequences should he be convicted. But those cases, more than ever, are looking unlikely to see verdicts before the presidential election. Which, of course, is what Trump is hoping for.
So I suppose we’ll just have to wait and see. I just wonder whether this case will have much of an impact on…well…anything at all.
Trump’s Mar-a-Lago interview is a preview of troubles ahead
Biden must issue pardons before Patel takes FBI lead
Bible-infused school curiculum sets dangerous precedent
Celebrities are finally talking about perimenopause
Trump’s extreme MAGA loyalist appointees are cause for alarm
Underreported stories from each side
Scott Jennings: The biggest scandal in America is the cover-up of Biden’s condition
19 sources | 13% from the left Getty ImagesSinema reflects on criticism in exit interview: ‘Don’t give a s‑‑‑’
11 sources | 10% from the right Getty ImagesLatest Stories
Biden considers commuting death row: Report
Louisville police issue citation to homeless woman in labor
New book accuses Spotify of promoting fake artists
Andrew Cuomo sues for defamation after sexual harassment allegations
Driver kills at least two in Germany Christmas market attack
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Time to say goodbye to DEI
Friday Star ParkerIt’s time to take failed capitalism out of Christmas
Friday Dr. Rashad RicheyMusk-Ramaswamy DOGE initiative overdue and full of challenges
Thursday John FortierTrump’s Mar-a-Lago interview is a preview of troubles ahead
Thursday Jordan Reid