Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
One great mystery is the persistent refusal of those on the left to abandon what is clearly not true.
Why do they keep insisting that the means for reducing the burden of poverty is more government spending?
The lie entrenched in the 1960s under President Lyndon B. Johnson.
LBJ declared in his 1964 State of the Union address an “unconditional War on Poverty in America.”
Yet, despite tens of trillions of spending since then, the conviction of progressives is that poverty can be wiped out with tens of trillions more government spending.
We now face the latest round of this misguided lie with the expansion of the Child Tax Credit in the Build Back Better Act — now derailed thanks to Sen. Joe Manchin.
Fellow Democrats are now all over Senator Manchin for allegedly not caring about child poverty.
President Biden’s so-called ‘Build Back Better’ Act would have increased the credit from $2,000 per child to $3,000, or $3,600 for children under 6.
Yet, in a particularly destructive move, the BBB detached work requirements from receiving the Child Tax Credit, which a team of University of Chicago economists’ estimate would result in 1.5 million parents leaving the workforce.
More government, less work. This is somehow the answer that Democrat Party leadership is serving up to us for how to build a better future for our nation.
It is becoming more obvious by the day that Democrats have used LBJ’s War on Poverty not to improve the lives of the poor, but as a weapon to dramatically expand government into the lives of the non-poor.
Equally revealing, the more you listen to these progressives and delve into their legislative agenda, is what does not interest them at all.
A little more than a decade ago, Ron Haskins and Isabel Sawhill at the Brookings Institution publicized what they called the “success sequence.”
The success sequence consists of three steps in behavior to avoid poverty.
Complete at least a high school education, work full time, and wait until age 21 before getting married and then having children.
According to testimony of Haskins in 2012 before the U.S. Senate, those following the “success sequence” have a 2% chance of being in poverty and a 75% chance of reaching the middle class.
But the success sequence doesn’t much interest progressives because the focus is about individuals taking personal responsibility for their lives in a free country.
The “personal responsibility” part and the “free country” part have little standing in the Democratic Party.
Also, of little interest to progressives is that larding down our economy with massive amounts of government retards economic growth.
Why would anyone think slow economic growth is good for the poor?
One big challenge for Americans to allow themselves to be convinced by progressives that government is the answer to anyone’s life’s problems – is that our society then becomes more likely to abandon faith and religion: the very pillars which provide the light and principles for individuals to take control of their own lives.
New data from the Pew Research Center shows the toll that secularization is taking on our country.
According to Pew, 63% of Americans in 2021 identify as Christians, compared with 78% in 2007.
In 2021, 29% indicated they have no religion, compared with 16% in 2007.
In 2007, 56% of Americans said religion was “very important” in their lives, yet in 2021 this was down to 41 percent.
If as a nation we really have desire to help folks in need, whether the need is child- care or to escape poverty, perhaps rather than allow politicians to expand government reach, we should again recall the words of America’s first president, George Washington, in his farewell address.
“Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. … And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion.
“Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.”
I think we should memorize our first president before these liberals and these progressives destroy our great country.
-
Don’t blame Israel, and keep the pressure on Hamas
Negotiators working to achieve a permanent cease-fire in the Israel-Hamas war have experienced a roller coaster of highs and lows since the Oct. 7 attack, at times coming close to a workable deal. Complicating their work is the difficulty of establishing any long-term political and security framework that meets the needs of both the Israeli… -
Harris-Walz extreme abortion views out of step with Americans
Abortion is poised to be a central issue in the 2024 presidential election. As a senator, presidential nominee Kamala Harris was a strong advocate for abortion rights, including cosponsoring legislation that would have banned state-level restrictions like mandatory medical tests. Harris’s vice-presidential pick, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, signed a law in early 2023 safeguarding abortion… -
Democrats’ double standard when selectively building security walls
During Donald Trump’s presidency, many progressives opposed building a wall along the southern border, which was intended to prevent illegal crossings from Mexico into the United States. Recently, another “wall” was constructed around the National Democratic Convention in Chicago to manage potential pro-Palestinian protests. In the video above, Straight Arrow News contributor Star Parker argues… -
Pro-life conservatives must reject Tim Walz
Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota has a celebrated record among his constituents, and has wide-ranging support from progressives, moderates and conservatives. On the Right, however, some Republicans have argued that Walz’s positions on abortion access and transgender rights are too far Left. Watch the above video as Straight Arrow News contributor Star Parker criticizes Walz… -
Harris’ record of failure and divisiveness makes her unfit for presidency
Now that Vice President Kamala Harris is the Democratic presidential nominee, both critics and supporters are scrutinizing her record on key issues to either bolster or undermine her campaign. Immigration, crime, reproductive rights and the economy are among the key topics being analyzed. Those topics will likely continue to be debated in the three months…
Latest Opinions
-
Michigan’s first ‘I Voted’ sticker contest draws inspiration from folklore and more
-
IRS recovers $1.3B in unpaid taxes from high-income Americans
-
Rome considers timed ticket system for Trevi Fountain
-
NOAA says Vineyard Wind won’t kill sea life, issues permits for it to do just that
-
Trump campaign staffers involved in Arlington cemetery altercation identified
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.